Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities

This study analyzes the value conflict of a paper on fan fiction writing that used online fan fiction novels as a source to extract and filter sexual expressions from text. The boundaries of public and private information are ambiguous because users are not always aware of or have agreed to the fact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the IEEE 2019-03, Vol.107 (3), p.575-581
Hauptverfasser: Ema, Arisa, Komatani, Kazunori, Ichise, Ryutaro, Osawa, Hirotaka, Saijo, Reina, Kubo, Akinori, Otani, Takushi, Hattori, Hiromitsu, Akiya, Naonori, Kanzaki, Nobutsugu, Kukita, Minao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 581
container_issue 3
container_start_page 575
container_title Proceedings of the IEEE
container_volume 107
creator Ema, Arisa
Komatani, Kazunori
Ichise, Ryutaro
Osawa, Hirotaka
Saijo, Reina
Kubo, Akinori
Otani, Takushi
Hattori, Hiromitsu
Akiya, Naonori
Kanzaki, Nobutsugu
Kukita, Minao
description This study analyzes the value conflict of a paper on fan fiction writing that used online fan fiction novels as a source to extract and filter sexual expressions from text. The boundaries of public and private information are ambiguous because users are not always aware of or have agreed to the fact that their content is to be used openly. The case was complicated by the fact that the use of these data by researchers violated an unconsciously infringed upon right of a vulnerable community with a weak legal position. This paper describes the debate on this topic among researchers from engineering and humanities fields on whether the purpose of the research was ethically acceptable; how the systems can be embedded in ethical values; and what ethical, legal, social, and educational lessons are appropriate for governance of artificial intelligence (AI). Our analysis aimed not only to clarify the abstract concept of privacy but also to make changes to the submission guidelines for authors. We hope that our analysis contributes to the governance of ethical AIs and AI ethics on handling sensitive aspects of online activities.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/JPROC.2018.2837045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2188602031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8419734</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2188602031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-466bab3f9d8105b35eea170723e8e510321e8861d750f2bd58c351d35c134d1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKf_gL4EfLUzlzRt6psWfzLY8Bf4FLL2KhldO5PW0f_ezIlP9-XuPnfwIeQU2ASAZZdP8-dZPuEM1IQrkbJY7pERSKkizmWyT0YsjKKMQ3ZIjrxfMsaETMSIfOS1cbYabPNJ585-m2K4CKFdo-tCMk1J5-0G3RXNjUf60vXlQNuGvpu6R5q3TVXboqM32G0Qm9BYrfrGdhb9MTmoTO3x5K-Oydvd7Wv-EE1n94_59TQqYia7KE6ShVmIKisVMLkQEtFAylIuUKEEJjigUgmUqWQVX5RSFUJCKWQBIi6hEGNyvru7du1Xj77Ty7Z3TXipOQSScSYgbPHdVuFa7x1Weu3syrhBA9NbhfpXod4q1H8KA3S2gywi_gMqhiwVsfgBTo1r_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2188602031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Ema, Arisa ; Komatani, Kazunori ; Ichise, Ryutaro ; Osawa, Hirotaka ; Saijo, Reina ; Kubo, Akinori ; Otani, Takushi ; Hattori, Hiromitsu ; Akiya, Naonori ; Kanzaki, Nobutsugu ; Kukita, Minao</creator><creatorcontrib>Ema, Arisa ; Komatani, Kazunori ; Ichise, Ryutaro ; Osawa, Hirotaka ; Saijo, Reina ; Kubo, Akinori ; Otani, Takushi ; Hattori, Hiromitsu ; Akiya, Naonori ; Kanzaki, Nobutsugu ; Kukita, Minao</creatorcontrib><description>This study analyzes the value conflict of a paper on fan fiction writing that used online fan fiction novels as a source to extract and filter sexual expressions from text. The boundaries of public and private information are ambiguous because users are not always aware of or have agreed to the fact that their content is to be used openly. The case was complicated by the fact that the use of these data by researchers violated an unconsciously infringed upon right of a vulnerable community with a weak legal position. This paper describes the debate on this topic among researchers from engineering and humanities fields on whether the purpose of the research was ethically acceptable; how the systems can be embedded in ethical values; and what ethical, legal, social, and educational lessons are appropriate for governance of artificial intelligence (AI). Our analysis aimed not only to clarify the abstract concept of privacy but also to make changes to the submission guidelines for authors. We hope that our analysis contributes to the governance of ethical AIs and AI ethics on handling sensitive aspects of online activities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2018.2837045</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEPAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Embedded systems ; Ethics ; Information filters ; intellectual property ; Privacy ; Researchers ; Social implications of technology ; Text mining ; Writing</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the IEEE, 2019-03, Vol.107 (3), p.575-581</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-466bab3f9d8105b35eea170723e8e510321e8861d750f2bd58c351d35c134d1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-466bab3f9d8105b35eea170723e8e510321e8861d750f2bd58c351d35c134d1c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8684-5001 ; 0000-0002-6052-600X ; 0000-0001-5779-8437</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8419734$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,793,27905,27906,54739</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ema, Arisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatani, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichise, Ryutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osawa, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saijo, Reina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Akinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Takushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akiya, Naonori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanzaki, Nobutsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukita, Minao</creatorcontrib><title>Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities</title><title>Proceedings of the IEEE</title><addtitle>JPROC</addtitle><description>This study analyzes the value conflict of a paper on fan fiction writing that used online fan fiction novels as a source to extract and filter sexual expressions from text. The boundaries of public and private information are ambiguous because users are not always aware of or have agreed to the fact that their content is to be used openly. The case was complicated by the fact that the use of these data by researchers violated an unconsciously infringed upon right of a vulnerable community with a weak legal position. This paper describes the debate on this topic among researchers from engineering and humanities fields on whether the purpose of the research was ethically acceptable; how the systems can be embedded in ethical values; and what ethical, legal, social, and educational lessons are appropriate for governance of artificial intelligence (AI). Our analysis aimed not only to clarify the abstract concept of privacy but also to make changes to the submission guidelines for authors. We hope that our analysis contributes to the governance of ethical AIs and AI ethics on handling sensitive aspects of online activities.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Embedded systems</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Information filters</subject><subject>intellectual property</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Social implications of technology</subject><subject>Text mining</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>0018-9219</issn><issn>1558-2256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKf_gL4EfLUzlzRt6psWfzLY8Bf4FLL2KhldO5PW0f_ezIlP9-XuPnfwIeQU2ASAZZdP8-dZPuEM1IQrkbJY7pERSKkizmWyT0YsjKKMQ3ZIjrxfMsaETMSIfOS1cbYabPNJ585-m2K4CKFdo-tCMk1J5-0G3RXNjUf60vXlQNuGvpu6R5q3TVXboqM32G0Qm9BYrfrGdhb9MTmoTO3x5K-Oydvd7Wv-EE1n94_59TQqYia7KE6ShVmIKisVMLkQEtFAylIuUKEEJjigUgmUqWQVX5RSFUJCKWQBIi6hEGNyvru7du1Xj77Ty7Z3TXipOQSScSYgbPHdVuFa7x1Weu3syrhBA9NbhfpXod4q1H8KA3S2gywi_gMqhiwVsfgBTo1r_g</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Ema, Arisa</creator><creator>Komatani, Kazunori</creator><creator>Ichise, Ryutaro</creator><creator>Osawa, Hirotaka</creator><creator>Saijo, Reina</creator><creator>Kubo, Akinori</creator><creator>Otani, Takushi</creator><creator>Hattori, Hiromitsu</creator><creator>Akiya, Naonori</creator><creator>Kanzaki, Nobutsugu</creator><creator>Kukita, Minao</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-5001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6052-600X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5779-8437</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities</title><author>Ema, Arisa ; Komatani, Kazunori ; Ichise, Ryutaro ; Osawa, Hirotaka ; Saijo, Reina ; Kubo, Akinori ; Otani, Takushi ; Hattori, Hiromitsu ; Akiya, Naonori ; Kanzaki, Nobutsugu ; Kukita, Minao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-466bab3f9d8105b35eea170723e8e510321e8861d750f2bd58c351d35c134d1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Embedded systems</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Information filters</topic><topic>intellectual property</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Social implications of technology</topic><topic>Text mining</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ema, Arisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komatani, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichise, Ryutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osawa, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saijo, Reina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Akinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Takushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hattori, Hiromitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akiya, Naonori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanzaki, Nobutsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukita, Minao</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the IEEE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ema, Arisa</au><au>Komatani, Kazunori</au><au>Ichise, Ryutaro</au><au>Osawa, Hirotaka</au><au>Saijo, Reina</au><au>Kubo, Akinori</au><au>Otani, Takushi</au><au>Hattori, Hiromitsu</au><au>Akiya, Naonori</au><au>Kanzaki, Nobutsugu</au><au>Kukita, Minao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the IEEE</jtitle><stitle>JPROC</stitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>581</epage><pages>575-581</pages><issn>0018-9219</issn><eissn>1558-2256</eissn><coden>IEEPAD</coden><abstract>This study analyzes the value conflict of a paper on fan fiction writing that used online fan fiction novels as a source to extract and filter sexual expressions from text. The boundaries of public and private information are ambiguous because users are not always aware of or have agreed to the fact that their content is to be used openly. The case was complicated by the fact that the use of these data by researchers violated an unconsciously infringed upon right of a vulnerable community with a weak legal position. This paper describes the debate on this topic among researchers from engineering and humanities fields on whether the purpose of the research was ethically acceptable; how the systems can be embedded in ethical values; and what ethical, legal, social, and educational lessons are appropriate for governance of artificial intelligence (AI). Our analysis aimed not only to clarify the abstract concept of privacy but also to make changes to the submission guidelines for authors. We hope that our analysis contributes to the governance of ethical AIs and AI ethics on handling sensitive aspects of online activities.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/JPROC.2018.2837045</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-5001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6052-600X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5779-8437</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9219
ispartof Proceedings of the IEEE, 2019-03, Vol.107 (3), p.575-581
issn 0018-9219
1558-2256
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2188602031
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Artificial intelligence
Embedded systems
Ethics
Information filters
intellectual property
Privacy
Researchers
Social implications of technology
Text mining
Writing
title Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A18%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clarifying%20Privacy,%20Property,%20and%20Power:%20Case%20Study%20on%20Value%20Conflict%20Between%20Communities&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20IEEE&rft.au=Ema,%20Arisa&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=581&rft.pages=575-581&rft.issn=0018-9219&rft.eissn=1558-2256&rft.coden=IEEPAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2837045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2188602031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2188602031&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8419734&rfr_iscdi=true