Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA

Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agroforestry systems 2019-02, Vol.93 (1), p.67-79
Hauptverfasser: Ford, Madeline M., Zamora, Diomy S., Current, Dean, Magner, Joe, Wyatt, Gary, Walter, W. D., Vaughan, Sophia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 79
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Agroforestry systems
container_volume 93
creator Ford, Madeline M.
Zamora, Diomy S.
Current, Dean
Magner, Joe
Wyatt, Gary
Walter, W. D.
Vaughan, Sophia
description Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2185820014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2185820014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d9ece92b103a00f0e00430027c41c7e3759762566a1051bf9da657d379141b0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscW1gNz92wg1V_FQq4gA9W07ilJTUTm23qDwGT4yjInHisNqV5puxPIRcIlwjAL9xCGnGI8AwUOQRHpERZjyOCpbDMRkBMh6lCWOn5My5FQSI8XxEvmfrXlaemoaupZZLVdNPY-pO6pourfxq9ZIaTRtjg0Y3W6l96_eT4erCQQeua3fKeVN90F7ZQIagSt1S_65ob7wKDtkNCdS13c700vmtVbTVdBo0G7TnVmvljJcTuni9OycnjeycuvjdY7J4uH-bPkXzl8fZ9G4eVUlW-KguVKWKuERIJEADCiBNAGJepVhxlfCs4CzOGJMIGZZNUUuW8TrhBaZYQpmMydUht7dmsw0_ECuztTo8KWLMszwGwDRQeKAqa5yzqhG9bdfS7gWCGKoXh-pFqF4M1QsMnvjgcYHVS2X_kv83_QBciogE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185820014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Ford, Madeline M. ; Zamora, Diomy S. ; Current, Dean ; Magner, Joe ; Wyatt, Gary ; Walter, W. D. ; Vaughan, Sophia</creator><creatorcontrib>Ford, Madeline M. ; Zamora, Diomy S. ; Current, Dean ; Magner, Joe ; Wyatt, Gary ; Walter, W. D. ; Vaughan, Sophia</creatorcontrib><description>Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Alliances ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Forage ; Forestry ; Grazing ; Land management ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Pasture ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2019-02, Vol.93 (1), p.67-79</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Agroforestry Systems is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d9ece92b103a00f0e00430027c41c7e3759762566a1051bf9da657d379141b0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d9ece92b103a00f0e00430027c41c7e3759762566a1051bf9da657d379141b0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1340-0383</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907,41470,42539,51301</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ford, Madeline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, Diomy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Current, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Sophia</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscW1gNz92wg1V_FQq4gA9W07ilJTUTm23qDwGT4yjInHisNqV5puxPIRcIlwjAL9xCGnGI8AwUOQRHpERZjyOCpbDMRkBMh6lCWOn5My5FQSI8XxEvmfrXlaemoaupZZLVdNPY-pO6pourfxq9ZIaTRtjg0Y3W6l96_eT4erCQQeua3fKeVN90F7ZQIagSt1S_65ob7wKDtkNCdS13c700vmtVbTVdBo0G7TnVmvljJcTuni9OycnjeycuvjdY7J4uH-bPkXzl8fZ9G4eVUlW-KguVKWKuERIJEADCiBNAGJepVhxlfCs4CzOGJMIGZZNUUuW8TrhBaZYQpmMydUht7dmsw0_ECuztTo8KWLMszwGwDRQeKAqa5yzqhG9bdfS7gWCGKoXh-pFqF4M1QsMnvjgcYHVS2X_kv83_QBciogE</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Ford, Madeline M.</creator><creator>Zamora, Diomy S.</creator><creator>Current, Dean</creator><creator>Magner, Joe</creator><creator>Wyatt, Gary</creator><creator>Walter, W. D.</creator><creator>Vaughan, Sophia</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-0383</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA</title><author>Ford, Madeline M. ; Zamora, Diomy S. ; Current, Dean ; Magner, Joe ; Wyatt, Gary ; Walter, W. D. ; Vaughan, Sophia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-d9ece92b103a00f0e00430027c41c7e3759762566a1051bf9da657d379141b0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ford, Madeline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamora, Diomy S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Current, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, W. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaughan, Sophia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ford, Madeline M.</au><au>Zamora, Diomy S.</au><au>Current, Dean</au><au>Magner, Joe</au><au>Wyatt, Gary</au><au>Walter, W. D.</au><au>Vaughan, Sophia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>67-79</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><abstract>Over 177,000 ha of woodlands in Minnesota, USA are grazed. In general, these woodlands are not managed specifically for timber or cattle benefits. This lack of management often leads to decreased timber value and reduced forage yields. Silvopasture is a potential alternative to overcome this lack of land management on Minnesota woodlots. However, very limited information are available about silvopasture use in Minnesota. This three-year study evaluated the potential for silvopasture in Minnesota by comparing the production of unmanaged woodland grazing, silvopastoral, and open pasture systems. Three farmers from Central Minnesota collaborated in this study to assess these grazing systems. Silvopasture paddocks were established when thinning and seeding were performed on woodland areas. We assessed forage production, forage quality, and livestock performance. Forage production was generally greater in silvopastoral systems compared with unmanaged woodland grazing systems, while forage quality was lower in open pasture systems, at least during the first year. Livestock performance was similar between the grazing systems. Results indicate that silvopasture has potential in Minnesota, but more research is required to develop specific management guidelines as well as to monitor silvopasture production systems for longer periods of time.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-0383</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4366
ispartof Agroforestry systems, 2019-02, Vol.93 (1), p.67-79
issn 0167-4366
1572-9680
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2185820014
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agriculture
Alliances
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Forage
Forestry
Grazing
Land management
Life Sciences
Livestock
Pasture
Woodlands
title Impact of managed woodland grazing on forage quantity, quality and livestock performance: the potential for silvopasture in Central Minnesota, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A08%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20managed%20woodland%20grazing%20on%20forage%20quantity,%20quality%20and%20livestock%20performance:%20the%20potential%20for%20silvopasture%20in%20Central%20Minnesota,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Ford,%20Madeline%20M.&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=67-79&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-017-0098-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2185820014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185820014&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true