The Role of Prosocial Motives and Social Exchange in Mediating the Relationship Between Organizational Virtuousness' Perceptions and Employee Outcomes
Theoretical arguments suggest that organizational virtuousness makes individuals surpass their exchange concerns sparking their prosocial motives. This paper focuses on the examination of this issue incorporating two field studies. The first field study examines prosocial motives and social exchange...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2020-10, Vol.166 (3), p.535-551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 551 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 535 |
container_title | Journal of business ethics |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Tsachouridi, Irene Nikandrou, Irene |
description | Theoretical arguments suggest that organizational virtuousness makes individuals surpass their exchange concerns sparking their prosocial motives. This paper focuses on the examination of this issue incorporating two field studies. The first field study examines prosocial motives and social exchange as parallel mediators of the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and three employee outcomes (willingness to support the organization, time commitment, work intensity). The second field study examines prosocial motives, personal sacrifice and impression management motives as parallel mediators of the examined relationships. Both field studies (employing 250 and 354 employees, respectively) indicated that only prosocial motives can mediate the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and employee outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-018-04102-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2175712107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45386618</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45386618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-c48d62b9ceb89dd56b6fb5b000427964acaaf462b8b5b144b16886fe6a17a95e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9u1DAQxi0EEkvhBThZQohTwE78L0eolhap1VZQuFqOM9n1KmsHOyltH6TPi7NBKqf6YGtmvt_M-EPoLSUfKSHyU6KEc1oQqgrCKCkL-QytKJdVQUQtn6MVoUIWjDP2Er1KaU_y4ZSt0MP1DvD30AMOHb6KIQXrTI8vw-huIGHjW_xjSa1v7c74LWDn8SW0zozOb_E449DnIPi0cwP-AuMfAI83cWu8uz8WMv3LxXEKU_KQ0gd8BdHCcGSOI9aHoQ93AHgzjTYcIL1GLzrTJ3jz7z1BP7-ur0_Pi4vN2bfTzxeFZUqN892KsqktNKpuWy4a0TW8yZ9jpawFM9aYjmWFylnKWEOFUqIDYag0NYfqBL1b-g4x_J4gjXofppgXTrqkkktaUiKzqlxUNhuUInR6iO5g4p2mRM_-68V_nf3XR__1DOEFAhu8S4-IrFgtGVGzpFokKReztfFx-pON3y_UPo0h_r9KWWWC8UoJQVX1F7lDoRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2175712107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Prosocial Motives and Social Exchange in Mediating the Relationship Between Organizational Virtuousness' Perceptions and Employee Outcomes</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tsachouridi, Irene ; Nikandrou, Irene</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsachouridi, Irene ; Nikandrou, Irene</creatorcontrib><description>Theoretical arguments suggest that organizational virtuousness makes individuals surpass their exchange concerns sparking their prosocial motives. This paper focuses on the examination of this issue incorporating two field studies. The first field study examines prosocial motives and social exchange as parallel mediators of the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and three employee outcomes (willingness to support the organization, time commitment, work intensity). The second field study examines prosocial motives, personal sacrifice and impression management motives as parallel mediators of the examined relationships. Both field studies (employing 250 and 354 employees, respectively) indicated that only prosocial motives can mediate the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and employee outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-04102-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Education ; Employee behavior ; Ethics ; Field study ; Impression management ; Management ; Organizational behavior ; Original Paper ; Perceptions ; Philosophy ; Prosocial behavior ; Quality of Life Research ; Social exchange theory ; Studies ; Work</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2020-10, Vol.166 (3), p.535-551</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-c48d62b9ceb89dd56b6fb5b000427964acaaf462b8b5b144b16886fe6a17a95e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-c48d62b9ceb89dd56b6fb5b000427964acaaf462b8b5b144b16886fe6a17a95e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4752-7120</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45386618$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45386618$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsachouridi, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikandrou, Irene</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Prosocial Motives and Social Exchange in Mediating the Relationship Between Organizational Virtuousness' Perceptions and Employee Outcomes</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>Theoretical arguments suggest that organizational virtuousness makes individuals surpass their exchange concerns sparking their prosocial motives. This paper focuses on the examination of this issue incorporating two field studies. The first field study examines prosocial motives and social exchange as parallel mediators of the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and three employee outcomes (willingness to support the organization, time commitment, work intensity). The second field study examines prosocial motives, personal sacrifice and impression management motives as parallel mediators of the examined relationships. Both field studies (employing 250 and 354 employees, respectively) indicated that only prosocial motives can mediate the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and employee outcomes.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Employee behavior</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Impression management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Prosocial behavior</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Social exchange theory</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Work</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9u1DAQxi0EEkvhBThZQohTwE78L0eolhap1VZQuFqOM9n1KmsHOyltH6TPi7NBKqf6YGtmvt_M-EPoLSUfKSHyU6KEc1oQqgrCKCkL-QytKJdVQUQtn6MVoUIWjDP2Er1KaU_y4ZSt0MP1DvD30AMOHb6KIQXrTI8vw-huIGHjW_xjSa1v7c74LWDn8SW0zozOb_E449DnIPi0cwP-AuMfAI83cWu8uz8WMv3LxXEKU_KQ0gd8BdHCcGSOI9aHoQ93AHgzjTYcIL1GLzrTJ3jz7z1BP7-ur0_Pi4vN2bfTzxeFZUqN892KsqktNKpuWy4a0TW8yZ9jpawFM9aYjmWFylnKWEOFUqIDYag0NYfqBL1b-g4x_J4gjXofppgXTrqkkktaUiKzqlxUNhuUInR6iO5g4p2mRM_-68V_nf3XR__1DOEFAhu8S4-IrFgtGVGzpFokKReztfFx-pON3y_UPo0h_r9KWWWC8UoJQVX1F7lDoRg</recordid><startdate>20201001</startdate><enddate>20201001</enddate><creator>Tsachouridi, Irene</creator><creator>Nikandrou, Irene</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-7120</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201001</creationdate><title>The Role of Prosocial Motives and Social Exchange in Mediating the Relationship Between Organizational Virtuousness' Perceptions and Employee Outcomes</title><author>Tsachouridi, Irene ; Nikandrou, Irene</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-c48d62b9ceb89dd56b6fb5b000427964acaaf462b8b5b144b16886fe6a17a95e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Employee behavior</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Impression management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Prosocial behavior</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Social exchange theory</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Work</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsachouridi, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikandrou, Irene</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsachouridi, Irene</au><au>Nikandrou, Irene</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Role of Prosocial Motives and Social Exchange in Mediating the Relationship Between Organizational Virtuousness' Perceptions and Employee Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2020-10-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>166</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>535</spage><epage>551</epage><pages>535-551</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>Theoretical arguments suggest that organizational virtuousness makes individuals surpass their exchange concerns sparking their prosocial motives. This paper focuses on the examination of this issue incorporating two field studies. The first field study examines prosocial motives and social exchange as parallel mediators of the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and three employee outcomes (willingness to support the organization, time commitment, work intensity). The second field study examines prosocial motives, personal sacrifice and impression management motives as parallel mediators of the examined relationships. Both field studies (employing 250 and 354 employees, respectively) indicated that only prosocial motives can mediate the relationship between organizational virtuousness' perceptions and employee outcomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-018-04102-7</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-7120</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2020-10, Vol.166 (3), p.535-551 |
issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2175712107 |
source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Business and Management Business Ethics Education Employee behavior Ethics Field study Impression management Management Organizational behavior Original Paper Perceptions Philosophy Prosocial behavior Quality of Life Research Social exchange theory Studies Work |
title | The Role of Prosocial Motives and Social Exchange in Mediating the Relationship Between Organizational Virtuousness' Perceptions and Employee Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A27%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Prosocial%20Motives%20and%20Social%20Exchange%20in%20Mediating%20the%20Relationship%20Between%20Organizational%20Virtuousness'%20Perceptions%20and%20Employee%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Tsachouridi,%20Irene&rft.date=2020-10-01&rft.volume=166&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=551&rft.pages=535-551&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-018-04102-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45386618%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2175712107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45386618&rfr_iscdi=true |