Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. II. Correlated response in litter size and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population1

Our objective was to evaluate the correlated responses to selection for litter size and its components after 10 generations of divergent selection for uterine capacity (UC). A total of 294 intact females from the 11th and 12th generations of divergent selection for high and low UC and from a cryopre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2005-10, Vol.83 (10), p.2303-2307
Hauptverfasser: Santacreu, M. A., Mocé, M. L., Climent, A., Blasco, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2307
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2303
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 83
creator Santacreu, M. A.
Mocé, M. L.
Climent, A.
Blasco, A.
description Our objective was to evaluate the correlated responses to selection for litter size and its components after 10 generations of divergent selection for uterine capacity (UC). A total of 294 intact females from the 11th and 12th generations of divergent selection for high and low UC and from a cryopreserved control population was used (139, 112, and 43 females, respectively). Uterine capacity was assessed as litter size in unilaterally ovariectomized females. Traits recorded on females for up to five parities were litter size (LS) and number born alive (NBA). Laparoscopy was performed in all females at d 12 of their second parity, and the ovulation rate (OR) and number of implanted embryos (IE) were recorded in these females. Embryo survival (ES = IE/OR), fetal survival (FS = LS/IE), and prenatal survival (PS = LS/OR) were computed. Correlated responses in LS and in its components were inferred using Bayesian methods. Correlated responses in LS were asymmetric. The divergence between high and low lines was 2.35 kits, mainly because of a higher correlated response in the low line (1.88 kits). The lower LS in the low line was associated with a lower PS (control - low = 0.14), because of decreases in ES and FS. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.2527/2005.83102303x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218113675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>906669811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1115-e8e78f6f7116bfc458857319664a08c1ae268d16a1bb5b452e6f6505259198933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1v2zAMFYYVWJru2jPRuz1RimT5WGT9CBBgl_ZsyAq9qXAtT5K7Zv-m_3TKOuxEgHzv8ZGPsUvktVCi-SI4V7WRyIXk8vUDW6ESqpKo5Ue24lxgZQyKT-w8pSfOUahWrdjbV_9C8TtNGRKN5LIPEwwhwpIp-onA2dk6n4_gJ4i2731ONex2NWxDjDTaTAeIlOYwJTphRp8LE5L_TWCnAxQ8uPBc5mVHAkrZP_8l_fL5B1hw8RjmIkDxpTRdmHIMI8xhXop2MYMX7GywY6LP_-qaPd7ePGzvq_23u932el85RFQVGWrMoIcGUfeD2yhjVCOx1XpjuXFoSWhzQG2x71W_UYL0oBUvL2qxNa2Ua3b1rjvH8HMpPrunsMSprOwEGkSpG1VA9TvIxZBSpKGbY7knHjvk3SmF7pRC9z8F-QdH4Xx7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218113675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. II. Correlated response in litter size and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population1</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Santacreu, M. A. ; Mocé, M. L. ; Climent, A. ; Blasco, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Santacreu, M. A. ; Mocé, M. L. ; Climent, A. ; Blasco, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Our objective was to evaluate the correlated responses to selection for litter size and its components after 10 generations of divergent selection for uterine capacity (UC). A total of 294 intact females from the 11th and 12th generations of divergent selection for high and low UC and from a cryopreserved control population was used (139, 112, and 43 females, respectively). Uterine capacity was assessed as litter size in unilaterally ovariectomized females. Traits recorded on females for up to five parities were litter size (LS) and number born alive (NBA). Laparoscopy was performed in all females at d 12 of their second parity, and the ovulation rate (OR) and number of implanted embryos (IE) were recorded in these females. Embryo survival (ES = IE/OR), fetal survival (FS = LS/IE), and prenatal survival (PS = LS/OR) were computed. Correlated responses in LS and in its components were inferred using Bayesian methods. Correlated responses in LS were asymmetric. The divergence between high and low lines was 2.35 kits, mainly because of a higher correlated response in the low line (1.88 kits). The lower LS in the low line was associated with a lower PS (control - low = 0.14), because of decreases in ES and FS. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2005.83102303x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Animal reproduction ; Bayesian analysis ; Experiments ; Females ; Genetics ; Rabbits ; Reproductive system ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2005-10, Vol.83 (10), p.2303-2307</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1115-e8e78f6f7116bfc458857319664a08c1ae268d16a1bb5b452e6f6505259198933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1115-e8e78f6f7116bfc458857319664a08c1ae268d16a1bb5b452e6f6505259198933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santacreu, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mocé, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Climent, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasco, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. II. Correlated response in litter size and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Our objective was to evaluate the correlated responses to selection for litter size and its components after 10 generations of divergent selection for uterine capacity (UC). A total of 294 intact females from the 11th and 12th generations of divergent selection for high and low UC and from a cryopreserved control population was used (139, 112, and 43 females, respectively). Uterine capacity was assessed as litter size in unilaterally ovariectomized females. Traits recorded on females for up to five parities were litter size (LS) and number born alive (NBA). Laparoscopy was performed in all females at d 12 of their second parity, and the ovulation rate (OR) and number of implanted embryos (IE) were recorded in these females. Embryo survival (ES = IE/OR), fetal survival (FS = LS/IE), and prenatal survival (PS = LS/OR) were computed. Correlated responses in LS and in its components were inferred using Bayesian methods. Correlated responses in LS were asymmetric. The divergence between high and low lines was 2.35 kits, mainly because of a higher correlated response in the low line (1.88 kits). The lower LS in the low line was associated with a lower PS (control - low = 0.14), because of decreases in ES and FS. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Reproductive system</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UU1v2zAMFYYVWJru2jPRuz1RimT5WGT9CBBgl_ZsyAq9qXAtT5K7Zv-m_3TKOuxEgHzv8ZGPsUvktVCi-SI4V7WRyIXk8vUDW6ESqpKo5Ue24lxgZQyKT-w8pSfOUahWrdjbV_9C8TtNGRKN5LIPEwwhwpIp-onA2dk6n4_gJ4i2731ONex2NWxDjDTaTAeIlOYwJTphRp8LE5L_TWCnAxQ8uPBc5mVHAkrZP_8l_fL5B1hw8RjmIkDxpTRdmHIMI8xhXop2MYMX7GywY6LP_-qaPd7ePGzvq_23u932el85RFQVGWrMoIcGUfeD2yhjVCOx1XpjuXFoSWhzQG2x71W_UYL0oBUvL2qxNa2Ua3b1rjvH8HMpPrunsMSprOwEGkSpG1VA9TvIxZBSpKGbY7knHjvk3SmF7pRC9z8F-QdH4Xx7</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Santacreu, M. A.</creator><creator>Mocé, M. L.</creator><creator>Climent, A.</creator><creator>Blasco, A.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. II. Correlated response in litter size and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population1</title><author>Santacreu, M. A. ; Mocé, M. L. ; Climent, A. ; Blasco, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1115-e8e78f6f7116bfc458857319664a08c1ae268d16a1bb5b452e6f6505259198933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Reproductive system</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santacreu, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mocé, M. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Climent, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blasco, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santacreu, M. A.</au><au>Mocé, M. L.</au><au>Climent, A.</au><au>Blasco, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. II. Correlated response in litter size and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2303</spage><epage>2307</epage><pages>2303-2307</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Our objective was to evaluate the correlated responses to selection for litter size and its components after 10 generations of divergent selection for uterine capacity (UC). A total of 294 intact females from the 11th and 12th generations of divergent selection for high and low UC and from a cryopreserved control population was used (139, 112, and 43 females, respectively). Uterine capacity was assessed as litter size in unilaterally ovariectomized females. Traits recorded on females for up to five parities were litter size (LS) and number born alive (NBA). Laparoscopy was performed in all females at d 12 of their second parity, and the ovulation rate (OR) and number of implanted embryos (IE) were recorded in these females. Embryo survival (ES = IE/OR), fetal survival (FS = LS/IE), and prenatal survival (PS = LS/OR) were computed. Correlated responses in LS and in its components were inferred using Bayesian methods. Correlated responses in LS were asymmetric. The divergence between high and low lines was 2.35 kits, mainly because of a higher correlated response in the low line (1.88 kits). The lower LS in the low line was associated with a lower PS (control - low = 0.14), because of decreases in ES and FS. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/2005.83102303x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2005-10, Vol.83 (10), p.2303-2307
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218113675
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animal populations
Animal reproduction
Bayesian analysis
Experiments
Females
Genetics
Rabbits
Reproductive system
Studies
title Divergent selection for uterine capacity in rabbits. II. Correlated response in litter size and its components estimated with a cryopreserved control population1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T02%3A40%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20selection%20for%20uterine%20capacity%20in%20rabbits.%20II.%20Correlated%20response%20in%20litter%20size%20and%20its%20components%20estimated%20with%20a%20cryopreserved%20control%20population1&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Santacreu,%20M.%20A.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2303&rft.epage=2307&rft.pages=2303-2307&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2005.83102303x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E906669811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218113675&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true