An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties
Importing countries frequently use instruments of trade policy for the purpose of retaliating against the practices of foreign exporting companies or their governments. These retaliatory actions obviously affect trade patterns when implemented. The effects of the threat of the imposition of antidump...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Southern economic journal 1984-07, Vol.51 (1), p.59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Southern economic journal |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Herander, Mark G Schwartz, J Brad |
description | Importing countries frequently use instruments of trade policy for the purpose of retaliating against the practices of foreign exporting companies or their governments. These retaliatory actions obviously affect trade patterns when implemented. The effects of the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties by the US on the pricing conduct of firms exporting to the US during the 1976-1981 period are analyzed. The theory that foreign firms have become more sensitive to the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties over this time period is tested. Results suggest that foreign companies have been incorporating the threat of US antidumping duties into their pricing behavior, although the precise nature of the firms' behavior appears to have changed over time. US trade policy may have been more effective in modifying trade flows than quantitative measures of protection would suggest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1058322 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217159267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1290971012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-8366584d81c93bf01548dcf5c06fa0349566d4f8b1d7c5ccc721308b3207de413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg_oIF54RdP2KbW1UKVKoEEum5cmyHpmqTkMeBf495iBtcdjWaT7OaJeQSIWUc1A2C1JyxIzJhnMlEA7JjMgHgOhFxnJKzvt8BAEOUE1LMaro4tFVXObuneegH2pR02Aa6PLTW_ap82wX7pdbpS0rzzvpAn5t95d5voxno3Pbh057VQ-XHmFi_0rtxqEJ_Tk5Ku-_Dxc-ekvX9Ip8_Jqunh-V8tkpa1DgkmmeZ1MJrdIYXJaAU2rtSOshKC1wYmWVelLpAr5x0zimGHHTBGSgfBPIpufrObbvmbYxNNrtm7Op4csNQoTQsU_9DDIVCYyJ0_ReEzIBRGJ_KPwAYjGle</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217159267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Herander, Mark G ; Schwartz, J Brad</creator><creatorcontrib>Herander, Mark G ; Schwartz, J Brad</creatorcontrib><description>Importing countries frequently use instruments of trade policy for the purpose of retaliating against the practices of foreign exporting companies or their governments. These retaliatory actions obviously affect trade patterns when implemented. The effects of the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties by the US on the pricing conduct of firms exporting to the US during the 1976-1981 period are analyzed. The theory that foreign firms have become more sensitive to the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties over this time period is tested. Results suggest that foreign companies have been incorporating the threat of US antidumping duties into their pricing behavior, although the precise nature of the firms' behavior appears to have changed over time. US trade policy may have been more effective in modifying trade flows than quantitative measures of protection would suggest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-4038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-8012</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1058322</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SECJAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stillwater: Southern Economic Association and the University of North Carolina</publisher><subject>Anti dumping tariffs ; Competition ; Complaints ; Dumping ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Fair value ; Hypotheses ; Impacts ; International trade ; Refineries ; Tariffs ; Trade policy ; Trade restrictions</subject><ispartof>Southern economic journal, 1984-07, Vol.51 (1), p.59</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southern Economic Association Jul 1984</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27868,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herander, Mark G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, J Brad</creatorcontrib><title>An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties</title><title>Southern economic journal</title><description>Importing countries frequently use instruments of trade policy for the purpose of retaliating against the practices of foreign exporting companies or their governments. These retaliatory actions obviously affect trade patterns when implemented. The effects of the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties by the US on the pricing conduct of firms exporting to the US during the 1976-1981 period are analyzed. The theory that foreign firms have become more sensitive to the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties over this time period is tested. Results suggest that foreign companies have been incorporating the threat of US antidumping duties into their pricing behavior, although the precise nature of the firms' behavior appears to have changed over time. US trade policy may have been more effective in modifying trade flows than quantitative measures of protection would suggest.</description><subject>Anti dumping tariffs</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Dumping</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Fair value</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Impacts</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Refineries</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Trade restrictions</subject><issn>0038-4038</issn><issn>2325-8012</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqUg_oIF54RdP2KbW1UKVKoEEum5cmyHpmqTkMeBf495iBtcdjWaT7OaJeQSIWUc1A2C1JyxIzJhnMlEA7JjMgHgOhFxnJKzvt8BAEOUE1LMaro4tFVXObuneegH2pR02Aa6PLTW_ap82wX7pdbpS0rzzvpAn5t95d5voxno3Pbh057VQ-XHmFi_0rtxqEJ_Tk5Ku-_Dxc-ekvX9Ip8_Jqunh-V8tkpa1DgkmmeZ1MJrdIYXJaAU2rtSOshKC1wYmWVelLpAr5x0zimGHHTBGSgfBPIpufrObbvmbYxNNrtm7Op4csNQoTQsU_9DDIVCYyJ0_ReEzIBRGJ_KPwAYjGle</recordid><startdate>19840701</startdate><enddate>19840701</enddate><creator>Herander, Mark G</creator><creator>Schwartz, J Brad</creator><general>Southern Economic Association and the University of North Carolina</general><general>Southern Economic Association</general><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0A</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840701</creationdate><title>An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties</title><author>Herander, Mark G ; Schwartz, J Brad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p181t-8366584d81c93bf01548dcf5c06fa0349566d4f8b1d7c5ccc721308b3207de413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Anti dumping tariffs</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Dumping</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Fair value</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Impacts</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Refineries</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Trade restrictions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herander, Mark G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, J Brad</creatorcontrib><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Archive</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Southern economic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herander, Mark G</au><au>Schwartz, J Brad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties</atitle><jtitle>Southern economic journal</jtitle><date>1984-07-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><pages>59-</pages><issn>0038-4038</issn><eissn>2325-8012</eissn><coden>SECJAR</coden><abstract>Importing countries frequently use instruments of trade policy for the purpose of retaliating against the practices of foreign exporting companies or their governments. These retaliatory actions obviously affect trade patterns when implemented. The effects of the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties by the US on the pricing conduct of firms exporting to the US during the 1976-1981 period are analyzed. The theory that foreign firms have become more sensitive to the threat of the imposition of antidumping duties over this time period is tested. Results suggest that foreign companies have been incorporating the threat of US antidumping duties into their pricing behavior, although the precise nature of the firms' behavior appears to have changed over time. US trade policy may have been more effective in modifying trade flows than quantitative measures of protection would suggest.</abstract><cop>Stillwater</cop><pub>Southern Economic Association and the University of North Carolina</pub><doi>10.2307/1058322</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-4038 |
ispartof | Southern economic journal, 1984-07, Vol.51 (1), p.59 |
issn | 0038-4038 2325-8012 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_217159267 |
source | Business Source Complete; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Anti dumping tariffs Competition Complaints Dumping Economic models Economic theory Fair value Hypotheses Impacts International trade Refineries Tariffs Trade policy Trade restrictions |
title | An Empirical Test of the Impact of the Threat of U.S. Trade Policy: The Case of Antidumping Duties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A04%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Empirical%20Test%20of%20the%20Impact%20of%20the%20Threat%20of%20U.S.%20Trade%20Policy:%20The%20Case%20of%20Antidumping%20Duties&rft.jtitle=Southern%20economic%20journal&rft.au=Herander,%20Mark%20G&rft.date=1984-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.pages=59-&rft.issn=0038-4038&rft.eissn=2325-8012&rft.coden=SECJAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1058322&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1290971012%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217159267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |