China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy

China is one of the first countries to explicitly attempt to institute coordinated, ecosystem-based management across local, regional, and national scales. Chinese scientists have been urging policymakers to manage landscapes using the ecosystem services (ESs) approach. However, substantive progress...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2019-02, Vol.81, p.111-114
Hauptverfasser: Jiang, Bo, Bai, Yang, Wong, Christina P., Xu, Xibao, Alatalo, Juha M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114
container_issue
container_start_page 111
container_title Land use policy
container_volume 81
creator Jiang, Bo
Bai, Yang
Wong, Christina P.
Xu, Xibao
Alatalo, Juha M.
description China is one of the first countries to explicitly attempt to institute coordinated, ecosystem-based management across local, regional, and national scales. Chinese scientists have been urging policymakers to manage landscapes using the ecosystem services (ESs) approach. However, substantive progress remains elusive due to lack of coordination, weak monitoring, and poor enforcement. China’s new ecological redline policy (ERP) requires policymakers and scientists to address urgent challenges in China that have global implications. This work can advance international understanding of the institutional reforms and scientific capacities needed to move from theory to practice on sustainable development. We begin this paper by providing an overview of the concepts, major reforms, timeline, and guidelines on drawing ecological conservation redlines (ECRs) and ERP processes in China. We then summarize and comment on the scientific challenges in ESs assessments for spatial land planning and discuss the need for a framework grounded in a policy context that relates ecosystem area to ESs, stressors, and biodiversity indicators. Based on this, we draw insights into creating such a framework to offer strategic support for scientists and policymakers in improving the measurement and valuation of ESs for effective implementation of ERP for sustainable development. We also identify a need for more studies on ecological production functions to provide relevant information for managers and economists in evaluating ERP efforts and tracking ESs trends.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2193148281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837718308172</els_id><sourcerecordid>2193148281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7cb7f6e723449d3c28a3f78b46ff7278addcec853a37250694c8b1a91eaa60603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWKvvsOD1rjntJnupxUOhIIhehzQ7W7NkDybbQr3yHbzy9fokplTQO68GZv5_5p8PoYTgjGBSXDWZ0121DjD0LqOYyNjOMCNHaEKkYGkucn6MJpgWPJVMiFN0FkKDMS5KQifoafZqO737-AoJmN71K2u0S4zdWGff9Wj7Lhl8v_K63X18ztvBQQvdaLvVX7mHytkOkhjBmu05Oqm1C3DxU6fo5e72efaQLh7v57PrRWoYL8ZUmKWoCxCUcV5WzFCpWS3kkhd1LaiQuqoMGJkzzQTNY1xu5JLokoDWBS4wm6LLw94Y8G0NYVRNv_ZdPKkoKRnhkkoSVfKgMr4PwUOtBm9b7beKYLUnqBr1S1DtCe4nkWC03hysEL_YWPAqGAudgcp6MKOqevv_km_LA4KA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193148281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jiang, Bo ; Bai, Yang ; Wong, Christina P. ; Xu, Xibao ; Alatalo, Juha M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bo ; Bai, Yang ; Wong, Christina P. ; Xu, Xibao ; Alatalo, Juha M.</creatorcontrib><description>China is one of the first countries to explicitly attempt to institute coordinated, ecosystem-based management across local, regional, and national scales. Chinese scientists have been urging policymakers to manage landscapes using the ecosystem services (ESs) approach. However, substantive progress remains elusive due to lack of coordination, weak monitoring, and poor enforcement. China’s new ecological redline policy (ERP) requires policymakers and scientists to address urgent challenges in China that have global implications. This work can advance international understanding of the institutional reforms and scientific capacities needed to move from theory to practice on sustainable development. We begin this paper by providing an overview of the concepts, major reforms, timeline, and guidelines on drawing ecological conservation redlines (ECRs) and ERP processes in China. We then summarize and comment on the scientific challenges in ESs assessments for spatial land planning and discuss the need for a framework grounded in a policy context that relates ecosystem area to ESs, stressors, and biodiversity indicators. Based on this, we draw insights into creating such a framework to offer strategic support for scientists and policymakers in improving the measurement and valuation of ESs for effective implementation of ERP for sustainable development. We also identify a need for more studies on ecological production functions to provide relevant information for managers and economists in evaluating ERP efforts and tracking ESs trends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Capacities ; Conservation ; Coordination ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecological redline policy ; Economic development ; Economists ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Framework ; Implementation ; Information management ; Land ; Land use ; Landscape ; Policy making ; Production ; Scientists ; Sustainable development ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2019-02, Vol.81, p.111-114</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Feb 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7cb7f6e723449d3c28a3f78b46ff7278addcec853a37250694c8b1a91eaa60603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7cb7f6e723449d3c28a3f78b46ff7278addcec853a37250694c8b1a91eaa60603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718308172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27845,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Christina P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xibao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alatalo, Juha M.</creatorcontrib><title>China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>China is one of the first countries to explicitly attempt to institute coordinated, ecosystem-based management across local, regional, and national scales. Chinese scientists have been urging policymakers to manage landscapes using the ecosystem services (ESs) approach. However, substantive progress remains elusive due to lack of coordination, weak monitoring, and poor enforcement. China’s new ecological redline policy (ERP) requires policymakers and scientists to address urgent challenges in China that have global implications. This work can advance international understanding of the institutional reforms and scientific capacities needed to move from theory to practice on sustainable development. We begin this paper by providing an overview of the concepts, major reforms, timeline, and guidelines on drawing ecological conservation redlines (ECRs) and ERP processes in China. We then summarize and comment on the scientific challenges in ESs assessments for spatial land planning and discuss the need for a framework grounded in a policy context that relates ecosystem area to ESs, stressors, and biodiversity indicators. Based on this, we draw insights into creating such a framework to offer strategic support for scientists and policymakers in improving the measurement and valuation of ESs for effective implementation of ERP for sustainable development. We also identify a need for more studies on ecological production functions to provide relevant information for managers and economists in evaluating ERP efforts and tracking ESs trends.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Capacities</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecological redline policy</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economists</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Framework</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWKvvsOD1rjntJnupxUOhIIhehzQ7W7NkDybbQr3yHbzy9fokplTQO68GZv5_5p8PoYTgjGBSXDWZ0121DjD0LqOYyNjOMCNHaEKkYGkucn6MJpgWPJVMiFN0FkKDMS5KQifoafZqO737-AoJmN71K2u0S4zdWGff9Wj7Lhl8v_K63X18ztvBQQvdaLvVX7mHytkOkhjBmu05Oqm1C3DxU6fo5e72efaQLh7v57PrRWoYL8ZUmKWoCxCUcV5WzFCpWS3kkhd1LaiQuqoMGJkzzQTNY1xu5JLokoDWBS4wm6LLw94Y8G0NYVRNv_ZdPKkoKRnhkkoSVfKgMr4PwUOtBm9b7beKYLUnqBr1S1DtCe4nkWC03hysEL_YWPAqGAudgcp6MKOqevv_km_LA4KA</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Jiang, Bo</creator><creator>Bai, Yang</creator><creator>Wong, Christina P.</creator><creator>Xu, Xibao</creator><creator>Alatalo, Juha M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy</title><author>Jiang, Bo ; Bai, Yang ; Wong, Christina P. ; Xu, Xibao ; Alatalo, Juha M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-7cb7f6e723449d3c28a3f78b46ff7278addcec853a37250694c8b1a91eaa60603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Capacities</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecological redline policy</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economists</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Framework</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Christina P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Xibao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alatalo, Juha M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Bo</au><au>Bai, Yang</au><au>Wong, Christina P.</au><au>Xu, Xibao</au><au>Alatalo, Juha M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>111</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>111-114</pages><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>China is one of the first countries to explicitly attempt to institute coordinated, ecosystem-based management across local, regional, and national scales. Chinese scientists have been urging policymakers to manage landscapes using the ecosystem services (ESs) approach. However, substantive progress remains elusive due to lack of coordination, weak monitoring, and poor enforcement. China’s new ecological redline policy (ERP) requires policymakers and scientists to address urgent challenges in China that have global implications. This work can advance international understanding of the institutional reforms and scientific capacities needed to move from theory to practice on sustainable development. We begin this paper by providing an overview of the concepts, major reforms, timeline, and guidelines on drawing ecological conservation redlines (ECRs) and ERP processes in China. We then summarize and comment on the scientific challenges in ESs assessments for spatial land planning and discuss the need for a framework grounded in a policy context that relates ecosystem area to ESs, stressors, and biodiversity indicators. Based on this, we draw insights into creating such a framework to offer strategic support for scientists and policymakers in improving the measurement and valuation of ESs for effective implementation of ERP for sustainable development. We also identify a need for more studies on ecological production functions to provide relevant information for managers and economists in evaluating ERP efforts and tracking ESs trends.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.031</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-8377
ispartof Land use policy, 2019-02, Vol.81, p.111-114
issn 0264-8377
1873-5754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2193148281
source PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biodiversity
Capacities
Conservation
Coordination
Ecological monitoring
Ecological redline policy
Economic development
Economists
Ecosystem management
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Framework
Implementation
Information management
Land
Land use
Landscape
Policy making
Production
Scientists
Sustainable development
Valuation
title China’s ecological civilization program–Implementing ecological redline policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A56%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China%E2%80%99s%20ecological%20civilization%20program%E2%80%93Implementing%20ecological%20redline%20policy&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Jiang,%20Bo&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=111-114&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2193148281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193148281&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837718308172&rfr_iscdi=true