The Uncorrelated Return Myth

For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, invest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Financial analysts journal 2009-11, Vol.65 (6), p.6-7
1. Verfasser: Ennis, Richard M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 6
container_start_page 6
container_title Financial analysts journal
container_volume 65
creator Ennis, Richard M.
description For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory.
doi_str_mv 10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219148317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1924778511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-2b31197e29b39b48e7d71827863e078d4f38aa8841e8f17af674d9fcb887e4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8FLwzAYxYMoWKc3jx6KZ1v7JWny5SjDqTARZANvIW2_MMtsZ9IJ---NzNPjweO992PsGqqSS2XuvevLH1WXgyrVCcvACCyEAH7KsqqCugCDH-fsIsY-WS5knbGb1Yby9dCOIdDWTdTl7zTtw5C_HqbNJTvzbhvp6l9nbL14XM2fi-Xb08v8YVm0YPhU8EYAGE3cNMI0Ekl3GpBrVIIqjZ30Ap1DlEDoQTuvtOyMbxtETdJIMWO3x95dGL_3FCfbj-lDmrQcDEgUoFPo7hhqwxhjIG934fPLhYOFyv7h24RvE74dlFXiF4uhTCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219148317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Ennis, Richard M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><description>For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-198X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FIAJA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Charlottesville: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Asset allocation ; Capital assets ; CAPM ; Equity ; Equity funds ; Hedge funds ; Investments ; Portfolio management ; Private equity ; Rates of return ; REITs ; Risk management ; Risk premiums ; Securities markets ; Stock exchanges</subject><ispartof>Financial analysts journal, 2009-11, Vol.65 (6), p.6-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright CFA Institute Nov/Dec 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-2b31197e29b39b48e7d71827863e078d4f38aa8841e8f17af674d9fcb887e4943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</title><title>Financial analysts journal</title><description>For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory.</description><subject>Asset allocation</subject><subject>Capital assets</subject><subject>CAPM</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Equity funds</subject><subject>Hedge funds</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Portfolio management</subject><subject>Private equity</subject><subject>Rates of return</subject><subject>REITs</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk premiums</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><issn>0015-198X</issn><issn>1938-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8FLwzAYxYMoWKc3jx6KZ1v7JWny5SjDqTARZANvIW2_MMtsZ9IJ---NzNPjweO992PsGqqSS2XuvevLH1WXgyrVCcvACCyEAH7KsqqCugCDH-fsIsY-WS5knbGb1Yby9dCOIdDWTdTl7zTtw5C_HqbNJTvzbhvp6l9nbL14XM2fi-Xb08v8YVm0YPhU8EYAGE3cNMI0Ekl3GpBrVIIqjZ30Ap1DlEDoQTuvtOyMbxtETdJIMWO3x95dGL_3FCfbj-lDmrQcDEgUoFPo7hhqwxhjIG934fPLhYOFyv7h24RvE74dlFXiF4uhTCY</recordid><startdate>200911</startdate><enddate>200911</enddate><creator>Ennis, Richard M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X1</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8A9</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ANIOZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRAZJ</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200911</creationdate><title>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</title><author>Ennis, Richard M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-2b31197e29b39b48e7d71827863e078d4f38aa8841e8f17af674d9fcb887e4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Asset allocation</topic><topic>Capital assets</topic><topic>CAPM</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Equity funds</topic><topic>Hedge funds</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Portfolio management</topic><topic>Private equity</topic><topic>Rates of return</topic><topic>REITs</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk premiums</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Accounting &amp; Tax Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Accounting, Tax &amp; Banking Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Financial analysts journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ennis, Richard M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Uncorrelated Return Myth</atitle><jtitle>Financial analysts journal</jtitle><date>2009-11</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>6-7</pages><issn>0015-198X</issn><eissn>1938-3312</eissn><coden>FIAJA4</coden><abstract>For the last several years, the Holy Grail of asset allocation has been assets that offer "uncorrelated return." The premise is that assets with equity-like risk premiums are, for all intents and purposes, uncorrelated with the broad market. Availing themselves amply of such assets, investors can create high-returning, comparatively low-risk portfolios because they get the average of the risk premiums but the risk itself largely cancels out. A cornerstone of asset-pricing theory is that investors may expect to be compensated for risk they cannot diversify away. Although the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) has been a source of controversy for nearly a half century, it remains the leading theory of asset pricing. More important, however, even though scholars challenge CAPM, rarely do they attack a critical proposition that underlies it: namely, that one cannot expect to get paid for a risk that can be eliminated without cost. This principle is a bedrock of asset-pricing theory.</abstract><cop>Charlottesville</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-198X
ispartof Financial analysts journal, 2009-11, Vol.65 (6), p.6-7
issn 0015-198X
1938-3312
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_219148317
source Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Asset allocation
Capital assets
CAPM
Equity
Equity funds
Hedge funds
Investments
Portfolio management
Private equity
Rates of return
REITs
Risk management
Risk premiums
Securities markets
Stock exchanges
title The Uncorrelated Return Myth
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T06%3A42%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Uncorrelated%20Return%20Myth&rft.jtitle=Financial%20analysts%20journal&rft.au=Ennis,%20Richard%20M.&rft.date=2009-11&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=6-7&rft.issn=0015-198X&rft.eissn=1938-3312&rft.coden=FIAJA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.2469/faj.v65.n6.6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924778511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219148317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true