Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition
In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria) Austria), 2019-12, Vol.128 (3), p.203-224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 224 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria) |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Kawasaki, Akio Ohkawa, Takao Okamura, Makoto |
description | In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2170796212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45220842</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45220842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwBZgiIUbD2XEce0QVfypVYoGJwXIcJ02gcbDdod8el1SiE4tP8r3fu7uH0DWBOwJQ3of0EIqBSAzAC4Z3J2hGOClxSXJ2imYgc4IFL8Q5ugihBwDGeTlDH8shWo9b77ZjZtxmtLGLnRuyuE5f7TrrXTfEbKP9Z-oMbWabxvkYMj3UWep4fWAXbusHF489LtFZo7-CvTrUOXp_enxbvODV6_Ny8bDChgmIuGqqqjZFI3leSS1ECULbwtZaN7riptayELamOYe6BgusqiU3pWCN0UaCtPkc3Uy-o3ffWxui6vfLpJGKkhJKySmhSUUnlfEuBG8bNfou3bVTBNQ-RDWFqFKI6jdEtUtQPkEhiYfW-j_rf6nbiepDdP54Ds0TwQpKQTCa_wAVyYRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170796212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kawasaki, Akio ; Ohkawa, Takao ; Okamura, Makoto</creator><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Akio ; Ohkawa, Takao ; Okamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><description>In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-8658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-7134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer</publisher><subject>Collusion ; Competition ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Game Theory ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Marketing ; Markets ; Microeconomics ; Public Finance ; Service industries ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Tourism ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria), 2019-12, Vol.128 (3), p.203-224</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45220842$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45220842$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohkawa, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</title><title>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria)</title><addtitle>J Econ</addtitle><description>In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms.</description><subject>Collusion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>0931-8658</issn><issn>1617-7134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwBZgiIUbD2XEce0QVfypVYoGJwXIcJ02gcbDdod8el1SiE4tP8r3fu7uH0DWBOwJQ3of0EIqBSAzAC4Z3J2hGOClxSXJ2imYgc4IFL8Q5ugihBwDGeTlDH8shWo9b77ZjZtxmtLGLnRuyuE5f7TrrXTfEbKP9Z-oMbWabxvkYMj3UWep4fWAXbusHF489LtFZo7-CvTrUOXp_enxbvODV6_Ny8bDChgmIuGqqqjZFI3leSS1ECULbwtZaN7riptayELamOYe6BgusqiU3pWCN0UaCtPkc3Uy-o3ffWxui6vfLpJGKkhJKySmhSUUnlfEuBG8bNfou3bVTBNQ-RDWFqFKI6jdEtUtQPkEhiYfW-j_rf6nbiepDdP54Ds0TwQpKQTCa_wAVyYRk</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Kawasaki, Akio</creator><creator>Ohkawa, Takao</creator><creator>Okamura, Makoto</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</title><author>Kawasaki, Akio ; Ohkawa, Takao ; Okamura, Makoto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Collusion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohkawa, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kawasaki, Akio</au><au>Ohkawa, Takao</au><au>Okamura, Makoto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria)</jtitle><stitle>J Econ</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>203-224</pages><issn>0931-8658</issn><eissn>1617-7134</eissn><abstract>In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-8658 |
ispartof | Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria), 2019-12, Vol.128 (3), p.203-224 |
issn | 0931-8658 1617-7134 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2170796212 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Collusion Competition Economic models Economic theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Game Theory Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics Marketing Markets Microeconomics Public Finance Service industries Social and Behav. Sciences Tourism Wisdom |
title | Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A03%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-group%20competition%20through%20joint%20marketing%20efforts%20and%20intra-group%20Cournot%20competition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economics%20(Vienna,%20Austria)&rft.au=Kawasaki,%20Akio&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=203-224&rft.issn=0931-8658&rft.eissn=1617-7134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45220842%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170796212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45220842&rfr_iscdi=true |