National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?

In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument up...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2019-02, Vol.81, p.825-833
1. Verfasser: Wang, Ju-Han Zoe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 833
container_issue
container_start_page 825
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 81
creator Wang, Ju-Han Zoe
description In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2193150967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837718307026</els_id><sourcerecordid>2193150967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAUDKLguvofAp5bX5ImaUUQXdYPWNSDnkO2fWVTa1OTruC_t90VPHp68z5meDOEUAYpA6YumrS1XbWN2Ps25cDycZyCyA7IjOVaJFLL7JDMgKssyYXWx-QkxgYAVMH4jFw92cH5zra0t-E9UtfRxcZ19pK-7PraB9qj71ukI5q6YYO025GuT8lRbduIZ791Tt7ulq-Lh2T1fP-4uFklpcjUkFTC4oQYKgmKlVragpcVSoB1jRlUArnUWkvMcsYLppUQmAux5oC2GE3Myfletw_-c4txMI3fhvHpaDgrBJNQqOkq31-VwccYsDZ9cB82fBsGZsrKNOYvKzNlNW3GrEbq7Z6Ko4svh8HE0mFXYuUCloOpvPtf5AcdUXWf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193150967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creatorcontrib><description>In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; China ; Civil society ; Community ; Conservation ; Discourse analysis ; Land use ; Local communities ; National park ; National parks ; NGO ; Parks &amp; recreation areas ; Protected area management</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2019-02, Vol.81, p.825-833</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27865,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creatorcontrib><title>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>National park</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>NGO</subject><subject>Parks &amp; recreation areas</subject><subject>Protected area management</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAUDKLguvofAp5bX5ImaUUQXdYPWNSDnkO2fWVTa1OTruC_t90VPHp68z5meDOEUAYpA6YumrS1XbWN2Ps25cDycZyCyA7IjOVaJFLL7JDMgKssyYXWx-QkxgYAVMH4jFw92cH5zra0t-E9UtfRxcZ19pK-7PraB9qj71ukI5q6YYO025GuT8lRbduIZ791Tt7ulq-Lh2T1fP-4uFklpcjUkFTC4oQYKgmKlVragpcVSoB1jRlUArnUWkvMcsYLppUQmAux5oC2GE3Myfletw_-c4txMI3fhvHpaDgrBJNQqOkq31-VwccYsDZ9cB82fBsGZsrKNOYvKzNlNW3GrEbq7Z6Ko4svh8HE0mFXYuUCloOpvPtf5AcdUXWf</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</title><author>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>National park</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>NGO</topic><topic>Parks &amp; recreation areas</topic><topic>Protected area management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>825</spage><epage>833</epage><pages>825-833</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2019-02, Vol.81, p.825-833
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2193150967
source PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Case studies
China
Civil society
Community
Conservation
Discourse analysis
Land use
Local communities
National park
National parks
NGO
Parks & recreation areas
Protected area management
title National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20parks%20in%20China:%20Parks%20for%20people%20or%20for%20the%20nation?&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Wang,%20Ju-Han%20Zoe&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=825&rft.epage=833&rft.pages=825-833&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193150967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193150967&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837718307026&rfr_iscdi=true