The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment
The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational technology research and development 2001-01, Vol.49 (3), p.71-86 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 86 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 71 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Flynn, Anna E. Klein, James D. |
description | The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/bf02504916 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218050775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ633255</ericid><jstor_id>30221123</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30221123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKsXzwpB8CKsTpJN0j3a2tZKwUs9L9lsoik1qcmu4L93y9Y6h5mB9808eAhdErgnAPKhskA55AURR2hAOBeZ4ECOux1ymhFBi1N0ltIaupJiNEDz1YfBC283rfHa4GDxk0u6TckFj-cxtNuEnccKT1Qy2bhrNV4aFb3z73jqv10M_tP45hydWLVJ5mI_h-htNl1NnrPl63wxeVxmmgneZDkYCTbn0nDLazkilbYahBacmqoa8QqoqHMpla6ZAG41Z4ZSk1smLFil2BDd9H-3MXy1JjXlOrTRd5YlJSPgICXvoLse0jGkFI0tt9F9qvhTEih3OZXj2V9OHXy7_6iSVhsbldcu_V_kpChAso676jkTnT7I0xfBGOU7z-teXqcmxIPOgFJCKGO_mpV4ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218050775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Flynn, Anna E. ; Klein, James D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anna E. ; Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><description>The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf02504916</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETRDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Association for Educational Communications and Technology</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Case Method (Teaching Technique) ; Collaborative learning ; College instruction ; College Students ; Control Groups ; Cooperative learning ; Course Content ; Development ; Discussion groups ; Educational Environment ; Educational Objectives ; Educational sciences ; Evaluation of teaching methods ; Group Discussion ; Higher Education ; Individualized Instruction ; Instructional Design ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Newsgroups ; Problem based learning ; Purchasing ; Recommendations ; School environment ; Skills ; Student Attitudes ; Student Reaction ; Student Teachers ; Students ; Teacher education ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2001-01, Vol.49 (3), p.71-86</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30221123$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30221123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ633255$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14199073$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><title>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><description>The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Case Method (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>College instruction</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Development</subject><subject>Discussion groups</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Objectives</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Evaluation of teaching methods</subject><subject>Group Discussion</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Newsgroups</subject><subject>Problem based learning</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>School environment</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Reaction</subject><subject>Student Teachers</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKsXzwpB8CKsTpJN0j3a2tZKwUs9L9lsoik1qcmu4L93y9Y6h5mB9808eAhdErgnAPKhskA55AURR2hAOBeZ4ECOux1ymhFBi1N0ltIaupJiNEDz1YfBC283rfHa4GDxk0u6TckFj-cxtNuEnccKT1Qy2bhrNV4aFb3z73jqv10M_tP45hydWLVJ5mI_h-htNl1NnrPl63wxeVxmmgneZDkYCTbn0nDLazkilbYahBacmqoa8QqoqHMpla6ZAG41Z4ZSk1smLFil2BDd9H-3MXy1JjXlOrTRd5YlJSPgICXvoLse0jGkFI0tt9F9qvhTEih3OZXj2V9OHXy7_6iSVhsbldcu_V_kpChAso676jkTnT7I0xfBGOU7z-teXqcmxIPOgFJCKGO_mpV4ww</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Flynn, Anna E.</creator><creator>Klein, James D.</creator><general>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</title><author>Flynn, Anna E. ; Klein, James D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-40e70f457e5f5d781bcfc06c652ebb85b026d477acd3605fc53e22e4f36f0faa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Case Method (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>College instruction</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Development</topic><topic>Discussion groups</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Objectives</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Evaluation of teaching methods</topic><topic>Group Discussion</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Newsgroups</topic><topic>Problem based learning</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>School environment</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Reaction</topic><topic>Student Teachers</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flynn, Anna E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, James D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flynn, Anna E.</au><au>Klein, James D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ633255</ericid><atitle>The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>71-86</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><coden>ETRDE5</coden><abstract>The common practice of using discussion groups during case-based learning makes the role of discussion important in these learning environments. However, little empirical research has been done to investigate the influence of discussion on performance and motivation in case-based learning. The purpose of this article is to present the results of a study conducted to examine the role of discussion groups in a case-based environment. College students completed two cases either individually or in small discussion groups. Measures included two case analyses, an attitude survey, time on task, and document analysis. Results revealed significant performance and time differences between instructional methods on the first case, but not on the second case. In addition, results indicated significant differences in student attitudes between treatments. Overall, participants who worked in groups liked their method significantly better than those who worked alone, felt they learned more working in a group than they would have working alone, and expressed a preference for working in a group if they had to do the class over again. Implications for implementing case-based learning and future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/bf02504916</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2001-01, Vol.49 (3), p.71-86 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_218050775 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Academic Achievement Case Method (Teaching Technique) Collaborative learning College instruction College Students Control Groups Cooperative learning Course Content Development Discussion groups Educational Environment Educational Objectives Educational sciences Evaluation of teaching methods Group Discussion Higher Education Individualized Instruction Instructional Design Instructional Effectiveness Newsgroups Problem based learning Purchasing Recommendations School environment Skills Student Attitudes Student Reaction Student Teachers Students Teacher education Teachers Teaching Methods Thinking Skills |
title | The Influence of Discussion Groups in a Case-Based Learning Environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T15%3A21%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Influence%20of%20Discussion%20Groups%20in%20a%20Case-Based%20Learning%20Environment&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Flynn,%20Anna%20E.&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=71-86&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft.coden=ETRDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf02504916&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30221123%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218050775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ633255&rft_jstor_id=30221123&rfr_iscdi=true |