Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Stomatal Conductance of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Waterlogging and Fluctuation Light Intensity
Under natural conditions, plants are often subjected to waterlogging due to poor soil drainage and or exessive rainfall. This condition leads to reduced maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (fv/fm) under suboptimal growing system. Under well-watered conditions (WW), the fv/fm of ten varieties of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 2018-11, Vol.30 (11), p.26-940 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 940 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 26 |
| container_title | Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture |
| container_volume | 30 |
| creator | Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti |
| description | Under natural conditions, plants are often subjected to waterlogging due to poor soil drainage and or exessive rainfall. This condition leads to reduced maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (fv/fm) under suboptimal growing system. Under well-watered conditions (WW), the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcane were maintained at more than 0.78. However, following waterlogging for 4 days and a constant light of 3000 mmolmol-1 for 60s, the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcene varied from 0.587 in PS882 (V4) to 0.740 in GMP2 (V9). Meanwhile, under fluctuating light intensity from dark to highlight of 1600 mmolmol-1, the fv/fm of all varieties decreased to below of 0.1 except in the genotype PSJK922 (V5) at 28 DAT (day after treatment) of waterlogging. This difference was then further examined through measurements of stomatal conductance (gs) among the varieties. There was negative correllation between fv/fm and stomatal conductance, high gs was not associated with lower fv/fm. Dendrogam analyses showed the variety of PS881 (V1), PS864 (V3) and Kidang Kencana (KK) were highly sensitive to waterlogging. These results suggest potential screening of plants based on improve fv/fm under abiotic condition. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i11.1844 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2177522594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A607287604</galeid><sourcerecordid>A607287604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3035df94df4d2922032f40ca3bba623d9169f0a4ee3e25baf696c5497baaaf573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1r3DAQhk1poCHJXyiCnnpYR5_W-hiWplm60ELSj5sYyyOvgiNtJTlkT_nrtbulp3lhHt4ZeKrqPaN1q5W6xkcHNadsXT8LWnvGaraW8k11zqluV1SJ9dv_mf96V13l7DsqpRZKK3ZevW72Y0zxsD-OI7kdp5gwWwwWCYSe3Jf4BAVGsomhn2yBZREdecBA7qcBkoWA5Ackj8VjJlPoMZGfUDCNcRh8GP7WzL22TFB8DGTnh30h21AwZF-Ol9WZgzHj1b95UX2__fSwuVvtvn7ebm52KyuYLitBhepdK3sne95yTgV3kloQXQcNF33LmtZRkIgCuerANW1jlWx1BwBOaXFRfTj1HlL8PWEu5jFOKcwnDWdaK85VK2fq44kaYETjg43zny9lgCln8-Xb1tw0VPO1bujCNifWpphzQmcOyT9BOhpGzeLGLG7M4sbMbszsxixuxB9D_IX5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2177522594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Stomatal Conductance of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Waterlogging and Fluctuation Light Intensity</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti</creator><creatorcontrib>Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti</creatorcontrib><description>Under natural conditions, plants are often subjected to waterlogging due to poor soil drainage and or exessive rainfall. This condition leads to reduced maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (fv/fm) under suboptimal growing system. Under well-watered conditions (WW), the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcane were maintained at more than 0.78. However, following waterlogging for 4 days and a constant light of 3000 mmolmol-1 for 60s, the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcene varied from 0.587 in PS882 (V4) to 0.740 in GMP2 (V9). Meanwhile, under fluctuating light intensity from dark to highlight of 1600 mmolmol-1, the fv/fm of all varieties decreased to below of 0.1 except in the genotype PSJK922 (V5) at 28 DAT (day after treatment) of waterlogging. This difference was then further examined through measurements of stomatal conductance (gs) among the varieties. There was negative correllation between fv/fm and stomatal conductance, high gs was not associated with lower fv/fm. Dendrogam analyses showed the variety of PS881 (V1), PS864 (V3) and Kidang Kencana (KK) were highly sensitive to waterlogging. These results suggest potential screening of plants based on improve fv/fm under abiotic condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-052X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-0538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i11.1844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sofia: College of Food & Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Agricultural production ; Biodiesel fuels ; Chlorophyll ; Conductance ; Fluorescence ; Genotype & phenotype ; Genotypes ; Leaves ; Light ; Light intensity ; Luminous intensity ; Observations ; Photosynthesis ; Photosystem II ; Physiological aspects ; Physiology ; Properties ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Resistance ; Rice ; Stomata ; Stomatal conductance ; Sugarcane ; Variation ; Water wells ; Waterlogged ground ; Waterlogging</subject><ispartof>Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2018-11, Vol.30 (11), p.26-940</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 College of Food & Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3035df94df4d2922032f40ca3bba623d9169f0a4ee3e25baf696c5497baaaf573</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti</creatorcontrib><title>Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Stomatal Conductance of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Waterlogging and Fluctuation Light Intensity</title><title>Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture</title><description>Under natural conditions, plants are often subjected to waterlogging due to poor soil drainage and or exessive rainfall. This condition leads to reduced maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (fv/fm) under suboptimal growing system. Under well-watered conditions (WW), the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcane were maintained at more than 0.78. However, following waterlogging for 4 days and a constant light of 3000 mmolmol-1 for 60s, the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcene varied from 0.587 in PS882 (V4) to 0.740 in GMP2 (V9). Meanwhile, under fluctuating light intensity from dark to highlight of 1600 mmolmol-1, the fv/fm of all varieties decreased to below of 0.1 except in the genotype PSJK922 (V5) at 28 DAT (day after treatment) of waterlogging. This difference was then further examined through measurements of stomatal conductance (gs) among the varieties. There was negative correllation between fv/fm and stomatal conductance, high gs was not associated with lower fv/fm. Dendrogam analyses showed the variety of PS881 (V1), PS864 (V3) and Kidang Kencana (KK) were highly sensitive to waterlogging. These results suggest potential screening of plants based on improve fv/fm under abiotic condition.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Conductance</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light intensity</subject><subject>Luminous intensity</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Photosystem II</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Stomatal conductance</subject><subject>Sugarcane</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Water wells</subject><subject>Waterlogged ground</subject><subject>Waterlogging</subject><issn>2079-052X</issn><issn>2079-0538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1r3DAQhk1poCHJXyiCnnpYR5_W-hiWplm60ELSj5sYyyOvgiNtJTlkT_nrtbulp3lhHt4ZeKrqPaN1q5W6xkcHNadsXT8LWnvGaraW8k11zqluV1SJ9dv_mf96V13l7DsqpRZKK3ZevW72Y0zxsD-OI7kdp5gwWwwWCYSe3Jf4BAVGsomhn2yBZREdecBA7qcBkoWA5Ackj8VjJlPoMZGfUDCNcRh8GP7WzL22TFB8DGTnh30h21AwZF-Ol9WZgzHj1b95UX2__fSwuVvtvn7ebm52KyuYLitBhepdK3sne95yTgV3kloQXQcNF33LmtZRkIgCuerANW1jlWx1BwBOaXFRfTj1HlL8PWEu5jFOKcwnDWdaK85VK2fq44kaYETjg43zny9lgCln8-Xb1tw0VPO1bujCNifWpphzQmcOyT9BOhpGzeLGLG7M4sbMbszsxixuxB9D_IX5</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti</creator><general>College of Food & Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University</general><general>Pensoft Publishers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Stomatal Conductance of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Waterlogging and Fluctuation Light Intensity</title><author>Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-3035df94df4d2922032f40ca3bba623d9169f0a4ee3e25baf696c5497baaaf573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Conductance</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light intensity</topic><topic>Luminous intensity</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Photosystem II</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Stomatal conductance</topic><topic>Sugarcane</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Water wells</topic><topic>Waterlogged ground</topic><topic>Waterlogging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Intan Ratna Dewi, Muhamad Kadapi, Mochamad Arief Soleh, Mira Ariyanti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Stomatal Conductance of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Waterlogging and Fluctuation Light Intensity</atitle><jtitle>Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture</jtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>940</epage><pages>26-940</pages><issn>2079-052X</issn><eissn>2079-0538</eissn><abstract>Under natural conditions, plants are often subjected to waterlogging due to poor soil drainage and or exessive rainfall. This condition leads to reduced maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (fv/fm) under suboptimal growing system. Under well-watered conditions (WW), the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcane were maintained at more than 0.78. However, following waterlogging for 4 days and a constant light of 3000 mmolmol-1 for 60s, the fv/fm of ten varieties of sugarcene varied from 0.587 in PS882 (V4) to 0.740 in GMP2 (V9). Meanwhile, under fluctuating light intensity from dark to highlight of 1600 mmolmol-1, the fv/fm of all varieties decreased to below of 0.1 except in the genotype PSJK922 (V5) at 28 DAT (day after treatment) of waterlogging. This difference was then further examined through measurements of stomatal conductance (gs) among the varieties. There was negative correllation between fv/fm and stomatal conductance, high gs was not associated with lower fv/fm. Dendrogam analyses showed the variety of PS881 (V1), PS864 (V3) and Kidang Kencana (KK) were highly sensitive to waterlogging. These results suggest potential screening of plants based on improve fv/fm under abiotic condition.</abstract><cop>Sofia</cop><pub>College of Food & Agriculture, United Arab Emirates University</pub><doi>10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i11.1844</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2079-052X |
| ispartof | Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2018-11, Vol.30 (11), p.26-940 |
| issn | 2079-052X 2079-0538 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2177522594 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Adaptation Agricultural production Biodiesel fuels Chlorophyll Conductance Fluorescence Genotype & phenotype Genotypes Leaves Light Light intensity Luminous intensity Observations Photosynthesis Photosystem II Physiological aspects Physiology Properties Rain Rainfall Resistance Rice Stomata Stomatal conductance Sugarcane Variation Water wells Waterlogged ground Waterlogging |
| title | Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Stomatal Conductance of Ten Sugarcane Varieties under Waterlogging and Fluctuation Light Intensity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chlorophyll%20Fluorescence%20and%20Stomatal%20Conductance%20of%20Ten%20Sugarcane%20Varieties%20under%20Waterlogging%20and%20Fluctuation%20Light%20Intensity&rft.jtitle=Emirates%20Journal%20of%20Food%20and%20Agriculture&rft.au=Intan%20Ratna%20Dewi,%20Muhamad%20Kadapi,%20Mochamad%20Arief%20Soleh,%20Mira%20Ariyanti&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=940&rft.pages=26-940&rft.issn=2079-052X&rft.eissn=2079-0538&rft_id=info:doi/10.9755/ejfa.2018.v30.i11.1844&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA607287604%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2177522594&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A607287604&rfr_iscdi=true |