Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action
This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business and society review (1974) 2006-06, Vol.111 (2), p.193-221 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 221 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Business and society review (1974) |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | MATTINGLY, JAMES E. |
description | This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219204203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1072937221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq2qlbqlfQerZxLGduI4SBzCQqESpZSlLDfLdRwpS4iXcVJ2-_R1divOncuMNP83I32EUAYpi3W0Slkmi0TlZZZyAJkCcKnSzRsye128JTOALE-EhPI9-RDCCmIVEmbkz62pDdKFRef6cEirMKAfRmwOqelretbisKVLj4_HtKI_RtO1gxna346eb9adxzj7nvqGLgYcbeTcDrtBb10ItO3p3ON6yjl64yPcWtPRyk7YR_KuMV1wn_71A_Lzy_nd_DK5-n7xdV5dJVaAUonh0hQl5yJjipWCs9r-UhnkcrcWNRilXNNII8pMWpY7ZVRd1tLmULDS1eKAfN7fXaN_Hl0Y9MqP2MeXmrOSQ8ZBxJDahyz6ENA1eo3tk8GtZqAn0XqlJ5968qkn0XonWm8ierJHX9rObf-b06fV4jZOkU_2fBsGt3nlDT5qWYgi18vrC_3tgRfXd8t7vRB_AfCgk3M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219204203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creator><creatorcontrib>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creatorcontrib><description>This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-3609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BUSRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Negotiations ; Organizational behavior ; Political behavior ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Business and society review (1974), 2006-06, Vol.111 (2), p.193-221</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Summer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8594.2006.00268.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8594.2006.00268.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creatorcontrib><title>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</title><title>Business and society review (1974)</title><description>This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding.</description><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0045-3609</issn><issn>1467-8594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq2qlbqlfQerZxLGduI4SBzCQqESpZSlLDfLdRwpS4iXcVJ2-_R1divOncuMNP83I32EUAYpi3W0Slkmi0TlZZZyAJkCcKnSzRsye128JTOALE-EhPI9-RDCCmIVEmbkz62pDdKFRef6cEirMKAfRmwOqelretbisKVLj4_HtKI_RtO1gxna346eb9adxzj7nvqGLgYcbeTcDrtBb10ItO3p3ON6yjl64yPcWtPRyk7YR_KuMV1wn_71A_Lzy_nd_DK5-n7xdV5dJVaAUonh0hQl5yJjipWCs9r-UhnkcrcWNRilXNNII8pMWpY7ZVRd1tLmULDS1eKAfN7fXaN_Hl0Y9MqP2MeXmrOSQ8ZBxJDahyz6ENA1eo3tk8GtZqAn0XqlJ5968qkn0XonWm8ierJHX9rObf-b06fV4jZOkU_2fBsGt3nlDT5qWYgi18vrC_3tgRfXd8t7vRB_AfCgk3M</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</title><author>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-a26a7922341819321dcb84056c30883d0a88eff6a3946c15e8a8d9d6c50719ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Business and society review (1974)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MATTINGLY, JAMES E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action</atitle><jtitle>Business and society review (1974)</jtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>193-221</pages><issn>0045-3609</issn><eissn>1467-8594</eissn><coden>BUSRAM</coden><abstract>This study seeks to discover whether negotiation with sociopolitical actors external to the firm is sometimes an important determinant of firms' public policy preferences. The research problem, then, is one of interpreting observations of corporate political action in light of extant literature and differences in the structure and process of corporate political strategy making. This article outlines the methods involved in a qualitative inquiry, a representative presentation of the data, and an interpretation of their meaning for scholarly understanding.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x</doi><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-3609 |
ispartof | Business and society review (1974), 2006-06, Vol.111 (2), p.193-221 |
issn | 0045-3609 1467-8594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_219204203 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Negotiations Organizational behavior Political behavior Studies |
title | Radar Screens, Astroturf, and Dirty Work: A Qualitative Exploration of Structure and Process in Corporate Political Action |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radar%20Screens,%20Astroturf,%20and%20Dirty%20Work:%20A%20Qualitative%20Exploration%20of%20Structure%20and%20Process%20in%20Corporate%20Political%20Action&rft.jtitle=Business%20and%20society%20review%20(1974)&rft.au=MATTINGLY,%20JAMES%20E.&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=193-221&rft.issn=0045-3609&rft.eissn=1467-8594&rft.coden=BUSRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8594.2006.00268.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1072937221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219204203&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |