National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?
In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument up...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Land use policy 2019-02, Vol.81, p.825-833 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 833 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 825 |
container_title | Land use policy |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Wang, Ju-Han Zoe |
description | In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2193150967</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837718307026</els_id><sourcerecordid>2193150967</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LxDAUDKLguvofAp5bX5ImaUUQXdYPWNSDnkO2fWVTa1OTruC_t90VPHp68z5meDOEUAYpA6YumrS1XbWN2Ps25cDycZyCyA7IjOVaJFLL7JDMgKssyYXWx-QkxgYAVMH4jFw92cH5zra0t-E9UtfRxcZ19pK-7PraB9qj71ukI5q6YYO025GuT8lRbduIZ791Tt7ulq-Lh2T1fP-4uFklpcjUkFTC4oQYKgmKlVragpcVSoB1jRlUArnUWkvMcsYLppUQmAux5oC2GE3Myfletw_-c4txMI3fhvHpaDgrBJNQqOkq31-VwccYsDZ9cB82fBsGZsrKNOYvKzNlNW3GrEbq7Z6Ko4svh8HE0mFXYuUCloOpvPtf5AcdUXWf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193150967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creatorcontrib><description>In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; China ; Civil society ; Community ; Conservation ; Discourse analysis ; Land use ; Local communities ; National park ; National parks ; NGO ; Parks & recreation areas ; Protected area management</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2019-02, Vol.81, p.825-833</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27865,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creatorcontrib><title>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>National park</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>NGO</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>Protected area management</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1LxDAUDKLguvofAp5bX5ImaUUQXdYPWNSDnkO2fWVTa1OTruC_t90VPHp68z5meDOEUAYpA6YumrS1XbWN2Ps25cDycZyCyA7IjOVaJFLL7JDMgKssyYXWx-QkxgYAVMH4jFw92cH5zra0t-E9UtfRxcZ19pK-7PraB9qj71ukI5q6YYO025GuT8lRbduIZ791Tt7ulq-Lh2T1fP-4uFklpcjUkFTC4oQYKgmKlVragpcVSoB1jRlUArnUWkvMcsYLppUQmAux5oC2GE3Myfletw_-c4txMI3fhvHpaDgrBJNQqOkq31-VwccYsDZ9cB82fBsGZsrKNOYvKzNlNW3GrEbq7Z6Ko4svh8HE0mFXYuUCloOpvPtf5AcdUXWf</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</title><author>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d3aec3461e65061c75a92cde500bfe40d3e257775e4812917633e833b20ea9873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>National park</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>NGO</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>Protected area management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Ju-Han Zoe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation?</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>825</spage><epage>833</epage><pages>825-833</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>In 2017, China announced its first policy framework for establishing a national park system, along with ten pilot national parks. Rather than viewing the announcement from a techno-bureaucratic perspective, this paper considers the politics of the proposed national park system. Basing my argument upon a case study and employing discourse analysis, I argue that the top-down approach is prioritised in the planning and management of the national park system, and that the involvement of civil society groups in the making of China’s national parks does not guarantee an inclusive and bottom-up approach. From the 1970s onwards, worldwide the conservation paradigm gradually shifted to recognise the importance of a participatory and inclusive approach to protected area management. China’s moving away from such understanding and practice may eventually undermine the rights of local communities and threaten to hamper the conservation goals that the national parks aim to achieve.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-8377 |
ispartof | Land use policy, 2019-02, Vol.81, p.825-833 |
issn | 0264-8377 1873-5754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2193150967 |
source | PAIS Index; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Case studies China Civil society Community Conservation Discourse analysis Land use Local communities National park National parks NGO Parks & recreation areas Protected area management |
title | National parks in China: Parks for people or for the nation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=National%20parks%20in%20China:%20Parks%20for%20people%20or%20for%20the%20nation?&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Wang,%20Ju-Han%20Zoe&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=825&rft.epage=833&rft.pages=825-833&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193150967%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193150967&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837718307026&rfr_iscdi=true |