Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s
In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of urban history 2019-03, Vol.45 (2), p.279-299 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 299 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | Journal of urban history |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Hess, Paul M. Lewis, Robert |
description | In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0096144217696987 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2180502357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0096144217696987</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2180502357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d0d2b298d34110d2b2c31c67946ef30667f858dededfc565989b19e8331e23343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Bry6mkk2yeZYilahoJT2vKSb2XZLu1mTVOi_d2sFQfA0w7yv4RFyC-wBQOtHxoyCPOeglVGm0GdkAFLyTGkN52RwhLMjfkmuYtwwxkAxMSCL9-A7DOlAZ81qneI9naHDT9z6bodtoqOAtj_a1tG5D75Nns5sws4eMNBRjL5qbGp8G2nT0rRGCkayeE0uaruNePMzh2Tx_DQfv2TTt8nreDTNKq54yhxzfMlN4UQO8L1XAiqlTa6wFkwpXReycP1Drq6kkqYwSzBYCAHIhcjFkNydfLvgP_YYU7nx-9D2kSWHgknGhdQ9i51YVfAxBqzLLjQ7Gw4lsPJYXvm3vF6SnSTRrvDX9F_-F-B6bOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2180502357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Hess, Paul M. ; Lewis, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Hess, Paul M. ; Lewis, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0096144217696987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>20th century ; Associations ; Authority ; Case studies ; Cities ; Eminent domain ; Expropriation ; History ; Owners ; Private property ; Property ; Property rights ; Public lands ; Public officials ; Redevelopment ; Social movements ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban history, 2019-03, Vol.45 (2), p.279-299</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0096144217696987$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0096144217696987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27847,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hess, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</title><title>Journal of urban history</title><description>In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Eminent domain</subject><subject>Expropriation</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Owners</subject><subject>Private property</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0096-1442</issn><issn>1552-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Bry6mkk2yeZYilahoJT2vKSb2XZLu1mTVOi_d2sFQfA0w7yv4RFyC-wBQOtHxoyCPOeglVGm0GdkAFLyTGkN52RwhLMjfkmuYtwwxkAxMSCL9-A7DOlAZ81qneI9naHDT9z6bodtoqOAtj_a1tG5D75Nns5sws4eMNBRjL5qbGp8G2nT0rRGCkayeE0uaruNePMzh2Tx_DQfv2TTt8nreDTNKq54yhxzfMlN4UQO8L1XAiqlTa6wFkwpXReycP1Drq6kkqYwSzBYCAHIhcjFkNydfLvgP_YYU7nx-9D2kSWHgknGhdQ9i51YVfAxBqzLLjQ7Gw4lsPJYXvm3vF6SnSTRrvDX9F_-F-B6bOA</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Hess, Paul M.</creator><creator>Lewis, Robert</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</title><author>Hess, Paul M. ; Lewis, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d0d2b298d34110d2b2c31c67946ef30667f858dededfc565989b19e8331e23343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Eminent domain</topic><topic>Expropriation</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Owners</topic><topic>Private property</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hess, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hess, Paul M.</au><au>Lewis, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban history</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>279-299</pages><issn>0096-1442</issn><eissn>1552-6771</eissn><abstract>In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0096144217696987</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1442 |
ispartof | Journal of urban history, 2019-03, Vol.45 (2), p.279-299 |
issn | 0096-1442 1552-6771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2180502357 |
source | PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | 20th century Associations Authority Case studies Cities Eminent domain Expropriation History Owners Private property Property Property rights Public lands Public officials Redevelopment Social movements Urban planning |
title | Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Property%20Rights,%20Redevelopment%20Areas,%20and%20Toronto%20Ratepayer%20Associations%20in%20the%201950s&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20history&rft.au=Hess,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=279-299&rft.issn=0096-1442&rft.eissn=1552-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0096144217696987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2180502357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2180502357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0096144217696987&rfr_iscdi=true |