Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes

Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2005-12, Vol.77 (24), p.8129-8137
Hauptverfasser: Maštovská, Kateřina, Lehotay, Steven J, Anastassiades, Michelangelo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8137
container_issue 24
container_start_page 8129
container_title Analytical chemistry (Washington)
container_volume 77
creator Maštovská, Kateřina
Lehotay, Steven J
Anastassiades, Michelangelo
description Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ac0515576
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217890418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>964601341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1vEzEQhi0EoqFw4A-AhcSBw8KMHe_HsURNQApqlAaJm-V4x8glWRfbQa3482y6q-bAyYd5_Mw7L2OvET4iCPxkLChUqiqfsAkqAUVZ1-IpmwCALEQFcMZepHQDgAhYPmdnWEqFWKoJ-zsL-63vTPah48Hxi87s7jPxVQyZbDZdTnwT-NUfijbsiX8zOfo7fulcP03cd3wdDtl3xBez4XPy6ShaUcre-pb4mpJvD_QAz0NoRwell-yZM7tEr8b3nG3ml5vZl2J5tfg6u1gWZtrUuRCibJEAK6sIiRzJmpyUVWOFUwgOVe1MC6WxpKQtiWRjJNaqMVtrRCvP2btBexvD7z5H1jfhEPuoSQus6gamWPfQhwGyMaQUyenb6Pcm3msEfSxZP5bcs29G4WG7p_ZEjq32wPsRMMmanYumsz6duErWIKbHpcXA-ZTp7nFu4i9dVrJSerO61supmuOPzwu97vm3A-9M0OZn7J3frwWgBKhq0TxEGzcbm05n_n_CP9BmqEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217890418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Maštovská, Kateřina ; Lehotay, Steven J ; Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Maštovská, Kateřina ; Lehotay, Steven J ; Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creatorcontrib><description>Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ac0515576</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16351165</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANCHAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>additives ; analyte protectants ; Analytical chemistry ; Biphenyl Compounds - analysis ; Caffeine - chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Crop residues ; Erythritol - chemistry ; ethyl glycerol ; Exact sciences and technology ; Follow-Up Studies ; food analysis ; food contamination ; Food Contamination - analysis ; food matrix ; Fruit - chemistry ; fruits (food) ; Gas chromatographic methods ; gas chromatography ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Glucose - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Glucose - chemistry ; Glycerol - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Glycerol - chemistry ; gulonolactone ; Lindane - analysis ; Mass spectrometry ; organic compounds ; Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis ; pesticide residues ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; Pesticides ; Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry ; sorbitol ; Sorbitol - chemistry ; Spectrometric and optical methods ; Sugar Acids - chemistry ; vegetables</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2005-12, Vol.77 (24), p.8129-8137</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Dec 15, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac0515576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac0515576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27075,27923,27924,56737,56787</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17380248$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16351165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maštovská, Kateřina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehotay, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creatorcontrib><title>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.</description><subject>additives</subject><subject>analyte protectants</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Biphenyl Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Caffeine - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Erythritol - chemistry</subject><subject>ethyl glycerol</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>food analysis</subject><subject>food contamination</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>food matrix</subject><subject>Fruit - chemistry</subject><subject>fruits (food)</subject><subject>Gas chromatographic methods</subject><subject>gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Glucose - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Glucose - chemistry</subject><subject>Glycerol - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Glycerol - chemistry</subject><subject>gulonolactone</subject><subject>Lindane - analysis</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>organic compounds</subject><subject>Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>pesticide residues</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</subject><subject>sorbitol</subject><subject>Sorbitol - chemistry</subject><subject>Spectrometric and optical methods</subject><subject>Sugar Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>vegetables</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1vEzEQhi0EoqFw4A-AhcSBw8KMHe_HsURNQApqlAaJm-V4x8glWRfbQa3482y6q-bAyYd5_Mw7L2OvET4iCPxkLChUqiqfsAkqAUVZ1-IpmwCALEQFcMZepHQDgAhYPmdnWEqFWKoJ-zsL-63vTPah48Hxi87s7jPxVQyZbDZdTnwT-NUfijbsiX8zOfo7fulcP03cd3wdDtl3xBez4XPy6ShaUcre-pb4mpJvD_QAz0NoRwell-yZM7tEr8b3nG3ml5vZl2J5tfg6u1gWZtrUuRCibJEAK6sIiRzJmpyUVWOFUwgOVe1MC6WxpKQtiWRjJNaqMVtrRCvP2btBexvD7z5H1jfhEPuoSQus6gamWPfQhwGyMaQUyenb6Pcm3msEfSxZP5bcs29G4WG7p_ZEjq32wPsRMMmanYumsz6duErWIKbHpcXA-ZTp7nFu4i9dVrJSerO61supmuOPzwu97vm3A-9M0OZn7J3frwWgBKhq0TxEGzcbm05n_n_CP9BmqEU</recordid><startdate>20051215</startdate><enddate>20051215</enddate><creator>Maštovská, Kateřina</creator><creator>Lehotay, Steven J</creator><creator>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051215</creationdate><title>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</title><author>Maštovská, Kateřina ; Lehotay, Steven J ; Anastassiades, Michelangelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>additives</topic><topic>analyte protectants</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Biphenyl Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Caffeine - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Erythritol - chemistry</topic><topic>ethyl glycerol</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>food analysis</topic><topic>food contamination</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>food matrix</topic><topic>Fruit - chemistry</topic><topic>fruits (food)</topic><topic>Gas chromatographic methods</topic><topic>gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Glucose - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Glucose - chemistry</topic><topic>Glycerol - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Glycerol - chemistry</topic><topic>gulonolactone</topic><topic>Lindane - analysis</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>organic compounds</topic><topic>Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>pesticide residues</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</topic><topic>sorbitol</topic><topic>Sorbitol - chemistry</topic><topic>Spectrometric and optical methods</topic><topic>Sugar Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maštovská, Kateřina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehotay, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maštovská, Kateřina</au><au>Lehotay, Steven J</au><au>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>2005-12-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>8129</spage><epage>8137</epage><pages>8129-8137</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><coden>ANCHAM</coden><abstract>Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>16351165</pmid><doi>10.1021/ac0515576</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2700
ispartof Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2005-12, Vol.77 (24), p.8129-8137
issn 0003-2700
1520-6882
1520-6882
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_217890418
source MEDLINE; ACS Publications
subjects additives
analyte protectants
Analytical chemistry
Biphenyl Compounds - analysis
Caffeine - chemistry
Chemistry
Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography
Crop residues
Erythritol - chemistry
ethyl glycerol
Exact sciences and technology
Follow-Up Studies
food analysis
food contamination
Food Contamination - analysis
food matrix
Fruit - chemistry
fruits (food)
Gas chromatographic methods
gas chromatography
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods
Glucose - analogs & derivatives
Glucose - chemistry
Glycerol - analogs & derivatives
Glycerol - chemistry
gulonolactone
Lindane - analysis
Mass spectrometry
organic compounds
Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis
pesticide residues
Pesticide Residues - analysis
Pesticides
Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry
sorbitol
Sorbitol - chemistry
Spectrometric and optical methods
Sugar Acids - chemistry
vegetables
title Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A21%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combination%20of%20Analyte%20Protectants%20To%20Overcome%20Matrix%20Effects%20in%20Routine%20GC%20Analysis%20of%20Pesticide%20Residues%20in%20Food%20Matrixes&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Ma%C5%A1tovsk%C3%A1,%20Kate%C5%99ina&rft.date=2005-12-15&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=8129&rft.epage=8137&rft.pages=8129-8137&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft.coden=ANCHAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ac0515576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E964601341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217890418&rft_id=info:pmid/16351165&rfr_iscdi=true