When Each One Has One: The Influences on Teaching Strategies and Student Achievement of Using Laptops in the Classroom

In this study, we examined the educational effects of providing fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-grade students with 24-hour access to laptop computers. Specifically we examined the impact of laptops on classroom activities, and on student use of technology and their writing and problem-solving skills. P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology research and development 2003-01, Vol.51 (3), p.23-44
Hauptverfasser: Lowther, Deborah L., Ross, Steven M., Morrison, Gary M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 44
container_issue 3
container_start_page 23
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 51
creator Lowther, Deborah L.
Ross, Steven M.
Morrison, Gary M.
description In this study, we examined the educational effects of providing fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-grade students with 24-hour access to laptop computers. Specifically we examined the impact of laptops on classroom activities, and on student use of technology and their writing and problem-solving skills. Participating teachers received computer integration training using the iNtegrating Technology for inQuiry (NTeQ) model to develop problem-based lessons that engage students in critically examining authentic issues, and strengthen research and writing skills. A matched treatment-control group design was employed, in which classes taught at the same grade levels in five participating schools served as the laptop (1 computer per student) and control (5+ computers per class) contexts. Participants included students, teachers, and parents from the two groups. Although systematic observations revealed relatively few differences in teaching methods between laptop and control classrooms, laptop students used computers more frequently, extensively, and independently. Writing assessment results showed substantial and significant advantages for laptop over control students, with six of eight effect sizes exceeding +0.80. Results also showed significant advantages for the laptop group on five of the seven components of the problem-solving task.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02504551
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_218018092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ678126</ericid><jstor_id>30221171</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>30221171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-31f30e4d3fb39d9113300c36f83a7404eee19c3e1d8bd0a795343485d204cb663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1rGzEQhpeSQh23l55bEIVcAtvM6Gt3e0uME7sYcohDj4usnbXX2JIrrQ3599HikIiBmdH76NUwWfYd4TcCFDd398AVSKXwUzZCpXSuFeBFqkHyHDWvvmSXMW4hnUKXo-z0b0OOTY3dsEdHbGbikP-w5YbY3LW7IzlLkXnHlpSgzq3ZUx9MT-suXRvXpPbYkOvZbVLpRPuh9i17jgO7MIfeHyLrHOuT42RnYgze779mn1uzi_TtLY-z5_vpcjLLF48P88ntIreCV30usBVAshHtSlRNhSgEgBW6LYUpJEgiwsoKwqZcNWCKSgkpZKkaDtKutBbj7NfZ9xD8_yPFvt76Y3Dpy5pjCSkqnqDrM2SDT-NRWx9CtzfhpUaoh7XWH2tN8NWbo4nW7NpgnO3ixwvFJQgtE_fjzFHo7Ls8_auLEvkw2M-zvI29D--6AM4RCxSv25KH1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218018092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Each One Has One: The Influences on Teaching Strategies and Student Achievement of Using Laptops in the Classroom</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lowther, Deborah L. ; Ross, Steven M. ; Morrison, Gary M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lowther, Deborah L. ; Ross, Steven M. ; Morrison, Gary M.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we examined the educational effects of providing fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-grade students with 24-hour access to laptop computers. Specifically we examined the impact of laptops on classroom activities, and on student use of technology and their writing and problem-solving skills. Participating teachers received computer integration training using the iNtegrating Technology for inQuiry (NTeQ) model to develop problem-based lessons that engage students in critically examining authentic issues, and strengthen research and writing skills. A matched treatment-control group design was employed, in which classes taught at the same grade levels in five participating schools served as the laptop (1 computer per student) and control (5+ computers per class) contexts. Participants included students, teachers, and parents from the two groups. Although systematic observations revealed relatively few differences in teaching methods between laptop and control classrooms, laptop students used computers more frequently, extensively, and independently. Writing assessment results showed substantial and significant advantages for laptop over control students, with six of eight effect sizes exceeding +0.80. Results also showed significant advantages for the laptop group on five of the seven components of the problem-solving task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02504551</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETRDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Association for Educational Communications and Technology</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Access to Computers ; Classroom observations ; Computer technology ; Computer Uses in Education ; Computers in education ; Control Groups ; Educational research ; Educational sciences ; Educational Technology ; Grade 5 ; Grade 6 ; Grade 7 ; Intermediate Grades ; Internet ; Laptop Computers ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Middle Schools ; Problem Solving ; Tables (Data) ; Teachers ; Teaching aids ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Skills ; Technology ; Technology Integration ; Textbooks, teaching materials ; Writing Achievement ; Writing instruction ; Writing Skills</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2003-01, Vol.51 (3), p.23-44</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Association for Educational Communications and Technology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Association for Educational Communications &amp; Technology 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-31f30e4d3fb39d9113300c36f83a7404eee19c3e1d8bd0a795343485d204cb663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-31f30e4d3fb39d9113300c36f83a7404eee19c3e1d8bd0a795343485d204cb663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/30221171$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/30221171$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ678126$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15240364$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lowther, Deborah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Gary M.</creatorcontrib><title>When Each One Has One: The Influences on Teaching Strategies and Student Achievement of Using Laptops in the Classroom</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><description>In this study, we examined the educational effects of providing fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-grade students with 24-hour access to laptop computers. Specifically we examined the impact of laptops on classroom activities, and on student use of technology and their writing and problem-solving skills. Participating teachers received computer integration training using the iNtegrating Technology for inQuiry (NTeQ) model to develop problem-based lessons that engage students in critically examining authentic issues, and strengthen research and writing skills. A matched treatment-control group design was employed, in which classes taught at the same grade levels in five participating schools served as the laptop (1 computer per student) and control (5+ computers per class) contexts. Participants included students, teachers, and parents from the two groups. Although systematic observations revealed relatively few differences in teaching methods between laptop and control classrooms, laptop students used computers more frequently, extensively, and independently. Writing assessment results showed substantial and significant advantages for laptop over control students, with six of eight effect sizes exceeding +0.80. Results also showed significant advantages for the laptop group on five of the seven components of the problem-solving task.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Access to Computers</subject><subject>Classroom observations</subject><subject>Computer technology</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Computers in education</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Grade 6</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Intermediate Grades</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Laptop Computers</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Middle Schools</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Tables (Data)</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching aids</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Skills</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology Integration</subject><subject>Textbooks, teaching materials</subject><subject>Writing Achievement</subject><subject>Writing instruction</subject><subject>Writing Skills</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1rGzEQhpeSQh23l55bEIVcAtvM6Gt3e0uME7sYcohDj4usnbXX2JIrrQ3599HikIiBmdH76NUwWfYd4TcCFDd398AVSKXwUzZCpXSuFeBFqkHyHDWvvmSXMW4hnUKXo-z0b0OOTY3dsEdHbGbikP-w5YbY3LW7IzlLkXnHlpSgzq3ZUx9MT-suXRvXpPbYkOvZbVLpRPuh9i17jgO7MIfeHyLrHOuT42RnYgze779mn1uzi_TtLY-z5_vpcjLLF48P88ntIreCV30usBVAshHtSlRNhSgEgBW6LYUpJEgiwsoKwqZcNWCKSgkpZKkaDtKutBbj7NfZ9xD8_yPFvt76Y3Dpy5pjCSkqnqDrM2SDT-NRWx9CtzfhpUaoh7XWH2tN8NWbo4nW7NpgnO3ixwvFJQgtE_fjzFHo7Ls8_auLEvkw2M-zvI29D--6AM4RCxSv25KH1A</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Lowther, Deborah L.</creator><creator>Ross, Steven M.</creator><creator>Morrison, Gary M.</creator><general>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>When Each One Has One: The Influences on Teaching Strategies and Student Achievement of Using Laptops in the Classroom</title><author>Lowther, Deborah L. ; Ross, Steven M. ; Morrison, Gary M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-31f30e4d3fb39d9113300c36f83a7404eee19c3e1d8bd0a795343485d204cb663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Access to Computers</topic><topic>Classroom observations</topic><topic>Computer technology</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Computers in education</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Grade 6</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Intermediate Grades</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Laptop Computers</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Middle Schools</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Tables (Data)</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching aids</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Skills</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology Integration</topic><topic>Textbooks, teaching materials</topic><topic>Writing Achievement</topic><topic>Writing instruction</topic><topic>Writing Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lowther, Deborah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, Gary M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lowther, Deborah L.</au><au>Ross, Steven M.</au><au>Morrison, Gary M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ678126</ericid><atitle>When Each One Has One: The Influences on Teaching Strategies and Student Achievement of Using Laptops in the Classroom</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>44</epage><pages>23-44</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><coden>ETRDE5</coden><abstract>In this study, we examined the educational effects of providing fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-grade students with 24-hour access to laptop computers. Specifically we examined the impact of laptops on classroom activities, and on student use of technology and their writing and problem-solving skills. Participating teachers received computer integration training using the iNtegrating Technology for inQuiry (NTeQ) model to develop problem-based lessons that engage students in critically examining authentic issues, and strengthen research and writing skills. A matched treatment-control group design was employed, in which classes taught at the same grade levels in five participating schools served as the laptop (1 computer per student) and control (5+ computers per class) contexts. Participants included students, teachers, and parents from the two groups. Although systematic observations revealed relatively few differences in teaching methods between laptop and control classrooms, laptop students used computers more frequently, extensively, and independently. Writing assessment results showed substantial and significant advantages for laptop over control students, with six of eight effect sizes exceeding +0.80. Results also showed significant advantages for the laptop group on five of the seven components of the problem-solving task.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Association for Educational Communications and Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/BF02504551</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 2003-01, Vol.51 (3), p.23-44
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_218018092
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Academic Achievement
Access to Computers
Classroom observations
Computer technology
Computer Uses in Education
Computers in education
Control Groups
Educational research
Educational sciences
Educational Technology
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Intermediate Grades
Internet
Laptop Computers
Learning
Learning Processes
Middle Schools
Problem Solving
Tables (Data)
Teachers
Teaching aids
Teaching Methods
Teaching Skills
Technology
Technology Integration
Textbooks, teaching materials
Writing Achievement
Writing instruction
Writing Skills
title When Each One Has One: The Influences on Teaching Strategies and Student Achievement of Using Laptops in the Classroom
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A47%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Each%20One%20Has%20One:%20The%20Influences%20on%20Teaching%20Strategies%20and%20Student%20Achievement%20of%20Using%20Laptops%20in%20the%20Classroom&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Lowther,%20Deborah%20L.&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=44&rft.pages=23-44&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft.coden=ETRDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02504551&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E30221171%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218018092&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ678126&rft_jstor_id=30221171&rfr_iscdi=true