0016 Birthing hospitals’ policies and practices related to infant safe sleep: a statewide survey in massachusetts

Statement of purposeSudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is the leading cause of post-neonatal infant death in Massachusetts. Multidisciplinary reviews have found that many are associated with unsafe infant sleep positions and environments. The hospital nursery is a place where infant care is model...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury prevention 2015-04, Vol.21 (Suppl 1), p.A6
Hauptverfasser: Hackman, Holly, McGuire, Colleen, KautzMills, Julie, Barber, Cathy, Pavlos, Carlene, Egan, Justine, Muzhuthett, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A6
container_title Injury prevention
container_volume 21
creator Hackman, Holly
McGuire, Colleen
KautzMills, Julie
Barber, Cathy
Pavlos, Carlene
Egan, Justine
Muzhuthett, Paul
description Statement of purposeSudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is the leading cause of post-neonatal infant death in Massachusetts. Multidisciplinary reviews have found that many are associated with unsafe infant sleep positions and environments. The hospital nursery is a place where infant care is modelled and parents receive education. Knowing the prevalence of hospital policies, practices and trainings related to safe sleep is valuable for informing SUID prevention.Methods/ApproachAn on-line survey of maternity department managers was sent to all 49 birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. Questions included staff training on infant safe sleep, infant side sleeping practices, presence of a written policy, parent education, perceived barriers to promoting safe sleep and needed areas of support. The survey was administered from April through September 2013 with 100% response rate.ResultsForty-six percent of birthing hospitals had a written infant “safe sleep” policy. Of these, “back only” sleep was the most common component (95%), followed by exclusion of soft crib items (82%), and avoidance of general co-bedding (82%), co-bedding multiples (68%), encouraging co-rooming (68%), and avoidance of overheating (77%). Twenty-six percent had a written policy with all six components. Nearly all (94%) trained staff. Only 27% reported side sleeping of “spitty” infants was “never done”. Nearly all indicated safe sleep was part of educational materials. Leading barriers to promoting safe sleep were family beliefs (81%) and language (33%).ConclusionsBirthing hospitals and centres in Massachusetts have different policies and practices on infant safe sleep and most do not incorporate several select prevention measures recommended in the 2011 AAP guidelines. Most of the respondents felt that a model policy, provided by the state, would be useful.Significance and contribution to the fieldThis is a universal survey of reported policies and practices related to infant safe sleep in birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. The findings provide valuable information for prevention efforts in other states.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041602.14
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2182485715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2182485715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21824857153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjU1OwzAQhS1EJQr0DoNYp9iJHUcsQSAO0H1lJRPiKNjGYxd11w2H4Ho9CV5wAFbvez_SY-xO8K0QTftg3ZzjMUQ8VDUXquJStLzeCnnB1kJqVSndqcvCjWqqjkt9xa6JZs5Fo9t6zXKh9nz6frIxTda9w-Qp2GQWOp9-IPjF9hYJjBsgRNMn2xcXcTEJB0gerBuNS0BmRKAFMTyCAUql_rJDiXI84LGs4MMQmX7KhCnRLVuN5QI3f3rD7l9fds9vVYj-MyOl_exzdKXa16KrZae0UM3_Vr8pUVi0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2182485715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>0016 Birthing hospitals’ policies and practices related to infant safe sleep: a statewide survey in massachusetts</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Hackman, Holly ; McGuire, Colleen ; KautzMills, Julie ; Barber, Cathy ; Pavlos, Carlene ; Egan, Justine ; Muzhuthett, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Hackman, Holly ; McGuire, Colleen ; KautzMills, Julie ; Barber, Cathy ; Pavlos, Carlene ; Egan, Justine ; Muzhuthett, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Statement of purposeSudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is the leading cause of post-neonatal infant death in Massachusetts. Multidisciplinary reviews have found that many are associated with unsafe infant sleep positions and environments. The hospital nursery is a place where infant care is modelled and parents receive education. Knowing the prevalence of hospital policies, practices and trainings related to safe sleep is valuable for informing SUID prevention.Methods/ApproachAn on-line survey of maternity department managers was sent to all 49 birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. Questions included staff training on infant safe sleep, infant side sleeping practices, presence of a written policy, parent education, perceived barriers to promoting safe sleep and needed areas of support. The survey was administered from April through September 2013 with 100% response rate.ResultsForty-six percent of birthing hospitals had a written infant “safe sleep” policy. Of these, “back only” sleep was the most common component (95%), followed by exclusion of soft crib items (82%), and avoidance of general co-bedding (82%), co-bedding multiples (68%), encouraging co-rooming (68%), and avoidance of overheating (77%). Twenty-six percent had a written policy with all six components. Nearly all (94%) trained staff. Only 27% reported side sleeping of “spitty” infants was “never done”. Nearly all indicated safe sleep was part of educational materials. Leading barriers to promoting safe sleep were family beliefs (81%) and language (33%).ConclusionsBirthing hospitals and centres in Massachusetts have different policies and practices on infant safe sleep and most do not incorporate several select prevention measures recommended in the 2011 AAP guidelines. Most of the respondents felt that a model policy, provided by the state, would be useful.Significance and contribution to the fieldThis is a universal survey of reported policies and practices related to infant safe sleep in birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. The findings provide valuable information for prevention efforts in other states.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-8047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-5785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041602.14</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Education ; Hospitals ; Infants ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Prevention ; Sleep</subject><ispartof>Injury prevention, 2015-04, Vol.21 (Suppl 1), p.A6</ispartof><rights>2015 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hackman, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KautzMills, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlos, Carlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzhuthett, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>0016 Birthing hospitals’ policies and practices related to infant safe sleep: a statewide survey in massachusetts</title><title>Injury prevention</title><description>Statement of purposeSudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is the leading cause of post-neonatal infant death in Massachusetts. Multidisciplinary reviews have found that many are associated with unsafe infant sleep positions and environments. The hospital nursery is a place where infant care is modelled and parents receive education. Knowing the prevalence of hospital policies, practices and trainings related to safe sleep is valuable for informing SUID prevention.Methods/ApproachAn on-line survey of maternity department managers was sent to all 49 birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. Questions included staff training on infant safe sleep, infant side sleeping practices, presence of a written policy, parent education, perceived barriers to promoting safe sleep and needed areas of support. The survey was administered from April through September 2013 with 100% response rate.ResultsForty-six percent of birthing hospitals had a written infant “safe sleep” policy. Of these, “back only” sleep was the most common component (95%), followed by exclusion of soft crib items (82%), and avoidance of general co-bedding (82%), co-bedding multiples (68%), encouraging co-rooming (68%), and avoidance of overheating (77%). Twenty-six percent had a written policy with all six components. Nearly all (94%) trained staff. Only 27% reported side sleeping of “spitty” infants was “never done”. Nearly all indicated safe sleep was part of educational materials. Leading barriers to promoting safe sleep were family beliefs (81%) and language (33%).ConclusionsBirthing hospitals and centres in Massachusetts have different policies and practices on infant safe sleep and most do not incorporate several select prevention measures recommended in the 2011 AAP guidelines. Most of the respondents felt that a model policy, provided by the state, would be useful.Significance and contribution to the fieldThis is a universal survey of reported policies and practices related to infant safe sleep in birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. The findings provide valuable information for prevention efforts in other states.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><issn>1353-8047</issn><issn>1475-5785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjU1OwzAQhS1EJQr0DoNYp9iJHUcsQSAO0H1lJRPiKNjGYxd11w2H4Ho9CV5wAFbvez_SY-xO8K0QTftg3ZzjMUQ8VDUXquJStLzeCnnB1kJqVSndqcvCjWqqjkt9xa6JZs5Fo9t6zXKh9nz6frIxTda9w-Qp2GQWOp9-IPjF9hYJjBsgRNMn2xcXcTEJB0gerBuNS0BmRKAFMTyCAUql_rJDiXI84LGs4MMQmX7KhCnRLVuN5QI3f3rD7l9fds9vVYj-MyOl_exzdKXa16KrZae0UM3_Vr8pUVi0</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Hackman, Holly</creator><creator>McGuire, Colleen</creator><creator>KautzMills, Julie</creator><creator>Barber, Cathy</creator><creator>Pavlos, Carlene</creator><creator>Egan, Justine</creator><creator>Muzhuthett, Paul</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>0016 Birthing hospitals’ policies and practices related to infant safe sleep: a statewide survey in massachusetts</title><author>Hackman, Holly ; McGuire, Colleen ; KautzMills, Julie ; Barber, Cathy ; Pavlos, Carlene ; Egan, Justine ; Muzhuthett, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21824857153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hackman, Holly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Colleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KautzMills, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlos, Carlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzhuthett, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Injury prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hackman, Holly</au><au>McGuire, Colleen</au><au>KautzMills, Julie</au><au>Barber, Cathy</au><au>Pavlos, Carlene</au><au>Egan, Justine</au><au>Muzhuthett, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>0016 Birthing hospitals’ policies and practices related to infant safe sleep: a statewide survey in massachusetts</atitle><jtitle>Injury prevention</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A6</spage><pages>A6-</pages><issn>1353-8047</issn><eissn>1475-5785</eissn><abstract>Statement of purposeSudden unexpected infant death (SUID) is the leading cause of post-neonatal infant death in Massachusetts. Multidisciplinary reviews have found that many are associated with unsafe infant sleep positions and environments. The hospital nursery is a place where infant care is modelled and parents receive education. Knowing the prevalence of hospital policies, practices and trainings related to safe sleep is valuable for informing SUID prevention.Methods/ApproachAn on-line survey of maternity department managers was sent to all 49 birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. Questions included staff training on infant safe sleep, infant side sleeping practices, presence of a written policy, parent education, perceived barriers to promoting safe sleep and needed areas of support. The survey was administered from April through September 2013 with 100% response rate.ResultsForty-six percent of birthing hospitals had a written infant “safe sleep” policy. Of these, “back only” sleep was the most common component (95%), followed by exclusion of soft crib items (82%), and avoidance of general co-bedding (82%), co-bedding multiples (68%), encouraging co-rooming (68%), and avoidance of overheating (77%). Twenty-six percent had a written policy with all six components. Nearly all (94%) trained staff. Only 27% reported side sleeping of “spitty” infants was “never done”. Nearly all indicated safe sleep was part of educational materials. Leading barriers to promoting safe sleep were family beliefs (81%) and language (33%).ConclusionsBirthing hospitals and centres in Massachusetts have different policies and practices on infant safe sleep and most do not incorporate several select prevention measures recommended in the 2011 AAP guidelines. Most of the respondents felt that a model policy, provided by the state, would be useful.Significance and contribution to the fieldThis is a universal survey of reported policies and practices related to infant safe sleep in birthing hospitals/centres in Massachusetts. The findings provide valuable information for prevention efforts in other states.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041602.14</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-8047
ispartof Injury prevention, 2015-04, Vol.21 (Suppl 1), p.A6
issn 1353-8047
1475-5785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2182485715
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Education
Hospitals
Infants
Polls & surveys
Prevention
Sleep
title 0016 Birthing hospitals’ policies and practices related to infant safe sleep: a statewide survey in massachusetts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A27%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=0016%E2%80%85Birthing%20hospitals%E2%80%99%20policies%20and%20practices%20related%20to%20infant%20safe%20sleep:%20a%20statewide%20survey%20in%20massachusetts&rft.jtitle=Injury%20prevention&rft.au=Hackman,%20Holly&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A6&rft.pages=A6-&rft.issn=1353-8047&rft.eissn=1475-5785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041602.14&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2182485715%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2182485715&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true