Distribution, fine-scale subdivision, and population size of San Joaquin kit foxes in the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area, California
The endangered San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF; Vulpes macrotis mutica ) is strongly linked ecologically to xeric areas with high abundance of kangaroo rats. Endemic to the San Joaquin Desert of central California, the elusive nature of SJKF, coupled with steady habitat loss and lack of comprehensive surv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation genetics 2019-06, Vol.20 (3), p.405-417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 417 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Conservation genetics |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Wilbert, Tammy R. Woollett, Deborah A. Smith Westphal, Michael F. Whitelaw, Alice Ralls, Katherine Maldonado, Jesús E. |
description | The endangered San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF;
Vulpes macrotis mutica
) is strongly linked ecologically to xeric areas with high abundance of kangaroo rats. Endemic to the San Joaquin Desert of central California, the elusive nature of SJKF, coupled with steady habitat loss and lack of comprehensive surveys, has precluded efforts to quantify the species’ population size and distribution, especially in the central and northern parts of its range. Because the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area contains the largest area of high-quality habitat in this central/northern region, we conducted systematic transect surveys for SJKF scats with professionally trained dog-handler teams throughout the area during 2009–2011. We collected almost 600 scats over 473 km of transects, documenting the freshness and location of each scat. Using molecular methods, we identified 93 SJKF individuals (56 males and 37 females) from 332 samples. Half of the individuals carried a mtDNA haplotype with a 16 bp deletion that had not been previously detected in other areas surveyed. Four individuals were recaptured in 2010 and five in 2011, including one female that was captured every year. We documented a unique mtDNA haplotype and more individuals across a wider area of the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area than expected. Population analyses revealed two distinct subpopulations, with low connectivity between foxes in the Panoche Valley that are separated by hills with unsuitable habitat from those on the adjacent valley floor next to a major Interstate highway (I-5). While individuals detected within 6 km of each other were closely related, overall relatedness within each subpopulation approached zero. Genetic population models indicated a conservative population estimate of 90 kit foxes in total, with 60–90 individuals in the Panoche Valley and 17–27 individuals in the I-5 area. These results will help to inform management of the SJKF and identify areas that may be important to maintaining connectivity between populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10592-018-1122-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2178455268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2178455268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9792a6b54622139bf199762ba9a389e696ec4e618cb88786eb588bcd71d6fa753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwAewssa3B4zR-LKvyVgVIwNqapA64BLvYSQXs-HNSisSK1Tx07x3NybJDYMfAmDxJwArNKQNFATin-VY2gEJyqmUut9e9EJQJDrvZXkoLxkBwCYPs69SlNrqya13wI1I7b2mqsLEkdeXcrVz62aOfk2VYdg2udSS5T0tCTe7Rk-uAb53z5MW1pA7vNpF-aJ8tmTobV4HeoQ9VP95g20VsyCRaHJEpNq4O0Tvcz3ZqbJI9-K3D7PH87GF6SWe3F1fTyYxWeaHb_g_NUZTFWHAOuS5r0FoKXqLGXGkrtLDV2ApQVamUVMKWhVJlNZcwFzXKIh9mR5vcZQxvnU2tWYQu-v6k4SDVuCi4UL0KNqoqhpSirc0yuleMHwaYWZM2G9KmJ23WpE3ee_jGk3qtf7LxL_l_0zckZ4FV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2178455268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distribution, fine-scale subdivision, and population size of San Joaquin kit foxes in the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area, California</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wilbert, Tammy R. ; Woollett, Deborah A. Smith ; Westphal, Michael F. ; Whitelaw, Alice ; Ralls, Katherine ; Maldonado, Jesús E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilbert, Tammy R. ; Woollett, Deborah A. Smith ; Westphal, Michael F. ; Whitelaw, Alice ; Ralls, Katherine ; Maldonado, Jesús E.</creatorcontrib><description>The endangered San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF;
Vulpes macrotis mutica
) is strongly linked ecologically to xeric areas with high abundance of kangaroo rats. Endemic to the San Joaquin Desert of central California, the elusive nature of SJKF, coupled with steady habitat loss and lack of comprehensive surveys, has precluded efforts to quantify the species’ population size and distribution, especially in the central and northern parts of its range. Because the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area contains the largest area of high-quality habitat in this central/northern region, we conducted systematic transect surveys for SJKF scats with professionally trained dog-handler teams throughout the area during 2009–2011. We collected almost 600 scats over 473 km of transects, documenting the freshness and location of each scat. Using molecular methods, we identified 93 SJKF individuals (56 males and 37 females) from 332 samples. Half of the individuals carried a mtDNA haplotype with a 16 bp deletion that had not been previously detected in other areas surveyed. Four individuals were recaptured in 2010 and five in 2011, including one female that was captured every year. We documented a unique mtDNA haplotype and more individuals across a wider area of the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area than expected. Population analyses revealed two distinct subpopulations, with low connectivity between foxes in the Panoche Valley that are separated by hills with unsuitable habitat from those on the adjacent valley floor next to a major Interstate highway (I-5). While individuals detected within 6 km of each other were closely related, overall relatedness within each subpopulation approached zero. Genetic population models indicated a conservative population estimate of 90 kit foxes in total, with 60–90 individuals in the Panoche Valley and 17–27 individuals in the I-5 area. These results will help to inform management of the SJKF and identify areas that may be important to maintaining connectivity between populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-0621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10592-018-1122-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal Genetics and Genomics ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Desert environments ; Ecology ; Evolutionary Biology ; Foxes ; Freshness ; Habitat loss ; Habitats ; Haplotypes ; Identification methods ; Life Sciences ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Polls & surveys ; Population ; Population genetics ; Population number ; Research Article ; Subpopulations ; Valleys</subject><ispartof>Conservation genetics, 2019-06, Vol.20 (3), p.405-417</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><rights>Conservation Genetics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved. © 2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9792a6b54622139bf199762ba9a389e696ec4e618cb88786eb588bcd71d6fa753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9792a6b54622139bf199762ba9a389e696ec4e618cb88786eb588bcd71d6fa753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1071-0607</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10592-018-1122-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10592-018-1122-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilbert, Tammy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woollett, Deborah A. Smith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westphal, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitelaw, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralls, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Jesús E.</creatorcontrib><title>Distribution, fine-scale subdivision, and population size of San Joaquin kit foxes in the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area, California</title><title>Conservation genetics</title><addtitle>Conserv Genet</addtitle><description>The endangered San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF;
Vulpes macrotis mutica
) is strongly linked ecologically to xeric areas with high abundance of kangaroo rats. Endemic to the San Joaquin Desert of central California, the elusive nature of SJKF, coupled with steady habitat loss and lack of comprehensive surveys, has precluded efforts to quantify the species’ population size and distribution, especially in the central and northern parts of its range. Because the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area contains the largest area of high-quality habitat in this central/northern region, we conducted systematic transect surveys for SJKF scats with professionally trained dog-handler teams throughout the area during 2009–2011. We collected almost 600 scats over 473 km of transects, documenting the freshness and location of each scat. Using molecular methods, we identified 93 SJKF individuals (56 males and 37 females) from 332 samples. Half of the individuals carried a mtDNA haplotype with a 16 bp deletion that had not been previously detected in other areas surveyed. Four individuals were recaptured in 2010 and five in 2011, including one female that was captured every year. We documented a unique mtDNA haplotype and more individuals across a wider area of the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area than expected. Population analyses revealed two distinct subpopulations, with low connectivity between foxes in the Panoche Valley that are separated by hills with unsuitable habitat from those on the adjacent valley floor next to a major Interstate highway (I-5). While individuals detected within 6 km of each other were closely related, overall relatedness within each subpopulation approached zero. Genetic population models indicated a conservative population estimate of 90 kit foxes in total, with 60–90 individuals in the Panoche Valley and 17–27 individuals in the I-5 area. These results will help to inform management of the SJKF and identify areas that may be important to maintaining connectivity between populations.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Desert environments</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Foxes</subject><subject>Freshness</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Subpopulations</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><issn>1566-0621</issn><issn>1572-9737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwAewssa3B4zR-LKvyVgVIwNqapA64BLvYSQXs-HNSisSK1Tx07x3NybJDYMfAmDxJwArNKQNFATin-VY2gEJyqmUut9e9EJQJDrvZXkoLxkBwCYPs69SlNrqya13wI1I7b2mqsLEkdeXcrVz62aOfk2VYdg2udSS5T0tCTe7Rk-uAb53z5MW1pA7vNpF-aJ8tmTobV4HeoQ9VP95g20VsyCRaHJEpNq4O0Tvcz3ZqbJI9-K3D7PH87GF6SWe3F1fTyYxWeaHb_g_NUZTFWHAOuS5r0FoKXqLGXGkrtLDV2ApQVamUVMKWhVJlNZcwFzXKIh9mR5vcZQxvnU2tWYQu-v6k4SDVuCi4UL0KNqoqhpSirc0yuleMHwaYWZM2G9KmJ23WpE3ee_jGk3qtf7LxL_l_0zckZ4FV</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Wilbert, Tammy R.</creator><creator>Woollett, Deborah A. Smith</creator><creator>Westphal, Michael F.</creator><creator>Whitelaw, Alice</creator><creator>Ralls, Katherine</creator><creator>Maldonado, Jesús E.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-0607</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Distribution, fine-scale subdivision, and population size of San Joaquin kit foxes in the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area, California</title><author>Wilbert, Tammy R. ; Woollett, Deborah A. Smith ; Westphal, Michael F. ; Whitelaw, Alice ; Ralls, Katherine ; Maldonado, Jesús E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-9792a6b54622139bf199762ba9a389e696ec4e618cb88786eb588bcd71d6fa753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Desert environments</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Foxes</topic><topic>Freshness</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Subpopulations</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilbert, Tammy R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woollett, Deborah A. Smith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westphal, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitelaw, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralls, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Jesús E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilbert, Tammy R.</au><au>Woollett, Deborah A. Smith</au><au>Westphal, Michael F.</au><au>Whitelaw, Alice</au><au>Ralls, Katherine</au><au>Maldonado, Jesús E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distribution, fine-scale subdivision, and population size of San Joaquin kit foxes in the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area, California</atitle><jtitle>Conservation genetics</jtitle><stitle>Conserv Genet</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>417</epage><pages>405-417</pages><issn>1566-0621</issn><eissn>1572-9737</eissn><abstract>The endangered San Joaquin kit fox (SJKF;
Vulpes macrotis mutica
) is strongly linked ecologically to xeric areas with high abundance of kangaroo rats. Endemic to the San Joaquin Desert of central California, the elusive nature of SJKF, coupled with steady habitat loss and lack of comprehensive surveys, has precluded efforts to quantify the species’ population size and distribution, especially in the central and northern parts of its range. Because the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area contains the largest area of high-quality habitat in this central/northern region, we conducted systematic transect surveys for SJKF scats with professionally trained dog-handler teams throughout the area during 2009–2011. We collected almost 600 scats over 473 km of transects, documenting the freshness and location of each scat. Using molecular methods, we identified 93 SJKF individuals (56 males and 37 females) from 332 samples. Half of the individuals carried a mtDNA haplotype with a 16 bp deletion that had not been previously detected in other areas surveyed. Four individuals were recaptured in 2010 and five in 2011, including one female that was captured every year. We documented a unique mtDNA haplotype and more individuals across a wider area of the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area than expected. Population analyses revealed two distinct subpopulations, with low connectivity between foxes in the Panoche Valley that are separated by hills with unsuitable habitat from those on the adjacent valley floor next to a major Interstate highway (I-5). While individuals detected within 6 km of each other were closely related, overall relatedness within each subpopulation approached zero. Genetic population models indicated a conservative population estimate of 90 kit foxes in total, with 60–90 individuals in the Panoche Valley and 17–27 individuals in the I-5 area. These results will help to inform management of the SJKF and identify areas that may be important to maintaining connectivity between populations.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10592-018-1122-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1071-0607</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1566-0621 |
ispartof | Conservation genetics, 2019-06, Vol.20 (3), p.405-417 |
issn | 1566-0621 1572-9737 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2178455268 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal Genetics and Genomics Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Conservation Biology/Ecology Desert environments Ecology Evolutionary Biology Foxes Freshness Habitat loss Habitats Haplotypes Identification methods Life Sciences Mitochondrial DNA Plant Genetics and Genomics Polls & surveys Population Population genetics Population number Research Article Subpopulations Valleys |
title | Distribution, fine-scale subdivision, and population size of San Joaquin kit foxes in the Ciervo-Panoche Natural Area, California |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T22%3A50%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distribution,%20fine-scale%20subdivision,%20and%20population%20size%20of%20San%20Joaquin%20kit%20foxes%20in%20the%20Ciervo-Panoche%20Natural%20Area,%20California&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20genetics&rft.au=Wilbert,%20Tammy%20R.&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=417&rft.pages=405-417&rft.issn=1566-0621&rft.eissn=1572-9737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10592-018-1122-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2178455268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2178455268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |