If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?

With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2019-02, Vol.46 (3), p.1681-1689
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Marena, Huybers, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1689
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1681
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 46
creator Lin, Marena
Huybers, Peter
description With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p > 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction. Plain Language Summary Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change. Key Points A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018GL079709
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2185588779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2185588779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscW1gbSdxfEKl6k-kQKWqnC3XcaRUqV3sVLRvj6EcOHHaOXyzuzMI3RN4JEDFEwVSzCvggoO4QAMi0jQpAPglGgCIqCnPr9FNCFsAYMDIAMmywSvVWjxTXRdwFKWtW4WVrfGbw0tr8Mrsne8DLvsRHnuDF23onW-16vDaG1v_uF6dDc5ZPD323uxMwC-tCqZ-vkVXjeqCufudQ_Q-m64ni6RazsvJuEo0S9M8ySgFphnoTR5_502WUqOIVrlmDWGcM6apEhmHtOY6NbwRlOV0Ex1NpGOYIXo4791793EwoZdbd_A2npSUFFlWFJyLSI3OlPYuBG8aufftTvmTJCC_K5R_K4w4PeOfbWdO_7JyvqqygmU5-wI0oW74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185588779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</title><source>Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Lin, Marena ; Huybers, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Marena ; Huybers, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p &gt; 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction. Plain Language Summary Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change. Key Points A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018GL079709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Access ; Agriculture ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Computer simulation ; Daily precipitation ; Data ; extreme events ; Extreme weather ; floods ; Gauges ; Hydrologic data ; Interpolation ; Monsoon precipitation ; Monsoon rainfall ; Monsoons ; Precipitation ; precipitation observations ; Rain ; Rain gauges ; Rainfall ; Rainfall data ; Replication ; Satellite observation ; Satellites ; South Asian monsoon ; Temporal variations ; Trends ; Weather ; Weather station data ; Weather stations ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2019-02, Vol.46 (3), p.1681-1689</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4610-5938 ; 0000-0002-3734-8145</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018GL079709$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018GL079709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Marena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huybers, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p &gt; 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction. Plain Language Summary Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change. Key Points A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Daily precipitation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>extreme events</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>floods</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Monsoon precipitation</subject><subject>Monsoon rainfall</subject><subject>Monsoons</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>precipitation observations</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall data</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>South Asian monsoon</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather station data</subject><subject>Weather stations</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscW1gbSdxfEKl6k-kQKWqnC3XcaRUqV3sVLRvj6EcOHHaOXyzuzMI3RN4JEDFEwVSzCvggoO4QAMi0jQpAPglGgCIqCnPr9FNCFsAYMDIAMmywSvVWjxTXRdwFKWtW4WVrfGbw0tr8Mrsne8DLvsRHnuDF23onW-16vDaG1v_uF6dDc5ZPD323uxMwC-tCqZ-vkVXjeqCufudQ_Q-m64ni6RazsvJuEo0S9M8ySgFphnoTR5_502WUqOIVrlmDWGcM6apEhmHtOY6NbwRlOV0Ex1NpGOYIXo4791793EwoZdbd_A2npSUFFlWFJyLSI3OlPYuBG8aufftTvmTJCC_K5R_K4w4PeOfbWdO_7JyvqqygmU5-wI0oW74</recordid><startdate>20190216</startdate><enddate>20190216</enddate><creator>Lin, Marena</creator><creator>Huybers, Peter</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-5938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-8145</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190216</creationdate><title>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</title><author>Lin, Marena ; Huybers, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Daily precipitation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>extreme events</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>floods</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Monsoon precipitation</topic><topic>Monsoon rainfall</topic><topic>Monsoons</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>precipitation observations</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall data</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>South Asian monsoon</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather station data</topic><topic>Weather stations</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Marena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huybers, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Marena</au><au>Huybers, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2019-02-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1681</spage><epage>1689</epage><pages>1681-1689</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p &gt; 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction. Plain Language Summary Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change. Key Points A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018GL079709</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-5938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-8145</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2019-02, Vol.46 (3), p.1681-1689
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2185588779
source Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Access
Agriculture
Atmospheric precipitations
Climate change
Climate models
Computer simulation
Daily precipitation
Data
extreme events
Extreme weather
floods
Gauges
Hydrologic data
Interpolation
Monsoon precipitation
Monsoon rainfall
Monsoons
Precipitation
precipitation observations
Rain
Rain gauges
Rainfall
Rainfall data
Replication
Satellite observation
Satellites
South Asian monsoon
Temporal variations
Trends
Weather
Weather station data
Weather stations
Wind
title If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A09%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=If%20Rain%20Falls%20in%20India%20and%20No%20One%20Reports%20It,%20Are%20Historical%20Trends%20in%20Monsoon%20Extremes%20Biased?&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Lin,%20Marena&rft.date=2019-02-16&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1681&rft.epage=1689&rft.pages=1681-1689&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018GL079709&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2185588779%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185588779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true