Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action

This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Business and society review (1974) 2006-06, Vol.111 (2), p.193-221
1. Verfasser: MATTINGLY, JAMES E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 221
container_issue 2
container_start_page 193
container_title Business and society review (1974)
container_volume 111
creator MATTINGLY, JAMES E.
description This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219204203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1072937221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq2qlbqlfQerZxLGduI4SBzCQqESpZSlLDfLdRwpS4iXcVJ2-_R1divOncuMNP83I32EUAYpi3W0Slkmi0TlZZZyAJkCcKnSzRsye128JTOALE-EhPI9-RDCCmIVEmbkz62pDdKFRef6cEirMKAfRmwOqelretbisKVLj4_HtKI_RtO1gxna346eb9adxzj7nvqGLgYcbeTcDrtBb10ItO3p3ON6yjl64yPcWtPRyk7YR_KuMV1wn_71A_Lzy_nd_DK5-n7xdV5dJVaAUonh0hQl5yJjipWCs9r-UhnkcrcWNRilXNNII8pMWpY7ZVRd1tLmULDS1eKAfN7fXaN_Hl0Y9MqP2MeXmrOSQ8ZBxJDahyz6ENA1eo3tk8GtZqAn0XqlJ5968qkn0XonWm8ierJHX9rObf-b06fV4jZOkU_2fBsGt3nlDT5qWYgi18vrC_3tgRfXd8t7vRB_AfCgk3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219204203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creator><creatorcontrib>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creatorcontrib><description>This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUSRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Negotiations ; Organizational behavior ; Political behavior ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Business and society review (1974), 2006-06, Vol.111 (2), p.193-221</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Summer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8594.2006.00268.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8594.2006.00268.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creatorcontrib><title>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</title><title>Business and society review (1974)</title><description>This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding.</description><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0045-3609</issn><issn>1467-8594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq2qlbqlfQerZxLGduI4SBzCQqESpZSlLDfLdRwpS4iXcVJ2-_R1divOncuMNP83I32EUAYpi3W0Slkmi0TlZZZyAJkCcKnSzRsye128JTOALE-EhPI9-RDCCmIVEmbkz62pDdKFRef6cEirMKAfRmwOqelretbisKVLj4_HtKI_RtO1gxna346eb9adxzj7nvqGLgYcbeTcDrtBb10ItO3p3ON6yjl64yPcWtPRyk7YR_KuMV1wn_71A_Lzy_nd_DK5-n7xdV5dJVaAUonh0hQl5yJjipWCs9r-UhnkcrcWNRilXNNII8pMWpY7ZVRd1tLmULDS1eKAfN7fXaN_Hl0Y9MqP2MeXmrOSQ8ZBxJDahyz6ENA1eo3tk8GtZqAn0XqlJ5968qkn0XonWm8ierJHX9rObf-b06fV4jZOkU_2fBsGt3nlDT5qWYgi18vrC_3tgRfXd8t7vRB_AfCgk3M</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</title><author>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Business and society review (1974)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</atitle><jtitle>Business and society review (1974)</jtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>193-221</pages><issn>0045-3609</issn><eissn>1467-8594</eissn><coden>BUSRAM</coden><abstract>This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-3609
ispartof Business and society review (1974), 2006-06, Vol.111 (2), p.193-221
issn 0045-3609
1467-8594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_219204203
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Negotiations
Organizational behavior
Political behavior
Studies
title Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radar%20Screens,%20Astroturf,%20and%20Dirty%20Work:%20A%20Qualitative%20Exploration%20of%20Structure%20and%20Process%20in%20Corporate%20Political%20Action&rft.jtitle=Business%20and%20society%20review%20(1974)&rft.au=MATTINGLY,%20JAMES%20E.&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=193-221&rft.issn=0045-3609&rft.eissn=1467-8594&rft.coden=BUSRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1072937221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219204203&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true