Preference, opportunity, and choice: A multilevel analysis of diverse friendship formation

Diverse friendships offer many benefits for individuals and for intergroup relations, yet similarity is a powerful predictor of attraction and relationship formation. The current study examined how beliefs about the value of diversity relate to friendship choices. Naturally occurring dyads (N = 552)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Group processes & intergroup relations 2019-02, Vol.22 (2), p.233-252
1. Verfasser: Bahns, Angela J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
container_title Group processes & intergroup relations
container_volume 22
creator Bahns, Angela J.
description Diverse friendships offer many benefits for individuals and for intergroup relations, yet similarity is a powerful predictor of attraction and relationship formation. The current study examined how beliefs about the value of diversity relate to friendship choices. Naturally occurring dyads (N = 552) were recruited from 10 college campus and community samples varying in size and racial heterogeneity. A questionnaire assessed dyad members’ beliefs about the value of diversity (valuing diversity), 10 social and political attitudes, and 4 social identity categories (race/ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, nationality). Multilevel models were estimated to examine dyad-level valuing diversity, community size, and community racial heterogeneity as predictors of diverse friendships. Valuing diversity was a significant predictor of diverse friendships; valuing diversity increased the likelihood that dyad members were diverse in race, religion, and sexual orientation but not in nationality or attitudes. The effect of valuing diversity varied according to community size and racial heterogeneity. Valuing diversity increased the likelihood of racially diverse friendships more in communities high compared to low in racial heterogeneity, and increased religiously diverse friendships more in smaller compared to larger communities. Valuing diversity was associated with greater attitude similarity in larger communities but was unrelated to attitude similarity in smaller communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1368430217725390
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2174078026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1368430217725390</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2174078026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-9918565842834acbf0c42794fa7c377c101b627df40a8b59981696046410106c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB97lwG3Hb2ZZPJwV4ovKOhCN26GNJPYlOlkTGYK_femVBAEV_fAd87l3oPQFYEbQoS4JZRLRqHMuqyogiM0IYyTQhApj7POuNjzU3SW0hogOxlM0MdrtM5G2xk7xaHvQxzGzg-7KdZdg80qeGPv8Axvxnbwrd3aNgPd7pJPODjc-K2NyWIXve2atPI9diFu9OBDd4FOnG6TvfyZ5-j94f5t_lQsXh6f57NFYWhFhkIpIiteSVZKyrRZOjCsFIo5LQwVwhAgS16KxjHQclkpJQlXHBhnmQA39BxdH_b2MXyNNg31OowxH5nq3AYDIaHk2QUHl4khpfx03Ue_0XFXE6j3DdZ_G8yR4hBJ-tP-Lv3X_w3eMG6v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2174078026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preference, opportunity, and choice: A multilevel analysis of diverse friendship formation</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Bahns, Angela J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bahns, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><description>Diverse friendships offer many benefits for individuals and for intergroup relations, yet similarity is a powerful predictor of attraction and relationship formation. The current study examined how beliefs about the value of diversity relate to friendship choices. Naturally occurring dyads (N = 552) were recruited from 10 college campus and community samples varying in size and racial heterogeneity. A questionnaire assessed dyad members’ beliefs about the value of diversity (valuing diversity), 10 social and political attitudes, and 4 social identity categories (race/ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, nationality). Multilevel models were estimated to examine dyad-level valuing diversity, community size, and community racial heterogeneity as predictors of diverse friendships. Valuing diversity was a significant predictor of diverse friendships; valuing diversity increased the likelihood that dyad members were diverse in race, religion, and sexual orientation but not in nationality or attitudes. The effect of valuing diversity varied according to community size and racial heterogeneity. Valuing diversity increased the likelihood of racially diverse friendships more in communities high compared to low in racial heterogeneity, and increased religiously diverse friendships more in smaller compared to larger communities. Valuing diversity was associated with greater attitude similarity in larger communities but was unrelated to attitude similarity in smaller communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-4302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7188</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1368430217725390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Citizenship ; Community ; Community size ; Dyads ; Ethnic identity ; Ethnicity ; Friendship ; Heterogeneity ; Intergroup relations ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Multilevel analysis ; National identity ; Political attitudes ; Questionnaires ; Race ; Racial identity ; Religion ; Sexual orientation ; Social attitudes ; Social identity ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Group processes &amp; intergroup relations, 2019-02, Vol.22 (2), p.233-252</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-9918565842834acbf0c42794fa7c377c101b627df40a8b59981696046410106c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-9918565842834acbf0c42794fa7c377c101b627df40a8b59981696046410106c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1368430217725390$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1368430217725390$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bahns, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><title>Preference, opportunity, and choice: A multilevel analysis of diverse friendship formation</title><title>Group processes &amp; intergroup relations</title><description>Diverse friendships offer many benefits for individuals and for intergroup relations, yet similarity is a powerful predictor of attraction and relationship formation. The current study examined how beliefs about the value of diversity relate to friendship choices. Naturally occurring dyads (N = 552) were recruited from 10 college campus and community samples varying in size and racial heterogeneity. A questionnaire assessed dyad members’ beliefs about the value of diversity (valuing diversity), 10 social and political attitudes, and 4 social identity categories (race/ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, nationality). Multilevel models were estimated to examine dyad-level valuing diversity, community size, and community racial heterogeneity as predictors of diverse friendships. Valuing diversity was a significant predictor of diverse friendships; valuing diversity increased the likelihood that dyad members were diverse in race, religion, and sexual orientation but not in nationality or attitudes. The effect of valuing diversity varied according to community size and racial heterogeneity. Valuing diversity increased the likelihood of racially diverse friendships more in communities high compared to low in racial heterogeneity, and increased religiously diverse friendships more in smaller compared to larger communities. Valuing diversity was associated with greater attitude similarity in larger communities but was unrelated to attitude similarity in smaller communities.</description><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community size</subject><subject>Dyads</subject><subject>Ethnic identity</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Friendship</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Intergroup relations</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Multilevel analysis</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial identity</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Sexual orientation</subject><subject>Social attitudes</subject><subject>Social identity</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>1368-4302</issn><issn>1461-7188</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWB97lwG3Hb2ZZPJwV4ovKOhCN26GNJPYlOlkTGYK_femVBAEV_fAd87l3oPQFYEbQoS4JZRLRqHMuqyogiM0IYyTQhApj7POuNjzU3SW0hogOxlM0MdrtM5G2xk7xaHvQxzGzg-7KdZdg80qeGPv8Axvxnbwrd3aNgPd7pJPODjc-K2NyWIXve2atPI9diFu9OBDd4FOnG6TvfyZ5-j94f5t_lQsXh6f57NFYWhFhkIpIiteSVZKyrRZOjCsFIo5LQwVwhAgS16KxjHQclkpJQlXHBhnmQA39BxdH_b2MXyNNg31OowxH5nq3AYDIaHk2QUHl4khpfx03Ue_0XFXE6j3DdZ_G8yR4hBJ-tP-Lv3X_w3eMG6v</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Bahns, Angela J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Preference, opportunity, and choice: A multilevel analysis of diverse friendship formation</title><author>Bahns, Angela J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-9918565842834acbf0c42794fa7c377c101b627df40a8b59981696046410106c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community size</topic><topic>Dyads</topic><topic>Ethnic identity</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Friendship</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Intergroup relations</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Multilevel analysis</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial identity</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Sexual orientation</topic><topic>Social attitudes</topic><topic>Social identity</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bahns, Angela J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Group processes &amp; intergroup relations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bahns, Angela J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preference, opportunity, and choice: A multilevel analysis of diverse friendship formation</atitle><jtitle>Group processes &amp; intergroup relations</jtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>233-252</pages><issn>1368-4302</issn><eissn>1461-7188</eissn><abstract>Diverse friendships offer many benefits for individuals and for intergroup relations, yet similarity is a powerful predictor of attraction and relationship formation. The current study examined how beliefs about the value of diversity relate to friendship choices. Naturally occurring dyads (N = 552) were recruited from 10 college campus and community samples varying in size and racial heterogeneity. A questionnaire assessed dyad members’ beliefs about the value of diversity (valuing diversity), 10 social and political attitudes, and 4 social identity categories (race/ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, nationality). Multilevel models were estimated to examine dyad-level valuing diversity, community size, and community racial heterogeneity as predictors of diverse friendships. Valuing diversity was a significant predictor of diverse friendships; valuing diversity increased the likelihood that dyad members were diverse in race, religion, and sexual orientation but not in nationality or attitudes. The effect of valuing diversity varied according to community size and racial heterogeneity. Valuing diversity increased the likelihood of racially diverse friendships more in communities high compared to low in racial heterogeneity, and increased religiously diverse friendships more in smaller compared to larger communities. Valuing diversity was associated with greater attitude similarity in larger communities but was unrelated to attitude similarity in smaller communities.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1368430217725390</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-4302
ispartof Group processes & intergroup relations, 2019-02, Vol.22 (2), p.233-252
issn 1368-4302
1461-7188
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2174078026
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Citizenship
Community
Community size
Dyads
Ethnic identity
Ethnicity
Friendship
Heterogeneity
Intergroup relations
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Multilevel analysis
National identity
Political attitudes
Questionnaires
Race
Racial identity
Religion
Sexual orientation
Social attitudes
Social identity
Social psychology
title Preference, opportunity, and choice: A multilevel analysis of diverse friendship formation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T03%3A07%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preference,%20opportunity,%20and%20choice:%20A%20multilevel%20analysis%20of%20diverse%20friendship%20formation&rft.jtitle=Group%20processes%20&%20intergroup%20relations&rft.au=Bahns,%20Angela%20J.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=233-252&rft.issn=1368-4302&rft.eissn=1461-7188&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1368430217725390&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2174078026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2174078026&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1368430217725390&rfr_iscdi=true