Rate-limiting Reactions Determining Different Activation Kinetics of Kv1.2and Kv2.1 Channels
To identify the mechanisms underlying the faster activation kinetics in Kv1.2 channels compared to Kv2.1 channels, ionic and gating currents were studied in rat Kv1.2 and human Kv2.1 channels heterologously expressed in mammalian cells. At all voltages the time course of the ionic currents could be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of membrane biology 2004-03, Vol.198 (2), p.103 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | The Journal of membrane biology |
container_volume | 198 |
creator | Scholle, A. Dugarmaa, S. Zimmer, T. Leonhardt, M. Koopmann, R. Engeland, B. Pongs, O. Benndorf, K. |
description | To identify the mechanisms underlying the faster activation kinetics in Kv1.2 channels compared to Kv2.1 channels, ionic and gating currents were studied in rat Kv1.2 and human Kv2.1 channels heterologously expressed in mammalian cells. At all voltages the time course of the ionic currents could be described by an initial sigmoidal and a subsequent exponential component and both components were faster in Kv1.2 than in Kv2.1 channels. In Kv1.2 channels, the activation time course was more sigmoid at more depolarized potentials, whereas in Kv2.1 channels it was somewhat less sigmoid at more depolarized potentials. In contrast to the ionic currents, the ON gating currents were similarly fast for both channels. The main portion of the measured ON gating charge moved before the ionic currents were activated. The equivalent gating charge of Kv1.2 ionic currents was twice that of Kv2.1 ionic currents, whereas that of Kv1.2 ON gating currents was smaller than that of Kv2.1 ON gating currents. In conclusion, the different activation kinetics of Kv1.2 and Kv2.1 channels are caused by rate-limiting reactions that follow the charge movement recorded from the gating currents. In Kv1.2 channels, the reaction coupling the voltage-sensor movement to the pore opening contributes to rate limitation in a voltage-dependent fashion, whereas in Kv2.1 channels, activation is additionally rate-limited by a slow reaction in the subunit gating. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00232-004-0664-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217461989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>685919691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1179-5da74101181ee09a2b093c33815ef9eeb9943b2cf336a2db4db2a5550c8fc3213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_wLfF960zSfaSx9J6owWh6JsQsrsTTWmzNdkK_nuz1JeZ4ZzDHPgYu0WYIUB1HwG44DmAzKEs0zhjE5RJQcnlOZskm-e8FHjJrmLcAmBVlXLCPjZmoHzn9m5w_jPbkGkH1_uYLWmgsHd-VJfOWgrkh2ye3B8zJrKV8zS4Nma9zVY_OOPGd-ngM8wWX8Z72sVrdmHNLtLN_56y98eHt8Vzvn59elnM13mLWKm86EwlERBrJAJleANKtELUWJBVRI1SUjS8tUKUhneN7BpuiqKAtrat4Cim7O709xD67yPFQW_7Y_CpUnOsZImqVimEp1Ab-hgDWX0Ibm_Cr0bQI0N9YqgTQz0y1CD-AMa9Yws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217461989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rate-limiting Reactions Determining Different Activation Kinetics of Kv1.2and Kv2.1 Channels</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Scholle, A. ; Dugarmaa, S. ; Zimmer, T. ; Leonhardt, M. ; Koopmann, R. ; Engeland, B. ; Pongs, O. ; Benndorf, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scholle, A. ; Dugarmaa, S. ; Zimmer, T. ; Leonhardt, M. ; Koopmann, R. ; Engeland, B. ; Pongs, O. ; Benndorf, K.</creatorcontrib><description>To identify the mechanisms underlying the faster activation kinetics in Kv1.2 channels compared to Kv2.1 channels, ionic and gating currents were studied in rat Kv1.2 and human Kv2.1 channels heterologously expressed in mammalian cells. At all voltages the time course of the ionic currents could be described by an initial sigmoidal and a subsequent exponential component and both components were faster in Kv1.2 than in Kv2.1 channels. In Kv1.2 channels, the activation time course was more sigmoid at more depolarized potentials, whereas in Kv2.1 channels it was somewhat less sigmoid at more depolarized potentials. In contrast to the ionic currents, the ON gating currents were similarly fast for both channels. The main portion of the measured ON gating charge moved before the ionic currents were activated. The equivalent gating charge of Kv1.2 ionic currents was twice that of Kv2.1 ionic currents, whereas that of Kv1.2 ON gating currents was smaller than that of Kv2.1 ON gating currents. In conclusion, the different activation kinetics of Kv1.2 and Kv2.1 channels are caused by rate-limiting reactions that follow the charge movement recorded from the gating currents. In Kv1.2 channels, the reaction coupling the voltage-sensor movement to the pore opening contributes to rate limitation in a voltage-dependent fashion, whereas in Kv2.1 channels, activation is additionally rate-limited by a slow reaction in the subunit gating.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00232-004-0664-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of membrane biology, 2004-03, Vol.198 (2), p.103</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1179-5da74101181ee09a2b093c33815ef9eeb9943b2cf336a2db4db2a5550c8fc3213</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scholle, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugarmaa, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonhardt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopmann, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engeland, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pongs, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benndorf, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Rate-limiting Reactions Determining Different Activation Kinetics of Kv1.2and Kv2.1 Channels</title><title>The Journal of membrane biology</title><description>To identify the mechanisms underlying the faster activation kinetics in Kv1.2 channels compared to Kv2.1 channels, ionic and gating currents were studied in rat Kv1.2 and human Kv2.1 channels heterologously expressed in mammalian cells. At all voltages the time course of the ionic currents could be described by an initial sigmoidal and a subsequent exponential component and both components were faster in Kv1.2 than in Kv2.1 channels. In Kv1.2 channels, the activation time course was more sigmoid at more depolarized potentials, whereas in Kv2.1 channels it was somewhat less sigmoid at more depolarized potentials. In contrast to the ionic currents, the ON gating currents were similarly fast for both channels. The main portion of the measured ON gating charge moved before the ionic currents were activated. The equivalent gating charge of Kv1.2 ionic currents was twice that of Kv2.1 ionic currents, whereas that of Kv1.2 ON gating currents was smaller than that of Kv2.1 ON gating currents. In conclusion, the different activation kinetics of Kv1.2 and Kv2.1 channels are caused by rate-limiting reactions that follow the charge movement recorded from the gating currents. In Kv1.2 channels, the reaction coupling the voltage-sensor movement to the pore opening contributes to rate limitation in a voltage-dependent fashion, whereas in Kv2.1 channels, activation is additionally rate-limited by a slow reaction in the subunit gating.</description><issn>0022-2631</issn><issn>1432-1424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotkFtLAzEQhYMoWKs_wLfF960zSfaSx9J6owWh6JsQsrsTTWmzNdkK_nuz1JeZ4ZzDHPgYu0WYIUB1HwG44DmAzKEs0zhjE5RJQcnlOZskm-e8FHjJrmLcAmBVlXLCPjZmoHzn9m5w_jPbkGkH1_uYLWmgsHd-VJfOWgrkh2ye3B8zJrKV8zS4Nma9zVY_OOPGd-ngM8wWX8Z72sVrdmHNLtLN_56y98eHt8Vzvn59elnM13mLWKm86EwlERBrJAJleANKtELUWJBVRI1SUjS8tUKUhneN7BpuiqKAtrat4Cim7O709xD67yPFQW_7Y_CpUnOsZImqVimEp1Ab-hgDWX0Ibm_Cr0bQI0N9YqgTQz0y1CD-AMa9Yws</recordid><startdate>200403</startdate><enddate>200403</enddate><creator>Scholle, A.</creator><creator>Dugarmaa, S.</creator><creator>Zimmer, T.</creator><creator>Leonhardt, M.</creator><creator>Koopmann, R.</creator><creator>Engeland, B.</creator><creator>Pongs, O.</creator><creator>Benndorf, K.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200403</creationdate><title>Rate-limiting Reactions Determining Different Activation Kinetics of Kv1.2and Kv2.1 Channels</title><author>Scholle, A. ; Dugarmaa, S. ; Zimmer, T. ; Leonhardt, M. ; Koopmann, R. ; Engeland, B. ; Pongs, O. ; Benndorf, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1179-5da74101181ee09a2b093c33815ef9eeb9943b2cf336a2db4db2a5550c8fc3213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scholle, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugarmaa, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonhardt, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koopmann, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engeland, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pongs, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benndorf, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>The Journal of membrane biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scholle, A.</au><au>Dugarmaa, S.</au><au>Zimmer, T.</au><au>Leonhardt, M.</au><au>Koopmann, R.</au><au>Engeland, B.</au><au>Pongs, O.</au><au>Benndorf, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rate-limiting Reactions Determining Different Activation Kinetics of Kv1.2and Kv2.1 Channels</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of membrane biology</jtitle><date>2004-03</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>198</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><pages>103-</pages><issn>0022-2631</issn><eissn>1432-1424</eissn><abstract>To identify the mechanisms underlying the faster activation kinetics in Kv1.2 channels compared to Kv2.1 channels, ionic and gating currents were studied in rat Kv1.2 and human Kv2.1 channels heterologously expressed in mammalian cells. At all voltages the time course of the ionic currents could be described by an initial sigmoidal and a subsequent exponential component and both components were faster in Kv1.2 than in Kv2.1 channels. In Kv1.2 channels, the activation time course was more sigmoid at more depolarized potentials, whereas in Kv2.1 channels it was somewhat less sigmoid at more depolarized potentials. In contrast to the ionic currents, the ON gating currents were similarly fast for both channels. The main portion of the measured ON gating charge moved before the ionic currents were activated. The equivalent gating charge of Kv1.2 ionic currents was twice that of Kv2.1 ionic currents, whereas that of Kv1.2 ON gating currents was smaller than that of Kv2.1 ON gating currents. In conclusion, the different activation kinetics of Kv1.2 and Kv2.1 channels are caused by rate-limiting reactions that follow the charge movement recorded from the gating currents. In Kv1.2 channels, the reaction coupling the voltage-sensor movement to the pore opening contributes to rate limitation in a voltage-dependent fashion, whereas in Kv2.1 channels, activation is additionally rate-limited by a slow reaction in the subunit gating.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s00232-004-0664-0</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2631 |
ispartof | The Journal of membrane biology, 2004-03, Vol.198 (2), p.103 |
issn | 0022-2631 1432-1424 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_217461989 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
title | Rate-limiting Reactions Determining Different Activation Kinetics of Kv1.2and Kv2.1 Channels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T13%3A07%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rate-limiting%20Reactions%20Determining%20Different%20Activation%20Kinetics%20of%20Kv1.2and%20Kv2.1%20Channels&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20membrane%20biology&rft.au=Scholle,%20A.&rft.date=2004-03&rft.volume=198&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.pages=103-&rft.issn=0022-2631&rft.eissn=1432-1424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00232-004-0664-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E685919691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217461989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |