The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment

The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology research and development 2001-01, Vol.49 (3), p.71-86
Hauptverfasser: Flynn, Anna E., Klein, James D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 3
container_start_page 71
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 49
creator Flynn, Anna E.
Klein, James D.
description The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/bf02504916
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218050775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ633255</ericid><jstor_id>30221123</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30221123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKsXzwpB8CKsTpJN0j3a2tZKwUs9L9lsoik1qcmu4L93y9Y6h5mB9808eAhdErgnAPKhskA55AURR2hAOBeZ4ECOux1ymhFBi1N0ltIaupJiNEDz1YfBC283rfHa4GDxk0u6TckFj-cxtNuEnccKT1Qy2bhrNV4aFb3z73jqv10M_tP45hydWLVJ5mI_h-htNl1NnrPl63wxeVxmmgneZDkYCTbn0nDLazkilbYahBacmqoa8QqoqHMpla6ZAG41Z4ZSk1smLFil2BDd9H-3MXy1JjXlOrTRd5YlJSPgICXvoLse0jGkFI0tt9F9qvhTEih3OZXj2V9OHXy7_6iSVhsbldcu_V_kpChAso676jkTnT7I0xfBGOU7z-teXqcmxIPOgFJCKGO_mpV4ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218050775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Flynn, Anna E. ; Klein, James D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anna E. ; Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><description>The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf02504916</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETRDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Association for Educational Communications and Technology</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Case Method (Teaching Technique) ; Collaborative learning ; College instruction ; College Students ; Control Groups ; Cooperative learning ; Course Content ; Development ; Discussion groups ; Educational Environment ; Educational Objectives ; Educational sciences ; Evaluation of teaching methods ; Group Discussion ; Higher Education ; Individualized Instruction ; Instructional Design ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Newsgroups ; Problem based learning ; Purchasing ; Recommendations ; School environment ; Skills ; Student Attitudes ; Student Reaction ; Student Teachers ; Students ; Teacher education ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2001-01, Vol.49 (3), p.71-86</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Educational Communications &amp; Technology 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30221123$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30221123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ633255$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14199073$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><description>The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Case Method (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>College instruction</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Discussion groups</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation of teaching methods</subject><subject>Group Discussion</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Newsgroups</subject><subject>Problem based learning</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>School environment</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Reaction</subject><subject>Student Teachers</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKsXzwpB8CKsTpJN0j3a2tZKwUs9L9lsoik1qcmu4L93y9Y6h5mB9808eAhdErgnAPKhskA55AURR2hAOBeZ4ECOux1ymhFBi1N0ltIaupJiNEDz1YfBC283rfHa4GDxk0u6TckFj-cxtNuEnccKT1Qy2bhrNV4aFb3z73jqv10M_tP45hydWLVJ5mI_h-htNl1NnrPl63wxeVxmmgneZDkYCTbn0nDLazkilbYahBacmqoa8QqoqHMpla6ZAG41Z4ZSk1smLFil2BDd9H-3MXy1JjXlOrTRd5YlJSPgICXvoLse0jGkFI0tt9F9qvhTEih3OZXj2V9OHXy7_6iSVhsbldcu_V_kpChAso676jkTnT7I0xfBGOU7z-teXqcmxIPOgFJCKGO_mpV4ww</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Flynn, Anna E.</creator><creator>Klein, James D.</creator><general>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</title><author>Flynn, Anna E. ; Klein, James D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Case Method (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>College instruction</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Discussion groups</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation of teaching methods</topic><topic>Group Discussion</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Newsgroups</topic><topic>Problem based learning</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>School environment</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Reaction</topic><topic>Student Teachers</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flynn, Anna E.</au><au>Klein, James D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ633255</ericid><atitle>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>71-86</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><coden>ETRDE5</coden><abstract>The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/bf02504916</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 2001-01, Vol.49 (3), p.71-86
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218050775
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Academic Achievement
Case Method (Teaching Technique)
Collaborative learning
College instruction
College Students
Control Groups
Cooperative learning
Course Content
Development
Discussion groups
Educational Environment
Educational Objectives
Educational sciences
Evaluation of teaching methods
Group Discussion
Higher Education
Individualized Instruction
Instructional Design
Instructional Effectiveness
Newsgroups
Problem based learning
Purchasing
Recommendations
School environment
Skills
Student Attitudes
Student Reaction
Student Teachers
Students
Teacher education
Teachers
Teaching Methods
Thinking Skills
title The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T15%3A21%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Discussion%20Groups%20in%20a%20Case-Based%20Learning%20Environment&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Flynn,%20Anna%20E.&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=71-86&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft.coden=ETRDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf02504916&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30221123%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218050775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ633255&rft_jstor_id=30221123&rfr_iscdi=true