Use of multi‐criteria decision‐making for selecting spillway type and optimizing dimensions by applying the harmony search algorithm: Qeshlagh Dam Case Study
Economic considerations are significantly important in designing a dam and its related hydraulic structures. Considering the methods used for economic design of hydraulic structures such as a spillway, they are also dependent on the construction costs of the spillway. In addition to the spillway typ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lakes & Reservoirs : Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use Policy and Management for Sustainable Use, 2019-03, Vol.24 (1), p.66-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 75 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 66 |
container_title | Lakes & Reservoirs : Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Hassanvand, Mohammad R. Karami, Hojat Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad |
description | Economic considerations are significantly important in designing a dam and its related hydraulic structures. Considering the methods used for economic design of hydraulic structures such as a spillway, they are also dependent on the construction costs of the spillway. In addition to the spillway type and capacity being associated with the magnitude of floods. Selecting different options of a spillway, considering all their aspects, has always been one of the biggest issues in decision‐making. The present study determined the best spillway type (free‐flow, stepped, semicircular and cylindrical) for Qeshlagh Dam, Iran, by considering different aspects (costs, time and performance) and using the TOPSIS method. The obtained dimensions of the spillway from multi‐criteria decision‐making were then optimized using meta‐heuristic Harmony Search Algorithm (HSA). The results identified a free‐flow spillway was the best option in terms of cost and time, whereas a cylindrical spillway is the best choice in terms of performance. The optimal free‐flow spillway length is 31.8 m, and height is 3.45 m, being capable of passing a flood discharge of 452 m3/s. This discharge was calculated by a reservoir routing method. Moreover, the obtained solution led to reducing the spillway construction costs, one of the most important issues in civil engineering projects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/lre.12250 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2191180446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2191180446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2470-424e7a9ba125c05326564c02c4fce5f5135f9fa9b8f2b92200a4cfe5d5dd818d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUlOwzAUhiMEElBYcANLrFiktR27bdihUgapEmLoOnKd58bFiYOdqAorjsAVuBonwaFseZs3fW-Q_ig6I3hIgo2MgyGhlOO96IgwhmMymeD9ECcUxzxJyGF07P0GB0vH6VH0tfSArEJlaxr9_fEpnW7AaYFykNprW4VaKV51tUbKOuTBgGz6zNfamK3oUNPVgESVI1s3utTvfTPXJVT9tEerDom6Nl1fbgpAhXClrbqwSThZIGHWNpwsykv0CL4wYl2ga1GimQh_PTdt3p1EB0oYD6d_fhAtb-Yvs7t48XB7P7taxJKyCY4ZZTAR6UoQyiXmCR3zMZOYSqYkcMVJwlWqAjBVdJVSirFgUgHPeZ5PyTRPBtH5bm_t7FsLvsk2tnVVOJlRkhIyxYyNA3Wxo6Sz3jtQWe10KVyXEZz1CmRBgexXgcCOduxWG-j-B7PF03w38QOGnY0F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2191180446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of multi‐criteria decision‐making for selecting spillway type and optimizing dimensions by applying the harmony search algorithm: Qeshlagh Dam Case Study</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Hassanvand, Mohammad R. ; Karami, Hojat ; Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad</creator><creatorcontrib>Hassanvand, Mohammad R. ; Karami, Hojat ; Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad</creatorcontrib><description>Economic considerations are significantly important in designing a dam and its related hydraulic structures. Considering the methods used for economic design of hydraulic structures such as a spillway, they are also dependent on the construction costs of the spillway. In addition to the spillway type and capacity being associated with the magnitude of floods. Selecting different options of a spillway, considering all their aspects, has always been one of the biggest issues in decision‐making. The present study determined the best spillway type (free‐flow, stepped, semicircular and cylindrical) for Qeshlagh Dam, Iran, by considering different aspects (costs, time and performance) and using the TOPSIS method. The obtained dimensions of the spillway from multi‐criteria decision‐making were then optimized using meta‐heuristic Harmony Search Algorithm (HSA). The results identified a free‐flow spillway was the best option in terms of cost and time, whereas a cylindrical spillway is the best choice in terms of performance. The optimal free‐flow spillway length is 31.8 m, and height is 3.45 m, being capable of passing a flood discharge of 452 m3/s. This discharge was calculated by a reservoir routing method. Moreover, the obtained solution led to reducing the spillway construction costs, one of the most important issues in civil engineering projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1320-5331</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1770</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/lre.12250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Richmond: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Civil engineering ; Construction ; Construction costs ; Dam engineering ; Decision making ; Dimensions ; Discharge ; Economics ; Flood discharge ; Floods ; harmony search algorithm ; Hydraulic structures ; Methods ; multi‐criteria decision‐making ; Optimization ; optimizing spillway dimensions ; Routing ; Search algorithms ; Spillways</subject><ispartof>Lakes & Reservoirs : Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use, 2019-03, Vol.24 (1), p.66-75</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2470-424e7a9ba125c05326564c02c4fce5f5135f9fa9b8f2b92200a4cfe5d5dd818d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2470-424e7a9ba125c05326564c02c4fce5f5135f9fa9b8f2b92200a4cfe5d5dd818d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2632-1422</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Flre.12250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Flre.12250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hassanvand, Mohammad R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karami, Hojat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad</creatorcontrib><title>Use of multi‐criteria decision‐making for selecting spillway type and optimizing dimensions by applying the harmony search algorithm: Qeshlagh Dam Case Study</title><title>Lakes & Reservoirs : Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use</title><description>Economic considerations are significantly important in designing a dam and its related hydraulic structures. Considering the methods used for economic design of hydraulic structures such as a spillway, they are also dependent on the construction costs of the spillway. In addition to the spillway type and capacity being associated with the magnitude of floods. Selecting different options of a spillway, considering all their aspects, has always been one of the biggest issues in decision‐making. The present study determined the best spillway type (free‐flow, stepped, semicircular and cylindrical) for Qeshlagh Dam, Iran, by considering different aspects (costs, time and performance) and using the TOPSIS method. The obtained dimensions of the spillway from multi‐criteria decision‐making were then optimized using meta‐heuristic Harmony Search Algorithm (HSA). The results identified a free‐flow spillway was the best option in terms of cost and time, whereas a cylindrical spillway is the best choice in terms of performance. The optimal free‐flow spillway length is 31.8 m, and height is 3.45 m, being capable of passing a flood discharge of 452 m3/s. This discharge was calculated by a reservoir routing method. Moreover, the obtained solution led to reducing the spillway construction costs, one of the most important issues in civil engineering projects.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Dam engineering</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Flood discharge</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>harmony search algorithm</subject><subject>Hydraulic structures</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>multi‐criteria decision‐making</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>optimizing spillway dimensions</subject><subject>Routing</subject><subject>Search algorithms</subject><subject>Spillways</subject><issn>1320-5331</issn><issn>1440-1770</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUlOwzAUhiMEElBYcANLrFiktR27bdihUgapEmLoOnKd58bFiYOdqAorjsAVuBonwaFseZs3fW-Q_ig6I3hIgo2MgyGhlOO96IgwhmMymeD9ECcUxzxJyGF07P0GB0vH6VH0tfSArEJlaxr9_fEpnW7AaYFykNprW4VaKV51tUbKOuTBgGz6zNfamK3oUNPVgESVI1s3utTvfTPXJVT9tEerDom6Nl1fbgpAhXClrbqwSThZIGHWNpwsykv0CL4wYl2ga1GimQh_PTdt3p1EB0oYD6d_fhAtb-Yvs7t48XB7P7taxJKyCY4ZZTAR6UoQyiXmCR3zMZOYSqYkcMVJwlWqAjBVdJVSirFgUgHPeZ5PyTRPBtH5bm_t7FsLvsk2tnVVOJlRkhIyxYyNA3Wxo6Sz3jtQWe10KVyXEZz1CmRBgexXgcCOduxWG-j-B7PF03w38QOGnY0F</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Hassanvand, Mohammad R.</creator><creator>Karami, Hojat</creator><creator>Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2632-1422</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Use of multi‐criteria decision‐making for selecting spillway type and optimizing dimensions by applying the harmony search algorithm: Qeshlagh Dam Case Study</title><author>Hassanvand, Mohammad R. ; Karami, Hojat ; Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2470-424e7a9ba125c05326564c02c4fce5f5135f9fa9b8f2b92200a4cfe5d5dd818d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Dam engineering</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Flood discharge</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>harmony search algorithm</topic><topic>Hydraulic structures</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>multi‐criteria decision‐making</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>optimizing spillway dimensions</topic><topic>Routing</topic><topic>Search algorithms</topic><topic>Spillways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hassanvand, Mohammad R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karami, Hojat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Lakes & Reservoirs : Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hassanvand, Mohammad R.</au><au>Karami, Hojat</au><au>Mousavi, Sayed‐Farhad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of multi‐criteria decision‐making for selecting spillway type and optimizing dimensions by applying the harmony search algorithm: Qeshlagh Dam Case Study</atitle><jtitle>Lakes & Reservoirs : Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>66</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>66-75</pages><issn>1320-5331</issn><eissn>1440-1770</eissn><abstract>Economic considerations are significantly important in designing a dam and its related hydraulic structures. Considering the methods used for economic design of hydraulic structures such as a spillway, they are also dependent on the construction costs of the spillway. In addition to the spillway type and capacity being associated with the magnitude of floods. Selecting different options of a spillway, considering all their aspects, has always been one of the biggest issues in decision‐making. The present study determined the best spillway type (free‐flow, stepped, semicircular and cylindrical) for Qeshlagh Dam, Iran, by considering different aspects (costs, time and performance) and using the TOPSIS method. The obtained dimensions of the spillway from multi‐criteria decision‐making were then optimized using meta‐heuristic Harmony Search Algorithm (HSA). The results identified a free‐flow spillway was the best option in terms of cost and time, whereas a cylindrical spillway is the best choice in terms of performance. The optimal free‐flow spillway length is 31.8 m, and height is 3.45 m, being capable of passing a flood discharge of 452 m3/s. This discharge was calculated by a reservoir routing method. Moreover, the obtained solution led to reducing the spillway construction costs, one of the most important issues in civil engineering projects.</abstract><cop>Richmond</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/lre.12250</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2632-1422</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1320-5331 |
ispartof | Lakes & Reservoirs : Science, Policy and Management for Sustainable Use, 2019-03, Vol.24 (1), p.66-75 |
issn | 1320-5331 1440-1770 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2191180446 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Case studies Civil engineering Construction Construction costs Dam engineering Decision making Dimensions Discharge Economics Flood discharge Floods harmony search algorithm Hydraulic structures Methods multi‐criteria decision‐making Optimization optimizing spillway dimensions Routing Search algorithms Spillways |
title | Use of multi‐criteria decision‐making for selecting spillway type and optimizing dimensions by applying the harmony search algorithm: Qeshlagh Dam Case Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20multi%E2%80%90criteria%20decision%E2%80%90making%20for%20selecting%20spillway%20type%20and%20optimizing%20dimensions%20by%20applying%20the%20harmony%20search%20algorithm:%20Qeshlagh%20Dam%20Case%20Study&rft.jtitle=Lakes%20&%20Reservoirs%20:%20Science,%20Policy%20and%20Management%20for%20Sustainable%20Use&rft.au=Hassanvand,%20Mohammad%20R.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=66&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=66-75&rft.issn=1320-5331&rft.eissn=1440-1770&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/lre.12250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2191180446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2191180446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |