THE LIMITS OF COPYRIGHT OFFICE EXPERTISE

The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office's chief responsibility-registration and recordation of copyright claims-has take...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Berkeley technology law journal 2019-12, Vol.33 (3), p.733
1. Verfasser: Perzanowski, Aaron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 733
container_title Berkeley technology law journal
container_volume 33
creator Perzanowski, Aaron
description The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office's chief responsibility-registration and recordation of copyright claims-has taken a back seat in recent years to a more ambitious set of substantive rulemakings and policy recommendations. As the triennial rulemaking under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act highlights, the Office is frequently called upon to answer technological questions far beyond its plausible claims of subject matter expertise. This Article traces the Office's history, identifies its substantial but discrete areas of expertise, and reveals the ways in which the Office has overstepped any reasonable definition of its expert knowledge. This Article concludes with a set of recommendations to better align the Office's agenda with its expertise by, first, reducing the current regulatory burdens on the Office, and second, building greater technological and economic competence within the Office, better equipping it to address contemporary questions of copyright policy.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2182448986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2182448986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21824489863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MrYw0DUxNzFiYeA0NLAw0zW2MLTgYOAqLs4yMDAwMjA05mTQCPFwVfDx9PUMCVbwd1Nw9g-IDPJ09wgBctw8nV0VXCMCXINCPINdeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRHlAq3sjQwsjExMLSwsyYOFUApx4tUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2182448986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE LIMITS OF COPYRIGHT OFFICE EXPERTISE</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Perzanowski, Aaron</creator><creatorcontrib>Perzanowski, Aaron</creatorcontrib><description>The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office's chief responsibility-registration and recordation of copyright claims-has taken a back seat in recent years to a more ambitious set of substantive rulemakings and policy recommendations. As the triennial rulemaking under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act highlights, the Office is frequently called upon to answer technological questions far beyond its plausible claims of subject matter expertise. This Article traces the Office's history, identifies its substantial but discrete areas of expertise, and reveals the ways in which the Office has overstepped any reasonable definition of its expert knowledge. This Article concludes with a set of recommendations to better align the Office's agenda with its expertise by, first, reducing the current regulatory burdens on the Office, and second, building greater technological and economic competence within the Office, better equipping it to address contemporary questions of copyright policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1086-3818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-4742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law</publisher><subject>Ambition ; Copyright ; Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US ; Experts ; Knowledge ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>Berkeley technology law journal, 2019-12, Vol.33 (3), p.733</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law Feb 5, 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perzanowski, Aaron</creatorcontrib><title>THE LIMITS OF COPYRIGHT OFFICE EXPERTISE</title><title>Berkeley technology law journal</title><description>The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office's chief responsibility-registration and recordation of copyright claims-has taken a back seat in recent years to a more ambitious set of substantive rulemakings and policy recommendations. As the triennial rulemaking under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act highlights, the Office is frequently called upon to answer technological questions far beyond its plausible claims of subject matter expertise. This Article traces the Office's history, identifies its substantial but discrete areas of expertise, and reveals the ways in which the Office has overstepped any reasonable definition of its expert knowledge. This Article concludes with a set of recommendations to better align the Office's agenda with its expertise by, first, reducing the current regulatory burdens on the Office, and second, building greater technological and economic competence within the Office, better equipping it to address contemporary questions of copyright policy.</description><subject>Ambition</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>1086-3818</issn><issn>2380-4742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYuA0MrYw0DUxNzFiYeA0NLAw0zW2MLTgYOAqLs4yMDAwMjA05mTQCPFwVfDx9PUMCVbwd1Nw9g-IDPJ09wgBctw8nV0VXCMCXINCPINdeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g7Kba4izh25BUX5haWpxSXxWfmlRHlAq3sjQwsjExMLSwsyYOFUApx4tUg</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Perzanowski, Aaron</creator><general>University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>THE LIMITS OF COPYRIGHT OFFICE EXPERTISE</title><author>Perzanowski, Aaron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21824489863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ambition</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perzanowski, Aaron</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Berkeley technology law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perzanowski, Aaron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE LIMITS OF COPYRIGHT OFFICE EXPERTISE</atitle><jtitle>Berkeley technology law journal</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>733</spage><pages>733-</pages><issn>1086-3818</issn><eissn>2380-4742</eissn><abstract>The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office's chief responsibility-registration and recordation of copyright claims-has taken a back seat in recent years to a more ambitious set of substantive rulemakings and policy recommendations. As the triennial rulemaking under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act highlights, the Office is frequently called upon to answer technological questions far beyond its plausible claims of subject matter expertise. This Article traces the Office's history, identifies its substantial but discrete areas of expertise, and reveals the ways in which the Office has overstepped any reasonable definition of its expert knowledge. This Article concludes with a set of recommendations to better align the Office's agenda with its expertise by, first, reducing the current regulatory burdens on the Office, and second, building greater technological and economic competence within the Office, better equipping it to address contemporary questions of copyright policy.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>University of California, Boalt Hall School of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1086-3818
ispartof Berkeley technology law journal, 2019-12, Vol.33 (3), p.733
issn 1086-3818
2380-4742
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2182448986
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Ambition
Copyright
Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998-US
Experts
Knowledge
Technological change
title THE LIMITS OF COPYRIGHT OFFICE EXPERTISE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20LIMITS%20OF%20COPYRIGHT%20OFFICE%20EXPERTISE&rft.jtitle=Berkeley%20technology%20law%20journal&rft.au=Perzanowski,%20Aaron&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=733&rft.pages=733-&rft.issn=1086-3818&rft.eissn=2380-4742&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2182448986%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2182448986&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true