Modeling electric vehicles adoption for urban commute trips

•This study develops a mixed user equilibrium formulation with electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline vehicles (GVs).•A new concept called EV charging ratio is introduced to capture EV charging behavior for inner-urban trips.•The formulation with exogenous charging ratio is convex in link flows, stati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part B: methodological 2018-11, Vol.117, p.431-454
Hauptverfasser: Cen, Xuekai, Lo, Hong K., Li, Lu, Lee, Enoch
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 454
container_issue
container_start_page 431
container_title Transportation research. Part B: methodological
container_volume 117
creator Cen, Xuekai
Lo, Hong K.
Li, Lu
Lee, Enoch
description •This study develops a mixed user equilibrium formulation with electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline vehicles (GVs).•A new concept called EV charging ratio is introduced to capture EV charging behavior for inner-urban trips.•The formulation with exogenous charging ratio is convex in link flows, stations flows, and EV demands.•The formulation incorporates EV elastic demand, whose utility function is calibrated via a market survey in Hong Kong.•The study observes the property of link flows preservation for a range of EV market penetration. In this paper, a mixed user equilibrium (MUE) model with Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Gasoline Vehicles (GVs) is proposed to account for the charging behavior of EVs in an urban network. The main difference between EVs and GVs lies in that certain EVs with immediate charging need have to traverse a specific station for recharging, while GVs and other EVs without immediate charging need do not have such a requirement. The proportion of EVs with immediate charging need, referred to as charging ratio in this study, is an OD specific endogenous variable, related to their daily commute trip lengths and EV driving ranges, i.e., EVs will need recharging once every few days. The MUE conditions state that EVs with charging need choose the routes via a charging station while en route to their destinations with minimum travel time cost, electricity cost plus charging station cost; whereas GVs and EVs without charging need select the routes with minimum travel cost without having to traverse any charging station. This study also captures the interaction between network design (such as charging station locations) and EV demand which follows a logit model calibrated with an EV market survey conducted in Hong Kong. We formulate the MUE problem first with a nonlinear complementarity (NCP) approach and solve it with a gap function, then we relax the charging ratio to be exogenous and formulate a convex mathematical program for efficient solutions, with the charging ratio iteratively determined. Furthermore, we observe that the resultant link flows exhibit the property of link flow preservation, i.e., the total link flows remain unchanged under a range of EV and GV demands. We first solve the Yang-Bell network to demonstrate its properties, and then solve the Sioux-Falls network to show its solution efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trb.2018.09.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2182474454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191261517308718</els_id><sourcerecordid>2182474454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1b064a01827304a3430c159414e7b09e68f4dddfe47c5961ebb8b515f3ea4a153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcB1633NumLWcngC0bc6Dqk6a2mdJqatAP-eyPj2tXdfOfcw8fYNUKKgMVtn86-STPAKoU6BRAnbIVVWSeZKMpTtgKsMckKzM_ZRQg9REICrtjmxbU02PGD00Bm9tbwA31aM1DgunXTbN3IO-f54hs9cuP2-2UmHsEpXLKzTg-Brv7umr0_3L9tn5Ld6-Pz9m6XGFEVc4INFFLHZVkpQGohBRjMa4mSygZqKqpOtm3bkSxNXhdITVM1OeadIC015mLNbo69k3dfC4VZ9W7xY3ypstgqSylzGSk8Usa7EDx1avJ2r_23QlC_jlSvoiP160hBraKBmNkcMxTnHyx5FYyl0VBrfbShWmf_Sf8ALSpuEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2182474454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling electric vehicles adoption for urban commute trips</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cen, Xuekai ; Lo, Hong K. ; Li, Lu ; Lee, Enoch</creator><creatorcontrib>Cen, Xuekai ; Lo, Hong K. ; Li, Lu ; Lee, Enoch</creatorcontrib><description>•This study develops a mixed user equilibrium formulation with electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline vehicles (GVs).•A new concept called EV charging ratio is introduced to capture EV charging behavior for inner-urban trips.•The formulation with exogenous charging ratio is convex in link flows, stations flows, and EV demands.•The formulation incorporates EV elastic demand, whose utility function is calibrated via a market survey in Hong Kong.•The study observes the property of link flows preservation for a range of EV market penetration. In this paper, a mixed user equilibrium (MUE) model with Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Gasoline Vehicles (GVs) is proposed to account for the charging behavior of EVs in an urban network. The main difference between EVs and GVs lies in that certain EVs with immediate charging need have to traverse a specific station for recharging, while GVs and other EVs without immediate charging need do not have such a requirement. The proportion of EVs with immediate charging need, referred to as charging ratio in this study, is an OD specific endogenous variable, related to their daily commute trip lengths and EV driving ranges, i.e., EVs will need recharging once every few days. The MUE conditions state that EVs with charging need choose the routes via a charging station while en route to their destinations with minimum travel time cost, electricity cost plus charging station cost; whereas GVs and EVs without charging need select the routes with minimum travel cost without having to traverse any charging station. This study also captures the interaction between network design (such as charging station locations) and EV demand which follows a logit model calibrated with an EV market survey conducted in Hong Kong. We formulate the MUE problem first with a nonlinear complementarity (NCP) approach and solve it with a gap function, then we relax the charging ratio to be exogenous and formulate a convex mathematical program for efficient solutions, with the charging ratio iteratively determined. Furthermore, we observe that the resultant link flows exhibit the property of link flow preservation, i.e., the total link flows remain unchanged under a range of EV and GV demands. We first solve the Yang-Bell network to demonstrate its properties, and then solve the Sioux-Falls network to show its solution efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2018.09.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Charging ; Charging ratio ; Charging stations ; Complementarity ; Cost engineering ; Electric vehicles ; Electricity pricing ; Gasoline ; Logit models ; Mixed user equilibrium ; Preservation ; Recharging ; Route selection ; Travel ; Travel time</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part B: methodological, 2018-11, Vol.117, p.431-454</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1b064a01827304a3430c159414e7b09e68f4dddfe47c5961ebb8b515f3ea4a153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1b064a01827304a3430c159414e7b09e68f4dddfe47c5961ebb8b515f3ea4a153</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0327-2880</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261517308718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cen, Xuekai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Hong K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Enoch</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling electric vehicles adoption for urban commute trips</title><title>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</title><description>•This study develops a mixed user equilibrium formulation with electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline vehicles (GVs).•A new concept called EV charging ratio is introduced to capture EV charging behavior for inner-urban trips.•The formulation with exogenous charging ratio is convex in link flows, stations flows, and EV demands.•The formulation incorporates EV elastic demand, whose utility function is calibrated via a market survey in Hong Kong.•The study observes the property of link flows preservation for a range of EV market penetration. In this paper, a mixed user equilibrium (MUE) model with Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Gasoline Vehicles (GVs) is proposed to account for the charging behavior of EVs in an urban network. The main difference between EVs and GVs lies in that certain EVs with immediate charging need have to traverse a specific station for recharging, while GVs and other EVs without immediate charging need do not have such a requirement. The proportion of EVs with immediate charging need, referred to as charging ratio in this study, is an OD specific endogenous variable, related to their daily commute trip lengths and EV driving ranges, i.e., EVs will need recharging once every few days. The MUE conditions state that EVs with charging need choose the routes via a charging station while en route to their destinations with minimum travel time cost, electricity cost plus charging station cost; whereas GVs and EVs without charging need select the routes with minimum travel cost without having to traverse any charging station. This study also captures the interaction between network design (such as charging station locations) and EV demand which follows a logit model calibrated with an EV market survey conducted in Hong Kong. We formulate the MUE problem first with a nonlinear complementarity (NCP) approach and solve it with a gap function, then we relax the charging ratio to be exogenous and formulate a convex mathematical program for efficient solutions, with the charging ratio iteratively determined. Furthermore, we observe that the resultant link flows exhibit the property of link flow preservation, i.e., the total link flows remain unchanged under a range of EV and GV demands. We first solve the Yang-Bell network to demonstrate its properties, and then solve the Sioux-Falls network to show its solution efficiency.</description><subject>Charging</subject><subject>Charging ratio</subject><subject>Charging stations</subject><subject>Complementarity</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>Logit models</subject><subject>Mixed user equilibrium</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Recharging</subject><subject>Route selection</subject><subject>Travel</subject><subject>Travel time</subject><issn>0191-2615</issn><issn>1879-2367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcB1633NumLWcngC0bc6Dqk6a2mdJqatAP-eyPj2tXdfOfcw8fYNUKKgMVtn86-STPAKoU6BRAnbIVVWSeZKMpTtgKsMckKzM_ZRQg9REICrtjmxbU02PGD00Bm9tbwA31aM1DgunXTbN3IO-f54hs9cuP2-2UmHsEpXLKzTg-Brv7umr0_3L9tn5Ld6-Pz9m6XGFEVc4INFFLHZVkpQGohBRjMa4mSygZqKqpOtm3bkSxNXhdITVM1OeadIC015mLNbo69k3dfC4VZ9W7xY3ypstgqSylzGSk8Usa7EDx1avJ2r_23QlC_jlSvoiP160hBraKBmNkcMxTnHyx5FYyl0VBrfbShWmf_Sf8ALSpuEg</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Cen, Xuekai</creator><creator>Lo, Hong K.</creator><creator>Li, Lu</creator><creator>Lee, Enoch</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0327-2880</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Modeling electric vehicles adoption for urban commute trips</title><author>Cen, Xuekai ; Lo, Hong K. ; Li, Lu ; Lee, Enoch</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-1b064a01827304a3430c159414e7b09e68f4dddfe47c5961ebb8b515f3ea4a153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Charging</topic><topic>Charging ratio</topic><topic>Charging stations</topic><topic>Complementarity</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>Logit models</topic><topic>Mixed user equilibrium</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Recharging</topic><topic>Route selection</topic><topic>Travel</topic><topic>Travel time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cen, Xuekai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Hong K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Enoch</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cen, Xuekai</au><au>Lo, Hong K.</au><au>Li, Lu</au><au>Lee, Enoch</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling electric vehicles adoption for urban commute trips</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>117</volume><spage>431</spage><epage>454</epage><pages>431-454</pages><issn>0191-2615</issn><eissn>1879-2367</eissn><abstract>•This study develops a mixed user equilibrium formulation with electric vehicles (EVs) and gasoline vehicles (GVs).•A new concept called EV charging ratio is introduced to capture EV charging behavior for inner-urban trips.•The formulation with exogenous charging ratio is convex in link flows, stations flows, and EV demands.•The formulation incorporates EV elastic demand, whose utility function is calibrated via a market survey in Hong Kong.•The study observes the property of link flows preservation for a range of EV market penetration. In this paper, a mixed user equilibrium (MUE) model with Electric Vehicles (EVs) and Gasoline Vehicles (GVs) is proposed to account for the charging behavior of EVs in an urban network. The main difference between EVs and GVs lies in that certain EVs with immediate charging need have to traverse a specific station for recharging, while GVs and other EVs without immediate charging need do not have such a requirement. The proportion of EVs with immediate charging need, referred to as charging ratio in this study, is an OD specific endogenous variable, related to their daily commute trip lengths and EV driving ranges, i.e., EVs will need recharging once every few days. The MUE conditions state that EVs with charging need choose the routes via a charging station while en route to their destinations with minimum travel time cost, electricity cost plus charging station cost; whereas GVs and EVs without charging need select the routes with minimum travel cost without having to traverse any charging station. This study also captures the interaction between network design (such as charging station locations) and EV demand which follows a logit model calibrated with an EV market survey conducted in Hong Kong. We formulate the MUE problem first with a nonlinear complementarity (NCP) approach and solve it with a gap function, then we relax the charging ratio to be exogenous and formulate a convex mathematical program for efficient solutions, with the charging ratio iteratively determined. Furthermore, we observe that the resultant link flows exhibit the property of link flow preservation, i.e., the total link flows remain unchanged under a range of EV and GV demands. We first solve the Yang-Bell network to demonstrate its properties, and then solve the Sioux-Falls network to show its solution efficiency.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trb.2018.09.003</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0327-2880</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2615
ispartof Transportation research. Part B: methodological, 2018-11, Vol.117, p.431-454
issn 0191-2615
1879-2367
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2182474454
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Charging
Charging ratio
Charging stations
Complementarity
Cost engineering
Electric vehicles
Electricity pricing
Gasoline
Logit models
Mixed user equilibrium
Preservation
Recharging
Route selection
Travel
Travel time
title Modeling electric vehicles adoption for urban commute trips
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A38%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20electric%20vehicles%20adoption%20for%20urban%20commute%20trips&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20B:%20methodological&rft.au=Cen,%20Xuekai&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=454&rft.pages=431-454&rft.issn=0191-2615&rft.eissn=1879-2367&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trb.2018.09.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2182474454%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2182474454&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191261517308718&rfr_iscdi=true