Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance
A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational technology research and development 2004-01, Vol.52 (3), p.5-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Olina, Zane Sullivan, Howard J. |
description | A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02504672 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218018374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ732654</ericid><jstor_id>30220387</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30220387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AQxxdRsFYvnhWC4EWM7qP7OmptfVBQaD2HTXYWU9Kk7iaC394tKa1zmWH-v3kidE7wHcFY3j9OMeV4JCQ9QAPCuUgFx-QwxnhEUyKoPkYnISxxNCnUAD3N285C3SZzqFw6-TFVZ9qyqW-TBZjiC3zyP2dqm8zA-DrmP8C7xq9MXcApOnKmCnC29UP0OZ0sxi_p7P35dfwwSwvGSJsqKrk0jFkAoAxyDLlxSlmtBYDjkFtJ4ua60NZyzQgXuTESU50rAxYcG6Krvu_aN98dhDZbNp2v48iMEoWJYnIUoZseKnwTggeXrX25Mv43IzjbPCnbPynC19uOJhSmcj6eU4Z9hWBUxvUid9Fz4MtiJ0_eJKOCb2Ze9vIytI3f6QxTipmS7A-MjXh5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218018374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Olina, Zane ; Sullivan, Howard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olina, Zane ; Sullivan, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><description>A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02504672</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETRDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Association for Educational Communications and Technology</publisher><subject>Attitude surveys ; Behavioral Objectives ; Education and psychology ; Educational sciences ; Elementary School Students ; Evaluation Methods ; Experiment design ; Foreign Countries ; High school students ; Latvia ; Learning ; Learning Strategies ; Lifelong Learning ; Posttests ; Psychology and learning ; Rating scales ; Secondary School Teachers ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Student attitudes ; Student Evaluation ; Student evaluation of teacher performance ; Student Research ; Teacher Evaluation ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Technical Writing ; Writing instruction</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2004-01, Vol.52 (3), p.5-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30220387$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30220387$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ732654$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16327996$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olina, Zane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><description>A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments.</description><subject>Attitude surveys</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Education and psychology</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Latvia</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Lifelong Learning</subject><subject>Posttests</subject><subject>Psychology and learning</subject><subject>Rating scales</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student evaluation of teacher performance</subject><subject>Student Research</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technical Writing</subject><subject>Writing instruction</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AQxxdRsFYvnhWC4EWM7qP7OmptfVBQaD2HTXYWU9Kk7iaC394tKa1zmWH-v3kidE7wHcFY3j9OMeV4JCQ9QAPCuUgFx-QwxnhEUyKoPkYnISxxNCnUAD3N285C3SZzqFw6-TFVZ9qyqW-TBZjiC3zyP2dqm8zA-DrmP8C7xq9MXcApOnKmCnC29UP0OZ0sxi_p7P35dfwwSwvGSJsqKrk0jFkAoAxyDLlxSlmtBYDjkFtJ4ua60NZyzQgXuTESU50rAxYcG6Krvu_aN98dhDZbNp2v48iMEoWJYnIUoZseKnwTggeXrX25Mv43IzjbPCnbPynC19uOJhSmcj6eU4Z9hWBUxvUid9Fz4MtiJ0_eJKOCb2Ze9vIytI3f6QxTipmS7A-MjXh5</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Olina, Zane</creator><creator>Sullivan, Howard J.</creator><general>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</title><author>Olina, Zane ; Sullivan, Howard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Attitude surveys</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Education and psychology</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Latvia</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Lifelong Learning</topic><topic>Posttests</topic><topic>Psychology and learning</topic><topic>Rating scales</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student evaluation of teacher performance</topic><topic>Student Research</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technical Writing</topic><topic>Writing instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olina, Zane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olina, Zane</au><au>Sullivan, Howard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ732654</ericid><atitle>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>5-22</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><coden>ETRDE5</coden><abstract>A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02504672</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2004-01, Vol.52 (3), p.5-22 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_218018374 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Education Source; JSTOR |
subjects | Attitude surveys Behavioral Objectives Education and psychology Educational sciences Elementary School Students Evaluation Methods Experiment design Foreign Countries High school students Latvia Learning Learning Strategies Lifelong Learning Posttests Psychology and learning Rating scales Secondary School Teachers Self Evaluation (Individuals) Student attitudes Student Evaluation Student evaluation of teacher performance Student Research Teacher Evaluation Teachers Teaching Methods Technical Writing Writing instruction |
title | Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A28%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20Self-Evaluation,%20Teacher%20Evaluation,%20and%20Learner%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Olina,%20Zane&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=5-22&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft.coden=ETRDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02504672&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30220387%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218018374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ732654&rft_jstor_id=30220387&rfr_iscdi=true |