Do hip protectors decrease the risk of hip fracture in institutional and community-dwelling elderly? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hip fractures are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Hip protectors are padded undergarments designed to decrease the impact of a fall on the hip. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of hip protectors to determine if they reduce hip fractures in the eld...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoporosis international 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1461-1474
Hauptverfasser: Sawka, Anna M., Boulos, Pauline, Beattie, Karen, Thabane, Lehana, Papaioannou, Alexandra, Gafni, Amiram, Cranney, Ann, Zytaruk, Nicole, Hanley, David A., Adachi, Jonathan D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1474
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1461
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 16
creator Sawka, Anna M.
Boulos, Pauline
Beattie, Karen
Thabane, Lehana
Papaioannou, Alexandra
Gafni, Amiram
Cranney, Ann
Zytaruk, Nicole
Hanley, David A.
Adachi, Jonathan D.
description Hip fractures are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Hip protectors are padded undergarments designed to decrease the impact of a fall on the hip. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of hip protectors to determine if they reduce hip fractures in the elderly. Analyses were pooled according to participant residence--community or institutional (the latter, included nursing homes, residential group homes or seniors' hostels). We included individually randomized and statistically adjusted cluster randomized trials. Seven trials of 12- to 28-month duration were included. The Safehip brand of hip protector was used in most studies. Compliance rates in the treatment groups varied from 31 to 68%. In four trials including a total of 5,696 community-dwelling seniors, the hip fracture rates in control groups ranged from 1.1 to 7.4%, and the pooled risk difference with hip protector allocation was 0% [95% confidence intervals (CI), -1%, +1%), with a relative risk of 1.07 (0.81, 1.42). In three trials including 1,188 institutionalized elderly participants, hip fracture rates in the control groups varied from 8 to 19.4%, and the pooled risk difference for sustaining one or more hip fractures with hip protector allocation was -3.7% (95% CI, -7.4%, 0.1%), with a relative risk of 0.56 (0.31, 1.01) (with statistically significant heterogeneity of treatment effect). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of two trials comprised of exclusively nursing home residents, the risk difference with hip protector allocation was -4.4% (-8.09, -0.76) with a relative risk of 0.50 (0.28, 0.91) ( n =1,014). Thus, there is little evidence to support the use of hip protectors outside the nursing home setting. The potential benefit of hip protectors in reducing hip fractures in nursing home residents requires further confirmation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00198-005-1932-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218828521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>943514251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7acfceaadcd17f6b1ca770eb1bb17e93d5156636f3fbee8ac2563e66bb08f25b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUdtKAzEQDaJgrX6Ab8H3aC7d25OUeoWCLwq-hWx2YlN3NzXJWtZP8itNW2HgDMM5Z4Y5CF0yes0oLW4CpawqCaUZYZXghB-hCZsJQXiVZ8doQitRkGrG3k_RWQhrmjRVVUzQ753DK7vBG-8i6Oh8wA1oDyoAjivA3oZP7MyeY7zScfCAbZ8qRBuHaF2vWqz6BmvXdUNv40iaLbSt7T8wtA34drzFcxzGEKFT0Wrs4dvCdq_pICqiksMYbNit8WnqOvsDO78-ete2qY3eqjacoxOTAC7-cYreHu5fF09k-fL4vJgviRaijKRQ2mhQqtENK0xeM62KgkLN6poVUIkmY1mei9wIUwOUSvMsF5DndU1Lw7NaTNHVwTf95GuAEOXaDT4dGSRnZcnLjLNEYgeS9i4ED0ZuvO2UHyWjcpeIPCQiUyJyl4jk4g_z5oSp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218828521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do hip protectors decrease the risk of hip fracture in institutional and community-dwelling elderly? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sawka, Anna M. ; Boulos, Pauline ; Beattie, Karen ; Thabane, Lehana ; Papaioannou, Alexandra ; Gafni, Amiram ; Cranney, Ann ; Zytaruk, Nicole ; Hanley, David A. ; Adachi, Jonathan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sawka, Anna M. ; Boulos, Pauline ; Beattie, Karen ; Thabane, Lehana ; Papaioannou, Alexandra ; Gafni, Amiram ; Cranney, Ann ; Zytaruk, Nicole ; Hanley, David A. ; Adachi, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><description>Hip fractures are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Hip protectors are padded undergarments designed to decrease the impact of a fall on the hip. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of hip protectors to determine if they reduce hip fractures in the elderly. Analyses were pooled according to participant residence--community or institutional (the latter, included nursing homes, residential group homes or seniors' hostels). We included individually randomized and statistically adjusted cluster randomized trials. Seven trials of 12- to 28-month duration were included. The Safehip brand of hip protector was used in most studies. Compliance rates in the treatment groups varied from 31 to 68%. In four trials including a total of 5,696 community-dwelling seniors, the hip fracture rates in control groups ranged from 1.1 to 7.4%, and the pooled risk difference with hip protector allocation was 0% [95% confidence intervals (CI), -1%, +1%), with a relative risk of 1.07 (0.81, 1.42). In three trials including 1,188 institutionalized elderly participants, hip fracture rates in the control groups varied from 8 to 19.4%, and the pooled risk difference for sustaining one or more hip fractures with hip protector allocation was -3.7% (95% CI, -7.4%, 0.1%), with a relative risk of 0.56 (0.31, 1.01) (with statistically significant heterogeneity of treatment effect). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of two trials comprised of exclusively nursing home residents, the risk difference with hip protector allocation was -4.4% (-8.09, -0.76) with a relative risk of 0.50 (0.28, 0.91) ( n =1,014). Thus, there is little evidence to support the use of hip protectors outside the nursing home setting. The potential benefit of hip protectors in reducing hip fractures in nursing home residents requires further confirmation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1932-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Endocrinology ; Fractures ; Health sciences ; Hip joint ; Institutionalization ; Medicine ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Osteoporosis ; Rheumatology ; Systematic review ; Underwear</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1461-1474</ispartof><rights>International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7acfceaadcd17f6b1ca770eb1bb17e93d5156636f3fbee8ac2563e66bb08f25b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7acfceaadcd17f6b1ca770eb1bb17e93d5156636f3fbee8ac2563e66bb08f25b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sawka, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulos, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thabane, Lehana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gafni, Amiram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cranney, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zytaruk, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Do hip protectors decrease the risk of hip fracture in institutional and community-dwelling elderly? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><description>Hip fractures are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Hip protectors are padded undergarments designed to decrease the impact of a fall on the hip. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of hip protectors to determine if they reduce hip fractures in the elderly. Analyses were pooled according to participant residence--community or institutional (the latter, included nursing homes, residential group homes or seniors' hostels). We included individually randomized and statistically adjusted cluster randomized trials. Seven trials of 12- to 28-month duration were included. The Safehip brand of hip protector was used in most studies. Compliance rates in the treatment groups varied from 31 to 68%. In four trials including a total of 5,696 community-dwelling seniors, the hip fracture rates in control groups ranged from 1.1 to 7.4%, and the pooled risk difference with hip protector allocation was 0% [95% confidence intervals (CI), -1%, +1%), with a relative risk of 1.07 (0.81, 1.42). In three trials including 1,188 institutionalized elderly participants, hip fracture rates in the control groups varied from 8 to 19.4%, and the pooled risk difference for sustaining one or more hip fractures with hip protector allocation was -3.7% (95% CI, -7.4%, 0.1%), with a relative risk of 0.56 (0.31, 1.01) (with statistically significant heterogeneity of treatment effect). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of two trials comprised of exclusively nursing home residents, the risk difference with hip protector allocation was -4.4% (-8.09, -0.76) with a relative risk of 0.50 (0.28, 0.91) ( n =1,014). Thus, there is little evidence to support the use of hip protectors outside the nursing home setting. The potential benefit of hip protectors in reducing hip fractures in nursing home residents requires further confirmation.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Underwear</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotUdtKAzEQDaJgrX6Ab8H3aC7d25OUeoWCLwq-hWx2YlN3NzXJWtZP8itNW2HgDMM5Z4Y5CF0yes0oLW4CpawqCaUZYZXghB-hCZsJQXiVZ8doQitRkGrG3k_RWQhrmjRVVUzQ753DK7vBG-8i6Oh8wA1oDyoAjivA3oZP7MyeY7zScfCAbZ8qRBuHaF2vWqz6BmvXdUNv40iaLbSt7T8wtA34drzFcxzGEKFT0Wrs4dvCdq_pICqiksMYbNit8WnqOvsDO78-ete2qY3eqjacoxOTAC7-cYreHu5fF09k-fL4vJgviRaijKRQ2mhQqtENK0xeM62KgkLN6poVUIkmY1mei9wIUwOUSvMsF5DndU1Lw7NaTNHVwTf95GuAEOXaDT4dGSRnZcnLjLNEYgeS9i4ED0ZuvO2UHyWjcpeIPCQiUyJyl4jk4g_z5oSp</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Sawka, Anna M.</creator><creator>Boulos, Pauline</creator><creator>Beattie, Karen</creator><creator>Thabane, Lehana</creator><creator>Papaioannou, Alexandra</creator><creator>Gafni, Amiram</creator><creator>Cranney, Ann</creator><creator>Zytaruk, Nicole</creator><creator>Hanley, David A.</creator><creator>Adachi, Jonathan D.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>Do hip protectors decrease the risk of hip fracture in institutional and community-dwelling elderly? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</title><author>Sawka, Anna M. ; Boulos, Pauline ; Beattie, Karen ; Thabane, Lehana ; Papaioannou, Alexandra ; Gafni, Amiram ; Cranney, Ann ; Zytaruk, Nicole ; Hanley, David A. ; Adachi, Jonathan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-7acfceaadcd17f6b1ca770eb1bb17e93d5156636f3fbee8ac2563e66bb08f25b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Underwear</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sawka, Anna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boulos, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thabane, Lehana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papaioannou, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gafni, Amiram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cranney, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zytaruk, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanley, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Jonathan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sawka, Anna M.</au><au>Boulos, Pauline</au><au>Beattie, Karen</au><au>Thabane, Lehana</au><au>Papaioannou, Alexandra</au><au>Gafni, Amiram</au><au>Cranney, Ann</au><au>Zytaruk, Nicole</au><au>Hanley, David A.</au><au>Adachi, Jonathan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do hip protectors decrease the risk of hip fracture in institutional and community-dwelling elderly? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1461</spage><epage>1474</epage><pages>1461-1474</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>Hip fractures are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Hip protectors are padded undergarments designed to decrease the impact of a fall on the hip. We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials of hip protectors to determine if they reduce hip fractures in the elderly. Analyses were pooled according to participant residence--community or institutional (the latter, included nursing homes, residential group homes or seniors' hostels). We included individually randomized and statistically adjusted cluster randomized trials. Seven trials of 12- to 28-month duration were included. The Safehip brand of hip protector was used in most studies. Compliance rates in the treatment groups varied from 31 to 68%. In four trials including a total of 5,696 community-dwelling seniors, the hip fracture rates in control groups ranged from 1.1 to 7.4%, and the pooled risk difference with hip protector allocation was 0% [95% confidence intervals (CI), -1%, +1%), with a relative risk of 1.07 (0.81, 1.42). In three trials including 1,188 institutionalized elderly participants, hip fracture rates in the control groups varied from 8 to 19.4%, and the pooled risk difference for sustaining one or more hip fractures with hip protector allocation was -3.7% (95% CI, -7.4%, 0.1%), with a relative risk of 0.56 (0.31, 1.01) (with statistically significant heterogeneity of treatment effect). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of two trials comprised of exclusively nursing home residents, the risk difference with hip protector allocation was -4.4% (-8.09, -0.76) with a relative risk of 0.50 (0.28, 0.91) ( n =1,014). Thus, there is little evidence to support the use of hip protectors outside the nursing home setting. The potential benefit of hip protectors in reducing hip fractures in nursing home residents requires further confirmation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00198-005-1932-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 2005-12, Vol.16 (12), p.1461-1474
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218828521
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Clinical trials
Endocrinology
Fractures
Health sciences
Hip joint
Institutionalization
Medicine
Morbidity
Mortality
Nursing homes
Older people
Osteoporosis
Rheumatology
Systematic review
Underwear
title Do hip protectors decrease the risk of hip fracture in institutional and community-dwelling elderly? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A40%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20hip%20protectors%20decrease%20the%20risk%20of%20hip%20fracture%20in%20institutional%20and%20community-dwelling%20elderly?%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Sawka,%20Anna%20M.&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1461&rft.epage=1474&rft.pages=1461-1474&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00198-005-1932-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E943514251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218828521&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true