Prioritisation of future research topics for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study
The Delphi process, widely used in health research to seek consensus on key issues amongst large stakeholder groups, was adopted to allow families, hospice staff/volunteers and linked professionals to identify and prioritise future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care. In the qualitat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Palliative medicine 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.398 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 398 |
container_title | Palliative medicine |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Malcolm, C Knighting, K bat, L Kearney, N |
description | The Delphi process, widely used in health research to seek consensus on key issues amongst large stakeholder groups, was adopted to allow families, hospice staff/volunteers and linked professionals to identify and prioritise future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care. In the qualitative Round 1, interviews with families (n  = 5), linked professionals (n  = 18) and focus groups with hospice staff and volunteers (n  = 44) led to the generation of 56 research topics categorised within 14 broad themes. To give a larger number of stakeholders (n  = 621) (including families n  = 293; hospice staff/volunteers n  = 216 and professionals n  = 112) the opportunity to rate the importance of each research topic and seek group consensus on the future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care, subsequent Rounds 2 and 3 involved the use of postal questionnaires. Response rates to questionnaires were 44% in Round 2 (274/621) and 83% in Round 3 (204/247). Participants prioritised research topics relating to 1) hospice and respite care needs of young people (aged 16 +), 2) pain and symptom management and 3) bereavement and end-of-life care. There was wide acknowledgement by those took part in the process of the difficulty in rating the topics, and emphasis on the fact that all of the topics raised during the project are of high importance and merit further research. The current salient issues perceived by key stakeholders as being the research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care were identified. Addressing these priority topics for research would further contribute to the development of a much needed evidence base in childrenâ(TM)s hospice and palliative care research and optimise the delivery of childrenâ(TM)s hospice services that are underpinned by valid and robust research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0269216309104061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217830422</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1747794071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2178304223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyz1OxDAQBWALgUT46SlHVFAExnYUs7T8iAaJYgu6lUkminejODtjF7kOV-FiZCUOQPWk972n1JXGO62du0dTr4yuLa40VljrI1XoyrkSLX4eq-LA5cFP1ZnIFlFbrKtC7T84RA4piE8hjhA76HLKTMAk5LnpIcUpNAJdZGj6MLRM48_3zfr9VqCPshhB45fD1wwhCexoBkl-R30cWmJ5BA_PNEx9WOrczhfqpPOD0OVfnqvr15f101s5cdxnkrTZxszjQhuj3YPFyhj7r9EvOfZRlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217830422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prioritisation of future research topics for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Malcolm, C ; Knighting, K ; bat, L ; Kearney, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, C ; Knighting, K ; bat, L ; Kearney, N</creatorcontrib><description>The Delphi process, widely used in health research to seek consensus on key issues amongst large stakeholder groups, was adopted to allow families, hospice staff/volunteers and linked professionals to identify and prioritise future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care. In the qualitative Round 1, interviews with families (n  = 5), linked professionals (n  = 18) and focus groups with hospice staff and volunteers (n  = 44) led to the generation of 56 research topics categorised within 14 broad themes. To give a larger number of stakeholders (n  = 621) (including families n  = 293; hospice staff/volunteers n  = 216 and professionals n  = 112) the opportunity to rate the importance of each research topic and seek group consensus on the future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care, subsequent Rounds 2 and 3 involved the use of postal questionnaires. Response rates to questionnaires were 44% in Round 2 (274/621) and 83% in Round 3 (204/247). Participants prioritised research topics relating to 1) hospice and respite care needs of young people (aged 16 +), 2) pain and symptom management and 3) bereavement and end-of-life care. There was wide acknowledgement by those took part in the process of the difficulty in rating the topics, and emphasis on the fact that all of the topics raised during the project are of high importance and merit further research. The current salient issues perceived by key stakeholders as being the research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care were identified. Addressing these priority topics for research would further contribute to the development of a much needed evidence base in childrenâ(TM)s hospice and palliative care research and optimise the delivery of childrenâ(TM)s hospice services that are underpinned by valid and robust research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-030X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269216309104061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Sage Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Data collection ; Delphi method ; Focus groups ; Hospice care ; Midwifery ; Nursing ; Palliative care ; Professional ethics ; Questionnaires ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Palliative medicine, 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.398</ispartof><rights>SAGE Publications © Jul 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knighting, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>bat, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearney, N</creatorcontrib><title>Prioritisation of future research topics for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study</title><title>Palliative medicine</title><description>The Delphi process, widely used in health research to seek consensus on key issues amongst large stakeholder groups, was adopted to allow families, hospice staff/volunteers and linked professionals to identify and prioritise future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care. In the qualitative Round 1, interviews with families (n  = 5), linked professionals (n  = 18) and focus groups with hospice staff and volunteers (n  = 44) led to the generation of 56 research topics categorised within 14 broad themes. To give a larger number of stakeholders (n  = 621) (including families n  = 293; hospice staff/volunteers n  = 216 and professionals n  = 112) the opportunity to rate the importance of each research topic and seek group consensus on the future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care, subsequent Rounds 2 and 3 involved the use of postal questionnaires. Response rates to questionnaires were 44% in Round 2 (274/621) and 83% in Round 3 (204/247). Participants prioritised research topics relating to 1) hospice and respite care needs of young people (aged 16 +), 2) pain and symptom management and 3) bereavement and end-of-life care. There was wide acknowledgement by those took part in the process of the difficulty in rating the topics, and emphasis on the fact that all of the topics raised during the project are of high importance and merit further research. The current salient issues perceived by key stakeholders as being the research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care were identified. Addressing these priority topics for research would further contribute to the development of a much needed evidence base in childrenâ(TM)s hospice and palliative care research and optimise the delivery of childrenâ(TM)s hospice services that are underpinned by valid and robust research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0269-2163</issn><issn>1477-030X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyz1OxDAQBWALgUT46SlHVFAExnYUs7T8iAaJYgu6lUkminejODtjF7kOV-FiZCUOQPWk972n1JXGO62du0dTr4yuLa40VljrI1XoyrkSLX4eq-LA5cFP1ZnIFlFbrKtC7T84RA4piE8hjhA76HLKTMAk5LnpIcUpNAJdZGj6MLRM48_3zfr9VqCPshhB45fD1wwhCexoBkl-R30cWmJ5BA_PNEx9WOrczhfqpPOD0OVfnqvr15f101s5cdxnkrTZxszjQhuj3YPFyhj7r9EvOfZRlQ</recordid><startdate>20090701</startdate><enddate>20090701</enddate><creator>Malcolm, C</creator><creator>Knighting, K</creator><creator>bat, L</creator><creator>Kearney, N</creator><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090701</creationdate><title>Prioritisation of future research topics for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study</title><author>Malcolm, C ; Knighting, K ; bat, L ; Kearney, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2178304223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malcolm, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knighting, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>bat, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearney, N</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Palliative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malcolm, C</au><au>Knighting, K</au><au>bat, L</au><au>Kearney, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prioritisation of future research topics for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study</atitle><jtitle>Palliative medicine</jtitle><date>2009-07-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>398</spage><pages>398-</pages><issn>0269-2163</issn><eissn>1477-030X</eissn><abstract>The Delphi process, widely used in health research to seek consensus on key issues amongst large stakeholder groups, was adopted to allow families, hospice staff/volunteers and linked professionals to identify and prioritise future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care. In the qualitative Round 1, interviews with families (n  = 5), linked professionals (n  = 18) and focus groups with hospice staff and volunteers (n  = 44) led to the generation of 56 research topics categorised within 14 broad themes. To give a larger number of stakeholders (n  = 621) (including families n  = 293; hospice staff/volunteers n  = 216 and professionals n  = 112) the opportunity to rate the importance of each research topic and seek group consensus on the future research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care, subsequent Rounds 2 and 3 involved the use of postal questionnaires. Response rates to questionnaires were 44% in Round 2 (274/621) and 83% in Round 3 (204/247). Participants prioritised research topics relating to 1) hospice and respite care needs of young people (aged 16 +), 2) pain and symptom management and 3) bereavement and end-of-life care. There was wide acknowledgement by those took part in the process of the difficulty in rating the topics, and emphasis on the fact that all of the topics raised during the project are of high importance and merit further research. The current salient issues perceived by key stakeholders as being the research priorities for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care were identified. Addressing these priority topics for research would further contribute to the development of a much needed evidence base in childrenâ(TM)s hospice and palliative care research and optimise the delivery of childrenâ(TM)s hospice services that are underpinned by valid and robust research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Sage Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0269216309104061</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-2163 |
ispartof | Palliative medicine, 2009-07, Vol.23 (5), p.398 |
issn | 0269-2163 1477-030X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_217830422 |
source | SAGE Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Data collection Delphi method Focus groups Hospice care Midwifery Nursing Palliative care Professional ethics Questionnaires Stakeholders |
title | Prioritisation of future research topics for childrenâ(TM)s hospice care by its key stakeholders: a Delphi study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A18%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prioritisation%20of%20future%20research%20topics%20for%20children%C3%A2(TM)s%20hospice%20care%20by%20its%20key%20stakeholders:%20a%20Delphi%20study&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20medicine&rft.au=Malcolm,%20C&rft.date=2009-07-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=398&rft.pages=398-&rft.issn=0269-2163&rft.eissn=1477-030X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269216309104061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1747794071%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217830422&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |