Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition

In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria) Austria), 2019-12, Vol.128 (3), p.203-224
Hauptverfasser: Kawasaki, Akio, Ohkawa, Takao, Okamura, Makoto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 3
container_start_page 203
container_title Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria)
container_volume 128
creator Kawasaki, Akio
Ohkawa, Takao
Okamura, Makoto
description In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2170796212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45220842</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45220842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwBZgiIUbD2XEce0QVfypVYoGJwXIcJ02gcbDdod8el1SiE4tP8r3fu7uH0DWBOwJQ3of0EIqBSAzAC4Z3J2hGOClxSXJ2imYgc4IFL8Q5ugihBwDGeTlDH8shWo9b77ZjZtxmtLGLnRuyuE5f7TrrXTfEbKP9Z-oMbWabxvkYMj3UWep4fWAXbusHF489LtFZo7-CvTrUOXp_enxbvODV6_Ny8bDChgmIuGqqqjZFI3leSS1ECULbwtZaN7riptayELamOYe6BgusqiU3pWCN0UaCtPkc3Uy-o3ffWxui6vfLpJGKkhJKySmhSUUnlfEuBG8bNfou3bVTBNQ-RDWFqFKI6jdEtUtQPkEhiYfW-j_rf6nbiepDdP54Ds0TwQpKQTCa_wAVyYRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170796212</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kawasaki, Akio ; Ohkawa, Takao ; Okamura, Makoto</creator><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Akio ; Ohkawa, Takao ; Okamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><description>In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-8658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-7134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer</publisher><subject>Collusion ; Competition ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Game Theory ; Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics ; Marketing ; Markets ; Microeconomics ; Public Finance ; Service industries ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Tourism ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria), 2019-12, Vol.128 (3), p.203-224</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Journal of Economics is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45220842$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45220842$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohkawa, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</title><title>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria)</title><addtitle>J Econ</addtitle><description>In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms.</description><subject>Collusion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Service industries</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Tourism</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>0931-8658</issn><issn>1617-7134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxS0EEqXwBZgiIUbD2XEce0QVfypVYoGJwXIcJ02gcbDdod8el1SiE4tP8r3fu7uH0DWBOwJQ3of0EIqBSAzAC4Z3J2hGOClxSXJ2imYgc4IFL8Q5ugihBwDGeTlDH8shWo9b77ZjZtxmtLGLnRuyuE5f7TrrXTfEbKP9Z-oMbWabxvkYMj3UWep4fWAXbusHF489LtFZo7-CvTrUOXp_enxbvODV6_Ny8bDChgmIuGqqqjZFI3leSS1ECULbwtZaN7riptayELamOYe6BgusqiU3pWCN0UaCtPkc3Uy-o3ffWxui6vfLpJGKkhJKySmhSUUnlfEuBG8bNfou3bVTBNQ-RDWFqFKI6jdEtUtQPkEhiYfW-j_rf6nbiepDdP54Ds0TwQpKQTCa_wAVyYRk</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Kawasaki, Akio</creator><creator>Ohkawa, Takao</creator><creator>Okamura, Makoto</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</title><author>Kawasaki, Akio ; Ohkawa, Takao ; Okamura, Makoto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-bfbbdc5f963b9a88708ae5edaafab6cda958ed2360dd0e04bd96c784fcac909e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Collusion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Service industries</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Tourism</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Akio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohkawa, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kawasaki, Akio</au><au>Ohkawa, Takao</au><au>Okamura, Makoto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria)</jtitle><stitle>J Econ</stitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>203-224</pages><issn>0931-8658</issn><eissn>1617-7134</eissn><abstract>In service industries such as the tourism industry, each firm in a given market faces intra-market competition in relation to quantity setting as well as inter-market competition regarding promotional activity. This study investigates whether collusion in relation to quantity setting and/or promotional activity in these markets is simultaneously beneficial for each firm. In particular, it examines the following four cases: double collusion, single collusion in relation to promotion, single collusion in relation to quantity setting, and competition. We demonstrate that double collusion does not always generate the largest profit for each firm, and that competition may generate the largest profit, which is contrary to conventional wisdom. Moreover, competition is always socially desirable. The novel contribution of this study is the analysis of what happens in terms of each firm's collusive promotional activities, demonstrating that collusive promotional activities bring about overpromotion that reduces a firm's profit. Furthermore, single collusion in relation to quantity setting competition results in overpromotion and a reduction in the firm's profit. Thus, our main contribution is to illustrate the inefficiency of these collusion mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-8658
ispartof Journal of economics (Vienna, Austria), 2019-12, Vol.128 (3), p.203-224
issn 0931-8658
1617-7134
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2170796212
source Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Collusion
Competition
Economic models
Economic theory
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Game Theory
Macroeconomics/Monetary Economics//Financial Economics
Marketing
Markets
Microeconomics
Public Finance
Service industries
Social and Behav. Sciences
Tourism
Wisdom
title Inter-group competition through joint marketing efforts and intra-group Cournot competition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A03%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-group%20competition%20through%20joint%20marketing%20efforts%20and%20intra-group%20Cournot%20competition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economics%20(Vienna,%20Austria)&rft.au=Kawasaki,%20Akio&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=203-224&rft.issn=0931-8658&rft.eissn=1617-7134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00712-019-00654-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45220842%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170796212&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45220842&rfr_iscdi=true