Basaltic and Solution Reference Materials for Iron, Copper and Zinc Isotope Measurements

Iron, Cu and Zn stable isotope systems are applied in constraining a variety of geochemical and environmental processes. Secondary reference materials have been developed by the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), in collaboration with other participating laboratorie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geostandards and geoanalytical research 2019-03, Vol.43 (1), p.163-175
Hauptverfasser: Li, Jin, Tang, Suo‐han, Zhu, Xiang‐kun, Li, Zhi‐hong, Li, Shi‐Zhen, Yan, Bin, Wang, Yue, Sun, Jian, Shi, Yao, Dong, Aiguo, Belshaw, Nick S., Zhang, Xingchao, Liu, Sheng‐ao, Liu, Ji‐hua, Wang, Deli, Jiang, Shao‐yong, Hou, KeJun, Cohen, Anthony S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 175
container_issue 1
container_start_page 163
container_title Geostandards and geoanalytical research
container_volume 43
creator Li, Jin
Tang, Suo‐han
Zhu, Xiang‐kun
Li, Zhi‐hong
Li, Shi‐Zhen
Yan, Bin
Wang, Yue
Sun, Jian
Shi, Yao
Dong, Aiguo
Belshaw, Nick S.
Zhang, Xingchao
Liu, Sheng‐ao
Liu, Ji‐hua
Wang, Deli
Jiang, Shao‐yong
Hou, KeJun
Cohen, Anthony S.
description Iron, Cu and Zn stable isotope systems are applied in constraining a variety of geochemical and environmental processes. Secondary reference materials have been developed by the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), in collaboration with other participating laboratories, comprising three solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt (CAGS‐Basalt). These materials exhibit sufficient homogeneity and stability for application in Fe, Cu and Zn isotopic ratio determinations. Reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory analytical comparisons involving up to eight participating laboratories employing MC‐ICP‐MS techniques, based on the unweighted means of submitted results. Isotopic compositions are reported in per mil notation, based on reference materials IRMM‐014 for Fe, NIST SRM 976 for Cu and IRMM‐3702 for Zn. Respective reference values of CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn solutions are as follows: δ56Fe = 0.83 ± 0.07 and δ57Fe = 1.20 ± 0.13, δ65Cu = 0.57 ± 0.06, and δ66Zn = −0.79 ± 0.12 and δ68Zn = −1.65 ± 0.24, respectively. Those of CAGS‐Basalt are δ56Fe = 0.15 ± 0.07, δ57Fe = 0.22 ± 0.10, δ65Cu = 0.12 ± 0.08, δ66Zn = 0.17 ± 0.13, and δ68Zn = 0.34 ± 0.26 (2s). Key Points Three reference solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt reference material (CAGSR) for calibrating Fe, Cu and Zn isotope ratio measurements have been developed. CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu, CAGS‐Zn and CAGSR show sufficient homogeneity and stability. Recommended reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory comparison of results from participating laboratories.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ggr.12241
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2176645960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2176645960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3551-e1878a0f49382b1e159591338484e2a49b8e6fe6ddfea5d834373b0b48c70fcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoOAT4LdkiZpk0cdOgcTYSoMX0LaXkZH19SkRfbtjZuv3svdw-9_d_wQuqZkQmNNNxs_oWnK6Qka0VzQRBG5Po1zxlTCuZTn6CKELSGCK0FHaP1ggmn6usSmrfCba4a-di1egQUPbQn4xfTga9MEbJ3HC-_aOzxzXQf-kPis2xIvgutdF1kwYfCwg7YPl-jMxhRc_fUx-nh6fJ89J8vX-WJ2v0wME_E9oDKXhliumEwLClQooShjkksOqeGqkJBZyKrKghGVZJzlrCAFl2VObFmwMbo57u28-xog9HrrBt_GkzqleZZxoTISqdsjVXoXggerO1_vjN9rSvSvOB3F6YO4yE6P7HfdwP5_UM_nq2PiB7_4brU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2176645960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Basaltic and Solution Reference Materials for Iron, Copper and Zinc Isotope Measurements</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Li, Jin ; Tang, Suo‐han ; Zhu, Xiang‐kun ; Li, Zhi‐hong ; Li, Shi‐Zhen ; Yan, Bin ; Wang, Yue ; Sun, Jian ; Shi, Yao ; Dong, Aiguo ; Belshaw, Nick S. ; Zhang, Xingchao ; Liu, Sheng‐ao ; Liu, Ji‐hua ; Wang, Deli ; Jiang, Shao‐yong ; Hou, KeJun ; Cohen, Anthony S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin ; Tang, Suo‐han ; Zhu, Xiang‐kun ; Li, Zhi‐hong ; Li, Shi‐Zhen ; Yan, Bin ; Wang, Yue ; Sun, Jian ; Shi, Yao ; Dong, Aiguo ; Belshaw, Nick S. ; Zhang, Xingchao ; Liu, Sheng‐ao ; Liu, Ji‐hua ; Wang, Deli ; Jiang, Shao‐yong ; Hou, KeJun ; Cohen, Anthony S.</creatorcontrib><description>Iron, Cu and Zn stable isotope systems are applied in constraining a variety of geochemical and environmental processes. Secondary reference materials have been developed by the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), in collaboration with other participating laboratories, comprising three solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt (CAGS‐Basalt). These materials exhibit sufficient homogeneity and stability for application in Fe, Cu and Zn isotopic ratio determinations. Reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory analytical comparisons involving up to eight participating laboratories employing MC‐ICP‐MS techniques, based on the unweighted means of submitted results. Isotopic compositions are reported in per mil notation, based on reference materials IRMM‐014 for Fe, NIST SRM 976 for Cu and IRMM‐3702 for Zn. Respective reference values of CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn solutions are as follows: δ56Fe = 0.83 ± 0.07 and δ57Fe = 1.20 ± 0.13, δ65Cu = 0.57 ± 0.06, and δ66Zn = −0.79 ± 0.12 and δ68Zn = −1.65 ± 0.24, respectively. Those of CAGS‐Basalt are δ56Fe = 0.15 ± 0.07, δ57Fe = 0.22 ± 0.10, δ65Cu = 0.12 ± 0.08, δ66Zn = 0.17 ± 0.13, and δ68Zn = 0.34 ± 0.26 (2s). Key Points Three reference solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt reference material (CAGSR) for calibrating Fe, Cu and Zn isotope ratio measurements have been developed. CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu, CAGS‐Zn and CAGSR show sufficient homogeneity and stability. Recommended reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory comparison of results from participating laboratories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1639-4488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-908X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ggr.12241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Basalt ; Copper ; Cu isotopes ; Fe isotopes ; Geology ; Iron ; Laboratories ; Reference materials ; single metal solution ; Solutions ; Stability ; Stable isotopes ; Zinc ; Zinc isotopes ; Zn isotopes</subject><ispartof>Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2019-03, Vol.43 (1), p.163-175</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research © 2018 International Association of Geoanalysts</rights><rights>Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research © 2019 International Association of Geoanalysts</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3551-e1878a0f49382b1e159591338484e2a49b8e6fe6ddfea5d834373b0b48c70fcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3551-e1878a0f49382b1e159591338484e2a49b8e6fe6ddfea5d834373b0b48c70fcb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6624-963X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fggr.12241$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fggr.12241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Suo‐han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiang‐kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhi‐hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shi‐Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Aiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belshaw, Nick S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xingchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sheng‐ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ji‐hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Deli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shao‐yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, KeJun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anthony S.</creatorcontrib><title>Basaltic and Solution Reference Materials for Iron, Copper and Zinc Isotope Measurements</title><title>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</title><description>Iron, Cu and Zn stable isotope systems are applied in constraining a variety of geochemical and environmental processes. Secondary reference materials have been developed by the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), in collaboration with other participating laboratories, comprising three solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt (CAGS‐Basalt). These materials exhibit sufficient homogeneity and stability for application in Fe, Cu and Zn isotopic ratio determinations. Reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory analytical comparisons involving up to eight participating laboratories employing MC‐ICP‐MS techniques, based on the unweighted means of submitted results. Isotopic compositions are reported in per mil notation, based on reference materials IRMM‐014 for Fe, NIST SRM 976 for Cu and IRMM‐3702 for Zn. Respective reference values of CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn solutions are as follows: δ56Fe = 0.83 ± 0.07 and δ57Fe = 1.20 ± 0.13, δ65Cu = 0.57 ± 0.06, and δ66Zn = −0.79 ± 0.12 and δ68Zn = −1.65 ± 0.24, respectively. Those of CAGS‐Basalt are δ56Fe = 0.15 ± 0.07, δ57Fe = 0.22 ± 0.10, δ65Cu = 0.12 ± 0.08, δ66Zn = 0.17 ± 0.13, and δ68Zn = 0.34 ± 0.26 (2s). Key Points Three reference solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt reference material (CAGSR) for calibrating Fe, Cu and Zn isotope ratio measurements have been developed. CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu, CAGS‐Zn and CAGSR show sufficient homogeneity and stability. Recommended reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory comparison of results from participating laboratories.</description><subject>Basalt</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Cu isotopes</subject><subject>Fe isotopes</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>single metal solution</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><subject>Zinc isotopes</subject><subject>Zn isotopes</subject><issn>1639-4488</issn><issn>1751-908X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoOAT4LdkiZpk0cdOgcTYSoMX0LaXkZH19SkRfbtjZuv3svdw-9_d_wQuqZkQmNNNxs_oWnK6Qka0VzQRBG5Po1zxlTCuZTn6CKELSGCK0FHaP1ggmn6usSmrfCba4a-di1egQUPbQn4xfTga9MEbJ3HC-_aOzxzXQf-kPis2xIvgutdF1kwYfCwg7YPl-jMxhRc_fUx-nh6fJ89J8vX-WJ2v0wME_E9oDKXhliumEwLClQooShjkksOqeGqkJBZyKrKghGVZJzlrCAFl2VObFmwMbo57u28-xog9HrrBt_GkzqleZZxoTISqdsjVXoXggerO1_vjN9rSvSvOB3F6YO4yE6P7HfdwP5_UM_nq2PiB7_4brU</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Li, Jin</creator><creator>Tang, Suo‐han</creator><creator>Zhu, Xiang‐kun</creator><creator>Li, Zhi‐hong</creator><creator>Li, Shi‐Zhen</creator><creator>Yan, Bin</creator><creator>Wang, Yue</creator><creator>Sun, Jian</creator><creator>Shi, Yao</creator><creator>Dong, Aiguo</creator><creator>Belshaw, Nick S.</creator><creator>Zhang, Xingchao</creator><creator>Liu, Sheng‐ao</creator><creator>Liu, Ji‐hua</creator><creator>Wang, Deli</creator><creator>Jiang, Shao‐yong</creator><creator>Hou, KeJun</creator><creator>Cohen, Anthony S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-963X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Basaltic and Solution Reference Materials for Iron, Copper and Zinc Isotope Measurements</title><author>Li, Jin ; Tang, Suo‐han ; Zhu, Xiang‐kun ; Li, Zhi‐hong ; Li, Shi‐Zhen ; Yan, Bin ; Wang, Yue ; Sun, Jian ; Shi, Yao ; Dong, Aiguo ; Belshaw, Nick S. ; Zhang, Xingchao ; Liu, Sheng‐ao ; Liu, Ji‐hua ; Wang, Deli ; Jiang, Shao‐yong ; Hou, KeJun ; Cohen, Anthony S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3551-e1878a0f49382b1e159591338484e2a49b8e6fe6ddfea5d834373b0b48c70fcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Basalt</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Cu isotopes</topic><topic>Fe isotopes</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>single metal solution</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><topic>Zinc isotopes</topic><topic>Zn isotopes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Suo‐han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Xiang‐kun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zhi‐hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Shi‐Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Aiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belshaw, Nick S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xingchao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sheng‐ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ji‐hua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Deli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shao‐yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, KeJun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Anthony S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Jin</au><au>Tang, Suo‐han</au><au>Zhu, Xiang‐kun</au><au>Li, Zhi‐hong</au><au>Li, Shi‐Zhen</au><au>Yan, Bin</au><au>Wang, Yue</au><au>Sun, Jian</au><au>Shi, Yao</au><au>Dong, Aiguo</au><au>Belshaw, Nick S.</au><au>Zhang, Xingchao</au><au>Liu, Sheng‐ao</au><au>Liu, Ji‐hua</au><au>Wang, Deli</au><au>Jiang, Shao‐yong</au><au>Hou, KeJun</au><au>Cohen, Anthony S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Basaltic and Solution Reference Materials for Iron, Copper and Zinc Isotope Measurements</atitle><jtitle>Geostandards and geoanalytical research</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>175</epage><pages>163-175</pages><issn>1639-4488</issn><eissn>1751-908X</eissn><abstract>Iron, Cu and Zn stable isotope systems are applied in constraining a variety of geochemical and environmental processes. Secondary reference materials have been developed by the Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CAGS), in collaboration with other participating laboratories, comprising three solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt (CAGS‐Basalt). These materials exhibit sufficient homogeneity and stability for application in Fe, Cu and Zn isotopic ratio determinations. Reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory analytical comparisons involving up to eight participating laboratories employing MC‐ICP‐MS techniques, based on the unweighted means of submitted results. Isotopic compositions are reported in per mil notation, based on reference materials IRMM‐014 for Fe, NIST SRM 976 for Cu and IRMM‐3702 for Zn. Respective reference values of CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn solutions are as follows: δ56Fe = 0.83 ± 0.07 and δ57Fe = 1.20 ± 0.13, δ65Cu = 0.57 ± 0.06, and δ66Zn = −0.79 ± 0.12 and δ68Zn = −1.65 ± 0.24, respectively. Those of CAGS‐Basalt are δ56Fe = 0.15 ± 0.07, δ57Fe = 0.22 ± 0.10, δ65Cu = 0.12 ± 0.08, δ66Zn = 0.17 ± 0.13, and δ68Zn = 0.34 ± 0.26 (2s). Key Points Three reference solutions (CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu and CAGS‐Zn) and one basalt reference material (CAGSR) for calibrating Fe, Cu and Zn isotope ratio measurements have been developed. CAGS‐Fe, CAGS‐Cu, CAGS‐Zn and CAGSR show sufficient homogeneity and stability. Recommended reference values were determined by inter‐laboratory comparison of results from participating laboratories.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ggr.12241</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6624-963X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1639-4488
ispartof Geostandards and geoanalytical research, 2019-03, Vol.43 (1), p.163-175
issn 1639-4488
1751-908X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2176645960
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Basalt
Copper
Cu isotopes
Fe isotopes
Geology
Iron
Laboratories
Reference materials
single metal solution
Solutions
Stability
Stable isotopes
Zinc
Zinc isotopes
Zn isotopes
title Basaltic and Solution Reference Materials for Iron, Copper and Zinc Isotope Measurements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A31%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Basaltic%20and%20Solution%20Reference%20Materials%20for%20Iron,%20Copper%20and%20Zinc%20Isotope%20Measurements&rft.jtitle=Geostandards%20and%20geoanalytical%20research&rft.au=Li,%20Jin&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=175&rft.pages=163-175&rft.issn=1639-4488&rft.eissn=1751-908X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ggr.12241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2176645960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2176645960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true