Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District
States increasingly lean on charter organizations to take responsibility for their most underperforming turnaround schools. These efforts employ a different constellation of regulation, market forces, and community involvement that constitute more complex environments for charters. This article rela...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Educational evaluation and policy analysis 2019-03, Vol.41 (1), p.5-33 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 33 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 5 |
| container_title | Educational evaluation and policy analysis |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Glazer, Joshua L. Massell, Diane Malone, Matthew |
| description | States increasingly lean on charter organizations to take responsibility for their most underperforming turnaround schools. These efforts employ a different constellation of regulation, market forces, and community involvement that constitute more complex environments for charters. This article relates the experience of operators within the Tennessee Achievement School District adapting to stringent performance demands, weak markets, and a vocal community. Results show the pressures this environment placed on operators to improve outcomes with restricted controls while simultaneously acting as community organizations dedicated to a wide range of goals. We conclude that while charter organizations can support school turnaround, the demands of a contested and complex environment require well-resourced organizations capable of meeting diverse expectations from varying stakeholders. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3102/0162373718795051 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2176101558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1204839</ericid><jstor_id>45281341</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3102_0162373718795051</sage_id><sourcerecordid>45281341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-73e936b07e3d7a3f5b436e0be3ce24f83cda730029d69aa5b5d4c9b87a4e47da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDFPIzEQhS3ESQSOngbJEqJcsD32epcOhcBxinTF5eqV1ztJHCV2sB0k_j0bFsGJgmmmeN-8pzeEnHF2BZyJa8ZLARo0r3StmOIHZMRrUAVnpTgko71c7PUjcpzSivWjtRiR1XhpYsZI_9plCOtEnaezXfQmhp3vbug4bLaYnV_QR5-yy7vsgjdrOg0LZ9_ovEQ6Q-8xJUR6a5cOn3GDPr9b0juXcnQ2_yQ_5mad8PR9n5B_95PZ-Fcx_fPwOL6dFlYyyIUGrKFsmUbotIG5aiWUyFoEi0LOK7Cd0cCYqLuyNka1qpO2bittJErdGTghF4PvNoanHabcrMK-0To1guuSM65U1VNsoGwMKUWcN9voNia-NJw1-482Xz_an5wPJ9jX-cAnv7lgsoK614tBT2aBn6Hf-F0O_CrlEP_PF8B0I5WoOEgOr1ANi3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2176101558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Glazer, Joshua L. ; Massell, Diane ; Malone, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Joshua L. ; Massell, Diane ; Malone, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>States increasingly lean on charter organizations to take responsibility for their most underperforming turnaround schools. These efforts employ a different constellation of regulation, market forces, and community involvement that constitute more complex environments for charters. This article relates the experience of operators within the Tennessee Achievement School District adapting to stringent performance demands, weak markets, and a vocal community. Results show the pressures this environment placed on operators to improve outcomes with restricted controls while simultaneously acting as community organizations dedicated to a wide range of goals. We conclude that while charter organizations can support school turnaround, the demands of a contested and complex environment require well-resourced organizations capable of meeting diverse expectations from varying stakeholders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-3737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-1062</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/0162373718795051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publishing</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Charter Schools ; Community involvement ; Community organizations ; Community structure ; Education policy ; Education reform ; Educational Change ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Policy ; Expectations ; Interest groups ; Markets ; Organizational Change ; Outcomes of Education ; School Districts ; School Turnaround ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 2019-03, Vol.41 (1), p.5-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2018 AERA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-73e936b07e3d7a3f5b436e0be3ce24f83cda730029d69aa5b5d4c9b87a4e47da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-73e936b07e3d7a3f5b436e0be3ce24f83cda730029d69aa5b5d4c9b87a4e47da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8573-4163</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45281341$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45281341$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21818,27865,27923,27924,43620,43621,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1204839$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massell, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District</title><title>Educational evaluation and policy analysis</title><description>States increasingly lean on charter organizations to take responsibility for their most underperforming turnaround schools. These efforts employ a different constellation of regulation, market forces, and community involvement that constitute more complex environments for charters. This article relates the experience of operators within the Tennessee Achievement School District adapting to stringent performance demands, weak markets, and a vocal community. Results show the pressures this environment placed on operators to improve outcomes with restricted controls while simultaneously acting as community organizations dedicated to a wide range of goals. We conclude that while charter organizations can support school turnaround, the demands of a contested and complex environment require well-resourced organizations capable of meeting diverse expectations from varying stakeholders.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Charter Schools</subject><subject>Community involvement</subject><subject>Community organizations</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Organizational Change</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>School Turnaround</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0162-3737</issn><issn>1935-1062</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDFPIzEQhS3ESQSOngbJEqJcsD32epcOhcBxinTF5eqV1ztJHCV2sB0k_j0bFsGJgmmmeN-8pzeEnHF2BZyJa8ZLARo0r3StmOIHZMRrUAVnpTgko71c7PUjcpzSivWjtRiR1XhpYsZI_9plCOtEnaezXfQmhp3vbug4bLaYnV_QR5-yy7vsgjdrOg0LZ9_ovEQ6Q-8xJUR6a5cOn3GDPr9b0juXcnQ2_yQ_5mad8PR9n5B_95PZ-Fcx_fPwOL6dFlYyyIUGrKFsmUbotIG5aiWUyFoEi0LOK7Cd0cCYqLuyNka1qpO2bittJErdGTghF4PvNoanHabcrMK-0To1guuSM65U1VNsoGwMKUWcN9voNia-NJw1-482Xz_an5wPJ9jX-cAnv7lgsoK614tBT2aBn6Hf-F0O_CrlEP_PF8B0I5WoOEgOr1ANi3A</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Glazer, Joshua L.</creator><creator>Massell, Diane</creator><creator>Malone, Matthew</creator><general>SAGE Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Educational Research Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-4163</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District</title><author>Glazer, Joshua L. ; Massell, Diane ; Malone, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-73e936b07e3d7a3f5b436e0be3ce24f83cda730029d69aa5b5d4c9b87a4e47da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Charter Schools</topic><topic>Community involvement</topic><topic>Community organizations</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Organizational Change</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>School Turnaround</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Joshua L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massell, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Educational evaluation and policy analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glazer, Joshua L.</au><au>Massell, Diane</au><au>Malone, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1204839</ericid><atitle>Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District</atitle><jtitle>Educational evaluation and policy analysis</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>5-33</pages><issn>0162-3737</issn><eissn>1935-1062</eissn><abstract>States increasingly lean on charter organizations to take responsibility for their most underperforming turnaround schools. These efforts employ a different constellation of regulation, market forces, and community involvement that constitute more complex environments for charters. This article relates the experience of operators within the Tennessee Achievement School District adapting to stringent performance demands, weak markets, and a vocal community. Results show the pressures this environment placed on operators to improve outcomes with restricted controls while simultaneously acting as community organizations dedicated to a wide range of goals. We conclude that while charter organizations can support school turnaround, the demands of a contested and complex environment require well-resourced organizations capable of meeting diverse expectations from varying stakeholders.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publishing</pub><doi>10.3102/0162373718795051</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8573-4163</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0162-3737 |
| ispartof | Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 2019-03, Vol.41 (1), p.5-33 |
| issn | 0162-3737 1935-1062 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2176101558 |
| source | PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Academic achievement Charter Schools Community involvement Community organizations Community structure Education policy Education reform Educational Change Educational Improvement Educational Policy Expectations Interest groups Markets Organizational Change Outcomes of Education School Districts School Turnaround Stakeholders |
| title | Charter Schools in Turnaround: Competing Institutional Logics in the Tennessee Achievement School District |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Charter%20Schools%20in%20Turnaround:%20Competing%20Institutional%20Logics%20in%20the%20Tennessee%20Achievement%20School%20District&rft.jtitle=Educational%20evaluation%20and%20policy%20analysis&rft.au=Glazer,%20Joshua%20L.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=5-33&rft.issn=0162-3737&rft.eissn=1935-1062&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/0162373718795051&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45281341%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2176101558&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1204839&rft_jstor_id=45281341&rft_sage_id=10.3102_0162373718795051&rfr_iscdi=true |