Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums

Many insurance contracts are contingent on events such as hurricanes, terrorist attacks, or political upheavals, whose probabilities are ambiguous. This article offers a theory to underpin the large body of empirical evidence showing that higher premiums are charged under ambiguity. We model a (re)i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of risk and insurance 2019-03, Vol.86 (1), p.213-235
Hauptverfasser: Dietz, Simon, Walker, Oliver
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 235
container_issue 1
container_start_page 213
container_title The Journal of risk and insurance
container_volume 86
creator Dietz, Simon
Walker, Oliver
description Many insurance contracts are contingent on events such as hurricanes, terrorist attacks, or political upheavals, whose probabilities are ambiguous. This article offers a theory to underpin the large body of empirical evidence showing that higher premiums are charged under ambiguity. We model a (re)insurer that maximizes profit subject to a survival constraint that is sensitive to the range of estimates of the probability of ruin, as well as the insurer's attitude toward this ambiguity. We characterize when one book of insurance is more ambiguous than another and general circumstances in which a more ambiguous book requires at least as large a capital holding. We subsequently derive several explicit formulae for the price of insurance contracts under ambiguity, each of which identifies the extra ambiguity load.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jori.12208
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2178055379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A582204673</galeid><jstor_id>45172739</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A582204673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-17f15eac32041f49ff92752114e412838e53374884e3a3d9467b81c6463caf573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1KKzEURoMcwR71xicoiDfi1PxOMt6VctSKoIhehzRNxpROpmbPcOjbG62iQjGBhIS19ob9IXRE8Ijkdb5oUxgRSrHaQQMiWFWUlRR_0ABjSgvOSrmH_gIsMMYSq2qALsbNLNR96NZDE-fDaYQ-mWjdxXBiVqEzy-GDe-lDco2LHbwz9_kR-gYO0K43S3CHH_c-err89zi5Lm7vrqaT8W1hBaeqINIT4YxlFHPieeV9RaWghHDHCVVMOcGY5EpxxwybV7yUM0VsyUtmjReS7aPjTd1Val96B51etH2KuaWmRCosBJPVF1WbpdMh-rZLxjYBrB4LlSeS67JMFVuo2kWXzLKNzof8_YMfbeHznucZ2K3C2Tdh1kOIDvIBoX7uoDY9wE_8dIPb1AIk5_UqhcaktSZYvyWq3xLV74lmmGzg_7np-hdS39w9TD-dk42zgK5N3x3KsNRcEEklq9grLM6qFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2178055379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Dietz, Simon ; Walker, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Simon ; Walker, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>Many insurance contracts are contingent on events such as hurricanes, terrorist attacks, or political upheavals, whose probabilities are ambiguous. This article offers a theory to underpin the large body of empirical evidence showing that higher premiums are charged under ambiguity. We model a (re)insurer that maximizes profit subject to a survival constraint that is sensitive to the range of estimates of the probability of ruin, as well as the insurer's attitude toward this ambiguity. We characterize when one book of insurance is more ambiguous than another and general circumstances in which a more ambiguous book requires at least as large a capital holding. We subsequently derive several explicit formulae for the price of insurance contracts under ambiguity, each of which identifies the extra ambiguity load.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6975</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jori.12208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malvern: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Climate change ; Decision making ; Economic models ; Environmental aspects ; Forecasts and trends ; Hurricanes ; Insurance companies ; Insurance industry ; Insurance policies ; Methods ; Terrorism</subject><ispartof>The Journal of risk and insurance, 2019-03, Vol.86 (1), p.213-235</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 The American Risk and Insurance Association</rights><rights>2017 The Journal of Risk and Insurance</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 American Risk and Insurance Association, Inc.</rights><rights>American Risk and Insurance Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-17f15eac32041f49ff92752114e412838e53374884e3a3d9467b81c6463caf573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-17f15eac32041f49ff92752114e412838e53374884e3a3d9467b81c6463caf573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45172739$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45172739$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums</title><title>The Journal of risk and insurance</title><description>Many insurance contracts are contingent on events such as hurricanes, terrorist attacks, or political upheavals, whose probabilities are ambiguous. This article offers a theory to underpin the large body of empirical evidence showing that higher premiums are charged under ambiguity. We model a (re)insurer that maximizes profit subject to a survival constraint that is sensitive to the range of estimates of the probability of ruin, as well as the insurer's attitude toward this ambiguity. We characterize when one book of insurance is more ambiguous than another and general circumstances in which a more ambiguous book requires at least as large a capital holding. We subsequently derive several explicit formulae for the price of insurance contracts under ambiguity, each of which identifies the extra ambiguity load.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Hurricanes</subject><subject>Insurance companies</subject><subject>Insurance industry</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Terrorism</subject><issn>0022-4367</issn><issn>1539-6975</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1KKzEURoMcwR71xicoiDfi1PxOMt6VctSKoIhehzRNxpROpmbPcOjbG62iQjGBhIS19ob9IXRE8Ijkdb5oUxgRSrHaQQMiWFWUlRR_0ABjSgvOSrmH_gIsMMYSq2qALsbNLNR96NZDE-fDaYQ-mWjdxXBiVqEzy-GDe-lDco2LHbwz9_kR-gYO0K43S3CHH_c-err89zi5Lm7vrqaT8W1hBaeqINIT4YxlFHPieeV9RaWghHDHCVVMOcGY5EpxxwybV7yUM0VsyUtmjReS7aPjTd1Val96B51etH2KuaWmRCosBJPVF1WbpdMh-rZLxjYBrB4LlSeS67JMFVuo2kWXzLKNzof8_YMfbeHznucZ2K3C2Tdh1kOIDvIBoX7uoDY9wE_8dIPb1AIk5_UqhcaktSZYvyWq3xLV74lmmGzg_7np-hdS39w9TD-dk42zgK5N3x3KsNRcEEklq9grLM6qFw</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Dietz, Simon</creator><creator>Walker, Oliver</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>American Risk and Insurance Association, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums</title><author>Dietz, Simon ; Walker, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5428-17f15eac32041f49ff92752114e412838e53374884e3a3d9467b81c6463caf573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Hurricanes</topic><topic>Insurance companies</topic><topic>Insurance industry</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Terrorism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dietz, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of risk and insurance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dietz, Simon</au><au>Walker, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of risk and insurance</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>213-235</pages><issn>0022-4367</issn><eissn>1539-6975</eissn><abstract>Many insurance contracts are contingent on events such as hurricanes, terrorist attacks, or political upheavals, whose probabilities are ambiguous. This article offers a theory to underpin the large body of empirical evidence showing that higher premiums are charged under ambiguity. We model a (re)insurer that maximizes profit subject to a survival constraint that is sensitive to the range of estimates of the probability of ruin, as well as the insurer's attitude toward this ambiguity. We characterize when one book of insurance is more ambiguous than another and general circumstances in which a more ambiguous book requires at least as large a capital holding. We subsequently derive several explicit formulae for the price of insurance contracts under ambiguity, each of which identifies the extra ambiguity load.</abstract><cop>Malvern</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jori.12208</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4367
ispartof The Journal of risk and insurance, 2019-03, Vol.86 (1), p.213-235
issn 0022-4367
1539-6975
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2178055379
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Ambiguity
Climate change
Decision making
Economic models
Environmental aspects
Forecasts and trends
Hurricanes
Insurance companies
Insurance industry
Insurance policies
Methods
Terrorism
title Ambiguity and Insurance: Capital Requirements and Premiums
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A46%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambiguity%20and%20Insurance:%20Capital%20Requirements%20and%20Premiums&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20risk%20and%20insurance&rft.au=Dietz,%20Simon&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=213-235&rft.issn=0022-4367&rft.eissn=1539-6975&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jori.12208&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA582204673%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2178055379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A582204673&rft_jstor_id=45172739&rfr_iscdi=true