Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited
The ongoing growth of the field of transdisciplinary research primarily takes place in transformative practice when specific challenges and problems arise. Usually there is little space for conceptual and theoretical reflection. This paper offers a comprehensive frame of reference for the epistemolo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Gaia (Heidelberg, Germany) Germany), 2017-12, Vol.26 (4), p.341-347 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | ger |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 347 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 341 |
| container_title | Gaia (Heidelberg, Germany) |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Krohn, Wolfgang Grunwald, Armin Ukowitz, Martina |
| description | The ongoing growth of the field of transdisciplinary research primarily takes place in transformative practice when specific challenges and problems arise. Usually there is little space for conceptual and theoretical reflection. This paper offers a comprehensive frame of reference for the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. Based on the principle of sustainable development, the discussion focuses on the constitution of its research objects, the need for contextualization in the experimental practice, challenges and possibilities of generalization of the knowledge created and specifics of the methodology to be applied. This paper does not aim to reach a concluding diagnosis of these items, but rather adds to the further debate on the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. The authors thereby expect that the practice of transdisciplinarity and its position within the field of science will benefit from theoretical reflection. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.14512/gaia.26.4.11 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2187376919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2187376919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21873769193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyjsOgkAUQNEXo4n4Ke1JTOwY580HpDYSF0BPJjLiEAI4DyxcjztxY1q4AKtbnAuwQc5QaRT7yjjDRMwUQ5xAIGKhI61QTiHgqeKR1prPYUFUcy41ogpgl3vTUuno6frGte-Xt2HWebrcxrYKvX04coMtVzC7mobs-tclbLNTfjxHve_uo6WhqLvRt18qBB4SmcQppvK_6wMovjcP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2187376919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited</title><source>IngentaConnect</source><creator>Krohn, Wolfgang ; Grunwald, Armin ; Ukowitz, Martina</creator><creatorcontrib>Krohn, Wolfgang ; Grunwald, Armin ; Ukowitz, Martina</creatorcontrib><description>The ongoing growth of the field of transdisciplinary research primarily takes place in transformative practice when specific challenges and problems arise. Usually there is little space for conceptual and theoretical reflection. This paper offers a comprehensive frame of reference for the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. Based on the principle of sustainable development, the discussion focuses on the constitution of its research objects, the need for contextualization in the experimental practice, challenges and possibilities of generalization of the knowledge created and specifics of the methodology to be applied. This paper does not aim to reach a concluding diagnosis of these items, but rather adds to the further debate on the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. The authors thereby expect that the practice of transdisciplinarity and its position within the field of science will benefit from theoretical reflection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-5550</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2625-5413</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14512/gaia.26.4.11</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Munich: Oekom - Gesellschaft fuer Oekologische Kommunikation mbH</publisher><subject>Constitution ; Epistemology ; Reflection ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Gaia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2017-12, Vol.26 (4), p.341-347</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oekom - Gesellschaft fuer Oekologische Kommunikation mbH 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krohn, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ukowitz, Martina</creatorcontrib><title>Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited</title><title>Gaia (Heidelberg, Germany)</title><description>The ongoing growth of the field of transdisciplinary research primarily takes place in transformative practice when specific challenges and problems arise. Usually there is little space for conceptual and theoretical reflection. This paper offers a comprehensive frame of reference for the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. Based on the principle of sustainable development, the discussion focuses on the constitution of its research objects, the need for contextualization in the experimental practice, challenges and possibilities of generalization of the knowledge created and specifics of the methodology to be applied. This paper does not aim to reach a concluding diagnosis of these items, but rather adds to the further debate on the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. The authors thereby expect that the practice of transdisciplinarity and its position within the field of science will benefit from theoretical reflection.</description><subject>Constitution</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0940-5550</issn><issn>2625-5413</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyjsOgkAUQNEXo4n4Ke1JTOwY580HpDYSF0BPJjLiEAI4DyxcjztxY1q4AKtbnAuwQc5QaRT7yjjDRMwUQ5xAIGKhI61QTiHgqeKR1prPYUFUcy41ogpgl3vTUuno6frGte-Xt2HWebrcxrYKvX04coMtVzC7mobs-tclbLNTfjxHve_uo6WhqLvRt18qBB4SmcQppvK_6wMovjcP</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Krohn, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Grunwald, Armin</creator><creator>Ukowitz, Martina</creator><general>Oekom - Gesellschaft fuer Oekologische Kommunikation mbH</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited</title><author>Krohn, Wolfgang ; Grunwald, Armin ; Ukowitz, Martina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21873769193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Constitution</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krohn, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grunwald, Armin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ukowitz, Martina</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Gaia (Heidelberg, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krohn, Wolfgang</au><au>Grunwald, Armin</au><au>Ukowitz, Martina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited</atitle><jtitle>Gaia (Heidelberg, Germany)</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>341-347</pages><issn>0940-5550</issn><eissn>2625-5413</eissn><abstract>The ongoing growth of the field of transdisciplinary research primarily takes place in transformative practice when specific challenges and problems arise. Usually there is little space for conceptual and theoretical reflection. This paper offers a comprehensive frame of reference for the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. Based on the principle of sustainable development, the discussion focuses on the constitution of its research objects, the need for contextualization in the experimental practice, challenges and possibilities of generalization of the knowledge created and specifics of the methodology to be applied. This paper does not aim to reach a concluding diagnosis of these items, but rather adds to the further debate on the epistemological structure of transdisciplinary research. The authors thereby expect that the practice of transdisciplinarity and its position within the field of science will benefit from theoretical reflection.</abstract><cop>Munich</cop><pub>Oekom - Gesellschaft fuer Oekologische Kommunikation mbH</pub><doi>10.14512/gaia.26.4.11</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0940-5550 |
| ispartof | Gaia (Heidelberg, Germany), 2017-12, Vol.26 (4), p.341-347 |
| issn | 0940-5550 2625-5413 |
| language | ger |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2187376919 |
| source | IngentaConnect |
| subjects | Constitution Epistemology Reflection Sustainable development |
| title | Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A20%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transdisziplin%C3%A4re%20Forschung%20revisited&rft.jtitle=Gaia%20(Heidelberg,%20Germany)&rft.au=Krohn,%20Wolfgang&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=341-347&rft.issn=0940-5550&rft.eissn=2625-5413&rft_id=info:doi/10.14512/gaia.26.4.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2187376919%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2187376919&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |