Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes
In the U.S., the prevalence of blindness is expected to double by 2050 and as many half of those with blinding eye disease are unaware of their diagnosis. Screening for vision health in the community setting may offer a key strategy to address the rising trend avoidable vision loss. However, problem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cogent medicine 2018-01, Vol.5 (1), p.1560641 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1560641 |
container_title | Cogent medicine |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Brinks, Mitch Zaback, Tosha Park, Dong-Wouk Joan, Randall Cramer, Stephanie K. Chiang, Michael F. |
description | In the U.S., the prevalence of blindness is expected to double by 2050 and as many half of those with blinding eye disease are unaware of their diagnosis. Screening for vision health in the community setting may offer a key strategy to address the rising trend avoidable vision loss. However, problems with excessive referrals and low compliance with these referrals (often |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/2331205X.2018.1560641 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2170826958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4626b8ec82a64f989fe71f0632794d2f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2336985255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4071-73412c78a3cfe4c27dc2ef56fb41c457b7e27d20c09fca471b79d2ca620dfc283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UkFvFCEYnRiNbdr-BM0kXrzMCgwDjAejWVvbpIkXTYwXwsDHLpsZqDCzdf-9THfbtB56At733oOP7xXFG4wWGAn0gdQ1Jqj5tSAIiwVuGGIUvyiOZ7yaCy8f7Y-Ks5Q2CCHMa4GpeF0c1ZgSwRg6Ln4vwzBM3o27qlMJTLl1yQVfrkH147pMOgJ451flrcvH4KvkRigNWJc1bgsl_FVD-lh-heRWvlTelGEadRggnRavrOoTnB3Wk-LnxfmP5WV1_f3b1fLLdaUp4rjiNcVEc6FqbYFqwo0mYBtmO4o1bXjHIWMEadRarSjHHW8N0YoRZKwmoj4prva-JqiNvIluUHEng3LyDghxJVUcne5BUkZYJ0ALohi1rWgtcGwRqwlvqSE2e33ae91M3QBGgx-j6p-YPq14t5arsJWMtS0XdTZ4fzCI4c8EaZSDSxr6XnkIU5J5KqwVDWmaTH33H3UTpujzV0mCORKEtc3cXbNn6RhSimAfHoORnMMg78Mg5zDIQxiy7u3jTh5U96PPhM97gvM2xEHdhtgbOapdH6KNymuXMvnZO_4Bsr3EPA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170826958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Brinks, Mitch ; Zaback, Tosha ; Park, Dong-Wouk ; Joan, Randall ; Cramer, Stephanie K. ; Chiang, Michael F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brinks, Mitch ; Zaback, Tosha ; Park, Dong-Wouk ; Joan, Randall ; Cramer, Stephanie K. ; Chiang, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><description>In the U.S., the prevalence of blindness is expected to double by 2050 and as many half of those with blinding eye disease are unaware of their diagnosis. Screening for vision health in the community setting may offer a key strategy to address the rising trend avoidable vision loss. However, problems with excessive referrals and low compliance with these referrals (often <50%) undermine the effectiveness of vision screening programs. We investigated the outcomes of a modified vision screening program design. Key modifications were 1) incorporating an on-site ophthalmologist during screening events; and 2) leveraging community partner resources to maximizing benefit to participants. A review of screening outcomes of 4349 particpant examinations from the Casey Eye Institute Outreach Program (CEIO program) from 01/04/2012 to 10/31/2016 were analyzed for demographics and disease findings. The burden on participants to comply with referrals was lessened as 97% of participants completed definitive exams. Clinical care was recommended for 924 (21.2%) participants. Nearly four out of five participants (78.8%) were provided care for all of their immediate vision health needs (full exams, refractions, and spectacle ordering). Modifications to vision screening program design may improve their effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-205X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-205X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2770-7571</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/2331205X.2018.1560641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31428660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cogent</publisher><subject>avoidable blindness ; Blindness ; Compliance ; Demography ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Disease prevention ; Eye diseases ; eye health ; Glaucoma ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Outreach services ; preventive eye exams ; Public health ; Vision ; vision screening ; Visual impairment</subject><ispartof>Cogent medicine, 2018-01, Vol.5 (1), p.1560641</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. 2018</rights><rights>2018 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4071-73412c78a3cfe4c27dc2ef56fb41c457b7e27d20c09fca471b79d2ca620dfc283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4071-73412c78a3cfe4c27dc2ef56fb41c457b7e27d20c09fca471b79d2ca620dfc283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5971-6383 ; 0000-0001-9524-6406 ; 0000-0002-8172-7636 ; 0000-0003-2028-9684 ; 0000-0002-4878-1526</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1560641$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2170826958?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,2096,4010,21367,27479,27900,27901,27902,33721,43781,59116,59117</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31428660$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brinks, Mitch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaback, Tosha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Dong-Wouk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joan, Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Stephanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><title>Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes</title><title>Cogent medicine</title><addtitle>Cogent Med</addtitle><description>In the U.S., the prevalence of blindness is expected to double by 2050 and as many half of those with blinding eye disease are unaware of their diagnosis. Screening for vision health in the community setting may offer a key strategy to address the rising trend avoidable vision loss. However, problems with excessive referrals and low compliance with these referrals (often <50%) undermine the effectiveness of vision screening programs. We investigated the outcomes of a modified vision screening program design. Key modifications were 1) incorporating an on-site ophthalmologist during screening events; and 2) leveraging community partner resources to maximizing benefit to participants. A review of screening outcomes of 4349 particpant examinations from the Casey Eye Institute Outreach Program (CEIO program) from 01/04/2012 to 10/31/2016 were analyzed for demographics and disease findings. The burden on participants to comply with referrals was lessened as 97% of participants completed definitive exams. Clinical care was recommended for 924 (21.2%) participants. Nearly four out of five participants (78.8%) were provided care for all of their immediate vision health needs (full exams, refractions, and spectacle ordering). Modifications to vision screening program design may improve their effectiveness.</description><subject>avoidable blindness</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Eye diseases</subject><subject>eye health</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Outreach services</subject><subject>preventive eye exams</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>vision screening</subject><subject>Visual impairment</subject><issn>2331-205X</issn><issn>2331-205X</issn><issn>2770-7571</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UkFvFCEYnRiNbdr-BM0kXrzMCgwDjAejWVvbpIkXTYwXwsDHLpsZqDCzdf-9THfbtB56At733oOP7xXFG4wWGAn0gdQ1Jqj5tSAIiwVuGGIUvyiOZ7yaCy8f7Y-Ks5Q2CCHMa4GpeF0c1ZgSwRg6Ln4vwzBM3o27qlMJTLl1yQVfrkH147pMOgJ451flrcvH4KvkRigNWJc1bgsl_FVD-lh-heRWvlTelGEadRggnRavrOoTnB3Wk-LnxfmP5WV1_f3b1fLLdaUp4rjiNcVEc6FqbYFqwo0mYBtmO4o1bXjHIWMEadRarSjHHW8N0YoRZKwmoj4prva-JqiNvIluUHEng3LyDghxJVUcne5BUkZYJ0ALohi1rWgtcGwRqwlvqSE2e33ae91M3QBGgx-j6p-YPq14t5arsJWMtS0XdTZ4fzCI4c8EaZSDSxr6XnkIU5J5KqwVDWmaTH33H3UTpujzV0mCORKEtc3cXbNn6RhSimAfHoORnMMg78Mg5zDIQxiy7u3jTh5U96PPhM97gvM2xEHdhtgbOapdH6KNymuXMvnZO_4Bsr3EPA</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Brinks, Mitch</creator><creator>Zaback, Tosha</creator><creator>Park, Dong-Wouk</creator><creator>Joan, Randall</creator><creator>Cramer, Stephanie K.</creator><creator>Chiang, Michael F.</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-6383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-6406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8172-7636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-9684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-1526</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes</title><author>Brinks, Mitch ; Zaback, Tosha ; Park, Dong-Wouk ; Joan, Randall ; Cramer, Stephanie K. ; Chiang, Michael F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4071-73412c78a3cfe4c27dc2ef56fb41c457b7e27d20c09fca471b79d2ca620dfc283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>avoidable blindness</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Eye diseases</topic><topic>eye health</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Outreach services</topic><topic>preventive eye exams</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>vision screening</topic><topic>Visual impairment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brinks, Mitch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaback, Tosha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Dong-Wouk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joan, Randall</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cramer, Stephanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cogent medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brinks, Mitch</au><au>Zaback, Tosha</au><au>Park, Dong-Wouk</au><au>Joan, Randall</au><au>Cramer, Stephanie K.</au><au>Chiang, Michael F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Cogent medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Cogent Med</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1560641</spage><pages>1560641-</pages><issn>2331-205X</issn><eissn>2331-205X</eissn><eissn>2770-7571</eissn><abstract>In the U.S., the prevalence of blindness is expected to double by 2050 and as many half of those with blinding eye disease are unaware of their diagnosis. Screening for vision health in the community setting may offer a key strategy to address the rising trend avoidable vision loss. However, problems with excessive referrals and low compliance with these referrals (often <50%) undermine the effectiveness of vision screening programs. We investigated the outcomes of a modified vision screening program design. Key modifications were 1) incorporating an on-site ophthalmologist during screening events; and 2) leveraging community partner resources to maximizing benefit to participants. A review of screening outcomes of 4349 particpant examinations from the Casey Eye Institute Outreach Program (CEIO program) from 01/04/2012 to 10/31/2016 were analyzed for demographics and disease findings. The burden on participants to comply with referrals was lessened as 97% of participants completed definitive exams. Clinical care was recommended for 924 (21.2%) participants. Nearly four out of five participants (78.8%) were provided care for all of their immediate vision health needs (full exams, refractions, and spectacle ordering). Modifications to vision screening program design may improve their effectiveness.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><pmid>31428660</pmid><doi>10.1080/2331205X.2018.1560641</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-6383</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-6406</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8172-7636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-9684</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4878-1526</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2331-205X |
ispartof | Cogent medicine, 2018-01, Vol.5 (1), p.1560641 |
issn | 2331-205X 2331-205X 2770-7571 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2170826958 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central |
subjects | avoidable blindness Blindness Compliance Demography Diabetic retinopathy Disease prevention Eye diseases eye health Glaucoma Medical screening Medicine Outreach services preventive eye exams Public health Vision vision screening Visual impairment |
title | Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A21%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Community-based%20vision%20health%20screening%20with%20on-site%20definitive%20exams:%20Design%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20medicine&rft.au=Brinks,%20Mitch&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1560641&rft.pages=1560641-&rft.issn=2331-205X&rft.eissn=2331-205X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1560641&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2336985255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170826958&rft_id=info:pmid/31428660&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4626b8ec82a64f989fe71f0632794d2f&rfr_iscdi=true |