Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s

In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of urban history 2019-03, Vol.45 (2), p.279-299
Hauptverfasser: Hess, Paul M., Lewis, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 299
container_issue 2
container_start_page 279
container_title Journal of urban history
container_volume 45
creator Hess, Paul M.
Lewis, Robert
description In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0096144217696987
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2180502357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0096144217696987</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2180502357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d0d2b298d34110d2b2c31c67946ef30667f858dededfc565989b19e8331e23343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Bry6mkk2yeZYilahoJT2vKSb2XZLu1mTVOi_d2sFQfA0w7yv4RFyC-wBQOtHxoyCPOeglVGm0GdkAFLyTGkN52RwhLMjfkmuYtwwxkAxMSCL9-A7DOlAZ81qneI9naHDT9z6bodtoqOAtj_a1tG5D75Nns5sws4eMNBRjL5qbGp8G2nT0rRGCkayeE0uaruNePMzh2Tx_DQfv2TTt8nreDTNKq54yhxzfMlN4UQO8L1XAiqlTa6wFkwpXReycP1Drq6kkqYwSzBYCAHIhcjFkNydfLvgP_YYU7nx-9D2kSWHgknGhdQ9i51YVfAxBqzLLjQ7Gw4lsPJYXvm3vF6SnSTRrvDX9F_-F-B6bOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2180502357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Hess, Paul M. ; Lewis, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Hess, Paul M. ; Lewis, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0096144217696987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>20th century ; Associations ; Authority ; Case studies ; Cities ; Eminent domain ; Expropriation ; History ; Owners ; Private property ; Property ; Property rights ; Public lands ; Public officials ; Redevelopment ; Social movements ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of urban history, 2019-03, Vol.45 (2), p.279-299</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0096144217696987$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0096144217696987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27847,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hess, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</title><title>Journal of urban history</title><description>In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Associations</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Eminent domain</subject><subject>Expropriation</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Owners</subject><subject>Private property</subject><subject>Property</subject><subject>Property rights</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Redevelopment</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>0096-1442</issn><issn>1552-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49Bry6mkk2yeZYilahoJT2vKSb2XZLu1mTVOi_d2sFQfA0w7yv4RFyC-wBQOtHxoyCPOeglVGm0GdkAFLyTGkN52RwhLMjfkmuYtwwxkAxMSCL9-A7DOlAZ81qneI9naHDT9z6bodtoqOAtj_a1tG5D75Nns5sws4eMNBRjL5qbGp8G2nT0rRGCkayeE0uaruNePMzh2Tx_DQfv2TTt8nreDTNKq54yhxzfMlN4UQO8L1XAiqlTa6wFkwpXReycP1Drq6kkqYwSzBYCAHIhcjFkNydfLvgP_YYU7nx-9D2kSWHgknGhdQ9i51YVfAxBqzLLjQ7Gw4lsPJYXvm3vF6SnSTRrvDX9F_-F-B6bOA</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Hess, Paul M.</creator><creator>Lewis, Robert</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</title><author>Hess, Paul M. ; Lewis, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-d0d2b298d34110d2b2c31c67946ef30667f858dededfc565989b19e8331e23343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Associations</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Eminent domain</topic><topic>Expropriation</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Owners</topic><topic>Private property</topic><topic>Property</topic><topic>Property rights</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Redevelopment</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hess, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of urban history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hess, Paul M.</au><au>Lewis, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s</atitle><jtitle>Journal of urban history</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>279-299</pages><issn>0096-1442</issn><eissn>1552-6771</eissn><abstract>In the 1950s, Toronto ratepayer associations inserted themselves into debates about property relations and the appropriate use of the City’s new redevelopment authority as then being tested by elected officials and developers. Two case studies are presented: a designated redevelopment area where the City failed to close a deal with development firms, and a request, ultimately denied, by a developer group to to have the City establish another area to acquire the properties they had failed to. In both cases, ratepayer associations did not question City expropriation of private property if done for a sufficiently public purpose but argued vehemently against City expropriation of land from one set of private owners to benefit another. Although it is not possible to fully know the effect ratepayer associations had on these failed attempts of using redevelopment authority, they should be seen as urban social movements organized to protect local property rights from developers and a new interventionist local state.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0096144217696987</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1442
ispartof Journal of urban history, 2019-03, Vol.45 (2), p.279-299
issn 0096-1442
1552-6771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2180502357
source PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects 20th century
Associations
Authority
Case studies
Cities
Eminent domain
Expropriation
History
Owners
Private property
Property
Property rights
Public lands
Public officials
Redevelopment
Social movements
Urban planning
title Property Rights, Redevelopment Areas, and Toronto Ratepayer Associations in the 1950s
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Property%20Rights,%20Redevelopment%20Areas,%20and%20Toronto%20Ratepayer%20Associations%20in%20the%201950s&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20urban%20history&rft.au=Hess,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=279-299&rft.issn=0096-1442&rft.eissn=1552-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0096144217696987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2180502357%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2180502357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0096144217696987&rfr_iscdi=true