Methane Emissions from the Marcellus Shale in Southwestern Pennsylvania and Northern West Virginia Based on Airborne Measurements
Natural gas production in the United States has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH4) fugitive emissions and its climate impacts. Quantification of CH4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically soun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2019-02, Vol.124 (3), p.1862-1878 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1878 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1862 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Ren, Xinrong Hall, Dolly L. Vinciguerra, Timothy Benish, Sarah E. Stratton, Philip R. Ahn, Doyeon Hansford, Jonathan R. Cohen, Mark D. Sahu, Sayantan He, Hao Grimes, Courtney Fuentes, Jose D. Shepson, Paul B. Salawitch, Ross J. Ehrman, Sheryl H. Dickerson, Russell R. |
description | Natural gas production in the United States has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH4) fugitive emissions and its climate impacts. Quantification of CH4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically sound policies for mitigating greenhouse gases. We use the aircraft mass balance approach for three flight experiments in August and September 2015 to estimate CH4 emissions from O&NG operations over the southwestern Marcellus Shale. We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate as 21.2 kg/s with 28% coming from O&NG operations. The mean CH4 emission rate from O&NG operations was estimated to be 1.1% of total NG production. The individual best‐estimate emission rates from the three flight experiments ranged from 0.78 to 1.5%, with overall limits of 0% and 3.5%. These emission rates are at the low end of other top‐down studies, but consistent with the few observational studies in the Marcellus Shale region as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CH4 inventory. A substantial source of CH4 (~70% of observed CH4 emissions) was found to contain little ethane, possibly due to coalbed CH4 emitted either directly from coal mines or from wells drilled through coalbed layers in O&NG operations. Recent regulations requiring capture of gas from the completion‐venting step of hydraulic fracturing appear to have reduced the atmospheric release of CH4. Our study suggests that for a 20‐year time scale, energy derived from the combustion of natural gas extracted from this region likely exerts a net climate benefit compared to coal.
Plain Language Summary
In this study methane (CH4) emission rates were estimated for the southwest Marcellus Shale based on airborne observations. A mean emission rate of ~21 kg CH4/s was observed from a 4,200‐km2 study area. A significant portion (~70%) of the emitted CH4 was found to originate likely from coalbeds. Our mean estimated emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production indicates a climate benefit of natural gas combustion compared to coal, but the full range includes values above the 2.4% break‐even point for the CH4 global warming potential over a 20‐year time horizon.
Key Points
A CH4 emission rate of ~21 kg/s from a 4200 km2 area of the southwestern Marcellus in 2015 with the bulk of the CH4 coming from coalbeds
We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production with a lower limit of 0% and an upper limit of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2018JD029690 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2185035535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2185035535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3689-4dae0f13c8d3494496f16bde2a1e0c924283f3463b1516f5fbc5ff4be3ca40a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEhV0xwdYYkvAju0QL0tbClULiPLaRU4ypq5Su9gJVZf8Oa6KECtmM1e6Zx66UXRC8DnBibhIMMnGg6BSgfeiTkJSEWdCpPu_-vLtMOp6v8ChMkwZZ53oawrNXBpAw6X2XlvjkXJ2iZo5oKl0JdR169FsLmtA2qCZbZv5GnwDzqAHMMZv6k9ptETSVOjOujAXnNdAoBft3vXWupIeKmQN6mlXWBeOTUH61sESTOOPowMlaw_dn34UPV8Pn_o38eR-dNvvTWJJ00zErJKAFaFlVlEmGBOpImlRQSIJ4FIkLMmooiylBeEkVVwVJVeKFUBLybDM6FF0utu7cvajDQ_mC9s6E07mCck4ppxTHqizHVU6670Dla-cXkq3yQnOtznnf3MOON3ha13D5l82H48eB5wTIeg3DT-Aag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185035535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane Emissions from the Marcellus Shale in Southwestern Pennsylvania and Northern West Virginia Based on Airborne Measurements</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ren, Xinrong ; Hall, Dolly L. ; Vinciguerra, Timothy ; Benish, Sarah E. ; Stratton, Philip R. ; Ahn, Doyeon ; Hansford, Jonathan R. ; Cohen, Mark D. ; Sahu, Sayantan ; He, Hao ; Grimes, Courtney ; Fuentes, Jose D. ; Shepson, Paul B. ; Salawitch, Ross J. ; Ehrman, Sheryl H. ; Dickerson, Russell R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xinrong ; Hall, Dolly L. ; Vinciguerra, Timothy ; Benish, Sarah E. ; Stratton, Philip R. ; Ahn, Doyeon ; Hansford, Jonathan R. ; Cohen, Mark D. ; Sahu, Sayantan ; He, Hao ; Grimes, Courtney ; Fuentes, Jose D. ; Shepson, Paul B. ; Salawitch, Ross J. ; Ehrman, Sheryl H. ; Dickerson, Russell R.</creatorcontrib><description>Natural gas production in the United States has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH4) fugitive emissions and its climate impacts. Quantification of CH4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically sound policies for mitigating greenhouse gases. We use the aircraft mass balance approach for three flight experiments in August and September 2015 to estimate CH4 emissions from O&NG operations over the southwestern Marcellus Shale. We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate as 21.2 kg/s with 28% coming from O&NG operations. The mean CH4 emission rate from O&NG operations was estimated to be 1.1% of total NG production. The individual best‐estimate emission rates from the three flight experiments ranged from 0.78 to 1.5%, with overall limits of 0% and 3.5%. These emission rates are at the low end of other top‐down studies, but consistent with the few observational studies in the Marcellus Shale region as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CH4 inventory. A substantial source of CH4 (~70% of observed CH4 emissions) was found to contain little ethane, possibly due to coalbed CH4 emitted either directly from coal mines or from wells drilled through coalbed layers in O&NG operations. Recent regulations requiring capture of gas from the completion‐venting step of hydraulic fracturing appear to have reduced the atmospheric release of CH4. Our study suggests that for a 20‐year time scale, energy derived from the combustion of natural gas extracted from this region likely exerts a net climate benefit compared to coal.
Plain Language Summary
In this study methane (CH4) emission rates were estimated for the southwest Marcellus Shale based on airborne observations. A mean emission rate of ~21 kg CH4/s was observed from a 4,200‐km2 study area. A significant portion (~70%) of the emitted CH4 was found to originate likely from coalbeds. Our mean estimated emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production indicates a climate benefit of natural gas combustion compared to coal, but the full range includes values above the 2.4% break‐even point for the CH4 global warming potential over a 20‐year time horizon.
Key Points
A CH4 emission rate of ~21 kg/s from a 4200 km2 area of the southwestern Marcellus in 2015 with the bulk of the CH4 coming from coalbeds
We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production with a lower limit of 0% and an upper limit of 3.5%
The mean emission rate indicates a climate impact of CH4 combustion below that of coal, but the full range includes values above this point</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018JD029690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Airborne sensing ; Climate ; Climate change ; Coal ; Coal mines ; Coal mining ; Combustion ; emission ; Emission analysis ; Emissions ; Environmental protection ; Ethane ; Flight ; Gas production ; Gases ; Geophysics ; Global warming ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Hydraulic fracturing ; leak rate ; Marcellus ; Mass balance ; Methane ; Methane emissions ; Natural gas ; Observational studies ; Oil and gas production ; oil and natural gas ; Policies ; Sedimentary rocks ; Shale ; Shale gas ; Shales</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-02, Vol.124 (3), p.1862-1878</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3689-4dae0f13c8d3494496f16bde2a1e0c924283f3463b1516f5fbc5ff4be3ca40a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3689-4dae0f13c8d3494496f16bde2a1e0c924283f3463b1516f5fbc5ff4be3ca40a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6823-9603 ; 0000-0002-7925-0568 ; 0000-0001-8597-5832 ; 0000-0001-8699-4429 ; 0000-0003-0206-3083 ; 0000-0003-4057-1652 ; 0000-0003-3183-2558 ; 0000-0002-6177-6326 ; 0000-0001-9974-1666 ; 0000-0003-3906-2199 ; 0000-0002-1726-3291</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018JD029690$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018JD029690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xinrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Dolly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinciguerra, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benish, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Philip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Doyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansford, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes, Jose D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepson, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salawitch, Ross J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Russell R.</creatorcontrib><title>Methane Emissions from the Marcellus Shale in Southwestern Pennsylvania and Northern West Virginia Based on Airborne Measurements</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>Natural gas production in the United States has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH4) fugitive emissions and its climate impacts. Quantification of CH4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically sound policies for mitigating greenhouse gases. We use the aircraft mass balance approach for three flight experiments in August and September 2015 to estimate CH4 emissions from O&NG operations over the southwestern Marcellus Shale. We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate as 21.2 kg/s with 28% coming from O&NG operations. The mean CH4 emission rate from O&NG operations was estimated to be 1.1% of total NG production. The individual best‐estimate emission rates from the three flight experiments ranged from 0.78 to 1.5%, with overall limits of 0% and 3.5%. These emission rates are at the low end of other top‐down studies, but consistent with the few observational studies in the Marcellus Shale region as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CH4 inventory. A substantial source of CH4 (~70% of observed CH4 emissions) was found to contain little ethane, possibly due to coalbed CH4 emitted either directly from coal mines or from wells drilled through coalbed layers in O&NG operations. Recent regulations requiring capture of gas from the completion‐venting step of hydraulic fracturing appear to have reduced the atmospheric release of CH4. Our study suggests that for a 20‐year time scale, energy derived from the combustion of natural gas extracted from this region likely exerts a net climate benefit compared to coal.
Plain Language Summary
In this study methane (CH4) emission rates were estimated for the southwest Marcellus Shale based on airborne observations. A mean emission rate of ~21 kg CH4/s was observed from a 4,200‐km2 study area. A significant portion (~70%) of the emitted CH4 was found to originate likely from coalbeds. Our mean estimated emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production indicates a climate benefit of natural gas combustion compared to coal, but the full range includes values above the 2.4% break‐even point for the CH4 global warming potential over a 20‐year time horizon.
Key Points
A CH4 emission rate of ~21 kg/s from a 4200 km2 area of the southwestern Marcellus in 2015 with the bulk of the CH4 coming from coalbeds
We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production with a lower limit of 0% and an upper limit of 3.5%
The mean emission rate indicates a climate impact of CH4 combustion below that of coal, but the full range includes values above this point</description><subject>Airborne sensing</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Coal mines</subject><subject>Coal mining</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>emission</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Ethane</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>leak rate</subject><subject>Marcellus</subject><subject>Mass balance</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane emissions</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>oil and natural gas</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Shale</subject><subject>Shale gas</subject><subject>Shales</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEhV0xwdYYkvAju0QL0tbClULiPLaRU4ypq5Su9gJVZf8Oa6KECtmM1e6Zx66UXRC8DnBibhIMMnGg6BSgfeiTkJSEWdCpPu_-vLtMOp6v8ChMkwZZ53oawrNXBpAw6X2XlvjkXJ2iZo5oKl0JdR169FsLmtA2qCZbZv5GnwDzqAHMMZv6k9ptETSVOjOujAXnNdAoBft3vXWupIeKmQN6mlXWBeOTUH61sESTOOPowMlaw_dn34UPV8Pn_o38eR-dNvvTWJJ00zErJKAFaFlVlEmGBOpImlRQSIJ4FIkLMmooiylBeEkVVwVJVeKFUBLybDM6FF0utu7cvajDQ_mC9s6E07mCck4ppxTHqizHVU6670Dla-cXkq3yQnOtznnf3MOON3ha13D5l82H48eB5wTIeg3DT-Aag</recordid><startdate>20190216</startdate><enddate>20190216</enddate><creator>Ren, Xinrong</creator><creator>Hall, Dolly L.</creator><creator>Vinciguerra, Timothy</creator><creator>Benish, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Stratton, Philip R.</creator><creator>Ahn, Doyeon</creator><creator>Hansford, Jonathan R.</creator><creator>Cohen, Mark D.</creator><creator>Sahu, Sayantan</creator><creator>He, Hao</creator><creator>Grimes, Courtney</creator><creator>Fuentes, Jose D.</creator><creator>Shepson, Paul B.</creator><creator>Salawitch, Ross J.</creator><creator>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creator><creator>Dickerson, Russell R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-9603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-0568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8597-5832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-4429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-3083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-1652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-2558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6177-6326</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-1666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3906-2199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1726-3291</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190216</creationdate><title>Methane Emissions from the Marcellus Shale in Southwestern Pennsylvania and Northern West Virginia Based on Airborne Measurements</title><author>Ren, Xinrong ; Hall, Dolly L. ; Vinciguerra, Timothy ; Benish, Sarah E. ; Stratton, Philip R. ; Ahn, Doyeon ; Hansford, Jonathan R. ; Cohen, Mark D. ; Sahu, Sayantan ; He, Hao ; Grimes, Courtney ; Fuentes, Jose D. ; Shepson, Paul B. ; Salawitch, Ross J. ; Ehrman, Sheryl H. ; Dickerson, Russell R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3689-4dae0f13c8d3494496f16bde2a1e0c924283f3463b1516f5fbc5ff4be3ca40a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Airborne sensing</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Coal mines</topic><topic>Coal mining</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>emission</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Ethane</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>leak rate</topic><topic>Marcellus</topic><topic>Mass balance</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane emissions</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>oil and natural gas</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Shale</topic><topic>Shale gas</topic><topic>Shales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xinrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Dolly L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vinciguerra, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benish, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Philip R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Doyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansford, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahu, Sayantan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuentes, Jose D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepson, Paul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salawitch, Ross J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Russell R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Xinrong</au><au>Hall, Dolly L.</au><au>Vinciguerra, Timothy</au><au>Benish, Sarah E.</au><au>Stratton, Philip R.</au><au>Ahn, Doyeon</au><au>Hansford, Jonathan R.</au><au>Cohen, Mark D.</au><au>Sahu, Sayantan</au><au>He, Hao</au><au>Grimes, Courtney</au><au>Fuentes, Jose D.</au><au>Shepson, Paul B.</au><au>Salawitch, Ross J.</au><au>Ehrman, Sheryl H.</au><au>Dickerson, Russell R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane Emissions from the Marcellus Shale in Southwestern Pennsylvania and Northern West Virginia Based on Airborne Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2019-02-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1862</spage><epage>1878</epage><pages>1862-1878</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Natural gas production in the United States has increased rapidly over the past decade, along with concerns about methane (CH4) fugitive emissions and its climate impacts. Quantification of CH4 emissions from oil and natural gas (O&NG) operations is important for establishing scientifically sound policies for mitigating greenhouse gases. We use the aircraft mass balance approach for three flight experiments in August and September 2015 to estimate CH4 emissions from O&NG operations over the southwestern Marcellus Shale. We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate as 21.2 kg/s with 28% coming from O&NG operations. The mean CH4 emission rate from O&NG operations was estimated to be 1.1% of total NG production. The individual best‐estimate emission rates from the three flight experiments ranged from 0.78 to 1.5%, with overall limits of 0% and 3.5%. These emission rates are at the low end of other top‐down studies, but consistent with the few observational studies in the Marcellus Shale region as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CH4 inventory. A substantial source of CH4 (~70% of observed CH4 emissions) was found to contain little ethane, possibly due to coalbed CH4 emitted either directly from coal mines or from wells drilled through coalbed layers in O&NG operations. Recent regulations requiring capture of gas from the completion‐venting step of hydraulic fracturing appear to have reduced the atmospheric release of CH4. Our study suggests that for a 20‐year time scale, energy derived from the combustion of natural gas extracted from this region likely exerts a net climate benefit compared to coal.
Plain Language Summary
In this study methane (CH4) emission rates were estimated for the southwest Marcellus Shale based on airborne observations. A mean emission rate of ~21 kg CH4/s was observed from a 4,200‐km2 study area. A significant portion (~70%) of the emitted CH4 was found to originate likely from coalbeds. Our mean estimated emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production indicates a climate benefit of natural gas combustion compared to coal, but the full range includes values above the 2.4% break‐even point for the CH4 global warming potential over a 20‐year time horizon.
Key Points
A CH4 emission rate of ~21 kg/s from a 4200 km2 area of the southwestern Marcellus in 2015 with the bulk of the CH4 coming from coalbeds
We estimate a mean CH4 emission rate of 1.1% of total natural gas production with a lower limit of 0% and an upper limit of 3.5%
The mean emission rate indicates a climate impact of CH4 combustion below that of coal, but the full range includes values above this point</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2018JD029690</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-9603</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7925-0568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8597-5832</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-4429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0206-3083</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-1652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-2558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6177-6326</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9974-1666</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3906-2199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1726-3291</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2019-02, Vol.124 (3), p.1862-1878 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2185035535 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Airborne sensing Climate Climate change Coal Coal mines Coal mining Combustion emission Emission analysis Emissions Environmental protection Ethane Flight Gas production Gases Geophysics Global warming Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Hydraulic fracturing leak rate Marcellus Mass balance Methane Methane emissions Natural gas Observational studies Oil and gas production oil and natural gas Policies Sedimentary rocks Shale Shale gas Shales |
title | Methane Emissions from the Marcellus Shale in Southwestern Pennsylvania and Northern West Virginia Based on Airborne Measurements |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A18%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20Emissions%20from%20the%20Marcellus%20Shale%20in%20Southwestern%20Pennsylvania%20and%20Northern%20West%20Virginia%20Based%20on%20Airborne%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Ren,%20Xinrong&rft.date=2019-02-16&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1862&rft.epage=1878&rft.pages=1862-1878&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018JD029690&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2185035535%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185035535&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |