Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique1

The DE content within cereal grains can vary 25% mainly due to changes in apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy. In vitro digestibility techniques have been developed to predict the DE value among feedstuffs. However, these techniques have not been tested properly for their suitability...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2008-10, Vol.86 (10), p.2619-2626
Hauptverfasser: Regmi, P. R., Sauer, W. C., Zijlstra, R. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2626
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2619
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 86
creator Regmi, P. R.
Sauer, W. C.
Zijlstra, R. T.
description The DE content within cereal grains can vary 25% mainly due to changes in apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy. In vitro digestibility techniques have been developed to predict the DE value among feedstuffs. However, these techniques have not been tested properly for their suitability to predict the variation in energy digestibility and DE content within a cereal grain. The objective of the present study was to establish and evaluate an in vitro digestibility technique to predict in vivo ATTD of energy of barley in grower pigs. Barley grain samples (hulled, n = 21) with a large range in quality were collected; the ADF and CP content ranged from 4.5 to 11.4% and 10.0 to 16.4% (DM basis), respectively. The ATTD of energy was determined using barrows (n = 63, 33 ± 2.1 kg of initial BW) in 2 periods with 6 observations per sample and ranged from 51.9 to 78.5%, with relative errors between 0.4 and 5.0%. A preliminary study, comparing a 2- and a 3-step in vitro digestibility technique using 3 barley samples, indicated that Rsup2 between in vivo and in vitro energy digestibility was greater using the 3- than the 2-step technique (0.92 vs. 0.76). Therefore, the 3-step in vitro digestibility technique was used solely in subsequent analyses. Briefly, ground barley was subsequently incubated with pepsin for 6 h, pancreatin for 18 h, and cellulase for 24 h. The DM and GE content of samples and residues were measured to calculate digestibility. The in vitro energy digestibility of the 21 barley samples with duplicate measurements ranged from 63.7 to 82.2%, with relative errors between 0.1 and 2.6%. In vitro energy digestibility was strongly related (y = 1.25 x - 25.22; Rsup2 = 0.81) to in vivo energy digestibility. Finally, a subset of 7 barley samples was analyzed in quadruplicate using the 3-step in vitro technique. The relationship between in vitro and in vivo energy digestibility was very strong (y = 1.23 x - 25.33; Rsup2 = 0.97) with relative errors between 0.5 and 2.7%. In vitro DE and energy digestibility were perfectly related (Rsup2 = 1.00). In summary, the 3-step in vitro energy digestibility technique can accurately predict the ATTD of energy in barley in grower pigs. The 3-step in vitro digestibility technique, thus, might be useful as the reference laboratory procedure to calibrate analytical equipment to rapidly predict the ATTD of energy in barley. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas.2008-1058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218156120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1580022831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1090-c64768de0563b8be327f9222a9dea8d4a6eb942c87467fa39364463845b4fa2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDtPwzAYRS0EEqUwslvsKfbnR5wRVbykSjDAbDmJE1wFO9huUWb-OI3KxHSXe-6VDkLXlKxAQHm7NWkFhKiCEqFO0IIKEAWjkp2iBSFAC6UonKOLlLaEUBCVWKCf12hb12QXPA4ddh7v3T5gM44mWp9xDtkMOEfTZGy9jf2EW9fblF3tBpenGapNHOw0s30M3zbi0fUJ75LzPTb-uJlj-Adm23x497Wz9BKddWZI9uovl-j94f5t_VRsXh6f13eboqGkIkUjeSlVa4mQrFa1ZVB2FQCYqrVGtdxIW1ccGlVyWXaGVUxyLpniouadAcOW6Oa4O8Zw-E1Zb8Mu-sOlBqqokBTIoVQcS00MKUXb6TG6TxMnTYmeNeuDZj1r1rNm9gtGwHJq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218156120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Regmi, P. R. ; Sauer, W. C. ; Zijlstra, R. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Regmi, P. R. ; Sauer, W. C. ; Zijlstra, R. T.</creatorcontrib><description>The DE content within cereal grains can vary 25% mainly due to changes in apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy. In vitro digestibility techniques have been developed to predict the DE value among feedstuffs. However, these techniques have not been tested properly for their suitability to predict the variation in energy digestibility and DE content within a cereal grain. The objective of the present study was to establish and evaluate an in vitro digestibility technique to predict in vivo ATTD of energy of barley in grower pigs. Barley grain samples (hulled, n = 21) with a large range in quality were collected; the ADF and CP content ranged from 4.5 to 11.4% and 10.0 to 16.4% (DM basis), respectively. The ATTD of energy was determined using barrows (n = 63, 33 ± 2.1 kg of initial BW) in 2 periods with 6 observations per sample and ranged from 51.9 to 78.5%, with relative errors between 0.4 and 5.0%. A preliminary study, comparing a 2- and a 3-step in vitro digestibility technique using 3 barley samples, indicated that Rsup2 between in vivo and in vitro energy digestibility was greater using the 3- than the 2-step technique (0.92 vs. 0.76). Therefore, the 3-step in vitro digestibility technique was used solely in subsequent analyses. Briefly, ground barley was subsequently incubated with pepsin for 6 h, pancreatin for 18 h, and cellulase for 24 h. The DM and GE content of samples and residues were measured to calculate digestibility. The in vitro energy digestibility of the 21 barley samples with duplicate measurements ranged from 63.7 to 82.2%, with relative errors between 0.1 and 2.6%. In vitro energy digestibility was strongly related (y = 1.25 x - 25.22; Rsup2 = 0.81) to in vivo energy digestibility. Finally, a subset of 7 barley samples was analyzed in quadruplicate using the 3-step in vitro technique. The relationship between in vitro and in vivo energy digestibility was very strong (y = 1.23 x - 25.33; Rsup2 = 0.97) with relative errors between 0.5 and 2.7%. In vitro DE and energy digestibility were perfectly related (Rsup2 = 1.00). In summary, the 3-step in vitro energy digestibility technique can accurately predict the ATTD of energy in barley in grower pigs. The 3-step in vitro digestibility technique, thus, might be useful as the reference laboratory procedure to calibrate analytical equipment to rapidly predict the ATTD of energy in barley. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Barley ; Digestive system ; Energy ; Hogs ; Reproductive technologies</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2008-10, Vol.86 (10), p.2619-2626</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1090-c64768de0563b8be327f9222a9dea8d4a6eb942c87467fa39364463845b4fa2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1090-c64768de0563b8be327f9222a9dea8d4a6eb942c87467fa39364463845b4fa2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Regmi, P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, W. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, R. T.</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>The DE content within cereal grains can vary 25% mainly due to changes in apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy. In vitro digestibility techniques have been developed to predict the DE value among feedstuffs. However, these techniques have not been tested properly for their suitability to predict the variation in energy digestibility and DE content within a cereal grain. The objective of the present study was to establish and evaluate an in vitro digestibility technique to predict in vivo ATTD of energy of barley in grower pigs. Barley grain samples (hulled, n = 21) with a large range in quality were collected; the ADF and CP content ranged from 4.5 to 11.4% and 10.0 to 16.4% (DM basis), respectively. The ATTD of energy was determined using barrows (n = 63, 33 ± 2.1 kg of initial BW) in 2 periods with 6 observations per sample and ranged from 51.9 to 78.5%, with relative errors between 0.4 and 5.0%. A preliminary study, comparing a 2- and a 3-step in vitro digestibility technique using 3 barley samples, indicated that Rsup2 between in vivo and in vitro energy digestibility was greater using the 3- than the 2-step technique (0.92 vs. 0.76). Therefore, the 3-step in vitro digestibility technique was used solely in subsequent analyses. Briefly, ground barley was subsequently incubated with pepsin for 6 h, pancreatin for 18 h, and cellulase for 24 h. The DM and GE content of samples and residues were measured to calculate digestibility. The in vitro energy digestibility of the 21 barley samples with duplicate measurements ranged from 63.7 to 82.2%, with relative errors between 0.1 and 2.6%. In vitro energy digestibility was strongly related (y = 1.25 x - 25.22; Rsup2 = 0.81) to in vivo energy digestibility. Finally, a subset of 7 barley samples was analyzed in quadruplicate using the 3-step in vitro technique. The relationship between in vitro and in vivo energy digestibility was very strong (y = 1.23 x - 25.33; Rsup2 = 0.97) with relative errors between 0.5 and 2.7%. In vitro DE and energy digestibility were perfectly related (Rsup2 = 1.00). In summary, the 3-step in vitro energy digestibility technique can accurately predict the ATTD of energy in barley in grower pigs. The 3-step in vitro digestibility technique, thus, might be useful as the reference laboratory procedure to calibrate analytical equipment to rapidly predict the ATTD of energy in barley. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Barley</subject><subject>Digestive system</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDtPwzAYRS0EEqUwslvsKfbnR5wRVbykSjDAbDmJE1wFO9huUWb-OI3KxHSXe-6VDkLXlKxAQHm7NWkFhKiCEqFO0IIKEAWjkp2iBSFAC6UonKOLlLaEUBCVWKCf12hb12QXPA4ddh7v3T5gM44mWp9xDtkMOEfTZGy9jf2EW9fblF3tBpenGapNHOw0s30M3zbi0fUJ75LzPTb-uJlj-Adm23x497Wz9BKddWZI9uovl-j94f5t_VRsXh6f13eboqGkIkUjeSlVa4mQrFa1ZVB2FQCYqrVGtdxIW1ccGlVyWXaGVUxyLpniouadAcOW6Oa4O8Zw-E1Zb8Mu-sOlBqqokBTIoVQcS00MKUXb6TG6TxMnTYmeNeuDZj1r1rNm9gtGwHJq</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Regmi, P. R.</creator><creator>Sauer, W. C.</creator><creator>Zijlstra, R. T.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique1</title><author>Regmi, P. R. ; Sauer, W. C. ; Zijlstra, R. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1090-c64768de0563b8be327f9222a9dea8d4a6eb942c87467fa39364463845b4fa2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Barley</topic><topic>Digestive system</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Regmi, P. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, W. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zijlstra, R. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Regmi, P. R.</au><au>Sauer, W. C.</au><au>Zijlstra, R. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2619</spage><epage>2626</epage><pages>2619-2626</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>The DE content within cereal grains can vary 25% mainly due to changes in apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy. In vitro digestibility techniques have been developed to predict the DE value among feedstuffs. However, these techniques have not been tested properly for their suitability to predict the variation in energy digestibility and DE content within a cereal grain. The objective of the present study was to establish and evaluate an in vitro digestibility technique to predict in vivo ATTD of energy of barley in grower pigs. Barley grain samples (hulled, n = 21) with a large range in quality were collected; the ADF and CP content ranged from 4.5 to 11.4% and 10.0 to 16.4% (DM basis), respectively. The ATTD of energy was determined using barrows (n = 63, 33 ± 2.1 kg of initial BW) in 2 periods with 6 observations per sample and ranged from 51.9 to 78.5%, with relative errors between 0.4 and 5.0%. A preliminary study, comparing a 2- and a 3-step in vitro digestibility technique using 3 barley samples, indicated that Rsup2 between in vivo and in vitro energy digestibility was greater using the 3- than the 2-step technique (0.92 vs. 0.76). Therefore, the 3-step in vitro digestibility technique was used solely in subsequent analyses. Briefly, ground barley was subsequently incubated with pepsin for 6 h, pancreatin for 18 h, and cellulase for 24 h. The DM and GE content of samples and residues were measured to calculate digestibility. The in vitro energy digestibility of the 21 barley samples with duplicate measurements ranged from 63.7 to 82.2%, with relative errors between 0.1 and 2.6%. In vitro energy digestibility was strongly related (y = 1.25 x - 25.22; Rsup2 = 0.81) to in vivo energy digestibility. Finally, a subset of 7 barley samples was analyzed in quadruplicate using the 3-step in vitro technique. The relationship between in vitro and in vivo energy digestibility was very strong (y = 1.23 x - 25.33; Rsup2 = 0.97) with relative errors between 0.5 and 2.7%. In vitro DE and energy digestibility were perfectly related (Rsup2 = 1.00). In summary, the 3-step in vitro energy digestibility technique can accurately predict the ATTD of energy in barley in grower pigs. The 3-step in vitro digestibility technique, thus, might be useful as the reference laboratory procedure to calibrate analytical equipment to rapidly predict the ATTD of energy in barley. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas.2008-1058</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2008-10, Vol.86 (10), p.2619-2626
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218156120
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Barley
Digestive system
Energy
Hogs
Reproductive technologies
title Prediction of in vivo apparent total tract energy digestibility of barley in grower pigs using an in vitro digestibility technique1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A29%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20in%20vivo%20apparent%20total%20tract%20energy%20digestibility%20of%20barley%20in%20grower%20pigs%20using%20an%20in%20vitro%20digestibility%20technique1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Regmi,%20P.%20R.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2619&rft.epage=2626&rft.pages=2619-2626&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2008-1058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1580022831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218156120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true