The Effect of Collaborative Writing on Iranian EFL Learners' Task Achievement in Writing and Their Perception

Collaborative writing has gained interest in the last decade; however, as stated by Shin, Lidster and Sabraw (2016) more research is required to delve into various aspects of this multifarious class activity. This true experimental research examined the effect of writing collaboratively on task achi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of applied linguistics & English literature 2018-01, Vol.7 (1), p.113
Hauptverfasser: Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein, Samadi, Farideh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 113
container_title International journal of applied linguistics & English literature
container_volume 7
creator Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein
Samadi, Farideh
description Collaborative writing has gained interest in the last decade; however, as stated by Shin, Lidster and Sabraw (2016) more research is required to delve into various aspects of this multifarious class activity. This true experimental research examined the effect of writing collaboratively on task achievement of Iranian EFL learners in writing. Oxford Placement Test was given to 60 language learners in the city of Kashmar, Iran,  as the test of homogeneity. Considering +/-1 standard deviation of the mean score, 40 learners were chosen to pursue the purpose of the study. These learners formed an experimental group and a control group with 20 participants in each. Collaborative writing was implemented in the experimental group and individual writing was used in the comparison group. The participants in the experimental group were later interviewed and their perception toward collaborative writing was investigated. The findings of the study through t-test revealed that the experimental group participants outperformed the ones in the control group in terms of task achievement. In addition, the results of the semi-structured interview through thematic analysis revealed that most participants found collaborative writing effective in terms of motivation, peer feedback, comprehensive view over the topic, changing ineffective writing habits, and vocabulary learning; though peer authority and teacher authority were considered as inhibiting factors. Pedagogical implications are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2188099842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2188099842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1302-fdf4644b7db88de1dea2fddc7dbafca6e702f706fd529a286677ca1e96877e623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOHS_wYAXXrUm6UfayzE2HRT0YuJlOEtPXGaX1KQb-O_tmHp13gPvBzyE3HGWykIWj2BBp3YHHXbpMZUu5X3KeXZBJkIwlmR5IS7_dFGLazKNcccY41nOZcEmZL_eIl0Yg3qg3tC57zrY-ACDPSJ9D3aw7oN6R1cBnAVHF8uGNgjBYYgPdA3xk8701uIR9-gGat1_CFxLx3Ib6CsGjf1gvbslVwa6iNPfe0Pelov1_DlpXp5W81mTaJ4xkZjW5GWeb2S7qaoWeYsgTNvq8QejoUTJhJGsNG0hahBVWUqpgWNdVlJiKbIbcn_u7YP_OmAc1M4fghsnleBVxeq6yk8ueXbp4GMMaFQf7B7Ct-JMnfCqE151xquOSjrFezXizX4AjABzMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2188099842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Collaborative Writing on Iranian EFL Learners' Task Achievement in Writing and Their Perception</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein ; Samadi, Farideh</creator><creatorcontrib>Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein ; Samadi, Farideh</creatorcontrib><description>Collaborative writing has gained interest in the last decade; however, as stated by Shin, Lidster and Sabraw (2016) more research is required to delve into various aspects of this multifarious class activity. This true experimental research examined the effect of writing collaboratively on task achievement of Iranian EFL learners in writing. Oxford Placement Test was given to 60 language learners in the city of Kashmar, Iran,  as the test of homogeneity. Considering +/-1 standard deviation of the mean score, 40 learners were chosen to pursue the purpose of the study. These learners formed an experimental group and a control group with 20 participants in each. Collaborative writing was implemented in the experimental group and individual writing was used in the comparison group. The participants in the experimental group were later interviewed and their perception toward collaborative writing was investigated. The findings of the study through t-test revealed that the experimental group participants outperformed the ones in the control group in terms of task achievement. In addition, the results of the semi-structured interview through thematic analysis revealed that most participants found collaborative writing effective in terms of motivation, peer feedback, comprehensive view over the topic, changing ineffective writing habits, and vocabulary learning; though peer authority and teacher authority were considered as inhibiting factors. Pedagogical implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2200-3592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2200-3452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Footscray: Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC)</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Cooperative learning ; Educational activities ; English as a second language instruction ; English as a second language learning ; Feedback ; Learning outcomes ; Second language vocabulary learning ; Second language writing ; Writing</subject><ispartof>International journal of applied linguistics &amp; English literature, 2018-01, Vol.7 (1), p.113</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1302-fdf4644b7db88de1dea2fddc7dbafca6e702f706fd529a286677ca1e96877e623</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samadi, Farideh</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Collaborative Writing on Iranian EFL Learners' Task Achievement in Writing and Their Perception</title><title>International journal of applied linguistics &amp; English literature</title><description>Collaborative writing has gained interest in the last decade; however, as stated by Shin, Lidster and Sabraw (2016) more research is required to delve into various aspects of this multifarious class activity. This true experimental research examined the effect of writing collaboratively on task achievement of Iranian EFL learners in writing. Oxford Placement Test was given to 60 language learners in the city of Kashmar, Iran,  as the test of homogeneity. Considering +/-1 standard deviation of the mean score, 40 learners were chosen to pursue the purpose of the study. These learners formed an experimental group and a control group with 20 participants in each. Collaborative writing was implemented in the experimental group and individual writing was used in the comparison group. The participants in the experimental group were later interviewed and their perception toward collaborative writing was investigated. The findings of the study through t-test revealed that the experimental group participants outperformed the ones in the control group in terms of task achievement. In addition, the results of the semi-structured interview through thematic analysis revealed that most participants found collaborative writing effective in terms of motivation, peer feedback, comprehensive view over the topic, changing ineffective writing habits, and vocabulary learning; though peer authority and teacher authority were considered as inhibiting factors. Pedagogical implications are discussed.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>English as a second language instruction</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Learning outcomes</subject><subject>Second language vocabulary learning</subject><subject>Second language writing</subject><subject>Writing</subject><issn>2200-3592</issn><issn>2200-3452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOHS_wYAXXrUm6UfayzE2HRT0YuJlOEtPXGaX1KQb-O_tmHp13gPvBzyE3HGWykIWj2BBp3YHHXbpMZUu5X3KeXZBJkIwlmR5IS7_dFGLazKNcccY41nOZcEmZL_eIl0Yg3qg3tC57zrY-ACDPSJ9D3aw7oN6R1cBnAVHF8uGNgjBYYgPdA3xk8701uIR9-gGat1_CFxLx3Ib6CsGjf1gvbslVwa6iNPfe0Pelov1_DlpXp5W81mTaJ4xkZjW5GWeb2S7qaoWeYsgTNvq8QejoUTJhJGsNG0hahBVWUqpgWNdVlJiKbIbcn_u7YP_OmAc1M4fghsnleBVxeq6yk8ueXbp4GMMaFQf7B7Ct-JMnfCqE151xquOSjrFezXizX4AjABzMQ</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein</creator><creator>Samadi, Farideh</creator><general>Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>The Effect of Collaborative Writing on Iranian EFL Learners' Task Achievement in Writing and Their Perception</title><author>Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein ; Samadi, Farideh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1302-fdf4644b7db88de1dea2fddc7dbafca6e702f706fd529a286677ca1e96877e623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>English as a second language instruction</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Learning outcomes</topic><topic>Second language vocabulary learning</topic><topic>Second language writing</topic><topic>Writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samadi, Farideh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International journal of applied linguistics &amp; English literature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khodabakhshzadeh, Hossein</au><au>Samadi, Farideh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Collaborative Writing on Iranian EFL Learners' Task Achievement in Writing and Their Perception</atitle><jtitle>International journal of applied linguistics &amp; English literature</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>113</spage><pages>113-</pages><issn>2200-3592</issn><eissn>2200-3452</eissn><abstract>Collaborative writing has gained interest in the last decade; however, as stated by Shin, Lidster and Sabraw (2016) more research is required to delve into various aspects of this multifarious class activity. This true experimental research examined the effect of writing collaboratively on task achievement of Iranian EFL learners in writing. Oxford Placement Test was given to 60 language learners in the city of Kashmar, Iran,  as the test of homogeneity. Considering +/-1 standard deviation of the mean score, 40 learners were chosen to pursue the purpose of the study. These learners formed an experimental group and a control group with 20 participants in each. Collaborative writing was implemented in the experimental group and individual writing was used in the comparison group. The participants in the experimental group were later interviewed and their perception toward collaborative writing was investigated. The findings of the study through t-test revealed that the experimental group participants outperformed the ones in the control group in terms of task achievement. In addition, the results of the semi-structured interview through thematic analysis revealed that most participants found collaborative writing effective in terms of motivation, peer feedback, comprehensive view over the topic, changing ineffective writing habits, and vocabulary learning; though peer authority and teacher authority were considered as inhibiting factors. Pedagogical implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>Footscray</cop><pub>Australian International Academic Centre PTY. Ltd (AIAC)</pub><doi>10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.113</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2200-3592
ispartof International journal of applied linguistics & English literature, 2018-01, Vol.7 (1), p.113
issn 2200-3592
2200-3452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2188099842
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Collaboration
Cooperative learning
Educational activities
English as a second language instruction
English as a second language learning
Feedback
Learning outcomes
Second language vocabulary learning
Second language writing
Writing
title The Effect of Collaborative Writing on Iranian EFL Learners' Task Achievement in Writing and Their Perception
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A01%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Collaborative%20Writing%20on%20Iranian%20EFL%20Learners'%20Task%20Achievement%20in%20Writing%20and%20Their%20Perception&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20applied%20linguistics%20&%20English%20literature&rft.au=Khodabakhshzadeh,%20Hossein&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=113&rft.pages=113-&rft.issn=2200-3592&rft.eissn=2200-3452&rft_id=info:doi/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.1p.113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2188099842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2188099842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true