Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes
Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2005-12, Vol.77 (24), p.8129-8137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8137 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 8129 |
container_title | Analytical chemistry (Washington) |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Maštovská, Kateřina Lehotay, Steven J Anastassiades, Michelangelo |
description | Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ac0515576 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217890418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>964601341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1vEzEQhi0EoqFw4A-AhcSBw8KMHe_HsURNQApqlAaJm-V4x8glWRfbQa3482y6q-bAyYd5_Mw7L2OvET4iCPxkLChUqiqfsAkqAUVZ1-IpmwCALEQFcMZepHQDgAhYPmdnWEqFWKoJ-zsL-63vTPah48Hxi87s7jPxVQyZbDZdTnwT-NUfijbsiX8zOfo7fulcP03cd3wdDtl3xBez4XPy6ShaUcre-pb4mpJvD_QAz0NoRwell-yZM7tEr8b3nG3ml5vZl2J5tfg6u1gWZtrUuRCibJEAK6sIiRzJmpyUVWOFUwgOVe1MC6WxpKQtiWRjJNaqMVtrRCvP2btBexvD7z5H1jfhEPuoSQus6gamWPfQhwGyMaQUyenb6Pcm3msEfSxZP5bcs29G4WG7p_ZEjq32wPsRMMmanYumsz6duErWIKbHpcXA-ZTp7nFu4i9dVrJSerO61supmuOPzwu97vm3A-9M0OZn7J3frwWgBKhq0TxEGzcbm05n_n_CP9BmqEU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217890418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Maštovská, Kateřina ; Lehotay, Steven J ; Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Maštovská, Kateřina ; Lehotay, Steven J ; Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creatorcontrib><description>Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ac0515576</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16351165</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANCHAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>additives ; analyte protectants ; Analytical chemistry ; Biphenyl Compounds - analysis ; Caffeine - chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography ; Crop residues ; Erythritol - chemistry ; ethyl glycerol ; Exact sciences and technology ; Follow-Up Studies ; food analysis ; food contamination ; Food Contamination - analysis ; food matrix ; Fruit - chemistry ; fruits (food) ; Gas chromatographic methods ; gas chromatography ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Glucose - analogs & derivatives ; Glucose - chemistry ; Glycerol - analogs & derivatives ; Glycerol - chemistry ; gulonolactone ; Lindane - analysis ; Mass spectrometry ; organic compounds ; Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis ; pesticide residues ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; Pesticides ; Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry ; sorbitol ; Sorbitol - chemistry ; Spectrometric and optical methods ; Sugar Acids - chemistry ; vegetables</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2005-12, Vol.77 (24), p.8129-8137</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Dec 15, 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ac0515576$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac0515576$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2763,27075,27923,27924,56737,56787</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17380248$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16351165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maštovská, Kateřina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehotay, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creatorcontrib><title>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.</description><subject>additives</subject><subject>analyte protectants</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Biphenyl Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Caffeine - chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Erythritol - chemistry</subject><subject>ethyl glycerol</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>food analysis</subject><subject>food contamination</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>food matrix</subject><subject>Fruit - chemistry</subject><subject>fruits (food)</subject><subject>Gas chromatographic methods</subject><subject>gas chromatography</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Glucose - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Glucose - chemistry</subject><subject>Glycerol - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Glycerol - chemistry</subject><subject>gulonolactone</subject><subject>Lindane - analysis</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>organic compounds</subject><subject>Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>pesticide residues</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</subject><subject>sorbitol</subject><subject>Sorbitol - chemistry</subject><subject>Spectrometric and optical methods</subject><subject>Sugar Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>vegetables</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1vEzEQhi0EoqFw4A-AhcSBw8KMHe_HsURNQApqlAaJm-V4x8glWRfbQa3482y6q-bAyYd5_Mw7L2OvET4iCPxkLChUqiqfsAkqAUVZ1-IpmwCALEQFcMZepHQDgAhYPmdnWEqFWKoJ-zsL-63vTPah48Hxi87s7jPxVQyZbDZdTnwT-NUfijbsiX8zOfo7fulcP03cd3wdDtl3xBez4XPy6ShaUcre-pb4mpJvD_QAz0NoRwell-yZM7tEr8b3nG3ml5vZl2J5tfg6u1gWZtrUuRCibJEAK6sIiRzJmpyUVWOFUwgOVe1MC6WxpKQtiWRjJNaqMVtrRCvP2btBexvD7z5H1jfhEPuoSQus6gamWPfQhwGyMaQUyenb6Pcm3msEfSxZP5bcs29G4WG7p_ZEjq32wPsRMMmanYumsz6duErWIKbHpcXA-ZTp7nFu4i9dVrJSerO61supmuOPzwu97vm3A-9M0OZn7J3frwWgBKhq0TxEGzcbm05n_n_CP9BmqEU</recordid><startdate>20051215</startdate><enddate>20051215</enddate><creator>Maštovská, Kateřina</creator><creator>Lehotay, Steven J</creator><creator>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051215</creationdate><title>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</title><author>Maštovská, Kateřina ; Lehotay, Steven J ; Anastassiades, Michelangelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a498t-226d1e017c5e1eefe38ef3379c2f510f158fad06ace53c6ee39a31859abca2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>additives</topic><topic>analyte protectants</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Biphenyl Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Caffeine - chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Erythritol - chemistry</topic><topic>ethyl glycerol</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>food analysis</topic><topic>food contamination</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>food matrix</topic><topic>Fruit - chemistry</topic><topic>fruits (food)</topic><topic>Gas chromatographic methods</topic><topic>gas chromatography</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Glucose - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Glucose - chemistry</topic><topic>Glycerol - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Glycerol - chemistry</topic><topic>gulonolactone</topic><topic>Lindane - analysis</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>organic compounds</topic><topic>Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>pesticide residues</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry</topic><topic>sorbitol</topic><topic>Sorbitol - chemistry</topic><topic>Spectrometric and optical methods</topic><topic>Sugar Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maštovská, Kateřina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehotay, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maštovská, Kateřina</au><au>Lehotay, Steven J</au><au>Anastassiades, Michelangelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>2005-12-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>8129</spage><epage>8137</epage><pages>8129-8137</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><coden>ANCHAM</coden><abstract>Analyte protectants were previously defined as compounds that strongly interact with active sites in the gas chromatographic (GC) system, thus decreasing degradation, adsorption, or both of coinjected analytes. In this study, we evaluated various combinations of promising analyte protectants for the volatility range of GC-amenable pesticides using GC/quadrupole mass spectrometry (MS) and 1-μL hot splitless injection for sample introduction. A mixture of ethylglycerol, gulonolactone, and sorbitol (at 10, 1, and 1 mg/mL, respectively, in the injected samples) was found to be the most effective in minimizing losses of susceptible analytes and significantly improving their peak shapes (due to reduction of peak tailing). When added to final sample extracts and matrix-free calibration standards alike, these analyte protectants induced a similar response enhancement in both instances, resulting in effective equalization of the matrix-induced response enhancement effect even after a large number of fruit and vegetable extract injections. As compared to matrix-matched standardization, the analyte protectant approach offers a more convenient solution to the problems associated with calibration in routine GC/MS analysis of pesticide residues and possibly other susceptible analyte types in diverse samples. Moreover, the use of analyte protectants also substantially reduced another adverse matrix-related effect caused by gradual build-up of nonvolatile matrix components in the GC system, thus improving ruggedness and, consequently, reducing need for frequent maintenance.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>16351165</pmid><doi>10.1021/ac0515576</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2700 |
ispartof | Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2005-12, Vol.77 (24), p.8129-8137 |
issn | 0003-2700 1520-6882 1520-6882 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_217890418 |
source | MEDLINE; ACS Publications |
subjects | additives analyte protectants Analytical chemistry Biphenyl Compounds - analysis Caffeine - chemistry Chemistry Chromatographic methods and physical methods associated with chromatography Crop residues Erythritol - chemistry ethyl glycerol Exact sciences and technology Follow-Up Studies food analysis food contamination Food Contamination - analysis food matrix Fruit - chemistry fruits (food) Gas chromatographic methods gas chromatography Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods Glucose - analogs & derivatives Glucose - chemistry Glycerol - analogs & derivatives Glycerol - chemistry gulonolactone Lindane - analysis Mass spectrometry organic compounds Organothiophosphorus Compounds - analysis pesticide residues Pesticide Residues - analysis Pesticides Polyethylene Glycols - chemistry sorbitol Sorbitol - chemistry Spectrometric and optical methods Sugar Acids - chemistry vegetables |
title | Combination of Analyte Protectants To Overcome Matrix Effects in Routine GC Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Food Matrixes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A21%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combination%20of%20Analyte%20Protectants%20To%20Overcome%20Matrix%20Effects%20in%20Routine%20GC%20Analysis%20of%20Pesticide%20Residues%20in%20Food%20Matrixes&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Ma%C5%A1tovsk%C3%A1,%20Kate%C5%99ina&rft.date=2005-12-15&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=8129&rft.epage=8137&rft.pages=8129-8137&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft.coden=ANCHAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ac0515576&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E964601341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217890418&rft_id=info:pmid/16351165&rfr_iscdi=true |