Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity: Do Positive, Neutral, and Negative Estuaries Respond Differently to Salinity Variation?
Salinity is known to be a driving factor in defining habitat suitability for estuarine-dependent species. With increased demands placed on freshwater resources and extreme drought conditions becoming prevalent for many coastal regions, it is important to understand how these changes may impact the e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Estuaries and coasts 2019-06, Vol.42 (4), p.1169-1184 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1169 |
container_title | Estuaries and coasts |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Olsen, Zachary |
description | Salinity is known to be a driving factor in defining habitat suitability for estuarine-dependent species. With increased demands placed on freshwater resources and extreme drought conditions becoming prevalent for many coastal regions, it is important to understand how these changes may impact the extent and distribution of suitable habitat for species that rely on the passage of freshwater to the coastal region. Here, habitat suitability models were constructed for three estuarine species (Farfantepenaeus aztecus, Micropogonias undulatus, and Cynoscion nebulosus) across three estuary classes (based on freshwater balance: positive, neutral, and negative estuaries) and for three simulated salinity regimes (low, moderate, and high salinities). The impact of changing salinity regimes on habitat suitability varied most notably at the species level but also varied significantly across the three estuary types examined. Of the three species examined, F. aztecus showed relatively little salinity-related variation in habitat extent or distribution. Variation in M. undulatus and C. nebulosus salinity impact was especially clear in relatively neutral and positive estuaries where distribution of habitat within the estuary under the varying salinity regimes followed intra-estuarine salinity gradients to match salinity preference for each species and typically resulted in a gradual shrinking of highly suitable habitat area into the far upper estuary as salinities increased. While salinity was not found to be the only or even the most impactful of variables regarding habitat suitability, model outputs show that at the estuary scale, salinity can have substantial influence on the spatial extent and distribution of suitable habitat and this influence is not constant across estuary types. Modeling exercises such as this are the first step in communicating such impacts and focusing the vigilance of resource managers towards vulnerable species and habitat regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12237-019-00528-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2177446951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48703204</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48703204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8495e47730466ab4a5d1eea12c7cc446fe16d934e7d6f02c7f07ceab27efeb833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QBACnlfzuekepVYrFESqJw8hu5u0KTVbk1l0_71bV_TmaYbhfZ6BF6FzSq4oIeo6Uca4yggtMkIkm2TdARpRKYuMKU4Pf3fGj9FJShtChJREjNDrU2sCeNf5sMKwtni5M-DNFs8-wQbAJtT41ieIvmzBNwE3Ds8StCb6YPHclB4M4A8Pazxdm7Daa5Zm64OH7hQdObNN9uxnjtHL3ex5Os8Wj_cP05tFVnFBIZuIQlqhFCciz00pjKyptYaySlWVELmzNK8LLqyqc0f6qyOqsqZkyjpbTjgfo8vBu4vNe2sT6E3TxtC_1Iwq1SsKSfsUG1JVbFKK1uld9G8mdpoSvS9RDyXqvkT9XaLueogPUOrDYWXjn_pf6mKgNgma-PtHTBThjAj-BTWuf_Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2177446951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity: Do Positive, Neutral, and Negative Estuaries Respond Differently to Salinity Variation?</title><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Olsen, Zachary</creator><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Zachary</creatorcontrib><description>Salinity is known to be a driving factor in defining habitat suitability for estuarine-dependent species. With increased demands placed on freshwater resources and extreme drought conditions becoming prevalent for many coastal regions, it is important to understand how these changes may impact the extent and distribution of suitable habitat for species that rely on the passage of freshwater to the coastal region. Here, habitat suitability models were constructed for three estuarine species (Farfantepenaeus aztecus, Micropogonias undulatus, and Cynoscion nebulosus) across three estuary classes (based on freshwater balance: positive, neutral, and negative estuaries) and for three simulated salinity regimes (low, moderate, and high salinities). The impact of changing salinity regimes on habitat suitability varied most notably at the species level but also varied significantly across the three estuary types examined. Of the three species examined, F. aztecus showed relatively little salinity-related variation in habitat extent or distribution. Variation in M. undulatus and C. nebulosus salinity impact was especially clear in relatively neutral and positive estuaries where distribution of habitat within the estuary under the varying salinity regimes followed intra-estuarine salinity gradients to match salinity preference for each species and typically resulted in a gradual shrinking of highly suitable habitat area into the far upper estuary as salinities increased. While salinity was not found to be the only or even the most impactful of variables regarding habitat suitability, model outputs show that at the estuary scale, salinity can have substantial influence on the spatial extent and distribution of suitable habitat and this influence is not constant across estuary types. Modeling exercises such as this are the first step in communicating such impacts and focusing the vigilance of resource managers towards vulnerable species and habitat regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-2723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12237-019-00528-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Associated species ; Brackishwater environment ; Coastal ecology ; Coastal Sciences ; Coastal zone ; Communication ; Computer simulation ; Distribution ; Drought ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Estuaries ; Estuarine dynamics ; Extreme drought ; Farfantepenaeus aztecus ; Freshwater ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater resources ; Habitats ; Herbivores ; Inland water environment ; Modelling ; ORIGINAL PAPERS ; Rare species ; Regions ; Salinity ; Salinity effects ; Salinity gradients ; Spatial distribution ; Species ; Threatened species ; Variation ; Vigilance ; Vulnerable species ; Water and Health</subject><ispartof>Estuaries and coasts, 2019-06, Vol.42 (4), p.1169-1184</ispartof><rights>Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2019</rights><rights>Estuaries and Coasts is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8495e47730466ab4a5d1eea12c7cc446fe16d934e7d6f02c7f07ceab27efeb833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8495e47730466ab4a5d1eea12c7cc446fe16d934e7d6f02c7f07ceab27efeb833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4539-1522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48703204$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48703204$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Zachary</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity: Do Positive, Neutral, and Negative Estuaries Respond Differently to Salinity Variation?</title><title>Estuaries and coasts</title><addtitle>Estuaries and Coasts</addtitle><description>Salinity is known to be a driving factor in defining habitat suitability for estuarine-dependent species. With increased demands placed on freshwater resources and extreme drought conditions becoming prevalent for many coastal regions, it is important to understand how these changes may impact the extent and distribution of suitable habitat for species that rely on the passage of freshwater to the coastal region. Here, habitat suitability models were constructed for three estuarine species (Farfantepenaeus aztecus, Micropogonias undulatus, and Cynoscion nebulosus) across three estuary classes (based on freshwater balance: positive, neutral, and negative estuaries) and for three simulated salinity regimes (low, moderate, and high salinities). The impact of changing salinity regimes on habitat suitability varied most notably at the species level but also varied significantly across the three estuary types examined. Of the three species examined, F. aztecus showed relatively little salinity-related variation in habitat extent or distribution. Variation in M. undulatus and C. nebulosus salinity impact was especially clear in relatively neutral and positive estuaries where distribution of habitat within the estuary under the varying salinity regimes followed intra-estuarine salinity gradients to match salinity preference for each species and typically resulted in a gradual shrinking of highly suitable habitat area into the far upper estuary as salinities increased. While salinity was not found to be the only or even the most impactful of variables regarding habitat suitability, model outputs show that at the estuary scale, salinity can have substantial influence on the spatial extent and distribution of suitable habitat and this influence is not constant across estuary types. Modeling exercises such as this are the first step in communicating such impacts and focusing the vigilance of resource managers towards vulnerable species and habitat regions.</description><subject>Associated species</subject><subject>Brackishwater environment</subject><subject>Coastal ecology</subject><subject>Coastal Sciences</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Estuarine dynamics</subject><subject>Extreme drought</subject><subject>Farfantepenaeus aztecus</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater resources</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Inland water environment</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>ORIGINAL PAPERS</subject><subject>Rare species</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity effects</subject><subject>Salinity gradients</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Vigilance</subject><subject>Vulnerable species</subject><subject>Water and Health</subject><issn>1559-2723</issn><issn>1559-2731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QBACnlfzuekepVYrFESqJw8hu5u0KTVbk1l0_71bV_TmaYbhfZ6BF6FzSq4oIeo6Uca4yggtMkIkm2TdARpRKYuMKU4Pf3fGj9FJShtChJREjNDrU2sCeNf5sMKwtni5M-DNFs8-wQbAJtT41ieIvmzBNwE3Ds8StCb6YPHclB4M4A8Pazxdm7Daa5Zm64OH7hQdObNN9uxnjtHL3ex5Os8Wj_cP05tFVnFBIZuIQlqhFCciz00pjKyptYaySlWVELmzNK8LLqyqc0f6qyOqsqZkyjpbTjgfo8vBu4vNe2sT6E3TxtC_1Iwq1SsKSfsUG1JVbFKK1uld9G8mdpoSvS9RDyXqvkT9XaLueogPUOrDYWXjn_pf6mKgNgma-PtHTBThjAj-BTWuf_Y</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Olsen, Zachary</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-1522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity</title><author>Olsen, Zachary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-8495e47730466ab4a5d1eea12c7cc446fe16d934e7d6f02c7f07ceab27efeb833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Associated species</topic><topic>Brackishwater environment</topic><topic>Coastal ecology</topic><topic>Coastal Sciences</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Estuarine dynamics</topic><topic>Extreme drought</topic><topic>Farfantepenaeus aztecus</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater resources</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Inland water environment</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>ORIGINAL PAPERS</topic><topic>Rare species</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity effects</topic><topic>Salinity gradients</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Vigilance</topic><topic>Vulnerable species</topic><topic>Water and Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Zachary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olsen, Zachary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity: Do Positive, Neutral, and Negative Estuaries Respond Differently to Salinity Variation?</atitle><jtitle>Estuaries and coasts</jtitle><stitle>Estuaries and Coasts</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1169</spage><epage>1184</epage><pages>1169-1184</pages><issn>1559-2723</issn><eissn>1559-2731</eissn><abstract>Salinity is known to be a driving factor in defining habitat suitability for estuarine-dependent species. With increased demands placed on freshwater resources and extreme drought conditions becoming prevalent for many coastal regions, it is important to understand how these changes may impact the extent and distribution of suitable habitat for species that rely on the passage of freshwater to the coastal region. Here, habitat suitability models were constructed for three estuarine species (Farfantepenaeus aztecus, Micropogonias undulatus, and Cynoscion nebulosus) across three estuary classes (based on freshwater balance: positive, neutral, and negative estuaries) and for three simulated salinity regimes (low, moderate, and high salinities). The impact of changing salinity regimes on habitat suitability varied most notably at the species level but also varied significantly across the three estuary types examined. Of the three species examined, F. aztecus showed relatively little salinity-related variation in habitat extent or distribution. Variation in M. undulatus and C. nebulosus salinity impact was especially clear in relatively neutral and positive estuaries where distribution of habitat within the estuary under the varying salinity regimes followed intra-estuarine salinity gradients to match salinity preference for each species and typically resulted in a gradual shrinking of highly suitable habitat area into the far upper estuary as salinities increased. While salinity was not found to be the only or even the most impactful of variables regarding habitat suitability, model outputs show that at the estuary scale, salinity can have substantial influence on the spatial extent and distribution of suitable habitat and this influence is not constant across estuary types. Modeling exercises such as this are the first step in communicating such impacts and focusing the vigilance of resource managers towards vulnerable species and habitat regions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s12237-019-00528-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-1522</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-2723 |
ispartof | Estuaries and coasts, 2019-06, Vol.42 (4), p.1169-1184 |
issn | 1559-2723 1559-2731 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2177446951 |
source | SpringerNature Complete Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Associated species Brackishwater environment Coastal ecology Coastal Sciences Coastal zone Communication Computer simulation Distribution Drought Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Environment Environmental Management Estuaries Estuarine dynamics Extreme drought Farfantepenaeus aztecus Freshwater Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater resources Habitats Herbivores Inland water environment Modelling ORIGINAL PAPERS Rare species Regions Salinity Salinity effects Salinity gradients Spatial distribution Species Threatened species Variation Vigilance Vulnerable species Water and Health |
title | Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity: Do Positive, Neutral, and Negative Estuaries Respond Differently to Salinity Variation? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A55%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20the%20Spatial%20Extent%20and%20Distribution%20of%20Estuarine%20Habitat%20with%20Changing%20Salinity:%20Do%20Positive,%20Neutral,%20and%20Negative%20Estuaries%20Respond%20Differently%20to%20Salinity%20Variation?&rft.jtitle=Estuaries%20and%20coasts&rft.au=Olsen,%20Zachary&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1169&rft.epage=1184&rft.pages=1169-1184&rft.issn=1559-2723&rft.eissn=1559-2731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12237-019-00528-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48703204%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2177446951&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48703204&rfr_iscdi=true |