If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?
With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2019-02, Vol.46 (3), p.1681-1689 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1689 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1681 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Lin, Marena Huybers, Peter |
description | With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p > 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction.
Plain Language Summary
Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change.
Key Points
A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates
Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018GL079709 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2185588779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2185588779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscW1gbSdxfEKl6k-kQKWqnC3XcaRUqV3sVLRvj6EcOHHaOXyzuzMI3RN4JEDFEwVSzCvggoO4QAMi0jQpAPglGgCIqCnPr9FNCFsAYMDIAMmywSvVWjxTXRdwFKWtW4WVrfGbw0tr8Mrsne8DLvsRHnuDF23onW-16vDaG1v_uF6dDc5ZPD323uxMwC-tCqZ-vkVXjeqCufudQ_Q-m64ni6RazsvJuEo0S9M8ySgFphnoTR5_502WUqOIVrlmDWGcM6apEhmHtOY6NbwRlOV0Ex1NpGOYIXo4791793EwoZdbd_A2npSUFFlWFJyLSI3OlPYuBG8aufftTvmTJCC_K5R_K4w4PeOfbWdO_7JyvqqygmU5-wI0oW74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185588779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</title><source>Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Lin, Marena ; Huybers, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Marena ; Huybers, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p > 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction.
Plain Language Summary
Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change.
Key Points
A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates
Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018GL079709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Access ; Agriculture ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Computer simulation ; Daily precipitation ; Data ; extreme events ; Extreme weather ; floods ; Gauges ; Hydrologic data ; Interpolation ; Monsoon precipitation ; Monsoon rainfall ; Monsoons ; Precipitation ; precipitation observations ; Rain ; Rain gauges ; Rainfall ; Rainfall data ; Replication ; Satellite observation ; Satellites ; South Asian monsoon ; Temporal variations ; Trends ; Weather ; Weather station data ; Weather stations ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2019-02, Vol.46 (3), p.1681-1689</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4610-5938 ; 0000-0002-3734-8145</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018GL079709$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018GL079709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Marena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huybers, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p > 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction.
Plain Language Summary
Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change.
Key Points
A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates
Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Daily precipitation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>extreme events</subject><subject>Extreme weather</subject><subject>floods</subject><subject>Gauges</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Monsoon precipitation</subject><subject>Monsoon rainfall</subject><subject>Monsoons</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>precipitation observations</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall data</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>Satellite observation</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>South Asian monsoon</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather station data</subject><subject>Weather stations</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4wEscW1gbSdxfEKl6k-kQKWqnC3XcaRUqV3sVLRvj6EcOHHaOXyzuzMI3RN4JEDFEwVSzCvggoO4QAMi0jQpAPglGgCIqCnPr9FNCFsAYMDIAMmywSvVWjxTXRdwFKWtW4WVrfGbw0tr8Mrsne8DLvsRHnuDF23onW-16vDaG1v_uF6dDc5ZPD323uxMwC-tCqZ-vkVXjeqCufudQ_Q-m64ni6RazsvJuEo0S9M8ySgFphnoTR5_502WUqOIVrlmDWGcM6apEhmHtOY6NbwRlOV0Ex1NpGOYIXo4791793EwoZdbd_A2npSUFFlWFJyLSI3OlPYuBG8aufftTvmTJCC_K5R_K4w4PeOfbWdO_7JyvqqygmU5-wI0oW74</recordid><startdate>20190216</startdate><enddate>20190216</enddate><creator>Lin, Marena</creator><creator>Huybers, Peter</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-5938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-8145</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190216</creationdate><title>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</title><author>Lin, Marena ; Huybers, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3446-52203c30cb67097f542ea1ca6c3f137733c2a95704d7c4e7f92362bc30f97f003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Daily precipitation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>extreme events</topic><topic>Extreme weather</topic><topic>floods</topic><topic>Gauges</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Monsoon precipitation</topic><topic>Monsoon rainfall</topic><topic>Monsoons</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>precipitation observations</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall data</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>Satellite observation</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>South Asian monsoon</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather station data</topic><topic>Weather stations</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Marena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huybers, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Marena</au><au>Huybers, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased?</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2019-02-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1681</spage><epage>1689</epage><pages>1681-1689</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>With two thirds of the total Indian population employed by the agriculture sector, changes in Indian monsoon precipitation have widespread implications for human welfare. Increased extreme precipitation since 1950 has been widely reported for central India. Major studies have relied upon the gridded daily precipitation observations provided by the India Meteorological Department (IMD), which assimilate observations from a variable network of weather stations. Replicating the IMD's interpolation method on satellite‐based precipitation observations, however, indicates that temporal changes in the observing weather station network introduce a jump in the record toward more extreme rainfall after 1975. Trends evaluated across this jump are suspect, and trends evaluated subsequent to it are insignificant (p > 0.1). This positive bias may also mask declines in average monsoon rainfall. Greater accuracy in these trends may resolve distinctions between climate model simulations of future changes. Access to the underlying data from IMD rain‐gauges would facilitate improved rainfall reconstruction.
Plain Language Summary
Previously reported trends in daily monsoon rainfall since 1950 have been estimated using interpolated weather station observations released by the India Meteorological Department. The number of reporting weather stations changes over time, and poor coverage by weather stations can overlook extreme rainfall events. By applying the interpolation of this changing network to satellite‐based rainfall data, we show that the changing coverage of weather stations in the Indian rainfall data leads to spurious increases in extreme rainfall. This suggests that previously reported trends of extreme rainfall are biased positive. Access to the raw weather station data would improve our ability to track changes in the Indian monsoon and assess modeled predictions given climate change.
Key Points
A method is introduced to diagnose how changes in gauge locations bias rainfall estimates
Central Indian rainfall estimates from 1951 to 2016 are biased toward increasing extreme rainfall</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018GL079709</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-5938</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-8145</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2019-02, Vol.46 (3), p.1681-1689 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2185588779 |
source | Wiley Online Library AGU Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Access Agriculture Atmospheric precipitations Climate change Climate models Computer simulation Daily precipitation Data extreme events Extreme weather floods Gauges Hydrologic data Interpolation Monsoon precipitation Monsoon rainfall Monsoons Precipitation precipitation observations Rain Rain gauges Rainfall Rainfall data Replication Satellite observation Satellites South Asian monsoon Temporal variations Trends Weather Weather station data Weather stations Wind |
title | If Rain Falls in India and No One Reports It, Are Historical Trends in Monsoon Extremes Biased? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A09%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=If%20Rain%20Falls%20in%20India%20and%20No%20One%20Reports%20It,%20Are%20Historical%20Trends%20in%20Monsoon%20Extremes%20Biased?&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Lin,%20Marena&rft.date=2019-02-16&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1681&rft.epage=1689&rft.pages=1681-1689&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018GL079709&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2185588779%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185588779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |