A Longitudinal Examination of FDA Warning and Untitled Letters Issued to Pharmaceutical Companies for Violations in Drug Promotion Standards

This study examined over-time differences in the nature and frequency of Food and Drug Administration warning and untitled letters issued to pharmaceutical companies. Across a 12-year time frame, results indicate that frequency of letters and specific violations rose steadily from 2005 to 2010 but h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of consumer affairs 2019-03, Vol.53 (1), p.3-23
Hauptverfasser: LIMBU, YAM B., MCKINLEY, CHRISTOPHER, TEMPERINI, VALERIO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study examined over-time differences in the nature and frequency of Food and Drug Administration warning and untitled letters issued to pharmaceutical companies. Across a 12-year time frame, results indicate that frequency of letters and specific violations rose steadily from 2005 to 2010 but have since fallen dramatically. When infractions do occur, they continue to result from the omission or lack of risk information, misleading/false claims, omission of material facts, and labeling issues. In addition, the findings show that violations occur most frequently on brochures, sales aids, corporate websites, and print ads, with the proportion of violations on Internet media rising consistently over-time. Overall, while these findings offer encouragement to those wary of deceptive marketing practices, given the increased proportion of violations within digital marketing platforms coupled with the rare, yet consistent tendency of companies to misrepresent product risk and/or efficacy information, continued focus must be given to consumer education initiatives.
ISSN:0022-0078
1745-6606
DOI:10.1111/joca.12189