Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding

Four experiments were conducted to explore outcome-specific transfer from causal predictive judgments to instrumental responding. A video game was designed in which participants had to defend Andalusia from navy and air force attacks. First, they learned the relationship between two instrumental res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Learning & behavior 2002-08, Vol.30 (3), p.239
Hauptverfasser: Paredes-Olay, Concepcion, Abad, Maria J F, Gamez, Matias, Rosas, Juan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 239
container_title Learning & behavior
container_volume 30
creator Paredes-Olay, Concepcion
Abad, Maria J F
Gamez, Matias
Rosas, Juan M
description Four experiments were conducted to explore outcome-specific transfer from causal predictive judgments to instrumental responding. A video game was designed in which participants had to defend Andalusia from navy and air force attacks. First, they learned the relationship between two instrumental responses (two keys on a standard keyboard) and two different outcomes (destruction of the ships or destruction of the planes). Then they learned to predict which of two different stimuli predicted which outcome. Finally, they had the opportunity of making either of the two instrumental responses in the presence of either stimulus. Transfer was shown as a preference for the response that shared an outcome with the current stimulus. The presentation of the stimulus during the test produced a decrease in the overall rate of response. Responding to a neutral stimulus in Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that this overall decrease in responding was due to a combination of the time needed to process the meaning of the stimulus and the activation of the representation of the outcome in the presence of the stimulus during the test. Transfer between predictive judgments and instrumental responding mirrors the outcome-specific Pavlovian instrumental transfer observed in conditioning studies with rats.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217120784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>204475931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2171207843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNissOgjAQRRujifj4h8Y9SQslwNpo3MueVBhICU6x0-rvi4nuXZ17cs-CRTJTaawyUSx_W5VqzTZEgxCJVEUZsWvlNFIHjtuONxa9syO_gX8BIG90ID3yyUFrGm-ewIfQ9ndAT1xjyw2Sd-Hjc-WAJoutwX7HVp0eCfZfbtnhfKqOl3hy9hGAfD3Y4HC-6kTmMhF5odK_ojdbg0Iu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217120784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Paredes-Olay, Concepcion ; Abad, Maria J F ; Gamez, Matias ; Rosas, Juan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Paredes-Olay, Concepcion ; Abad, Maria J F ; Gamez, Matias ; Rosas, Juan M</creatorcontrib><description>Four experiments were conducted to explore outcome-specific transfer from causal predictive judgments to instrumental responding. A video game was designed in which participants had to defend Andalusia from navy and air force attacks. First, they learned the relationship between two instrumental responses (two keys on a standard keyboard) and two different outcomes (destruction of the ships or destruction of the planes). Then they learned to predict which of two different stimuli predicted which outcome. Finally, they had the opportunity of making either of the two instrumental responses in the presence of either stimulus. Transfer was shown as a preference for the response that shared an outcome with the current stimulus. The presentation of the stimulus during the test produced a decrease in the overall rate of response. Responding to a neutral stimulus in Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that this overall decrease in responding was due to a combination of the time needed to process the meaning of the stimulus and the activation of the representation of the outcome in the presence of the stimulus during the test. Transfer between predictive judgments and instrumental responding mirrors the outcome-specific Pavlovian instrumental transfer observed in conditioning studies with rats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1543-4494</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-4508</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ALBVAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin: Psychonomic Society, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Learning</subject><ispartof>Learning &amp; behavior, 2002-08, Vol.30 (3), p.239</ispartof><rights>Copyright Psychonomic Society, Inc. Aug 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paredes-Olay, Concepcion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, Maria J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamez, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosas, Juan M</creatorcontrib><title>Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding</title><title>Learning &amp; behavior</title><description>Four experiments were conducted to explore outcome-specific transfer from causal predictive judgments to instrumental responding. A video game was designed in which participants had to defend Andalusia from navy and air force attacks. First, they learned the relationship between two instrumental responses (two keys on a standard keyboard) and two different outcomes (destruction of the ships or destruction of the planes). Then they learned to predict which of two different stimuli predicted which outcome. Finally, they had the opportunity of making either of the two instrumental responses in the presence of either stimulus. Transfer was shown as a preference for the response that shared an outcome with the current stimulus. The presentation of the stimulus during the test produced a decrease in the overall rate of response. Responding to a neutral stimulus in Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that this overall decrease in responding was due to a combination of the time needed to process the meaning of the stimulus and the activation of the representation of the outcome in the presence of the stimulus during the test. Transfer between predictive judgments and instrumental responding mirrors the outcome-specific Pavlovian instrumental transfer observed in conditioning studies with rats.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Learning</subject><issn>1543-4494</issn><issn>1543-4508</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNissOgjAQRRujifj4h8Y9SQslwNpo3MueVBhICU6x0-rvi4nuXZ17cs-CRTJTaawyUSx_W5VqzTZEgxCJVEUZsWvlNFIHjtuONxa9syO_gX8BIG90ID3yyUFrGm-ewIfQ9ndAT1xjyw2Sd-Hjc-WAJoutwX7HVp0eCfZfbtnhfKqOl3hy9hGAfD3Y4HC-6kTmMhF5odK_ojdbg0Iu</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Paredes-Olay, Concepcion</creator><creator>Abad, Maria J F</creator><creator>Gamez, Matias</creator><creator>Rosas, Juan M</creator><general>Psychonomic Society, Inc</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding</title><author>Paredes-Olay, Concepcion ; Abad, Maria J F ; Gamez, Matias ; Rosas, Juan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2171207843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paredes-Olay, Concepcion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abad, Maria J F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamez, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosas, Juan M</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Learning &amp; behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paredes-Olay, Concepcion</au><au>Abad, Maria J F</au><au>Gamez, Matias</au><au>Rosas, Juan M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding</atitle><jtitle>Learning &amp; behavior</jtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>239</spage><pages>239-</pages><issn>1543-4494</issn><eissn>1543-4508</eissn><coden>ALBVAB</coden><abstract>Four experiments were conducted to explore outcome-specific transfer from causal predictive judgments to instrumental responding. A video game was designed in which participants had to defend Andalusia from navy and air force attacks. First, they learned the relationship between two instrumental responses (two keys on a standard keyboard) and two different outcomes (destruction of the ships or destruction of the planes). Then they learned to predict which of two different stimuli predicted which outcome. Finally, they had the opportunity of making either of the two instrumental responses in the presence of either stimulus. Transfer was shown as a preference for the response that shared an outcome with the current stimulus. The presentation of the stimulus during the test produced a decrease in the overall rate of response. Responding to a neutral stimulus in Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that this overall decrease in responding was due to a combination of the time needed to process the meaning of the stimulus and the activation of the representation of the outcome in the presence of the stimulus during the test. Transfer between predictive judgments and instrumental responding mirrors the outcome-specific Pavlovian instrumental transfer observed in conditioning studies with rats.</abstract><cop>Austin</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society, Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1543-4494
ispartof Learning & behavior, 2002-08, Vol.30 (3), p.239
issn 1543-4494
1543-4508
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_217120784
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Behavior
Cognition & reasoning
Learning
title Transfer of control between causal predictive judgments and instrumental responding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T16%3A35%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transfer%20of%20control%20between%20causal%20predictive%20judgments%20and%20instrumental%20responding&rft.jtitle=Learning%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Paredes-Olay,%20Concepcion&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=239&rft.pages=239-&rft.issn=1543-4494&rft.eissn=1543-4508&rft.coden=ALBVAB&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E204475931%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217120784&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true