The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients

Purpose To provide initial validation of the Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP) quality-of-life survey that analyses specific issues related to side effects, patient satisfaction, and compliance. Methods A prospective, observational cohort of 250 consecutive patients with p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2006-05, Vol.20 (5), p.583-590
Hauptverfasser: Day, D G, Sharpe, E D, Atkinson, M J, Stewart, J A, Stewart, W C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 590
container_issue 5
container_start_page 583
container_title Eye (London)
container_volume 20
creator Day, D G
Sharpe, E D
Atkinson, M J
Stewart, J A
Stewart, W C
description Purpose To provide initial validation of the Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP) quality-of-life survey that analyses specific issues related to side effects, patient satisfaction, and compliance. Methods A prospective, observational cohort of 250 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was administered the TSS-IOP survey. Results Factors that correlated with patient satisfaction included perceived effectiveness of the medicine ( F =7.47, P
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.eye.6701932
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218360742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1031847901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-30cd8db6b4978555aca33b63e6728f53f0d9d1f27f67a1ddb173c73c38b49a993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM2L1TAUxYMoznN0604Jgsu-yUfTtEsZ_IIBNyO4K7f5mMmjL61J-qA7_3SvvOpbCYHAPb9zbnIIec3ZnjPZ3uTD3q1u32jGOymekB2vdVOpWtVPyY51ilVCiB9X5EXOB8ZQ1Ow5ueKqk1IrviO_7h8dNWOIwcBITzAGG8pKJ08LCiU5KEcXC81QQvZgSpgizUs6uZX6KdEQS4LJLCMkOieXUXI4pNvocZ1dKi7mcHIUoqUPIyxmOgKdMRCD80vyzMOY3avtvibfP328v_1S3X37_PX2w11laiVKJZmxrR2aoe50q5QCA1IOjXSNFq1X0jPbWe6F9o0Gbu3AtTR4ZIsO6Dp5Td6dc-c0_VxcLv1hWlLElb3grWyYrgVC-zNk0pRzcr6fUzhCWnvO-j999_nQY9_91jca3m6py3B09oJvBSPwfgMgY8M-QTQhXzit6xZ_gNzNmcsoxQeXLs_77-o3Z0eEgqX_i_yr_wZ5OqY6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218360742</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Day, D G ; Sharpe, E D ; Atkinson, M J ; Stewart, J A ; Stewart, W C</creator><creatorcontrib>Day, D G ; Sharpe, E D ; Atkinson, M J ; Stewart, J A ; Stewart, W C</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Purpose To provide initial validation of the Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP) quality-of-life survey that analyses specific issues related to side effects, patient satisfaction, and compliance. Methods A prospective, observational cohort of 250 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was administered the TSS-IOP survey. Results Factors that correlated with patient satisfaction included perceived effectiveness of the medicine ( F =7.47, P <0.001), ocular irritation ( F =6.06, P <0.001), conjunctival hyperaemia ( F =4.40, P <0.001), ease of use ( F =8.52, P <0.001), and convenience of use ( F =6.90, P <0.001). Patient compliance, acceptance of their illness, and knowledge of glaucoma were also related to perceived effectiveness of the medicine ( P <0.001), ease of use ( P <0.05) and convenience ( P <0.001). Physician ratings of patient pressure control, side effects, and instillation problems also were significantly correlated to patient satisfaction ( R =0.13–0.26, P =0.05–0.001). The physician ratings of patient compliance, however, were not significantly related to any dimension of patient satisfaction ( P >0.05). Among monotherapy prostaglandin treatments, latanoprost demonstrated statistically greater satisfaction than bimatoprost or travoprost regarding conjunctival hyperaemia ( P <0.05) and eye irritation ( P <0.01). Conclusions This study provides initial evidence that patient satisfaction may be related to compliance, perceived effectiveness of treatment, adverse side effects, ease and convenience of use, acceptance of illness, and knowledge of glaucoma.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15933751</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EYEEEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects ; Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; clinical-study ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma - drug therapy ; Glaucoma - physiopathology ; Glaucoma - psychology ; Glaucoma and intraocular pressure ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Status Indicators ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy ; Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology ; Ocular Hypertension - psychology ; Ophthalmic Solutions ; Ophthalmology ; Patient Compliance ; Patient Satisfaction ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Psychometrics ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2006-05, Vol.20 (5), p.583-590</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2006</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-30cd8db6b4978555aca33b63e6728f53f0d9d1f27f67a1ddb173c73c38b49a993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-30cd8db6b4978555aca33b63e6728f53f0d9d1f27f67a1ddb173c73c38b49a993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.eye.6701932$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.eye.6701932$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17748728$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15933751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Day, D G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, W C</creatorcontrib><title>The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Purpose To provide initial validation of the Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP) quality-of-life survey that analyses specific issues related to side effects, patient satisfaction, and compliance. Methods A prospective, observational cohort of 250 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was administered the TSS-IOP survey. Results Factors that correlated with patient satisfaction included perceived effectiveness of the medicine ( F =7.47, P <0.001), ocular irritation ( F =6.06, P <0.001), conjunctival hyperaemia ( F =4.40, P <0.001), ease of use ( F =8.52, P <0.001), and convenience of use ( F =6.90, P <0.001). Patient compliance, acceptance of their illness, and knowledge of glaucoma were also related to perceived effectiveness of the medicine ( P <0.001), ease of use ( P <0.05) and convenience ( P <0.001). Physician ratings of patient pressure control, side effects, and instillation problems also were significantly correlated to patient satisfaction ( R =0.13–0.26, P =0.05–0.001). The physician ratings of patient compliance, however, were not significantly related to any dimension of patient satisfaction ( P >0.05). Among monotherapy prostaglandin treatments, latanoprost demonstrated statistically greater satisfaction than bimatoprost or travoprost regarding conjunctival hyperaemia ( P <0.05) and eye irritation ( P <0.01). Conclusions This study provides initial evidence that patient satisfaction may be related to compliance, perceived effectiveness of treatment, adverse side effects, ease and convenience of use, acceptance of illness, and knowledge of glaucoma.]]></description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical-study</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Glaucoma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma - psychology</subject><subject>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - psychology</subject><subject>Ophthalmic Solutions</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM2L1TAUxYMoznN0604Jgsu-yUfTtEsZ_IIBNyO4K7f5mMmjL61J-qA7_3SvvOpbCYHAPb9zbnIIec3ZnjPZ3uTD3q1u32jGOymekB2vdVOpWtVPyY51ilVCiB9X5EXOB8ZQ1Ow5ueKqk1IrviO_7h8dNWOIwcBITzAGG8pKJ08LCiU5KEcXC81QQvZgSpgizUs6uZX6KdEQS4LJLCMkOieXUXI4pNvocZ1dKi7mcHIUoqUPIyxmOgKdMRCD80vyzMOY3avtvibfP328v_1S3X37_PX2w11laiVKJZmxrR2aoe50q5QCA1IOjXSNFq1X0jPbWe6F9o0Gbu3AtTR4ZIsO6Dp5Td6dc-c0_VxcLv1hWlLElb3grWyYrgVC-zNk0pRzcr6fUzhCWnvO-j999_nQY9_91jca3m6py3B09oJvBSPwfgMgY8M-QTQhXzit6xZ_gNzNmcsoxQeXLs_77-o3Z0eEgqX_i_yr_wZ5OqY6</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Day, D G</creator><creator>Sharpe, E D</creator><creator>Atkinson, M J</creator><creator>Stewart, J A</creator><creator>Stewart, W C</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients</title><author>Day, D G ; Sharpe, E D ; Atkinson, M J ; Stewart, J A ; Stewart, W C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-30cd8db6b4978555aca33b63e6728f53f0d9d1f27f67a1ddb173c73c38b49a993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical-study</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Glaucoma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma - psychology</topic><topic>Glaucoma and intraocular pressure</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - psychology</topic><topic>Ophthalmic Solutions</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Day, D G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharpe, E D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkinson, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, W C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Day, D G</au><au>Sharpe, E D</au><au>Atkinson, M J</au><au>Stewart, J A</au><au>Stewart, W C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>590</epage><pages>583-590</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><coden>EYEEEC</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Purpose To provide initial validation of the Treatment Satisfaction Survey-Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP) quality-of-life survey that analyses specific issues related to side effects, patient satisfaction, and compliance. Methods A prospective, observational cohort of 250 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension was administered the TSS-IOP survey. Results Factors that correlated with patient satisfaction included perceived effectiveness of the medicine ( F =7.47, P <0.001), ocular irritation ( F =6.06, P <0.001), conjunctival hyperaemia ( F =4.40, P <0.001), ease of use ( F =8.52, P <0.001), and convenience of use ( F =6.90, P <0.001). Patient compliance, acceptance of their illness, and knowledge of glaucoma were also related to perceived effectiveness of the medicine ( P <0.001), ease of use ( P <0.05) and convenience ( P <0.001). Physician ratings of patient pressure control, side effects, and instillation problems also were significantly correlated to patient satisfaction ( R =0.13–0.26, P =0.05–0.001). The physician ratings of patient compliance, however, were not significantly related to any dimension of patient satisfaction ( P >0.05). Among monotherapy prostaglandin treatments, latanoprost demonstrated statistically greater satisfaction than bimatoprost or travoprost regarding conjunctival hyperaemia ( P <0.05) and eye irritation ( P <0.01). Conclusions This study provides initial evidence that patient satisfaction may be related to compliance, perceived effectiveness of treatment, adverse side effects, ease and convenience of use, acceptance of illness, and knowledge of glaucoma.]]></abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>15933751</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.eye.6701932</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-222X
ispartof Eye (London), 2006-05, Vol.20 (5), p.583-590
issn 0950-222X
1476-5454
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218360742
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage
Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
clinical-study
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Glaucoma
Glaucoma - drug therapy
Glaucoma - physiopathology
Glaucoma - psychology
Glaucoma and intraocular pressure
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Status Indicators
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Laboratory Medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Ocular Hypertension - drug therapy
Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology
Ocular Hypertension - psychology
Ophthalmic Solutions
Ophthalmology
Patient Compliance
Patient Satisfaction
Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology
Psychometrics
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
title The clinical validity of the treatment satisfaction survey for intraocular pressure in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20clinical%20validity%20of%20the%20treatment%20satisfaction%20survey%20for%20intraocular%20pressure%20in%20ocular%20hypertensive%20and%20glaucoma%20patients&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Day,%20D%20G&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=590&rft.pages=583-590&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft.coden=EYEEEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.eye.6701932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1031847901%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218360742&rft_id=info:pmid/15933751&rfr_iscdi=true