Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma: detailed analysis of morphology, immunohistochemical profile, and clinical outcomes in 59 cases
Although 2014 World Health Organization criteria require unequivocal glandular and squamous differentiation for a diagnosis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma, in practice, adenosquamous carcinoma diagnoses are often made in tumors that lack unequivocal squamous and/or glandular differentiation. Co...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern pathology 2019-02, Vol.32 (2), p.269-279 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 279 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | Modern pathology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Stolnicu, Simona Lien Hoang Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya Barsan, Iulia Terinte, Cristina Pesci, Anna Aviel-Ronen, Sarit Kiyokawa, Takako Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel Oliva, Esther Park, Kay J Soslow, Robert A |
description | Although 2014 World Health Organization criteria require unequivocal glandular and squamous differentiation for a diagnosis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma, in practice, adenosquamous carcinoma diagnoses are often made in tumors that lack unequivocal squamous and/or glandular differentiation. Considering the ambiguous etiologic, morphological, and clinical features and outcomes associated with adenosquamous carcinomas, we sought to redefine these tumors. We reviewed slides from 59 initially diagnosed adenosquamous carcinomas (including glassy cell carcinoma and related lesions) to confirm an adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. Select cases underwent immunohistochemical profiling as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by in situ hybridization. Of the 59 cases originally classified as adenosquamous carcinomas, 34 retained their adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis, 9 were reclassified as pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas, 10 as invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with other components (such as HPV-associated mucinous, usual-type, or adenosquamous carcinomas), and 4 as HPV-associated usual or mucinous adenocarcinomas with benign-appearing squamous metaplasia. Two glassy cell carcinomas were reclassified as poorly differentiated usual-type carcinomas based on morphology and immunophenotype. There were significant immunophenotypic differences between adenosquamous carcinomas and pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with regard to HPV (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41379-018-0123-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2172666627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2172666627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-e981a47629e8f6b2bf6167f45b64518be0797dbd5dddf3b1130ca35d23b9a48d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AbaN5TF7upFgVCm50XfK0KZNJO5kRuvSfO1QvXA4c-M49F4Bbgu8JZuqhNoRJjTBR01KGxBmYEc4wwlTxczDDSjPENKeX4KrWHcak4YrOwM8y9N_JmRYaH7pSD6PJZazQmd6lrmTzCH0YTGqDh6Yz7bGmCkuEufT7bWnL13EBU85jV7apDsVtQz6l7fsSJ2gxQR66NnUnt4yDKzlUmDrI9XSkhnoNLqJpa7j51zn4XD1_LF_R-v3lbfm0Rnui2ICCVsQ0UlAdVBSW2iiIkLHhVjScKBuw1NJbz733kVlCGHaGcU-Z1aZRns3B3V_uVO0whjpsdmXsp5fqhhJJxTRUsl-kUmRy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2172666627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma: detailed analysis of morphology, immunohistochemical profile, and clinical outcomes in 59 cases</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stolnicu, Simona ; Lien Hoang ; Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya ; Barsan, Iulia ; Terinte, Cristina ; Pesci, Anna ; Aviel-Ronen, Sarit ; Kiyokawa, Takako ; Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel ; Oliva, Esther ; Park, Kay J ; Soslow, Robert A</creator><creatorcontrib>Stolnicu, Simona ; Lien Hoang ; Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya ; Barsan, Iulia ; Terinte, Cristina ; Pesci, Anna ; Aviel-Ronen, Sarit ; Kiyokawa, Takako ; Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel ; Oliva, Esther ; Park, Kay J ; Soslow, Robert A</creatorcontrib><description>Although 2014 World Health Organization criteria require unequivocal glandular and squamous differentiation for a diagnosis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma, in practice, adenosquamous carcinoma diagnoses are often made in tumors that lack unequivocal squamous and/or glandular differentiation. Considering the ambiguous etiologic, morphological, and clinical features and outcomes associated with adenosquamous carcinomas, we sought to redefine these tumors. We reviewed slides from 59 initially diagnosed adenosquamous carcinomas (including glassy cell carcinoma and related lesions) to confirm an adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. Select cases underwent immunohistochemical profiling as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by in situ hybridization. Of the 59 cases originally classified as adenosquamous carcinomas, 34 retained their adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis, 9 were reclassified as pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas, 10 as invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with other components (such as HPV-associated mucinous, usual-type, or adenosquamous carcinomas), and 4 as HPV-associated usual or mucinous adenocarcinomas with benign-appearing squamous metaplasia. Two glassy cell carcinomas were reclassified as poorly differentiated usual-type carcinomas based on morphology and immunophenotype. There were significant immunophenotypic differences between adenosquamous carcinomas and pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with regard to HPV (p < 0.0001), PAX8 (p = 0.038; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p40 (p < 0.0001; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p63 (p = 0.0018; more in adenosquamous carcinoma) and MUC6 (p < 0.0001; less in adenosquamous carcinoma), HNF-1beta (p = 0.0023), vimentin (p = 0.0003), p53 (p = 0.0004), and CK7 (p = 0.0002) expression. Survival outcomes were similar between all groups. Adenosquamous carcinomas should be diagnosed only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. The two putative glassy cell carcinomas studied did not meet our criteria for adenosquamous carcinoma, and categorizing them as such should be reconsidered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0123-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Limited</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenosquamous ; Carcinoma ; Cervix ; Cytology ; Diagnosis ; Human papillomavirus ; Hybridization ; Immunohistochemistry ; Invasiveness ; Metaplasia ; Morphology ; Mucin ; p53 Protein ; Pax8 protein ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Tumors ; Vimentin</subject><ispartof>Modern pathology, 2019-02, Vol.32 (2), p.269-279</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2172666627?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,64383,64387,72239</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stolnicu, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lien Hoang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsan, Iulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terinte, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesci, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aviel-Ronen, Sarit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyokawa, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kay J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soslow, Robert A</creatorcontrib><title>Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma: detailed analysis of morphology, immunohistochemical profile, and clinical outcomes in 59 cases</title><title>Modern pathology</title><description>Although 2014 World Health Organization criteria require unequivocal glandular and squamous differentiation for a diagnosis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma, in practice, adenosquamous carcinoma diagnoses are often made in tumors that lack unequivocal squamous and/or glandular differentiation. Considering the ambiguous etiologic, morphological, and clinical features and outcomes associated with adenosquamous carcinomas, we sought to redefine these tumors. We reviewed slides from 59 initially diagnosed adenosquamous carcinomas (including glassy cell carcinoma and related lesions) to confirm an adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. Select cases underwent immunohistochemical profiling as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by in situ hybridization. Of the 59 cases originally classified as adenosquamous carcinomas, 34 retained their adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis, 9 were reclassified as pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas, 10 as invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with other components (such as HPV-associated mucinous, usual-type, or adenosquamous carcinomas), and 4 as HPV-associated usual or mucinous adenocarcinomas with benign-appearing squamous metaplasia. Two glassy cell carcinomas were reclassified as poorly differentiated usual-type carcinomas based on morphology and immunophenotype. There were significant immunophenotypic differences between adenosquamous carcinomas and pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with regard to HPV (p < 0.0001), PAX8 (p = 0.038; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p40 (p < 0.0001; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p63 (p = 0.0018; more in adenosquamous carcinoma) and MUC6 (p < 0.0001; less in adenosquamous carcinoma), HNF-1beta (p = 0.0023), vimentin (p = 0.0003), p53 (p = 0.0004), and CK7 (p = 0.0002) expression. Survival outcomes were similar between all groups. Adenosquamous carcinomas should be diagnosed only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. The two putative glassy cell carcinomas studied did not meet our criteria for adenosquamous carcinoma, and categorizing them as such should be reconsidered.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenosquamous</subject><subject>Carcinoma</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Metaplasia</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Mucin</subject><subject>p53 Protein</subject><subject>Pax8 protein</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Vimentin</subject><issn>0893-3952</issn><issn>1530-0285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0tLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3AbaN5TF7upFgVCm50XfK0KZNJO5kRuvSfO1QvXA4c-M49F4Bbgu8JZuqhNoRJjTBR01KGxBmYEc4wwlTxczDDSjPENKeX4KrWHcak4YrOwM8y9N_JmRYaH7pSD6PJZazQmd6lrmTzCH0YTGqDh6Yz7bGmCkuEufT7bWnL13EBU85jV7apDsVtQz6l7fsSJ2gxQR66NnUnt4yDKzlUmDrI9XSkhnoNLqJpa7j51zn4XD1_LF_R-v3lbfm0Rnui2ICCVsQ0UlAdVBSW2iiIkLHhVjScKBuw1NJbz733kVlCGHaGcU-Z1aZRns3B3V_uVO0whjpsdmXsp5fqhhJJxTRUsl-kUmRy</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Stolnicu, Simona</creator><creator>Lien Hoang</creator><creator>Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya</creator><creator>Barsan, Iulia</creator><creator>Terinte, Cristina</creator><creator>Pesci, Anna</creator><creator>Aviel-Ronen, Sarit</creator><creator>Kiyokawa, Takako</creator><creator>Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel</creator><creator>Oliva, Esther</creator><creator>Park, Kay J</creator><creator>Soslow, Robert A</creator><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma: detailed analysis of morphology, immunohistochemical profile, and clinical outcomes in 59 cases</title><author>Stolnicu, Simona ; Lien Hoang ; Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya ; Barsan, Iulia ; Terinte, Cristina ; Pesci, Anna ; Aviel-Ronen, Sarit ; Kiyokawa, Takako ; Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel ; Oliva, Esther ; Park, Kay J ; Soslow, Robert A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-e981a47629e8f6b2bf6167f45b64518be0797dbd5dddf3b1130ca35d23b9a48d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenosquamous</topic><topic>Carcinoma</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Metaplasia</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Mucin</topic><topic>p53 Protein</topic><topic>Pax8 protein</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Vimentin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stolnicu, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lien Hoang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsan, Iulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terinte, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesci, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aviel-Ronen, Sarit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyokawa, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kay J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soslow, Robert A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stolnicu, Simona</au><au>Lien Hoang</au><au>Hanko-Bauer, Orsolya</au><au>Barsan, Iulia</au><au>Terinte, Cristina</au><au>Pesci, Anna</au><au>Aviel-Ronen, Sarit</au><au>Kiyokawa, Takako</au><au>Alvarado-Cabrero, Isabel</au><au>Oliva, Esther</au><au>Park, Kay J</au><au>Soslow, Robert A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma: detailed analysis of morphology, immunohistochemical profile, and clinical outcomes in 59 cases</atitle><jtitle>Modern pathology</jtitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>269-279</pages><issn>0893-3952</issn><eissn>1530-0285</eissn><abstract>Although 2014 World Health Organization criteria require unequivocal glandular and squamous differentiation for a diagnosis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma, in practice, adenosquamous carcinoma diagnoses are often made in tumors that lack unequivocal squamous and/or glandular differentiation. Considering the ambiguous etiologic, morphological, and clinical features and outcomes associated with adenosquamous carcinomas, we sought to redefine these tumors. We reviewed slides from 59 initially diagnosed adenosquamous carcinomas (including glassy cell carcinoma and related lesions) to confirm an adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. Select cases underwent immunohistochemical profiling as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) testing by in situ hybridization. Of the 59 cases originally classified as adenosquamous carcinomas, 34 retained their adenosquamous carcinoma diagnosis, 9 were reclassified as pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas, 10 as invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with other components (such as HPV-associated mucinous, usual-type, or adenosquamous carcinomas), and 4 as HPV-associated usual or mucinous adenocarcinomas with benign-appearing squamous metaplasia. Two glassy cell carcinomas were reclassified as poorly differentiated usual-type carcinomas based on morphology and immunophenotype. There were significant immunophenotypic differences between adenosquamous carcinomas and pure invasive stratified mucin-producing carcinomas with regard to HPV (p < 0.0001), PAX8 (p = 0.038; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p40 (p < 0.0001; more in adenosquamous carcinoma), p63 (p = 0.0018; more in adenosquamous carcinoma) and MUC6 (p < 0.0001; less in adenosquamous carcinoma), HNF-1beta (p = 0.0023), vimentin (p = 0.0003), p53 (p = 0.0004), and CK7 (p = 0.0002) expression. Survival outcomes were similar between all groups. Adenosquamous carcinomas should be diagnosed only in the presence of unequivocal malignant glandular and squamous differentiation. The two putative glassy cell carcinomas studied did not meet our criteria for adenosquamous carcinoma, and categorizing them as such should be reconsidered.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Limited</pub><doi>10.1038/s41379-018-0123-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-3952 |
ispartof | Modern pathology, 2019-02, Vol.32 (2), p.269-279 |
issn | 0893-3952 1530-0285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2172666627 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma Adenosquamous Carcinoma Cervix Cytology Diagnosis Human papillomavirus Hybridization Immunohistochemistry Invasiveness Metaplasia Morphology Mucin p53 Protein Pax8 protein Squamous cell carcinoma Tumors Vimentin |
title | Cervical adenosquamous carcinoma: detailed analysis of morphology, immunohistochemical profile, and clinical outcomes in 59 cases |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A28%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cervical%20adenosquamous%20carcinoma:%20detailed%20analysis%20of%20morphology,%20immunohistochemical%20profile,%20and%20clinical%20outcomes%20in%2059%20cases&rft.jtitle=Modern%20pathology&rft.au=Stolnicu,%20Simona&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=269-279&rft.issn=0893-3952&rft.eissn=1530-0285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41379-018-0123-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2172666627%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2172666627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |