THE RISE AND NATURE OF ALTERNATIVE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995–2015
To monitor trends in alternative work arrangements, the authors conducted a version of the Contingent Worker Survey as part of the RAND American Life Panel in late 2015. Their findings point to a rise in the incidence of alternative work arrangements in the US economy from 1995 to 2015. The percenta...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial & labor relations review 2019-03, Vol.72 (2), p.382-416 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 416 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 382 |
| container_title | Industrial & labor relations review |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | KATZ, LAWRENCE F. KRUEGER, ALAN B. |
| description | To monitor trends in alternative work arrangements, the authors conducted a version of the Contingent Worker Survey as part of the RAND American Life Panel in late 2015. Their findings point to a rise in the incidence of alternative work arrangements in the US economy from 1995 to 2015. The percentage of workers engaged in alternative work arrangements—defined as temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract workers, and independent contractors or freelancers—rose from 10.7% in February 2005 to possibly as high as 15.8% in late 2015. Workers who provide services through online intermediaries, such as Uber or TaskRabbit, accounted for 0.5% of all workers in 2015. Of the workers selling goods or services directly to customers, approximately twice as many reported finding customers through off-line intermediaries than through online intermediaries. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0019793918820008 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2172480849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26957028</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0019793918820008</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26957028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-763463f6ff1e161c4a9fb64d15b3137726ed09f85dd51db22fa0e7b945a8f3f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFb3boQBt0bnTuYnswzttA3WFJK0ugtJk5EWbWqmXbjzHXxDn8SEiIoLV5fLPef74CJ0DuQaQMobQkBJ5SrwPEoI8Q5Qj4KgDpXwcIh67dlp78foxNp1QxAmoYcWyUTjKIg19sMhDv1kHmk8G2F_muioWYOFxvez6Bb7UeSHY32nwyTGQYhbbx4GiR7iOPETHV9hUIp_vL1TAvwUHZnsyZZnX7OP5iOdDCbOdDYOBv7UWXKqdo4ULhOuEcZACQKWLFMmF6wAnrvgSklFWRBlPF4UHIqcUpORUuaK8cwzjef20WWXu62rl31pd-m62tebpjKlICnziMdUQ5GOWtaVtXVp0m29es7q1xRI2n4v_fu9RsGdUi6rzcr-EoQUjDPWdjsdYrPH8qf3n8iLjl_bXVV_J1KhuCTUcz8B01N6JA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2172480849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE RISE AND NATURE OF ALTERNATIVE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995–2015</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>KATZ, LAWRENCE F. ; KRUEGER, ALAN B.</creator><creatorcontrib>KATZ, LAWRENCE F. ; KRUEGER, ALAN B.</creatorcontrib><description>To monitor trends in alternative work arrangements, the authors conducted a version of the Contingent Worker Survey as part of the RAND American Life Panel in late 2015. Their findings point to a rise in the incidence of alternative work arrangements in the US economy from 1995 to 2015. The percentage of workers engaged in alternative work arrangements—defined as temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract workers, and independent contractors or freelancers—rose from 10.7% in February 2005 to possibly as high as 15.8% in late 2015. Workers who provide services through online intermediaries, such as Uber or TaskRabbit, accounted for 0.5% of all workers in 2015. Of the workers selling goods or services directly to customers, approximately twice as many reported finding customers through off-line intermediaries than through online intermediaries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-7939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-271X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0019793918820008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Alternatives ; Arrangements ; Consumers ; Customers ; Internet ; Labor relations ; Temporary employees ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Industrial & labor relations review, 2019-03, Vol.72 (2), p.382-416</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-763463f6ff1e161c4a9fb64d15b3137726ed09f85dd51db22fa0e7b945a8f3f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-763463f6ff1e161c4a9fb64d15b3137726ed09f85dd51db22fa0e7b945a8f3f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26957028$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26957028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21800,27903,27904,33753,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KATZ, LAWRENCE F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRUEGER, ALAN B.</creatorcontrib><title>THE RISE AND NATURE OF ALTERNATIVE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995–2015</title><title>Industrial & labor relations review</title><description>To monitor trends in alternative work arrangements, the authors conducted a version of the Contingent Worker Survey as part of the RAND American Life Panel in late 2015. Their findings point to a rise in the incidence of alternative work arrangements in the US economy from 1995 to 2015. The percentage of workers engaged in alternative work arrangements—defined as temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract workers, and independent contractors or freelancers—rose from 10.7% in February 2005 to possibly as high as 15.8% in late 2015. Workers who provide services through online intermediaries, such as Uber or TaskRabbit, accounted for 0.5% of all workers in 2015. Of the workers selling goods or services directly to customers, approximately twice as many reported finding customers through off-line intermediaries than through online intermediaries.</description><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Arrangements</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Temporary employees</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0019-7939</issn><issn>2162-271X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFb3boQBt0bnTuYnswzttA3WFJK0ugtJk5EWbWqmXbjzHXxDn8SEiIoLV5fLPef74CJ0DuQaQMobQkBJ5SrwPEoI8Q5Qj4KgDpXwcIh67dlp78foxNp1QxAmoYcWyUTjKIg19sMhDv1kHmk8G2F_muioWYOFxvez6Bb7UeSHY32nwyTGQYhbbx4GiR7iOPETHV9hUIp_vL1TAvwUHZnsyZZnX7OP5iOdDCbOdDYOBv7UWXKqdo4ULhOuEcZACQKWLFMmF6wAnrvgSklFWRBlPF4UHIqcUpORUuaK8cwzjef20WWXu62rl31pd-m62tebpjKlICnziMdUQ5GOWtaVtXVp0m29es7q1xRI2n4v_fu9RsGdUi6rzcr-EoQUjDPWdjsdYrPH8qf3n8iLjl_bXVV_J1KhuCTUcz8B01N6JA</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>KATZ, LAWRENCE F.</creator><creator>KRUEGER, ALAN B.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>THE RISE AND NATURE OF ALTERNATIVE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995–2015</title><author>KATZ, LAWRENCE F. ; KRUEGER, ALAN B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-763463f6ff1e161c4a9fb64d15b3137726ed09f85dd51db22fa0e7b945a8f3f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Arrangements</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Temporary employees</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KATZ, LAWRENCE F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KRUEGER, ALAN B.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Industrial & labor relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KATZ, LAWRENCE F.</au><au>KRUEGER, ALAN B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE RISE AND NATURE OF ALTERNATIVE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995–2015</atitle><jtitle>Industrial & labor relations review</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>382</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>382-416</pages><issn>0019-7939</issn><eissn>2162-271X</eissn><abstract>To monitor trends in alternative work arrangements, the authors conducted a version of the Contingent Worker Survey as part of the RAND American Life Panel in late 2015. Their findings point to a rise in the incidence of alternative work arrangements in the US economy from 1995 to 2015. The percentage of workers engaged in alternative work arrangements—defined as temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract workers, and independent contractors or freelancers—rose from 10.7% in February 2005 to possibly as high as 15.8% in late 2015. Workers who provide services through online intermediaries, such as Uber or TaskRabbit, accounted for 0.5% of all workers in 2015. Of the workers selling goods or services directly to customers, approximately twice as many reported finding customers through off-line intermediaries than through online intermediaries.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0019793918820008</doi><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0019-7939 |
| ispartof | Industrial & labor relations review, 2019-03, Vol.72 (2), p.382-416 |
| issn | 0019-7939 2162-271X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2172480849 |
| source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Alternatives Arrangements Consumers Customers Internet Labor relations Temporary employees Workers |
| title | THE RISE AND NATURE OF ALTERNATIVE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 1995–2015 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20RISE%20AND%20NATURE%20OF%20ALTERNATIVE%20WORK%20ARRANGEMENTS%20IN%20THE%20UNITED%20STATES,%201995%E2%80%932015&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20labor%20relations%20review&rft.au=KATZ,%20LAWRENCE%20F.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=382-416&rft.issn=0019-7939&rft.eissn=2162-271X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0019793918820008&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26957028%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2172480849&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26957028&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0019793918820008&rfr_iscdi=true |