The Uncorrelated Return Myth
For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, invest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Financial analysts journal 2009-11, Vol.65 (6), p.6-7 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 6 |
container_title | Financial analysts journal |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Ennis, Richard M. |
description | For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219148317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1924778511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-2b31197e29b39b48e7d71827863e078d4f38aa8841e8f17af674d9fcb887e4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8FLwzAYxYMoWKc3jx6KZ1v7JWny5SjDqTARZANvIW2_MMtsZ9IJ---NzNPjweO992PsGqqSS2XuvevLH1WXgyrVCcvACCyEAH7KsqqCugCDH-fsIsY-WS5knbGb1Yby9dCOIdDWTdTl7zTtw5C_HqbNJTvzbhvp6l9nbL14XM2fi-Xb08v8YVm0YPhU8EYAGE3cNMI0Ekl3GpBrVIIqjZ30Ap1DlEDoQTuvtOyMbxtETdJIMWO3x95dGL_3FCfbj-lDmrQcDEgUoFPo7hhqwxhjIG934fPLhYOFyv7h24RvE74dlFXiF4uhTCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219148317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Ennis, Richard M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><description>For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-198X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FIAJA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlottesville: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Asset allocation ; Capital assets ; CAPM ; Equity ; Equity funds ; Hedge funds ; Investments ; Portfolio management ; Private equity ; Rates of return ; REITs ; Risk management ; Risk premiums ; Securities markets ; Stock exchanges</subject><ispartof>Financial analysts journal, 2009-11, Vol.65 (6), p.6-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright CFA Institute Nov/Dec 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-2b31197e29b39b48e7d71827863e078d4f38aa8841e8f17af674d9fcb887e4943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</title><title>Financial analysts journal</title><description>For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory.</description><subject>Asset allocation</subject><subject>Capital assets</subject><subject>CAPM</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Equity funds</subject><subject>Hedge funds</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>Private equity</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>REITs</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk premiums</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><issn>0015-198X</issn><issn>1938-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8FLwzAYxYMoWKc3jx6KZ1v7JWny5SjDqTARZANvIW2_MMtsZ9IJ---NzNPjweO992PsGqqSS2XuvevLH1WXgyrVCcvACCyEAH7KsqqCugCDH-fsIsY-WS5knbGb1Yby9dCOIdDWTdTl7zTtw5C_HqbNJTvzbhvp6l9nbL14XM2fi-Xb08v8YVm0YPhU8EYAGE3cNMI0Ekl3GpBrVIIqjZ30Ap1DlEDoQTuvtOyMbxtETdJIMWO3x95dGL_3FCfbj-lDmrQcDEgUoFPo7hhqwxhjIG934fPLhYOFyv7h24RvE74dlFXiF4uhTCY</recordid><startdate>200911</startdate><enddate>200911</enddate><creator>Ennis, Richard M.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200911</creationdate><title>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</title><author>Ennis, Richard M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-2b31197e29b39b48e7d71827863e078d4f38aa8841e8f17af674d9fcb887e4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Asset allocation</topic><topic>Capital assets</topic><topic>CAPM</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Equity funds</topic><topic>Hedge funds</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>Private equity</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>REITs</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk premiums</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting & Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax & Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Financial analysts journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ennis, Richard M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</atitle><jtitle>Financial analysts journal</jtitle><date>2009-11</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>6-7</pages><issn>0015-198X</issn><eissn>1938-3312</eissn><coden>FIAJA4</coden><abstract>For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory.</abstract><cop>Charlottesville</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-198X |
ispartof | Financial analysts journal, 2009-11, Vol.65 (6), p.6-7 |
issn | 0015-198X 1938-3312 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_219148317 |
source | Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Asset allocation Capital assets CAPM Equity Equity funds Hedge funds Investments Portfolio management Private equity Rates of return REITs Risk management Risk premiums Securities markets Stock exchanges |
title | The Uncorrelated Return Myth |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T06%3A42%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Uncorrelated%20Return%20Myth&rft.jtitle=Financial%20analysts%20journal&rft.au=Ennis,%20Richard%20M.&rft.date=2009-11&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=6-7&rft.issn=0015-198X&rft.eissn=1938-3312&rft.coden=FIAJA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924778511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219148317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |