Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow

Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 2019-04, Vol.346, p.486-512
Hauptverfasser: Fonn, Eivind, van Brummelen, Harald, Kvamsdal, Trond, Rasheed, Adil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue
container_start_page 486
container_title Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering
container_volume 346
creator Fonn, Eivind
van Brummelen, Harald
Kvamsdal, Trond
Rasheed, Adil
description Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack. •Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2185028268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045782518305978</els_id><sourcerecordid>2185028268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaRWCd4nMR1xQpVFJAqQALWlmNPikMTFzst6o47cENOgqOyZjazeO_Nz0fIOdAMKPDLJtOtyhgFkQFkNBcHZARiMk0Z5OKQjCgtynQiWHlMTkJoaCwBbESe5ir0ibFb9EvsNKbadbXzre2WiUez0WiSSgUbkhb7N2dCEtUk9KjMLnlQW4v-5-v7uXfvGKWV-zwlR7VaBTz762PyOr95md2li8fb-9n1ItU5F32a16IqOCiOmFOsSlNNcYpMgebAWKG5EoYVwnCuygkrIefAK24YssLUrFD5mFzs5669-9hg6GXjNr6LKyUDUVImGBfRBXuX9i4Ej7Vce9sqv5NA5QBONjKCkwM4CSAjuJi52mcwnj88KIO2AxtjPepeGmf_Sf8ChVt3Ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2185028268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fonn, Eivind ; van Brummelen, Harald ; Kvamsdal, Trond ; Rasheed, Adil</creator><creatorcontrib>Fonn, Eivind ; van Brummelen, Harald ; Kvamsdal, Trond ; Rasheed, Adil</creatorcontrib><description>Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack. •Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-7825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Angle of attack ; Approximation ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computing time ; Divergence ; Divergence-conforming ; Fluid flow ; Incompressible flow ; Isogeometric analysis ; Mathematical models ; Navier-Stokes equations ; Reduced basis method ; Reduced order modeling ; Splines ; Stability ; Stokes flow ; Two dimensional flow ; Two dimensional models ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2019-04, Vol.346, p.486-512</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Apr 1, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1433-0652</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fonn, Eivind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvamsdal, Trond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Adil</creatorcontrib><title>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</title><title>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</title><description>Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack. •Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Angle of attack</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Divergence-conforming</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Incompressible flow</subject><subject>Isogeometric analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Navier-Stokes equations</subject><subject>Reduced basis method</subject><subject>Reduced order modeling</subject><subject>Splines</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stokes flow</subject><subject>Two dimensional flow</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0045-7825</issn><issn>1879-2138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaRWCd4nMR1xQpVFJAqQALWlmNPikMTFzst6o47cENOgqOyZjazeO_Nz0fIOdAMKPDLJtOtyhgFkQFkNBcHZARiMk0Z5OKQjCgtynQiWHlMTkJoaCwBbESe5ir0ibFb9EvsNKbadbXzre2WiUez0WiSSgUbkhb7N2dCEtUk9KjMLnlQW4v-5-v7uXfvGKWV-zwlR7VaBTz762PyOr95md2li8fb-9n1ItU5F32a16IqOCiOmFOsSlNNcYpMgebAWKG5EoYVwnCuygkrIefAK24YssLUrFD5mFzs5669-9hg6GXjNr6LKyUDUVImGBfRBXuX9i4Ej7Vce9sqv5NA5QBONjKCkwM4CSAjuJi52mcwnj88KIO2AxtjPepeGmf_Sf8ChVt3Ag</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Fonn, Eivind</creator><creator>van Brummelen, Harald</creator><creator>Kvamsdal, Trond</creator><creator>Rasheed, Adil</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-0652</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</title><author>Fonn, Eivind ; van Brummelen, Harald ; Kvamsdal, Trond ; Rasheed, Adil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-3f8b461a6ee30eb5db9e9e2a1c61224c6a8d248d66a572513616b6d2e24df24a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Angle of attack</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Divergence-conforming</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Incompressible flow</topic><topic>Isogeometric analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Navier-Stokes equations</topic><topic>Reduced basis method</topic><topic>Reduced order modeling</topic><topic>Splines</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stokes flow</topic><topic>Two dimensional flow</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonn, Eivind</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kvamsdal, Trond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasheed, Adil</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonn, Eivind</au><au>van Brummelen, Harald</au><au>Kvamsdal, Trond</au><au>Rasheed, Adil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</jtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>346</volume><spage>486</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>486-512</pages><issn>0045-7825</issn><eissn>1879-2138</eissn><abstract>Reduced-basis methods (RB methods or RBMs) form one of the most promising techniques to deliver numerical solutions of parametrized PDEs in real-time with reasonable accuracy. For incompressible flow problems, RBMs based on LBB stable velocity–pressure spaces do not generally inherit the stability of the underlying high-fidelity model and, instead, additional stabilization techniques must be introduced. One way of bypassing the loss of LBB stability in the RBM is to inflate the velocity space with supremizer modes. This however deteriorates the performance of the RBM in the performance-critical online stage, as additional DOFs must be introduced to retain stability, while these DOFs do not effectively contribute to accuracy of the RB approximation. In this work we consider a velocity-only RB approximation, exploiting a solenoidal velocity basis. The solenoidal reduced basis emerges directly from the high-fidelity velocity solutions in the offline stage. By means of Piola transforms, the solenoidality of the velocity space is retained under geometric transformations, making the proposed RB method suitable also for the investigation of geometric parameters. To ensure exact solenoidality of the high-fidelity velocity solutions that constitute the RB, we consider approximations based on divergence-conforming compatible B-splines. We show that the velocity-only RB method leads to a significant improvement in computational efficiency in the online stage, and that the pressure solution can be recovered a posteriori at negligible extra cost. We illustrate the solenoidal RB approach by modeling steady two-dimensional Navier–Stokes flow around a NACA0015 airfoil at various angles of attack. •Isogeometric methods enable velocity-only divergence-free reduced models.•Such divergence-free reduced models are considerably faster in the only stage.•Parametrized geometry variation can be handled with the Piola transform.•Pressure fields can be reconstructed with negligible computational expense.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-0652</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-7825
ispartof Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2019-04, Vol.346, p.486-512
issn 0045-7825
1879-2138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2185028268
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Angle of attack
Approximation
Computational fluid dynamics
Computing time
Divergence
Divergence-conforming
Fluid flow
Incompressible flow
Isogeometric analysis
Mathematical models
Navier-Stokes equations
Reduced basis method
Reduced order modeling
Splines
Stability
Stokes flow
Two dimensional flow
Two dimensional models
Velocity
title Fast divergence-conforming reduced basis methods for steady Navier–Stokes flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T03%3A22%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fast%20divergence-conforming%20reduced%20basis%20methods%20for%20steady%20Navier%E2%80%93Stokes%20flow&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20in%20applied%20mechanics%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Fonn,%20Eivind&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=346&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=486-512&rft.issn=0045-7825&rft.eissn=1879-2138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2185028268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2185028268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0045782518305978&rfr_iscdi=true