Resonance frequency evaluation on immediate loading implants with angled abutments: case series
Aim: Immediate loading of implant-supported prosthesis is a predictable and standardised therapy for rehabilitation of partially and totally edentulous patients. The present case series evaluate implant success rates by measuring resonance frequency on immediate loading implants with angled abutment...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annali di stomatologia 2018-05, Vol.9 (2), p.91-96 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 96 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 91 |
| container_title | Annali di stomatologia |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Notaro, Vincenzo Rapone, Biagio Cagnetta, Giovanni Sportelli, Pasquale Nardi, Gianna Maria Corsalini, Massimo |
| description | Aim: Immediate loading of implant-supported prosthesis is a predictable and standardised therapy for rehabilitation of partially and totally edentulous patients. The present case series evaluate implant success rates by measuring resonance frequency on immediate loading implants with angled abutments. Materials and methods: A prospective study was performed on five partially edentulous patients. Twenty-six Neoss ProActive Tapered® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) implants were inserted: 22 in the maxillary bone and 4 in the mandibular bone. The Osstell ISQ® (Osstell; Integration Diagnostics, Göteborg, Sweden) was used to evaluate implant stability. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements were performed in three stages: at time of implant insertion (t0), after three (t1) and 12 (t2) months. The ISQ values were recorded after implant installation of Access® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) during the different stages. Results: A six month- follow-up showed implant survival of 96%. Twenty-four implants were osseointegrated, a maxillary implant was lost and one other implant was excluded from the study. The values of ISQ ranged between 53-88 ISQ (average 66 ± 6.1 ISQ, median 67 ISQ) at t0, 51-80 ISQ (average 70 ± 5.8 ISQ, median 70 ISQ) at t1 and 53-80 ISQ (average 70.8 ± 5.7 ISQ, median 72 ISQ) at t2. Conclusions: The 24 successful implants out of 25 in 5 patients demonstrate how using 4-6 implants guarantees sufficient anchorage for a fixed prosthesis and adequate distribution of the prosthetic load on the maxillary and mandible bones, without causing implants failures. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.11138/ads/2018.9.2.091 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2183986948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2183986948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-4a27b3c6f22d2cc15e3f058fd6c6ffe42cee065437fb103fb9ae4a3acae2ef113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj09LxDAQxYMouKz7AbwFPLebSdI29SaL_2BBED2XaTpZu7Tp2qSK396APgbe43d4w2PsGkQOAMpssQtbKcDkdS5zUcMZW0FdQQZaw3nKRupMmEJesk0IR5FUikLLcsWaVwqTR2-Ju5k-F_L2h9MXDgvGfvI8XT-O1PUYiQ8Tdr0_JHIa0MfAv_v4wdEfBuo4tkscKdFbbjEQDzT3FK7YhcMh0Obf1-z94f5t95TtXx6fd3f77JQGxEyjrFplSydlJ62FgpQThXFdmZgjLS2RKAutKteCUK6tkTQqtEiSXKpYs5u_3tM8pRUhNsdpmX162UgwqjZlrY36BbNLWes</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183986948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resonance frequency evaluation on immediate loading implants with angled abutments: case series</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Notaro, Vincenzo ; Rapone, Biagio ; Cagnetta, Giovanni ; Sportelli, Pasquale ; Nardi, Gianna Maria ; Corsalini, Massimo</creator><creatorcontrib>Notaro, Vincenzo ; Rapone, Biagio ; Cagnetta, Giovanni ; Sportelli, Pasquale ; Nardi, Gianna Maria ; Corsalini, Massimo</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: Immediate loading of implant-supported prosthesis is a predictable and standardised therapy for rehabilitation of partially and totally edentulous patients. The present case series evaluate implant success rates by measuring resonance frequency on immediate loading implants with angled abutments. Materials and methods: A prospective study was performed on five partially edentulous patients. Twenty-six Neoss ProActive Tapered® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) implants were inserted: 22 in the maxillary bone and 4 in the mandibular bone. The Osstell ISQ® (Osstell; Integration Diagnostics, Göteborg, Sweden) was used to evaluate implant stability. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements were performed in three stages: at time of implant insertion (t0), after three (t1) and 12 (t2) months. The ISQ values were recorded after implant installation of Access® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) during the different stages. Results: A six month- follow-up showed implant survival of 96%. Twenty-four implants were osseointegrated, a maxillary implant was lost and one other implant was excluded from the study. The values of ISQ ranged between 53-88 ISQ (average 66 ± 6.1 ISQ, median 67 ISQ) at t0, 51-80 ISQ (average 70 ± 5.8 ISQ, median 70 ISQ) at t1 and 53-80 ISQ (average 70.8 ± 5.7 ISQ, median 72 ISQ) at t2. Conclusions: The 24 successful implants out of 25 in 5 patients demonstrate how using 4-6 implants guarantees sufficient anchorage for a fixed prosthesis and adequate distribution of the prosthetic load on the maxillary and mandible bones, without causing implants failures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1824-0852</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1971-1441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11138/ads/2018.9.2.091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rome: CIC Edizioni Internazionali</publisher><subject>Bond strength ; Bone implants ; Bones ; Chemotherapy ; Load distribution (forces) ; Mandible ; Maxilla ; Mechanical loading ; Oral hygiene ; Osseointegration ; Patients ; Prostheses ; Radiation therapy ; Rehabilitation ; Stability analysis ; Stress concentration ; Success ; Surgical implants ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Annali di stomatologia, 2018-05, Vol.9 (2), p.91-96</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under NOCC (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Notaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapone, Biagio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagnetta, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sportelli, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardi, Gianna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corsalini, Massimo</creatorcontrib><title>Resonance frequency evaluation on immediate loading implants with angled abutments: case series</title><title>Annali di stomatologia</title><description>Aim: Immediate loading of implant-supported prosthesis is a predictable and standardised therapy for rehabilitation of partially and totally edentulous patients. The present case series evaluate implant success rates by measuring resonance frequency on immediate loading implants with angled abutments. Materials and methods: A prospective study was performed on five partially edentulous patients. Twenty-six Neoss ProActive Tapered® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) implants were inserted: 22 in the maxillary bone and 4 in the mandibular bone. The Osstell ISQ® (Osstell; Integration Diagnostics, Göteborg, Sweden) was used to evaluate implant stability. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements were performed in three stages: at time of implant insertion (t0), after three (t1) and 12 (t2) months. The ISQ values were recorded after implant installation of Access® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) during the different stages. Results: A six month- follow-up showed implant survival of 96%. Twenty-four implants were osseointegrated, a maxillary implant was lost and one other implant was excluded from the study. The values of ISQ ranged between 53-88 ISQ (average 66 ± 6.1 ISQ, median 67 ISQ) at t0, 51-80 ISQ (average 70 ± 5.8 ISQ, median 70 ISQ) at t1 and 53-80 ISQ (average 70.8 ± 5.7 ISQ, median 72 ISQ) at t2. Conclusions: The 24 successful implants out of 25 in 5 patients demonstrate how using 4-6 implants guarantees sufficient anchorage for a fixed prosthesis and adequate distribution of the prosthetic load on the maxillary and mandible bones, without causing implants failures.</description><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Load distribution (forces)</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Mechanical loading</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>1824-0852</issn><issn>1971-1441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotj09LxDAQxYMouKz7AbwFPLebSdI29SaL_2BBED2XaTpZu7Tp2qSK396APgbe43d4w2PsGkQOAMpssQtbKcDkdS5zUcMZW0FdQQZaw3nKRupMmEJesk0IR5FUikLLcsWaVwqTR2-Ju5k-F_L2h9MXDgvGfvI8XT-O1PUYiQ8Tdr0_JHIa0MfAv_v4wdEfBuo4tkscKdFbbjEQDzT3FK7YhcMh0Obf1-z94f5t95TtXx6fd3f77JQGxEyjrFplSydlJ62FgpQThXFdmZgjLS2RKAutKteCUK6tkTQqtEiSXKpYs5u_3tM8pRUhNsdpmX162UgwqjZlrY36BbNLWes</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Notaro, Vincenzo</creator><creator>Rapone, Biagio</creator><creator>Cagnetta, Giovanni</creator><creator>Sportelli, Pasquale</creator><creator>Nardi, Gianna Maria</creator><creator>Corsalini, Massimo</creator><general>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Resonance frequency evaluation on immediate loading implants with angled abutments: case series</title><author>Notaro, Vincenzo ; Rapone, Biagio ; Cagnetta, Giovanni ; Sportelli, Pasquale ; Nardi, Gianna Maria ; Corsalini, Massimo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-4a27b3c6f22d2cc15e3f058fd6c6ffe42cee065437fb103fb9ae4a3acae2ef113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Load distribution (forces)</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Mechanical loading</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Notaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapone, Biagio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagnetta, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sportelli, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nardi, Gianna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corsalini, Massimo</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Annali di stomatologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Notaro, Vincenzo</au><au>Rapone, Biagio</au><au>Cagnetta, Giovanni</au><au>Sportelli, Pasquale</au><au>Nardi, Gianna Maria</au><au>Corsalini, Massimo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resonance frequency evaluation on immediate loading implants with angled abutments: case series</atitle><jtitle>Annali di stomatologia</jtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>91-96</pages><issn>1824-0852</issn><eissn>1971-1441</eissn><abstract>Aim: Immediate loading of implant-supported prosthesis is a predictable and standardised therapy for rehabilitation of partially and totally edentulous patients. The present case series evaluate implant success rates by measuring resonance frequency on immediate loading implants with angled abutments. Materials and methods: A prospective study was performed on five partially edentulous patients. Twenty-six Neoss ProActive Tapered® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) implants were inserted: 22 in the maxillary bone and 4 in the mandibular bone. The Osstell ISQ® (Osstell; Integration Diagnostics, Göteborg, Sweden) was used to evaluate implant stability. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measurements were performed in three stages: at time of implant insertion (t0), after three (t1) and 12 (t2) months. The ISQ values were recorded after implant installation of Access® (Neoss Ltd. Harrogate, UK) during the different stages. Results: A six month- follow-up showed implant survival of 96%. Twenty-four implants were osseointegrated, a maxillary implant was lost and one other implant was excluded from the study. The values of ISQ ranged between 53-88 ISQ (average 66 ± 6.1 ISQ, median 67 ISQ) at t0, 51-80 ISQ (average 70 ± 5.8 ISQ, median 70 ISQ) at t1 and 53-80 ISQ (average 70.8 ± 5.7 ISQ, median 72 ISQ) at t2. Conclusions: The 24 successful implants out of 25 in 5 patients demonstrate how using 4-6 implants guarantees sufficient anchorage for a fixed prosthesis and adequate distribution of the prosthetic load on the maxillary and mandible bones, without causing implants failures.</abstract><cop>Rome</cop><pub>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</pub><doi>10.11138/ads/2018.9.2.091</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1824-0852 |
| ispartof | Annali di stomatologia, 2018-05, Vol.9 (2), p.91-96 |
| issn | 1824-0852 1971-1441 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2183986948 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Bond strength Bone implants Bones Chemotherapy Load distribution (forces) Mandible Maxilla Mechanical loading Oral hygiene Osseointegration Patients Prostheses Radiation therapy Rehabilitation Stability analysis Stress concentration Success Surgical implants Transplants & implants |
| title | Resonance frequency evaluation on immediate loading implants with angled abutments: case series |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A47%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resonance%20frequency%20evaluation%20on%20immediate%20loading%20implants%20with%20angled%20abutments:%20case%20series&rft.jtitle=Annali%20di%20stomatologia&rft.au=Notaro,%20Vincenzo&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=91-96&rft.issn=1824-0852&rft.eissn=1971-1441&rft_id=info:doi/10.11138/ads/2018.9.2.091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2183986948%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183986948&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |