Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow
Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 2019-04, Vol.346, p.486-512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 512 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 486 |
container_title | Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering |
container_volume | 346 |
creator | Fonn, Eivind van Brummelen, Harald Kvamsdal, Trond Rasheed, Adil |
description | Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack.
•Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2185028268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045782518305978</els_id><sourcerecordid>2185028268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaRWCd4nMR1xQpVFJAqQALWlmNPikMTFzst6o47cENOgqOyZjazeO_Nz0fIOdAMKPDLJtOtyhgFkQFkNBcHZARiMk0Z5OKQjCgtynQiWHlMTkJoaCwBbESe5ir0ibFb9EvsNKbadbXzre2WiUez0WiSSgUbkhb7N2dCEtUk9KjMLnlQW4v-5-v7uXfvGKWV-zwlR7VaBTz762PyOr95md2li8fb-9n1ItU5F32a16IqOCiOmFOsSlNNcYpMgebAWKG5EoYVwnCuygkrIefAK24YssLUrFD5mFzs5669-9hg6GXjNr6LKyUDUVImGBfRBXuX9i4Ej7Vce9sqv5NA5QBONjKCkwM4CSAjuJi52mcwnj88KIO2AxtjPepeGmf_Sf8ChVt3Ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185028268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fonn, Eivind ; van Brummelen, Harald ; Kvamsdal, Trond ; Rasheed, Adil</creator><creatorcontrib>Fonn, Eivind ; van Brummelen, Harald ; Kvamsdal, Trond ; Rasheed, Adil</creatorcontrib><description>Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack.
•Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-7825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Angle of attack ; Approximation ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computing time ; Divergence ; Divergence-conforming ; Fluid flow ; Incompressible flow ; Isogeometric analysis ; Mathematical models ; Navier-Stokes equations ; Reduced basis method ; Reduced order modeling ; Splines ; Stability ; Stokes flow ; Two dimensional flow ; Two dimensional models ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2019-04, Vol.346, p.486-512</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1433-0652</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fonn, Eivind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvamsdal, Trond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Adil</creatorcontrib><title>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</title><title>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</title><description>Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack.
•Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Angle of attack</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Divergence-conforming</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Incompressible flow</subject><subject>Isogeometric analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Navier-Stokes equations</subject><subject>Reduced basis method</subject><subject>Reduced order modeling</subject><subject>Splines</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stokes flow</subject><subject>Two dimensional flow</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0045-7825</issn><issn>1879-2138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaRWCd4nMR1xQpVFJAqQALWlmNPikMTFzst6o47cENOgqOyZjazeO_Nz0fIOdAMKPDLJtOtyhgFkQFkNBcHZARiMk0Z5OKQjCgtynQiWHlMTkJoaCwBbESe5ir0ibFb9EvsNKbadbXzre2WiUez0WiSSgUbkhb7N2dCEtUk9KjMLnlQW4v-5-v7uXfvGKWV-zwlR7VaBTz762PyOr95md2li8fb-9n1ItU5F32a16IqOCiOmFOsSlNNcYpMgebAWKG5EoYVwnCuygkrIefAK24YssLUrFD5mFzs5669-9hg6GXjNr6LKyUDUVImGBfRBXuX9i4Ej7Vce9sqv5NA5QBONjKCkwM4CSAjuJi52mcwnj88KIO2AxtjPepeGmf_Sf8ChVt3Ag</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Fonn, Eivind</creator><creator>van Brummelen, Harald</creator><creator>Kvamsdal, Trond</creator><creator>Rasheed, Adil</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-0652</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</title><author>Fonn, Eivind ; van Brummelen, Harald ; Kvamsdal, Trond ; Rasheed, Adil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Angle of attack</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Divergence-conforming</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Incompressible flow</topic><topic>Isogeometric analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Navier-Stokes equations</topic><topic>Reduced basis method</topic><topic>Reduced order modeling</topic><topic>Splines</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stokes flow</topic><topic>Two dimensional flow</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonn, Eivind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvamsdal, Trond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Adil</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonn, Eivind</au><au>van Brummelen, Harald</au><au>Kvamsdal, Trond</au><au>Rasheed, Adil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>346</volume><spage>486</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>486-512</pages><issn>0045-7825</issn><eissn>1879-2138</eissn><abstract>Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack.
•Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-0652</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-7825 |
ispartof | Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2019-04, Vol.346, p.486-512 |
issn | 0045-7825 1879-2138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2185028268 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Angle of attack Approximation Computational fluid dynamics Computing time Divergence Divergence-conforming Fluid flow Incompressible flow Isogeometric analysis Mathematical models Navier-Stokes equations Reduced basis method Reduced order modeling Splines Stability Stokes flow Two dimensional flow Two dimensional models Velocity |
title | Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T03%3A22%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fast%20divergence-conforming%20reduced%20basis%20methods%20for%20steady%20Navier%E2%80%93Stokes%20flow&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20in%20applied%20mechanics%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Fonn,%20Eivind&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=346&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=486-512&rft.issn=0045-7825&rft.eissn=1879-2138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2185028268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185028268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0045782518305978&rfr_iscdi=true |