Microsoft Exchange Implementation on a Distributed Storage Area Network
The ever-increasing demand for fast and reliable data storage has caused dramatic changes in the storage model. Direct attached storage (DAS) architecture, also known as server-centric architecture, is being replaced by the storage area network (SAN), leading to storage-centric architecture. In SAN...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of computers & applications 2008, Vol.30 (3), p.251-264 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 264 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | International journal of computers & applications |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Brothers, T. Mandagere, N. Muknahallipatna, S. Hamann, J.C. Johnson, H. |
description | The ever-increasing demand for fast and reliable data storage has caused dramatic changes in the storage model. Direct attached storage (DAS) architecture, also known as server-centric architecture, is being replaced by the storage area network (SAN), leading to storage-centric architecture. In SAN storage devices exist completely independent of any computer (servers in particular). Multiple servers can access the same storage device without involvement of other servers. Recently, companies have been able to implement storage integration/sharing, remote backup/restoral, near-real-time disk mirroring/replication, and the like, using a new SAN architecture known as distributed storage area network (DSAN). The DSAN is multiple SANs interconnected using existing Internet Protocol (IP) networks to distribute storage over wide geographical areas. Even though DSANs provide additional capabilities to a SAN, the end-to-end latency (ETEL) due to large physical cable lengths (IP networks) imposes limitations on enterprise class application performance. DSANs can also be implemented using IP storage solutions that provide direct links between servers and storages, eliminating translation of fibre channel protocol frames to IP packets. This paper examines the effect of ETEL in DSAN on the performance of an enterprise class application with real-time application replication like Microsoft Exchange Server 2003. This investigation in done in two parts: disk subsystem (DS) characterization using Jetstress benchmarking software and the performance of Microsoft Exchange using LoadSim 2003 benchmarking software. Preliminary results were presented in [1]. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/1206212X.2008.11441905 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219265730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>35884700</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-f19373a81547f0b13701716a0bc252165ecf96a3e2b137be85485c2f777e9aa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QRYP3rbmY7PJHkvVWqh6UMFbyKaJpu5uapJF--_NUnvxIgzMwDwzvDwAnCM4QZDDK4RhiRF-nWAI-QShokAVpAdghCpMcwZZcZjmBOUDdQxOQlhDWDBc8hGY31vlXXAmZjff6l12bzpbtJtGt7qLMlrXZalkdm1D9Lbuo15lT9F5mbip1zJ70PHL-Y9TcGRkE_TZbx-Dl9ub59ldvnycL2bTZa4wITE3qCKMSI5owQysEWEQMVRKWCtMMSqpVqYqJdF42NWa04JThQ1jTFdSYjIGl7u_G-8-ex2iaG1Qumlkp10fBKGcFwzCBF78Adeu913KJnASU1JGBqjcQYOD4LURG29b6bcCQTHIFXu5YpAr9nLT4XR3aDvjfCuTgmYlotw2zhsvO2VTlH9-_ACT5H-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219265730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microsoft Exchange Implementation on a Distributed Storage Area Network</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Brothers, T. ; Mandagere, N. ; Muknahallipatna, S. ; Hamann, J.C. ; Johnson, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brothers, T. ; Mandagere, N. ; Muknahallipatna, S. ; Hamann, J.C. ; Johnson, H.</creatorcontrib><description>The ever-increasing demand for fast and reliable data storage has caused dramatic changes in the storage model. Direct attached storage (DAS) architecture, also known as server-centric architecture, is being replaced by the storage area network (SAN), leading to storage-centric architecture. In SAN storage devices exist completely independent of any computer (servers in particular). Multiple servers can access the same storage device without involvement of other servers. Recently, companies have been able to implement storage integration/sharing, remote backup/restoral, near-real-time disk mirroring/replication, and the like, using a new SAN architecture known as distributed storage area network (DSAN). The DSAN is multiple SANs interconnected using existing Internet Protocol (IP) networks to distribute storage over wide geographical areas. Even though DSANs provide additional capabilities to a SAN, the end-to-end latency (ETEL) due to large physical cable lengths (IP networks) imposes limitations on enterprise class application performance. DSANs can also be implemented using IP storage solutions that provide direct links between servers and storages, eliminating translation of fibre channel protocol frames to IP packets. This paper examines the effect of ETEL in DSAN on the performance of an enterprise class application with real-time application replication like Microsoft Exchange Server 2003. This investigation in done in two parts: disk subsystem (DS) characterization using Jetstress benchmarking software and the performance of Microsoft Exchange using LoadSim 2003 benchmarking software. Preliminary results were presented in [1].</description><identifier>ISSN: 1206-212X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-7074</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1206212X.2008.11441905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Calgary: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Bandwidths ; distance ; Hard disks ; Information storage ; Internet Protocol ; IP storage ; mass storage ; Performance evaluation ; Product introduction ; Servers ; simulation ; Software ; Storage area networks ; topology</subject><ispartof>International journal of computers & applications, 2008, Vol.30 (3), p.251-264</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Taylor and Francis Group LLC 2008</rights><rights>Copyright ACTA Press 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-f19373a81547f0b13701716a0bc252165ecf96a3e2b137be85485c2f777e9aa23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1206212X.2008.11441905$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1206212X.2008.11441905$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brothers, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandagere, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muknahallipatna, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Microsoft Exchange Implementation on a Distributed Storage Area Network</title><title>International journal of computers & applications</title><description>The ever-increasing demand for fast and reliable data storage has caused dramatic changes in the storage model. Direct attached storage (DAS) architecture, also known as server-centric architecture, is being replaced by the storage area network (SAN), leading to storage-centric architecture. In SAN storage devices exist completely independent of any computer (servers in particular). Multiple servers can access the same storage device without involvement of other servers. Recently, companies have been able to implement storage integration/sharing, remote backup/restoral, near-real-time disk mirroring/replication, and the like, using a new SAN architecture known as distributed storage area network (DSAN). The DSAN is multiple SANs interconnected using existing Internet Protocol (IP) networks to distribute storage over wide geographical areas. Even though DSANs provide additional capabilities to a SAN, the end-to-end latency (ETEL) due to large physical cable lengths (IP networks) imposes limitations on enterprise class application performance. DSANs can also be implemented using IP storage solutions that provide direct links between servers and storages, eliminating translation of fibre channel protocol frames to IP packets. This paper examines the effect of ETEL in DSAN on the performance of an enterprise class application with real-time application replication like Microsoft Exchange Server 2003. This investigation in done in two parts: disk subsystem (DS) characterization using Jetstress benchmarking software and the performance of Microsoft Exchange using LoadSim 2003 benchmarking software. Preliminary results were presented in [1].</description><subject>Bandwidths</subject><subject>distance</subject><subject>Hard disks</subject><subject>Information storage</subject><subject>Internet Protocol</subject><subject>IP storage</subject><subject>mass storage</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Product introduction</subject><subject>Servers</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Storage area networks</subject><subject>topology</subject><issn>1206-212X</issn><issn>1925-7074</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QRYP3rbmY7PJHkvVWqh6UMFbyKaJpu5uapJF--_NUnvxIgzMwDwzvDwAnCM4QZDDK4RhiRF-nWAI-QShokAVpAdghCpMcwZZcZjmBOUDdQxOQlhDWDBc8hGY31vlXXAmZjff6l12bzpbtJtGt7qLMlrXZalkdm1D9Lbuo15lT9F5mbip1zJ70PHL-Y9TcGRkE_TZbx-Dl9ub59ldvnycL2bTZa4wITE3qCKMSI5owQysEWEQMVRKWCtMMSqpVqYqJdF42NWa04JThQ1jTFdSYjIGl7u_G-8-ex2iaG1Qumlkp10fBKGcFwzCBF78Adeu913KJnASU1JGBqjcQYOD4LURG29b6bcCQTHIFXu5YpAr9nLT4XR3aDvjfCuTgmYlotw2zhsvO2VTlH9-_ACT5H-c</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Brothers, T.</creator><creator>Mandagere, N.</creator><creator>Muknahallipatna, S.</creator><creator>Hamann, J.C.</creator><creator>Johnson, H.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Microsoft Exchange Implementation on a Distributed Storage Area Network</title><author>Brothers, T. ; Mandagere, N. ; Muknahallipatna, S. ; Hamann, J.C. ; Johnson, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c233t-f19373a81547f0b13701716a0bc252165ecf96a3e2b137be85485c2f777e9aa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bandwidths</topic><topic>distance</topic><topic>Hard disks</topic><topic>Information storage</topic><topic>Internet Protocol</topic><topic>IP storage</topic><topic>mass storage</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Product introduction</topic><topic>Servers</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Storage area networks</topic><topic>topology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brothers, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandagere, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muknahallipatna, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of computers & applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brothers, T.</au><au>Mandagere, N.</au><au>Muknahallipatna, S.</au><au>Hamann, J.C.</au><au>Johnson, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microsoft Exchange Implementation on a Distributed Storage Area Network</atitle><jtitle>International journal of computers & applications</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>251-264</pages><issn>1206-212X</issn><eissn>1925-7074</eissn><abstract>The ever-increasing demand for fast and reliable data storage has caused dramatic changes in the storage model. Direct attached storage (DAS) architecture, also known as server-centric architecture, is being replaced by the storage area network (SAN), leading to storage-centric architecture. In SAN storage devices exist completely independent of any computer (servers in particular). Multiple servers can access the same storage device without involvement of other servers. Recently, companies have been able to implement storage integration/sharing, remote backup/restoral, near-real-time disk mirroring/replication, and the like, using a new SAN architecture known as distributed storage area network (DSAN). The DSAN is multiple SANs interconnected using existing Internet Protocol (IP) networks to distribute storage over wide geographical areas. Even though DSANs provide additional capabilities to a SAN, the end-to-end latency (ETEL) due to large physical cable lengths (IP networks) imposes limitations on enterprise class application performance. DSANs can also be implemented using IP storage solutions that provide direct links between servers and storages, eliminating translation of fibre channel protocol frames to IP packets. This paper examines the effect of ETEL in DSAN on the performance of an enterprise class application with real-time application replication like Microsoft Exchange Server 2003. This investigation in done in two parts: disk subsystem (DS) characterization using Jetstress benchmarking software and the performance of Microsoft Exchange using LoadSim 2003 benchmarking software. Preliminary results were presented in [1].</abstract><cop>Calgary</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/1206212X.2008.11441905</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1206-212X |
ispartof | International journal of computers & applications, 2008, Vol.30 (3), p.251-264 |
issn | 1206-212X 1925-7074 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_219265730 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | Bandwidths distance Hard disks Information storage Internet Protocol IP storage mass storage Performance evaluation Product introduction Servers simulation Software Storage area networks topology |
title | Microsoft Exchange Implementation on a Distributed Storage Area Network |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A55%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microsoft%20Exchange%20Implementation%20on%20a%20Distributed%20Storage%20Area%20Network&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20computers%20&%20applications&rft.au=Brothers,%20T.&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=251-264&rft.issn=1206-212X&rft.eissn=1925-7074&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1206212X.2008.11441905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E35884700%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219265730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |