Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance

A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology research and development 2004-01, Vol.52 (3), p.5-22
Hauptverfasser: Olina, Zane, Sullivan, Howard J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 3
container_start_page 5
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 52
creator Olina, Zane
Sullivan, Howard J.
description A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02504672
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218018374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ732654</ericid><jstor_id>30220387</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30220387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLw0AQxxdRsFYvnhWC4EWM7qP7OmptfVBQaD2HTXYWU9Kk7iaC394tKa1zmWH-v3kidE7wHcFY3j9OMeV4JCQ9QAPCuUgFx-QwxnhEUyKoPkYnISxxNCnUAD3N285C3SZzqFw6-TFVZ9qyqW-TBZjiC3zyP2dqm8zA-DrmP8C7xq9MXcApOnKmCnC29UP0OZ0sxi_p7P35dfwwSwvGSJsqKrk0jFkAoAxyDLlxSlmtBYDjkFtJ4ua60NZyzQgXuTESU50rAxYcG6Krvu_aN98dhDZbNp2v48iMEoWJYnIUoZseKnwTggeXrX25Mv43IzjbPCnbPynC19uOJhSmcj6eU4Z9hWBUxvUid9Fz4MtiJ0_eJKOCb2Ze9vIytI3f6QxTipmS7A-MjXh5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218018374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Olina, Zane ; Sullivan, Howard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olina, Zane ; Sullivan, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><description>A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02504672</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETRDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Association for Educational Communications and Technology</publisher><subject>Attitude surveys ; Behavioral Objectives ; Education and psychology ; Educational sciences ; Elementary School Students ; Evaluation Methods ; Experiment design ; Foreign Countries ; High school students ; Latvia ; Learning ; Learning Strategies ; Lifelong Learning ; Posttests ; Psychology and learning ; Rating scales ; Secondary School Teachers ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Student attitudes ; Student Evaluation ; Student evaluation of teacher performance ; Student Research ; Teacher Evaluation ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Technical Writing ; Writing instruction</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2004-01, Vol.52 (3), p.5-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Educational Communications &amp; Technology 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30220387$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30220387$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ732654$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16327996$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olina, Zane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><description>A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments.</description><subject>Attitude surveys</subject><subject>Behavioral Objectives</subject><subject>Education and psychology</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Experiment design</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Latvia</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Lifelong Learning</subject><subject>Posttests</subject><subject>Psychology and learning</subject><subject>Rating scales</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Student evaluation of teacher performance</subject><subject>Student Research</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technical Writing</subject><subject>Writing instruction</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLw0AQxxdRsFYvnhWC4EWM7qP7OmptfVBQaD2HTXYWU9Kk7iaC394tKa1zmWH-v3kidE7wHcFY3j9OMeV4JCQ9QAPCuUgFx-QwxnhEUyKoPkYnISxxNCnUAD3N285C3SZzqFw6-TFVZ9qyqW-TBZjiC3zyP2dqm8zA-DrmP8C7xq9MXcApOnKmCnC29UP0OZ0sxi_p7P35dfwwSwvGSJsqKrk0jFkAoAxyDLlxSlmtBYDjkFtJ4ua60NZyzQgXuTESU50rAxYcG6Krvu_aN98dhDZbNp2v48iMEoWJYnIUoZseKnwTggeXrX25Mv43IzjbPCnbPynC19uOJhSmcj6eU4Z9hWBUxvUid9Fz4MtiJ0_eJKOCb2Ze9vIytI3f6QxTipmS7A-MjXh5</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Olina, Zane</creator><creator>Sullivan, Howard J.</creator><general>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</title><author>Olina, Zane ; Sullivan, Howard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-82757a33deee23eb0ebaf88d996eef5ebd716729c9dd593156baa7029b8aedef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Attitude surveys</topic><topic>Behavioral Objectives</topic><topic>Education and psychology</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Experiment design</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Latvia</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Lifelong Learning</topic><topic>Posttests</topic><topic>Psychology and learning</topic><topic>Rating scales</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Student evaluation of teacher performance</topic><topic>Student Research</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technical Writing</topic><topic>Writing instruction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olina, Zane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Howard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olina, Zane</au><au>Sullivan, Howard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ732654</ericid><atitle>Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>5-22</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><coden>ETRDE5</coden><abstract>A total of 341 Latvian students and eight teachers participated in this study of student self-evaluation and teacher evaluation. Students completed a 12-lesson teacher-directed instructional program on conducting and writing a report of their own experimental research. Sixteen classes were randomly assigned to one of four treatment conditions: (1) no in-program evaluation, (2) self-evaluation and revision at the research design and draft final report stages, (3) teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages, (4) self-plus-teacher evaluation and student revision at both stages. Students in the teacher-evaluation and self-plus-teacher evaluation conditions received significantly higher ratings from an independent rater on their final research reports. However, students under the self-evaluation conditions had greater confidence in their ability to conduct future experiments.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02504672</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 2004-01, Vol.52 (3), p.5-22
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218018374
source SpringerLink Journals; Education Source; JSTOR
subjects Attitude surveys
Behavioral Objectives
Education and psychology
Educational sciences
Elementary School Students
Evaluation Methods
Experiment design
Foreign Countries
High school students
Latvia
Learning
Learning Strategies
Lifelong Learning
Posttests
Psychology and learning
Rating scales
Secondary School Teachers
Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Student attitudes
Student Evaluation
Student evaluation of teacher performance
Student Research
Teacher Evaluation
Teachers
Teaching Methods
Technical Writing
Writing instruction
title Student Self-Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, and Learner Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A28%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Student%20Self-Evaluation,%20Teacher%20Evaluation,%20and%20Learner%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Olina,%20Zane&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=5-22&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft.coden=ETRDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02504672&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30220387%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218018374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ732654&rft_jstor_id=30220387&rfr_iscdi=true