Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders

OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to use a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) to examine the total-body and regional fat and lean composition of soft tissue in subjects with and without eating disorders initially and after weight change. It was necessary also to study the effects of differences...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Obesity 2004-07, Vol.28 (7), p.912-919
Hauptverfasser: Tothill, P, James Hannan, W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 919
container_issue 7
container_start_page 912
container_title International Journal of Obesity
container_volume 28
creator Tothill, P
James Hannan, W
description OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to use a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) to examine the total-body and regional fat and lean composition of soft tissue in subjects with and without eating disorders initially and after weight change. It was necessary also to study the effects of differences of calibration of different models of DXA scanner. DESIGN: A total of 175 women with eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa, and 43 age-matched controls were measured for soft-tissue composition with a pencil-beam Hologic QDR 1000W scanner and results converted to be equivalent to those from a fan-beam Hologic QDR 4500A, using previously determined crosscalibration factors. Some measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline body composition of the patients covered a continuous range of fat proportions. Implausibly low fat proportions in some of the AN subjects were corrected by conversion to 4500 equivalents. The relationship between total lean mass and fat mass could be fitted equally well by a linear or linear/log regression. The relationship between leg and trunk fat was best fitted by a polynomial regression. There were weight changes in either direction in some of the subjects. The fat proportion in the total changed mass was a mean of 55%, higher in the legs and lower in the trunk, but not different between weight gainers and losers or clinical groups. The proportion was dependent on the initial fat proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small differences in fat/lean calibration of DXA scanners may lead to anomalous results in very anorexic subjects and corrections are necessary in comparing results from different instruments. Concerns expressed about preferential trunk fat accumulation during weight recovery are not well founded. Previous claims of a relationship between fat proportion in regained weight and the amount of the weight gain are not justified.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219315012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A188448880</galeid><sourcerecordid>A188448880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-9ab1474b1475c98b252e3a9205f0fa400b4e33aa2a2fb103ef823760c86f07773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxU1paTZpr721iEJ682YsW7Z8DOknBHppoTcztke7Mra81ciU_e-rZd0mPRSBBNJv3szTS5JXGWwzyPUND1s7zFvQIFVePkk2WVGVqSrq6mmygRyqFFSpLpJL5gEAlAL5PLnIFNQasnKTmPcLjik58ruj-JF6PApsefaHYOeJgj-KiZAXTxO5wGI2wmAQ6HoxEjoxITOxsE7w0g7UReSXDXtBGKzbid5GqZ48v0ieGRyZXq7nVfL944dvd5_T-6-fvtzd3qddUdQhrbGN8xenTXW1bqWSlGMtQRkwWAC0BeU5okRp2uifjJZ5VUKnSwNVVeVXyduz7sHPPxfi0Azz4l1s2ciszqPvTEZoe4Z2OFJjnZmDxy6unibbzY6Mjfe3mdZFobWGWPDuUcGecAx7nscl_pHjf8FVufMzsyfTHLyd0B-bDJpTXg0PTcyrWfOKBW_WeZd2ov4BXwOKwPUKIHc4Go-us_yIq_NSy5PxmzPH8cntyD8Y_2_r1-cKhyHm-1fyz_tvs9K3HA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219315012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Nature</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tothill, P ; James Hannan, W</creator><creatorcontrib>Tothill, P ; James Hannan, W</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to use a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) to examine the total-body and regional fat and lean composition of soft tissue in subjects with and without eating disorders initially and after weight change. It was necessary also to study the effects of differences of calibration of different models of DXA scanner. DESIGN: A total of 175 women with eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa, and 43 age-matched controls were measured for soft-tissue composition with a pencil-beam Hologic QDR 1000W scanner and results converted to be equivalent to those from a fan-beam Hologic QDR 4500A, using previously determined crosscalibration factors. Some measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline body composition of the patients covered a continuous range of fat proportions. Implausibly low fat proportions in some of the AN subjects were corrected by conversion to 4500 equivalents. The relationship between total lean mass and fat mass could be fitted equally well by a linear or linear/log regression. The relationship between leg and trunk fat was best fitted by a polynomial regression. There were weight changes in either direction in some of the subjects. The fat proportion in the total changed mass was a mean of 55%, higher in the legs and lower in the trunk, but not different between weight gainers and losers or clinical groups. The proportion was dependent on the initial fat proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small differences in fat/lean calibration of DXA scanners may lead to anomalous results in very anorexic subjects and corrections are necessary in comparing results from different instruments. Concerns expressed about preferential trunk fat accumulation during weight recovery are not well founded. Previous claims of a relationship between fat proportion in regained weight and the amount of the weight gain are not justified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-0565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15098016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOBDP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods ; Adipose Tissue - pathology ; Adult ; Anorexia ; Anorexia Nervosa - pathology ; Anthropometry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Composition ; Body fat ; Bulimia ; Bulimia - pathology ; Calibration ; Eating disorders ; Epidemiology ; Feeding and Eating Disorders - pathology ; Feeding and Eating Disorders - physiopathology ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Health physics ; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metabolic Diseases ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Public Health ; Scanners ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; Weight Gain ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Obesity, 2004-07, Vol.28 (7), p.912-919</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-9ab1474b1475c98b252e3a9205f0fa400b4e33aa2a2fb103ef823760c86f07773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-9ab1474b1475c98b252e3a9205f0fa400b4e33aa2a2fb103ef823760c86f07773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2727,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15936827$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15098016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tothill, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James Hannan, W</creatorcontrib><title>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders</title><title>International Journal of Obesity</title><addtitle>Int J Obes</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to use a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) to examine the total-body and regional fat and lean composition of soft tissue in subjects with and without eating disorders initially and after weight change. It was necessary also to study the effects of differences of calibration of different models of DXA scanner. DESIGN: A total of 175 women with eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa, and 43 age-matched controls were measured for soft-tissue composition with a pencil-beam Hologic QDR 1000W scanner and results converted to be equivalent to those from a fan-beam Hologic QDR 4500A, using previously determined crosscalibration factors. Some measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline body composition of the patients covered a continuous range of fat proportions. Implausibly low fat proportions in some of the AN subjects were corrected by conversion to 4500 equivalents. The relationship between total lean mass and fat mass could be fitted equally well by a linear or linear/log regression. The relationship between leg and trunk fat was best fitted by a polynomial regression. There were weight changes in either direction in some of the subjects. The fat proportion in the total changed mass was a mean of 55%, higher in the legs and lower in the trunk, but not different between weight gainers and losers or clinical groups. The proportion was dependent on the initial fat proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small differences in fat/lean calibration of DXA scanners may lead to anomalous results in very anorexic subjects and corrections are necessary in comparing results from different instruments. Concerns expressed about preferential trunk fat accumulation during weight recovery are not well founded. Previous claims of a relationship between fat proportion in regained weight and the amount of the weight gain are not justified.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - pathology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anorexia</subject><subject>Anorexia Nervosa - pathology</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Bulimia</subject><subject>Bulimia - pathology</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feeding and Eating Disorders - pathology</subject><subject>Feeding and Eating Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Health physics</subject><subject>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metabolic Diseases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>0307-0565</issn><issn>1476-5497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1r3DAQxU1paTZpr721iEJ682YsW7Z8DOknBHppoTcztke7Mra81ciU_e-rZd0mPRSBBNJv3szTS5JXGWwzyPUND1s7zFvQIFVePkk2WVGVqSrq6mmygRyqFFSpLpJL5gEAlAL5PLnIFNQasnKTmPcLjik58ruj-JF6PApsefaHYOeJgj-KiZAXTxO5wGI2wmAQ6HoxEjoxITOxsE7w0g7UReSXDXtBGKzbid5GqZ48v0ieGRyZXq7nVfL944dvd5_T-6-fvtzd3qddUdQhrbGN8xenTXW1bqWSlGMtQRkwWAC0BeU5okRp2uifjJZ5VUKnSwNVVeVXyduz7sHPPxfi0Azz4l1s2ciszqPvTEZoe4Z2OFJjnZmDxy6unibbzY6Mjfe3mdZFobWGWPDuUcGecAx7nscl_pHjf8FVufMzsyfTHLyd0B-bDJpTXg0PTcyrWfOKBW_WeZd2ov4BXwOKwPUKIHc4Go-us_yIq_NSy5PxmzPH8cntyD8Y_2_r1-cKhyHm-1fyz_tvs9K3HA</recordid><startdate>20040701</startdate><enddate>20040701</enddate><creator>Tothill, P</creator><creator>James Hannan, W</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040701</creationdate><title>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders</title><author>Tothill, P ; James Hannan, W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-9ab1474b1475c98b252e3a9205f0fa400b4e33aa2a2fb103ef823760c86f07773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - methods</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - pathology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anorexia</topic><topic>Anorexia Nervosa - pathology</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Bulimia</topic><topic>Bulimia - pathology</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feeding and Eating Disorders - pathology</topic><topic>Feeding and Eating Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Health physics</topic><topic>Health Promotion and Disease Prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metabolic Diseases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tothill, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James Hannan, W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tothill, P</au><au>James Hannan, W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Obesity</jtitle><stitle>Int J Obes</stitle><addtitle>Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord</addtitle><date>2004-07-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>912</spage><epage>919</epage><pages>912-919</pages><issn>0307-0565</issn><eissn>1476-5497</eissn><coden>IJOBDP</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to use a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer (DXA) to examine the total-body and regional fat and lean composition of soft tissue in subjects with and without eating disorders initially and after weight change. It was necessary also to study the effects of differences of calibration of different models of DXA scanner. DESIGN: A total of 175 women with eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa, and 43 age-matched controls were measured for soft-tissue composition with a pencil-beam Hologic QDR 1000W scanner and results converted to be equivalent to those from a fan-beam Hologic QDR 4500A, using previously determined crosscalibration factors. Some measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: The baseline body composition of the patients covered a continuous range of fat proportions. Implausibly low fat proportions in some of the AN subjects were corrected by conversion to 4500 equivalents. The relationship between total lean mass and fat mass could be fitted equally well by a linear or linear/log regression. The relationship between leg and trunk fat was best fitted by a polynomial regression. There were weight changes in either direction in some of the subjects. The fat proportion in the total changed mass was a mean of 55%, higher in the legs and lower in the trunk, but not different between weight gainers and losers or clinical groups. The proportion was dependent on the initial fat proportion. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small differences in fat/lean calibration of DXA scanners may lead to anomalous results in very anorexic subjects and corrections are necessary in comparing results from different instruments. Concerns expressed about preferential trunk fat accumulation during weight recovery are not well founded. Previous claims of a relationship between fat proportion in regained weight and the amount of the weight gain are not justified.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>15098016</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0307-0565
ispartof International Journal of Obesity, 2004-07, Vol.28 (7), p.912-919
issn 0307-0565
1476-5497
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_219315012
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Nature; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon - methods
Adipose Tissue - pathology
Adult
Anorexia
Anorexia Nervosa - pathology
Anthropometry
Biological and medical sciences
Body Composition
Body fat
Bulimia
Bulimia - pathology
Calibration
Eating disorders
Epidemiology
Feeding and Eating Disorders - pathology
Feeding and Eating Disorders - physiopathology
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Health physics
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Humans
Internal Medicine
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metabolic Diseases
Middle Aged
Obesity
Public Health
Scanners
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
Weight Gain
Weight Loss
title Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of fat and lean masses in subjects with eating disorders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T11%3A42%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dual-energy%20X-ray%20absorptiometry%20measurements%20of%20fat%20and%20lean%20masses%20in%20subjects%20with%20eating%20disorders&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Obesity&rft.au=Tothill,%20P&rft.date=2004-07-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=912&rft.epage=919&rft.pages=912-919&rft.issn=0307-0565&rft.eissn=1476-5497&rft.coden=IJOBDP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802536&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA188448880%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219315012&rft_id=info:pmid/15098016&rft_galeid=A188448880&rfr_iscdi=true