Usefulness of ^sup 123^I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Primary or Metastatic Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial

Although ^sup 123^I-MIBG has been in clinical use for the imaging of pheochromocytoma for many years, a large multicenter evaluation of this agent has never been performed. The present study was designed to provide a prospective confirmation of the performance of ^sup 123^I-MIBG scintigraphy for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 2009-09, Vol.50 (9), p.1448
Hauptverfasser: Wiseman, Gregory A, Pacak, Karel, O'Dorisio, Mary S, Neumann, Donald R, Waxman, Alan D, Mankoff, David A, Heiba, Sherif I, Serafini, Aldo N, Tumeh, Sabah S, Khutoryansky, Natalie, Jacobson, Arnold F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1448
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 50
creator Wiseman, Gregory A
Pacak, Karel
O'Dorisio, Mary S
Neumann, Donald R
Waxman, Alan D
Mankoff, David A
Heiba, Sherif I
Serafini, Aldo N
Tumeh, Sabah S
Khutoryansky, Natalie
Jacobson, Arnold F
description Although ^sup 123^I-MIBG has been in clinical use for the imaging of pheochromocytoma for many years, a large multicenter evaluation of this agent has never been performed. The present study was designed to provide a prospective confirmation of the performance of ^sup 123^I-MIBG scintigraphy for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Methods: A total of 81 patients with a prior history of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and 69 with suspected pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma based on symptoms of catecholamine excess, CT or MRI findings, or elevated catecholamine or metanephrine levels underwent whole-body planar and selected SPECT 24 h after the administration of ^sup 123^I-MIBG. Images were independently interpreted by 3 masked readers, with consensus requiring agreement of at least 2 readers. Final diagnoses were based on histopathology, correlative imaging, catecholamine or metanephrine measurements, and clinical follow-up. Results: Among 140 patients with definitive diagnoses (91, disease present; 49, disease absent), ^sup 123^I-MIBG planar scintigraphy had a sensitivity and specificity of 82%. For patients evaluated for suspected disease, sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 84%, respectively. For the subpopulations of adrenal (pheochromocytoma) and extraadrenal (paraganglioma) tumors, sensitivities were 88% and 67%, respectively. The addition of SPECT increased reader confidence but minimally affected sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: This prospective study demonstrated a sensitivity of 82% - 88% and specificity of 82% - 84% for ^sup 123^I-MIBG imaging used in the diagnostic assessment of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_219141571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1862976931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2191415713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjdtKw0AQhhdRMB7eYfA-kG3cNHqpVC0lEGy9bRnWSbIl2Y17aOkL-lxuxAfwaob_-w9nLOEiF6koivk5SzJe8FSITFyyK-f2WZYVZVkm7PvDURN6Tc6BaWDrwgh8lm-XabV8eoW1VNqr1uLYnUBp8B3B4oB9QK-MnhJ1_Eh7B0flO1hpc4yyhXVwI0lPn1BbNaA9TWJFHp2PAQl1R0Z21gxGnrwZcMI1WmxRt72KwiO8kwt9LG6iCzD2mN9KdSCoIlAyzpKFjVXY37CLBntHt3_3mt29LDbPb-lozVcg53d7E6yOaDfjD_yeiznP_2X6AePha1U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>219141571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usefulness of ^sup 123^I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Primary or Metastatic Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wiseman, Gregory A ; Pacak, Karel ; O'Dorisio, Mary S ; Neumann, Donald R ; Waxman, Alan D ; Mankoff, David A ; Heiba, Sherif I ; Serafini, Aldo N ; Tumeh, Sabah S ; Khutoryansky, Natalie ; Jacobson, Arnold F</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Gregory A ; Pacak, Karel ; O'Dorisio, Mary S ; Neumann, Donald R ; Waxman, Alan D ; Mankoff, David A ; Heiba, Sherif I ; Serafini, Aldo N ; Tumeh, Sabah S ; Khutoryansky, Natalie ; Jacobson, Arnold F</creatorcontrib><description>Although ^sup 123^I-MIBG has been in clinical use for the imaging of pheochromocytoma for many years, a large multicenter evaluation of this agent has never been performed. The present study was designed to provide a prospective confirmation of the performance of ^sup 123^I-MIBG scintigraphy for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Methods: A total of 81 patients with a prior history of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and 69 with suspected pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma based on symptoms of catecholamine excess, CT or MRI findings, or elevated catecholamine or metanephrine levels underwent whole-body planar and selected SPECT 24 h after the administration of ^sup 123^I-MIBG. Images were independently interpreted by 3 masked readers, with consensus requiring agreement of at least 2 readers. Final diagnoses were based on histopathology, correlative imaging, catecholamine or metanephrine measurements, and clinical follow-up. Results: Among 140 patients with definitive diagnoses (91, disease present; 49, disease absent), ^sup 123^I-MIBG planar scintigraphy had a sensitivity and specificity of 82%. For patients evaluated for suspected disease, sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 84%, respectively. For the subpopulations of adrenal (pheochromocytoma) and extraadrenal (paraganglioma) tumors, sensitivities were 88% and 67%, respectively. The addition of SPECT increased reader confidence but minimally affected sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: This prospective study demonstrated a sensitivity of 82% - 88% and specificity of 82% - 84% for ^sup 123^I-MIBG imaging used in the diagnostic assessment of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2009-09, Vol.50 (9), p.1448</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Sep 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacak, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dorisio, Mary S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Donald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waxman, Alan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mankoff, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiba, Sherif I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serafini, Aldo N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumeh, Sabah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khutoryansky, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Arnold F</creatorcontrib><title>Usefulness of ^sup 123^I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Primary or Metastatic Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><description>Although ^sup 123^I-MIBG has been in clinical use for the imaging of pheochromocytoma for many years, a large multicenter evaluation of this agent has never been performed. The present study was designed to provide a prospective confirmation of the performance of ^sup 123^I-MIBG scintigraphy for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Methods: A total of 81 patients with a prior history of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and 69 with suspected pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma based on symptoms of catecholamine excess, CT or MRI findings, or elevated catecholamine or metanephrine levels underwent whole-body planar and selected SPECT 24 h after the administration of ^sup 123^I-MIBG. Images were independently interpreted by 3 masked readers, with consensus requiring agreement of at least 2 readers. Final diagnoses were based on histopathology, correlative imaging, catecholamine or metanephrine measurements, and clinical follow-up. Results: Among 140 patients with definitive diagnoses (91, disease present; 49, disease absent), ^sup 123^I-MIBG planar scintigraphy had a sensitivity and specificity of 82%. For patients evaluated for suspected disease, sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 84%, respectively. For the subpopulations of adrenal (pheochromocytoma) and extraadrenal (paraganglioma) tumors, sensitivities were 88% and 67%, respectively. The addition of SPECT increased reader confidence but minimally affected sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: This prospective study demonstrated a sensitivity of 82% - 88% and specificity of 82% - 84% for ^sup 123^I-MIBG imaging used in the diagnostic assessment of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjdtKw0AQhhdRMB7eYfA-kG3cNHqpVC0lEGy9bRnWSbIl2Y17aOkL-lxuxAfwaob_-w9nLOEiF6koivk5SzJe8FSITFyyK-f2WZYVZVkm7PvDURN6Tc6BaWDrwgh8lm-XabV8eoW1VNqr1uLYnUBp8B3B4oB9QK-MnhJ1_Eh7B0flO1hpc4yyhXVwI0lPn1BbNaA9TWJFHp2PAQl1R0Z21gxGnrwZcMI1WmxRt72KwiO8kwt9LG6iCzD2mN9KdSCoIlAyzpKFjVXY37CLBntHt3_3mt29LDbPb-lozVcg53d7E6yOaDfjD_yeiznP_2X6AePha1U</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Wiseman, Gregory A</creator><creator>Pacak, Karel</creator><creator>O'Dorisio, Mary S</creator><creator>Neumann, Donald R</creator><creator>Waxman, Alan D</creator><creator>Mankoff, David A</creator><creator>Heiba, Sherif I</creator><creator>Serafini, Aldo N</creator><creator>Tumeh, Sabah S</creator><creator>Khutoryansky, Natalie</creator><creator>Jacobson, Arnold F</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Usefulness of ^sup 123^I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Primary or Metastatic Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial</title><author>Wiseman, Gregory A ; Pacak, Karel ; O'Dorisio, Mary S ; Neumann, Donald R ; Waxman, Alan D ; Mankoff, David A ; Heiba, Sherif I ; Serafini, Aldo N ; Tumeh, Sabah S ; Khutoryansky, Natalie ; Jacobson, Arnold F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2191415713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Gregory A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacak, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dorisio, Mary S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Donald R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waxman, Alan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mankoff, David A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heiba, Sherif I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serafini, Aldo N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tumeh, Sabah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khutoryansky, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Arnold F</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiseman, Gregory A</au><au>Pacak, Karel</au><au>O'Dorisio, Mary S</au><au>Neumann, Donald R</au><au>Waxman, Alan D</au><au>Mankoff, David A</au><au>Heiba, Sherif I</au><au>Serafini, Aldo N</au><au>Tumeh, Sabah S</au><au>Khutoryansky, Natalie</au><au>Jacobson, Arnold F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usefulness of ^sup 123^I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Primary or Metastatic Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1448</spage><pages>1448-</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>Although ^sup 123^I-MIBG has been in clinical use for the imaging of pheochromocytoma for many years, a large multicenter evaluation of this agent has never been performed. The present study was designed to provide a prospective confirmation of the performance of ^sup 123^I-MIBG scintigraphy for the evaluation of patients with known or suspected primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. Methods: A total of 81 patients with a prior history of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma and 69 with suspected pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma based on symptoms of catecholamine excess, CT or MRI findings, or elevated catecholamine or metanephrine levels underwent whole-body planar and selected SPECT 24 h after the administration of ^sup 123^I-MIBG. Images were independently interpreted by 3 masked readers, with consensus requiring agreement of at least 2 readers. Final diagnoses were based on histopathology, correlative imaging, catecholamine or metanephrine measurements, and clinical follow-up. Results: Among 140 patients with definitive diagnoses (91, disease present; 49, disease absent), ^sup 123^I-MIBG planar scintigraphy had a sensitivity and specificity of 82%. For patients evaluated for suspected disease, sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 84%, respectively. For the subpopulations of adrenal (pheochromocytoma) and extraadrenal (paraganglioma) tumors, sensitivities were 88% and 67%, respectively. The addition of SPECT increased reader confidence but minimally affected sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: This prospective study demonstrated a sensitivity of 82% - 88% and specificity of 82% - 84% for ^sup 123^I-MIBG imaging used in the diagnostic assessment of primary or metastatic pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2009-09, Vol.50 (9), p.1448
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_219141571
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Usefulness of ^sup 123^I-MIBG Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Patients with Known or Suspected Primary or Metastatic Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A25%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usefulness%20of%20%5Esup%20123%5EI-MIBG%20Scintigraphy%20in%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Patients%20with%20Known%20or%20Suspected%20Primary%20or%20Metastatic%20Pheochromocytoma%20or%20Paraganglioma:%20Results%20from%20a%20Prospective%20Multicenter%20Trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Wiseman,%20Gregory%20A&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1448&rft.pages=1448-&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1862976931%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=219141571&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true