Lean in Higher Education: A Proposed Model for Lean Transformation in a Business School with MCDM Application

Purpose: This research aims to investigate and define the eight wastes of lean philosophy in higher education institutions (HEIs) by proposing a multi-stage model. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have used a specific multi-criteria decision-making method, fuzzy decision-making trial and eva...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality assurance in education 2019-02, Vol.27 (1), p.82-102
Hauptverfasser: Kazancoglu, Yigit, Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue 1
container_start_page 82
container_title Quality assurance in education
container_volume 27
creator Kazancoglu, Yigit
Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz
description Purpose: This research aims to investigate and define the eight wastes of lean philosophy in higher education institutions (HEIs) by proposing a multi-stage model. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have used a specific multi-criteria decision-making method, fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, to investigate the cause-effect relationships and importance order between criteria for wastes in HEIs. In total, 22 criteria were categorized under eight wastes of lean. The study was implemented in a business school with the participation of faculty members from different departments. Findings: The results showed that the most important wastes in the business school selected were repeated tasks, unnecessary bureaucracy, errors because of misunderstanding/communication problems, excessive number of academic units and creation of an excessive amount of information. Another important result was that all the sub-wastes of talent were in the causes group, while motion and transportation wastes were in the effect group. Practical implications: A road map to guide lean transformation for HEIs is proposed with a multi-stage model and potential areas for improvement in HEIs were presented. Originality/value: This study proposes a multi-stage structure by applying multi-criteria decision-making to HEIs, focussing on wastes from a lean perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/QAE-12-2016-0089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2183528942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1206314</ericid><sourcerecordid>2183528942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-f61b6b700629535982a92c6c762227aae2bd797b847c1744cd6cb7ea5d7daeee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd3L0LAczVJ0yT1Vmd1yoaK8xzSNHUZXVOTFvHf21rx9PHC874fPACcY3SFMRLXr1keYRIRhFmEkEgPwAzzREScMXIIZihlIqJCxMfgJIQdQigWNJ2B_cqoBtoGLu3H1niYl71WnXXNDczgi3etC6aEa1eaGlbOw19841UThrT_Jce2grd9sI0JAb7prXM1_LLdFq4Xd2uYtW1tp9FTcFSpOpizvzsH7_f5ZrGMVs8Pj4tsFWlCWRdVDBes4AgxkiZxkgqiUqKZ5owQwpUypCh5ygtBucacUl0yXXCjkpKXyhgTz8HltNt699mb0Mmd630zvJQEizghIqVkoNBEae9C8KaSrbd75b8lRnKUKgepEhM5SpWj1KFyMVWMt_ofz58wQSzGNP4BEidy0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2183528942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lean in Higher Education: A Proposed Model for Lean Transformation in a Business School with MCDM Application</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Kazancoglu, Yigit ; Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazancoglu, Yigit ; Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This research aims to investigate and define the eight wastes of lean philosophy in higher education institutions (HEIs) by proposing a multi-stage model. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have used a specific multi-criteria decision-making method, fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, to investigate the cause-effect relationships and importance order between criteria for wastes in HEIs. In total, 22 criteria were categorized under eight wastes of lean. The study was implemented in a business school with the participation of faculty members from different departments. Findings: The results showed that the most important wastes in the business school selected were repeated tasks, unnecessary bureaucracy, errors because of misunderstanding/communication problems, excessive number of academic units and creation of an excessive amount of information. Another important result was that all the sub-wastes of talent were in the causes group, while motion and transportation wastes were in the effect group. Practical implications: A road map to guide lean transformation for HEIs is proposed with a multi-stage model and potential areas for improvement in HEIs were presented. Originality/value: This study proposes a multi-stage structure by applying multi-criteria decision-making to HEIs, focussing on wastes from a lean perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-4883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7662</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/QAE-12-2016-0089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Administrative Organization ; Beneficiaries ; Business Schools ; College Faculty ; Communication Problems ; Decision making ; Departments ; Efficiency ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Ideology ; Lean manufacturing ; Learning Processes ; Literature reviews ; Philosophy ; Productivity ; Service industries ; Systems Approach ; Talent</subject><ispartof>Quality assurance in education, 2019-02, Vol.27 (1), p.82-102</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-f61b6b700629535982a92c6c762227aae2bd797b847c1744cd6cb7ea5d7daeee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1206314$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazancoglu, Yigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz</creatorcontrib><title>Lean in Higher Education: A Proposed Model for Lean Transformation in a Business School with MCDM Application</title><title>Quality assurance in education</title><description>Purpose: This research aims to investigate and define the eight wastes of lean philosophy in higher education institutions (HEIs) by proposing a multi-stage model. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have used a specific multi-criteria decision-making method, fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, to investigate the cause-effect relationships and importance order between criteria for wastes in HEIs. In total, 22 criteria were categorized under eight wastes of lean. The study was implemented in a business school with the participation of faculty members from different departments. Findings: The results showed that the most important wastes in the business school selected were repeated tasks, unnecessary bureaucracy, errors because of misunderstanding/communication problems, excessive number of academic units and creation of an excessive amount of information. Another important result was that all the sub-wastes of talent were in the causes group, while motion and transportation wastes were in the effect group. Practical implications: A road map to guide lean transformation for HEIs is proposed with a multi-stage model and potential areas for improvement in HEIs were presented. Originality/value: This study proposes a multi-stage structure by applying multi-criteria decision-making to HEIs, focussing on wastes from a lean perspective.</description><subject>Administrative Organization</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Business Schools</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Communication Problems</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Lean manufacturing</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>Systems Approach</subject><subject>Talent</subject><issn>0968-4883</issn><issn>1758-7662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLwzAYhoMoOKd3L0LAczVJ0yT1Vmd1yoaK8xzSNHUZXVOTFvHf21rx9PHC874fPACcY3SFMRLXr1keYRIRhFmEkEgPwAzzREScMXIIZihlIqJCxMfgJIQdQigWNJ2B_cqoBtoGLu3H1niYl71WnXXNDczgi3etC6aEa1eaGlbOw19841UThrT_Jce2grd9sI0JAb7prXM1_LLdFq4Xd2uYtW1tp9FTcFSpOpizvzsH7_f5ZrGMVs8Pj4tsFWlCWRdVDBes4AgxkiZxkgqiUqKZ5owQwpUypCh5ygtBucacUl0yXXCjkpKXyhgTz8HltNt699mb0Mmd630zvJQEizghIqVkoNBEae9C8KaSrbd75b8lRnKUKgepEhM5SpWj1KFyMVWMt_ofz58wQSzGNP4BEidy0g</recordid><startdate>20190204</startdate><enddate>20190204</enddate><creator>Kazancoglu, Yigit</creator><creator>Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190204</creationdate><title>Lean in Higher Education: A Proposed Model for Lean Transformation in a Business School with MCDM Application</title><author>Kazancoglu, Yigit ; Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-f61b6b700629535982a92c6c762227aae2bd797b847c1744cd6cb7ea5d7daeee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Administrative Organization</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Business Schools</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Communication Problems</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Lean manufacturing</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>Systems Approach</topic><topic>Talent</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazancoglu, Yigit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Quality assurance in education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazancoglu, Yigit</au><au>Ozkan-Ozen, Yesim Deniz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1206314</ericid><atitle>Lean in Higher Education: A Proposed Model for Lean Transformation in a Business School with MCDM Application</atitle><jtitle>Quality assurance in education</jtitle><date>2019-02-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>82-102</pages><issn>0968-4883</issn><eissn>1758-7662</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This research aims to investigate and define the eight wastes of lean philosophy in higher education institutions (HEIs) by proposing a multi-stage model. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have used a specific multi-criteria decision-making method, fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, to investigate the cause-effect relationships and importance order between criteria for wastes in HEIs. In total, 22 criteria were categorized under eight wastes of lean. The study was implemented in a business school with the participation of faculty members from different departments. Findings: The results showed that the most important wastes in the business school selected were repeated tasks, unnecessary bureaucracy, errors because of misunderstanding/communication problems, excessive number of academic units and creation of an excessive amount of information. Another important result was that all the sub-wastes of talent were in the causes group, while motion and transportation wastes were in the effect group. Practical implications: A road map to guide lean transformation for HEIs is proposed with a multi-stage model and potential areas for improvement in HEIs were presented. Originality/value: This study proposes a multi-stage structure by applying multi-criteria decision-making to HEIs, focussing on wastes from a lean perspective.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/QAE-12-2016-0089</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-4883
ispartof Quality assurance in education, 2019-02, Vol.27 (1), p.82-102
issn 0968-4883
1758-7662
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2183528942
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Administrative Organization
Beneficiaries
Business Schools
College Faculty
Communication Problems
Decision making
Departments
Efficiency
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Ideology
Lean manufacturing
Learning Processes
Literature reviews
Philosophy
Productivity
Service industries
Systems Approach
Talent
title Lean in Higher Education: A Proposed Model for Lean Transformation in a Business School with MCDM Application
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T14%3A37%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lean%20in%20Higher%20Education:%20A%20Proposed%20Model%20for%20Lean%20Transformation%20in%20a%20Business%20School%20with%20MCDM%20Application&rft.jtitle=Quality%20assurance%20in%20education&rft.au=Kazancoglu,%20Yigit&rft.date=2019-02-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=82-102&rft.issn=0968-4883&rft.eissn=1758-7662&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/QAE-12-2016-0089&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2183528942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2183528942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1206314&rfr_iscdi=true