Arsenic removal from naturally arsenic contaminated ground water by packed-bed electrocoagulator using Al and Fe scrap anodes

•Both Al and Fe scrap anodes reduced the residual As level to WHO standard.•Overal, Fe scrap anodes performed much better than Al electrodes.•Electrogenerated Al or Fe-hydroxides showed satisfactory As removal capacity. In this work, feasibility of electrocoagulation (EC) process with Al and Fe scra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Process safety and environmental protection 2019-01, Vol.121, p.20-31
Hauptverfasser: Omwene, Philip Isaac, Çelen, Meltem, Öncel, Mehmet Salim, Kobya, Mehmet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue
container_start_page 20
container_title Process safety and environmental protection
container_volume 121
creator Omwene, Philip Isaac
Çelen, Meltem
Öncel, Mehmet Salim
Kobya, Mehmet
description •Both Al and Fe scrap anodes reduced the residual As level to WHO standard.•Overal, Fe scrap anodes performed much better than Al electrodes.•Electrogenerated Al or Fe-hydroxides showed satisfactory As removal capacity. In this work, feasibility of electrocoagulation (EC) process with Al and Fe scrap anodes for treatment of groundwater contaminated with arsenic (As) was examined as a cheaper treatment alternative for affected remote communities. EC experiments were carried out in a batch packed-bed EC reactor and the effect of applied current (0.010–0.100 A), type of scrap electrode (Fe and Al), packed-bed density (0.1–0.4 kg/m3 for Fe and 0.02–0.08 kg/m3 for Al) and EC time were investigated. Optimum operating conditions to obtain maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg /L for total As (>93% removal) in groundwater samples were determined as 8 min and 0.05 A for Fe scrap anodes. Whereas for Al scrap anode, 30 min and 0.10 A were the optimums. The operating cost, energy and electrode consumptions at these optimums were calculated as 0.017 US $/m3, 0.070 kW h/m3 and 0.052 kg/m3 for Fe anodes and 0.181 US $/m3, 0.876 kW h/m3 and 0.067 kg/m3 for AL anodes respectively. The As removal slightly decreased with decrease in anode bed density. Moreover, Fe scrap anodes exhibited better As removal than the Al scrap anodes at all tested conditions. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the electro-coagulated sludge revealed irregular and porous particles with amorphous structure. The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed bonding between Fe(III) - As(V), and AsO bond, confirming As removal by co-precipitation and adsorption, respectively in the EC process.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2178125469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957582018302477</els_id><sourcerecordid>2178125469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-533892744a860479b35f8cff15ada9683dadf8dd54be5399c9ac56c256e403da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtO6zAQhi0EEuXyAqwssU6x4zixpbOp0OEiIbGBtTW1J1VKGueME1AX591xVdasRjP__HP5GLuRYimFrO-2yzHhuCyFNLmwFEKdsIVsqqpQ2ppTthBWN4U2pThnFylthRCybOSC_V9RwqHznHAXP6HnLcUdH2CaCfp-z-FH9nGYYNdlAQPfUJyHwL9yQny95yP4DwzFOkvYo58o-gibuYcpEp9TN2z4queQLQ_IkycYcxIDpit21kKf8PonXrL3h79v90_Fy-vj8_3qpfCq1lOhlTK2zN-AqUXV2LXSrfFtKzUEsLVRAUJrQtDVGrWy1lvwuvalrrESWVSX7PY4d6T4b8Y0uW2cacgrXSkbI0td1TZ3lccuTzElwtaN1O2A9k4Kd8Dstu6A2R0wH2oZczb9OZow3__ZIbnkOxw8ho4yChdi95v9G2l5iGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2178125469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arsenic removal from naturally arsenic contaminated ground water by packed-bed electrocoagulator using Al and Fe scrap anodes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Omwene, Philip Isaac ; Çelen, Meltem ; Öncel, Mehmet Salim ; Kobya, Mehmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Omwene, Philip Isaac ; Çelen, Meltem ; Öncel, Mehmet Salim ; Kobya, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><description>•Both Al and Fe scrap anodes reduced the residual As level to WHO standard.•Overal, Fe scrap anodes performed much better than Al electrodes.•Electrogenerated Al or Fe-hydroxides showed satisfactory As removal capacity. In this work, feasibility of electrocoagulation (EC) process with Al and Fe scrap anodes for treatment of groundwater contaminated with arsenic (As) was examined as a cheaper treatment alternative for affected remote communities. EC experiments were carried out in a batch packed-bed EC reactor and the effect of applied current (0.010–0.100 A), type of scrap electrode (Fe and Al), packed-bed density (0.1–0.4 kg/m3 for Fe and 0.02–0.08 kg/m3 for Al) and EC time were investigated. Optimum operating conditions to obtain maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg /L for total As (&gt;93% removal) in groundwater samples were determined as 8 min and 0.05 A for Fe scrap anodes. Whereas for Al scrap anode, 30 min and 0.10 A were the optimums. The operating cost, energy and electrode consumptions at these optimums were calculated as 0.017 US $/m3, 0.070 kW h/m3 and 0.052 kg/m3 for Fe anodes and 0.181 US $/m3, 0.876 kW h/m3 and 0.067 kg/m3 for AL anodes respectively. The As removal slightly decreased with decrease in anode bed density. Moreover, Fe scrap anodes exhibited better As removal than the Al scrap anodes at all tested conditions. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the electro-coagulated sludge revealed irregular and porous particles with amorphous structure. The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed bonding between Fe(III) - As(V), and AsO bond, confirming As removal by co-precipitation and adsorption, respectively in the EC process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rugby: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Al and Fe scrap anodes ; Anodes ; Arsenic ; Arsenic removal ; Contaminants ; Density ; Electrocoagulation ; Electrodes ; Feasibility studies ; Fourier transforms ; Groundwater ; Groundwater pollution ; Groundwater treatment ; Infrared spectroscopy ; Iron ; Operating costs ; Pollutant removal ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Scrap ; Sludge ; Soil contamination ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Process safety and environmental protection, 2019-01, Vol.121, p.20-31</ispartof><rights>2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-533892744a860479b35f8cff15ada9683dadf8dd54be5399c9ac56c256e403da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-533892744a860479b35f8cff15ada9683dadf8dd54be5399c9ac56c256e403da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omwene, Philip Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çelen, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öncel, Mehmet Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobya, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><title>Arsenic removal from naturally arsenic contaminated ground water by packed-bed electrocoagulator using Al and Fe scrap anodes</title><title>Process safety and environmental protection</title><description>•Both Al and Fe scrap anodes reduced the residual As level to WHO standard.•Overal, Fe scrap anodes performed much better than Al electrodes.•Electrogenerated Al or Fe-hydroxides showed satisfactory As removal capacity. In this work, feasibility of electrocoagulation (EC) process with Al and Fe scrap anodes for treatment of groundwater contaminated with arsenic (As) was examined as a cheaper treatment alternative for affected remote communities. EC experiments were carried out in a batch packed-bed EC reactor and the effect of applied current (0.010–0.100 A), type of scrap electrode (Fe and Al), packed-bed density (0.1–0.4 kg/m3 for Fe and 0.02–0.08 kg/m3 for Al) and EC time were investigated. Optimum operating conditions to obtain maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg /L for total As (&gt;93% removal) in groundwater samples were determined as 8 min and 0.05 A for Fe scrap anodes. Whereas for Al scrap anode, 30 min and 0.10 A were the optimums. The operating cost, energy and electrode consumptions at these optimums were calculated as 0.017 US $/m3, 0.070 kW h/m3 and 0.052 kg/m3 for Fe anodes and 0.181 US $/m3, 0.876 kW h/m3 and 0.067 kg/m3 for AL anodes respectively. The As removal slightly decreased with decrease in anode bed density. Moreover, Fe scrap anodes exhibited better As removal than the Al scrap anodes at all tested conditions. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the electro-coagulated sludge revealed irregular and porous particles with amorphous structure. The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed bonding between Fe(III) - As(V), and AsO bond, confirming As removal by co-precipitation and adsorption, respectively in the EC process.</description><subject>Al and Fe scrap anodes</subject><subject>Anodes</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Arsenic removal</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>Groundwater treatment</subject><subject>Infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Scrap</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>0957-5820</issn><issn>1744-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtO6zAQhi0EEuXyAqwssU6x4zixpbOp0OEiIbGBtTW1J1VKGueME1AX591xVdasRjP__HP5GLuRYimFrO-2yzHhuCyFNLmwFEKdsIVsqqpQ2ppTthBWN4U2pThnFylthRCybOSC_V9RwqHznHAXP6HnLcUdH2CaCfp-z-FH9nGYYNdlAQPfUJyHwL9yQny95yP4DwzFOkvYo58o-gibuYcpEp9TN2z4queQLQ_IkycYcxIDpit21kKf8PonXrL3h79v90_Fy-vj8_3qpfCq1lOhlTK2zN-AqUXV2LXSrfFtKzUEsLVRAUJrQtDVGrWy1lvwuvalrrESWVSX7PY4d6T4b8Y0uW2cacgrXSkbI0td1TZ3lccuTzElwtaN1O2A9k4Kd8Dstu6A2R0wH2oZczb9OZow3__ZIbnkOxw8ho4yChdi95v9G2l5iGw</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Omwene, Philip Isaac</creator><creator>Çelen, Meltem</creator><creator>Öncel, Mehmet Salim</creator><creator>Kobya, Mehmet</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Arsenic removal from naturally arsenic contaminated ground water by packed-bed electrocoagulator using Al and Fe scrap anodes</title><author>Omwene, Philip Isaac ; Çelen, Meltem ; Öncel, Mehmet Salim ; Kobya, Mehmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-533892744a860479b35f8cff15ada9683dadf8dd54be5399c9ac56c256e403da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Al and Fe scrap anodes</topic><topic>Anodes</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Arsenic removal</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>Groundwater treatment</topic><topic>Infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Scrap</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omwene, Philip Isaac</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çelen, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öncel, Mehmet Salim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobya, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omwene, Philip Isaac</au><au>Çelen, Meltem</au><au>Öncel, Mehmet Salim</au><au>Kobya, Mehmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arsenic removal from naturally arsenic contaminated ground water by packed-bed electrocoagulator using Al and Fe scrap anodes</atitle><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>20-31</pages><issn>0957-5820</issn><eissn>1744-3598</eissn><abstract>•Both Al and Fe scrap anodes reduced the residual As level to WHO standard.•Overal, Fe scrap anodes performed much better than Al electrodes.•Electrogenerated Al or Fe-hydroxides showed satisfactory As removal capacity. In this work, feasibility of electrocoagulation (EC) process with Al and Fe scrap anodes for treatment of groundwater contaminated with arsenic (As) was examined as a cheaper treatment alternative for affected remote communities. EC experiments were carried out in a batch packed-bed EC reactor and the effect of applied current (0.010–0.100 A), type of scrap electrode (Fe and Al), packed-bed density (0.1–0.4 kg/m3 for Fe and 0.02–0.08 kg/m3 for Al) and EC time were investigated. Optimum operating conditions to obtain maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 μg /L for total As (&gt;93% removal) in groundwater samples were determined as 8 min and 0.05 A for Fe scrap anodes. Whereas for Al scrap anode, 30 min and 0.10 A were the optimums. The operating cost, energy and electrode consumptions at these optimums were calculated as 0.017 US $/m3, 0.070 kW h/m3 and 0.052 kg/m3 for Fe anodes and 0.181 US $/m3, 0.876 kW h/m3 and 0.067 kg/m3 for AL anodes respectively. The As removal slightly decreased with decrease in anode bed density. Moreover, Fe scrap anodes exhibited better As removal than the Al scrap anodes at all tested conditions. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the electro-coagulated sludge revealed irregular and porous particles with amorphous structure. The Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed bonding between Fe(III) - As(V), and AsO bond, confirming As removal by co-precipitation and adsorption, respectively in the EC process.</abstract><cop>Rugby</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-5820
ispartof Process safety and environmental protection, 2019-01, Vol.121, p.20-31
issn 0957-5820
1744-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2178125469
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Al and Fe scrap anodes
Anodes
Arsenic
Arsenic removal
Contaminants
Density
Electrocoagulation
Electrodes
Feasibility studies
Fourier transforms
Groundwater
Groundwater pollution
Groundwater treatment
Infrared spectroscopy
Iron
Operating costs
Pollutant removal
Scanning electron microscopy
Scrap
Sludge
Soil contamination
Water pollution
title Arsenic removal from naturally arsenic contaminated ground water by packed-bed electrocoagulator using Al and Fe scrap anodes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A08%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arsenic%20removal%20from%20naturally%20arsenic%20contaminated%20ground%20water%20by%20packed-bed%20electrocoagulator%20using%20Al%20and%20Fe%20scrap%20anodes&rft.jtitle=Process%20safety%20and%20environmental%20protection&rft.au=Omwene,%20Philip%20Isaac&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=20-31&rft.issn=0957-5820&rft.eissn=1744-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2178125469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2178125469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0957582018302477&rfr_iscdi=true