Effects of energy source on methionine utilization by growing steers1
We evaluated the effects of different supplemental energy sources on Met use in growing steers. Ruminally cannulated Holstein steers were used in two 6 × 6 Latin squares, and data were pooled for analyses. In Exp. 1, steers (148 kg) were fed 2.3 kg of DM/d of a diet based on soybean hulls. Treatment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.1505-1511 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1511 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1505 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Schroeder, G. F. Titgemeyer, E. C. Awawdeh, M. S. Smith, J. S. Gnad, D. P. |
description | We evaluated the effects of different supplemental energy sources on Met use in growing steers. Ruminally cannulated Holstein steers were used in two 6 × 6 Latin squares, and data were pooled for analyses. In Exp. 1, steers (148 kg) were fed 2.3 kg of DM/d of a diet based on soybean hulls. Treatments (2 × 3 factorial) were abomasal infusion of 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and supplementation with no energy or with glucose (360 g/d) or fat (150 g/d) continuously infused into the abomasum. In Exp. 2, steers (190 kg) received 2.6 kg of dietary DM/d and were provided (2 × 3 factorial) with 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and with no supplemental energy or with acetate (385 g/d) or propionate (270 g/ d) continuously infused into the rumen. In both experiments, the energy sources supplied 1.3 Meal of GE/d, and all steers received basal infusions of 400 g of acetate/d into the rumen and a mixture (125 g/d) of all essential AA except Met into the abomasum. Nitrogen balance (18.8 vs. 23.5 g/d; P < 0.01) and whole-body protein synthesis (2.1 vs. 2.3 kg/d; P < 0.07) were increased by Met supplementation, indicating that protein deposition was limited by Met. Supplemental energy reduced (P < 0.01) urinary N excretion and increased (P < 0.01) N retention without differences among energy sources. Increases in N retention in response to Met were numerically greater when energy was supplemented. Efficiency of supplemental Met use was 11% when no energy was supplemented but averaged 21% when 1.3 Meal of GE/d was provided. Wholebody protein synthesis and degradation were not affected by energy supplementation. Serum insulin concentrations were increased by glucose and propionate supplementation. Serum IGF-I concentrations were increased by supplementation with Met or glucogenic sources of energy. In growing steers, N retention was increased by energy supplementation even though protein deposition was limited by Met, suggesting that energy supplementation improves the efficiency of AA use. These responses were independent of the source of energy. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/2006.8461505x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218133701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1084349791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c148x-36aa14cf21736e25a8aaf8191b4f2d64a4d885ea8b8ac2731dab0b38fd6f3c4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LAzEYhIMouFaP3oP3rXnztelRSrVCwYueQzb7Zt3SbmqyxdZf75bqaRgYZoaHkHtgU6549cgZ01MjNSimDhekAMVVKUCLS1IwxqE0Bvg1ucl5zRhwNVMFWSxCQD9kGgPFHlN7pDnuk0cae7rF4bOLfdcj3Q_dpvtxw2hpfaRtit9d39I8IKYMt-QquE3Guz-dkI_nxft8Wa7eXl7nT6vSgzSHUmjnQPrAoRIauXLGuWBgBrUMvNHSycYYhc7UxnleCWhczWphQqOD8NKJCXk49-5S_NpjHux6PNuPk5aDASEqBmOoPId8ijknDHaXuq1LRwvMnkDZEyj7D0r8AgstW2k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218133701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of energy source on methionine utilization by growing steers1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Schroeder, G. F. ; Titgemeyer, E. C. ; Awawdeh, M. S. ; Smith, J. S. ; Gnad, D. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, G. F. ; Titgemeyer, E. C. ; Awawdeh, M. S. ; Smith, J. S. ; Gnad, D. P.</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated the effects of different supplemental energy sources on Met use in growing steers. Ruminally cannulated Holstein steers were used in two 6 × 6 Latin squares, and data were pooled for analyses. In Exp. 1, steers (148 kg) were fed 2.3 kg of DM/d of a diet based on soybean hulls. Treatments (2 × 3 factorial) were abomasal infusion of 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and supplementation with no energy or with glucose (360 g/d) or fat (150 g/d) continuously infused into the abomasum. In Exp. 2, steers (190 kg) received 2.6 kg of dietary DM/d and were provided (2 × 3 factorial) with 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and with no supplemental energy or with acetate (385 g/d) or propionate (270 g/ d) continuously infused into the rumen. In both experiments, the energy sources supplied 1.3 Meal of GE/d, and all steers received basal infusions of 400 g of acetate/d into the rumen and a mixture (125 g/d) of all essential AA except Met into the abomasum. Nitrogen balance (18.8 vs. 23.5 g/d; P < 0.01) and whole-body protein synthesis (2.1 vs. 2.3 kg/d; P < 0.07) were increased by Met supplementation, indicating that protein deposition was limited by Met. Supplemental energy reduced (P < 0.01) urinary N excretion and increased (P < 0.01) N retention without differences among energy sources. Increases in N retention in response to Met were numerically greater when energy was supplemented. Efficiency of supplemental Met use was 11% when no energy was supplemented but averaged 21% when 1.3 Meal of GE/d was provided. Wholebody protein synthesis and degradation were not affected by energy supplementation. Serum insulin concentrations were increased by glucose and propionate supplementation. Serum IGF-I concentrations were increased by supplementation with Met or glucogenic sources of energy. In growing steers, N retention was increased by energy supplementation even though protein deposition was limited by Met, suggesting that energy supplementation improves the efficiency of AA use. These responses were independent of the source of energy. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2006.8461505x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Cattle ; Diet ; Efficiency ; Fatty acids ; Protein synthesis ; Random variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.1505-1511</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c148x-36aa14cf21736e25a8aaf8191b4f2d64a4d885ea8b8ac2731dab0b38fd6f3c4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c148x-36aa14cf21736e25a8aaf8191b4f2d64a4d885ea8b8ac2731dab0b38fd6f3c4a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, G. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titgemeyer, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awawdeh, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnad, D. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of energy source on methionine utilization by growing steers1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>We evaluated the effects of different supplemental energy sources on Met use in growing steers. Ruminally cannulated Holstein steers were used in two 6 × 6 Latin squares, and data were pooled for analyses. In Exp. 1, steers (148 kg) were fed 2.3 kg of DM/d of a diet based on soybean hulls. Treatments (2 × 3 factorial) were abomasal infusion of 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and supplementation with no energy or with glucose (360 g/d) or fat (150 g/d) continuously infused into the abomasum. In Exp. 2, steers (190 kg) received 2.6 kg of dietary DM/d and were provided (2 × 3 factorial) with 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and with no supplemental energy or with acetate (385 g/d) or propionate (270 g/ d) continuously infused into the rumen. In both experiments, the energy sources supplied 1.3 Meal of GE/d, and all steers received basal infusions of 400 g of acetate/d into the rumen and a mixture (125 g/d) of all essential AA except Met into the abomasum. Nitrogen balance (18.8 vs. 23.5 g/d; P < 0.01) and whole-body protein synthesis (2.1 vs. 2.3 kg/d; P < 0.07) were increased by Met supplementation, indicating that protein deposition was limited by Met. Supplemental energy reduced (P < 0.01) urinary N excretion and increased (P < 0.01) N retention without differences among energy sources. Increases in N retention in response to Met were numerically greater when energy was supplemented. Efficiency of supplemental Met use was 11% when no energy was supplemented but averaged 21% when 1.3 Meal of GE/d was provided. Wholebody protein synthesis and degradation were not affected by energy supplementation. Serum insulin concentrations were increased by glucose and propionate supplementation. Serum IGF-I concentrations were increased by supplementation with Met or glucogenic sources of energy. In growing steers, N retention was increased by energy supplementation even though protein deposition was limited by Met, suggesting that energy supplementation improves the efficiency of AA use. These responses were independent of the source of energy. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1LAzEYhIMouFaP3oP3rXnztelRSrVCwYueQzb7Zt3SbmqyxdZf75bqaRgYZoaHkHtgU6549cgZ01MjNSimDhekAMVVKUCLS1IwxqE0Bvg1ucl5zRhwNVMFWSxCQD9kGgPFHlN7pDnuk0cae7rF4bOLfdcj3Q_dpvtxw2hpfaRtit9d39I8IKYMt-QquE3Guz-dkI_nxft8Wa7eXl7nT6vSgzSHUmjnQPrAoRIauXLGuWBgBrUMvNHSycYYhc7UxnleCWhczWphQqOD8NKJCXk49-5S_NpjHux6PNuPk5aDASEqBmOoPId8ijknDHaXuq1LRwvMnkDZEyj7D0r8AgstW2k</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Schroeder, G. F.</creator><creator>Titgemeyer, E. C.</creator><creator>Awawdeh, M. S.</creator><creator>Smith, J. S.</creator><creator>Gnad, D. P.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Effects of energy source on methionine utilization by growing steers1</title><author>Schroeder, G. F. ; Titgemeyer, E. C. ; Awawdeh, M. S. ; Smith, J. S. ; Gnad, D. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c148x-36aa14cf21736e25a8aaf8191b4f2d64a4d885ea8b8ac2731dab0b38fd6f3c4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, G. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titgemeyer, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Awawdeh, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnad, D. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schroeder, G. F.</au><au>Titgemeyer, E. C.</au><au>Awawdeh, M. S.</au><au>Smith, J. S.</au><au>Gnad, D. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of energy source on methionine utilization by growing steers1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1505</spage><epage>1511</epage><pages>1505-1511</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>We evaluated the effects of different supplemental energy sources on Met use in growing steers. Ruminally cannulated Holstein steers were used in two 6 × 6 Latin squares, and data were pooled for analyses. In Exp. 1, steers (148 kg) were fed 2.3 kg of DM/d of a diet based on soybean hulls. Treatments (2 × 3 factorial) were abomasal infusion of 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and supplementation with no energy or with glucose (360 g/d) or fat (150 g/d) continuously infused into the abomasum. In Exp. 2, steers (190 kg) received 2.6 kg of dietary DM/d and were provided (2 × 3 factorial) with 0 or 3 g of L-Met/d, and with no supplemental energy or with acetate (385 g/d) or propionate (270 g/ d) continuously infused into the rumen. In both experiments, the energy sources supplied 1.3 Meal of GE/d, and all steers received basal infusions of 400 g of acetate/d into the rumen and a mixture (125 g/d) of all essential AA except Met into the abomasum. Nitrogen balance (18.8 vs. 23.5 g/d; P < 0.01) and whole-body protein synthesis (2.1 vs. 2.3 kg/d; P < 0.07) were increased by Met supplementation, indicating that protein deposition was limited by Met. Supplemental energy reduced (P < 0.01) urinary N excretion and increased (P < 0.01) N retention without differences among energy sources. Increases in N retention in response to Met were numerically greater when energy was supplemented. Efficiency of supplemental Met use was 11% when no energy was supplemented but averaged 21% when 1.3 Meal of GE/d was provided. Wholebody protein synthesis and degradation were not affected by energy supplementation. Serum insulin concentrations were increased by glucose and propionate supplementation. Serum IGF-I concentrations were increased by supplementation with Met or glucogenic sources of energy. In growing steers, N retention was increased by energy supplementation even though protein deposition was limited by Met, suggesting that energy supplementation improves the efficiency of AA use. These responses were independent of the source of energy. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/2006.8461505x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.1505-1511 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_218133701 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Amino acids Cattle Diet Efficiency Fatty acids Protein synthesis Random variables |
title | Effects of energy source on methionine utilization by growing steers1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T04%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20energy%20source%20on%20methionine%20utilization%20by%20growing%20steers1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Schroeder,%20G.%20F.&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1505&rft.epage=1511&rft.pages=1505-1511&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2006.8461505x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1084349791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218133701&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |