Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies

Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2019-01
Hauptverfasser: Clifton, Sara M, Hill, Kaitlin, Karamchandani, Avinash J, Autry, Eric A, McMahon, Patrick, Sun, Grace
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Clifton, Sara M
Hill, Kaitlin
Karamchandani, Avinash J
Autry, Eric A
McMahon, Patrick
Sun, Grace
description Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2170770520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2170770520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21707705203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy7EKwjAUQNEgCBbtPzxwLqRJa9xFEcTNvcT21aSkSc1rB__eDH6A013uWbFMSFkWx0qIDcuJBs65OChR1zJjt7ueDY56tq12MIYOHYQeXug7jPC0mkD7DkwYw2Ss-4D1MMXQI5ENPhFjMerYptCOrXvtCPNft2x_OT9O1yKB94I0N0NYYkLUiFJxpXgtuPzv-gIwDD1x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170770520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Clifton, Sara M ; Hill, Kaitlin ; Karamchandani, Avinash J ; Autry, Eric A ; McMahon, Patrick ; Sun, Grace</creator><creatorcontrib>Clifton, Sara M ; Hill, Kaitlin ; Karamchandani, Avinash J ; Autry, Eric A ; McMahon, Patrick ; Sun, Grace</creatorcontrib><description>Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bias ; Fractionation ; Gender ; Hierarchies ; Human bias ; Leadership ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Psychological factors</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2019-01</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clifton, Sara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karamchandani, Avinash J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autry, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMahon, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Grace</creatorcontrib><title>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Human bias</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy7EKwjAUQNEgCBbtPzxwLqRJa9xFEcTNvcT21aSkSc1rB__eDH6A013uWbFMSFkWx0qIDcuJBs65OChR1zJjt7ueDY56tq12MIYOHYQeXug7jPC0mkD7DkwYw2Ss-4D1MMXQI5ENPhFjMerYptCOrXvtCPNft2x_OT9O1yKB94I0N0NYYkLUiFJxpXgtuPzv-gIwDD1x</recordid><startdate>20190122</startdate><enddate>20190122</enddate><creator>Clifton, Sara M</creator><creator>Hill, Kaitlin</creator><creator>Karamchandani, Avinash J</creator><creator>Autry, Eric A</creator><creator>McMahon, Patrick</creator><creator>Sun, Grace</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190122</creationdate><title>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</title><author>Clifton, Sara M ; Hill, Kaitlin ; Karamchandani, Avinash J ; Autry, Eric A ; McMahon, Patrick ; Sun, Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21707705203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Human bias</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clifton, Sara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karamchandani, Avinash J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autry, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMahon, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clifton, Sara M</au><au>Hill, Kaitlin</au><au>Karamchandani, Avinash J</au><au>Autry, Eric A</au><au>McMahon, Patrick</au><au>Sun, Grace</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2019-01-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2019-01
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2170770520
source Free E- Journals
subjects Bias
Fractionation
Gender
Hierarchies
Human bias
Leadership
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Psychological factors
title Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Mathematical%20model%20of%20gender%20bias%20and%20homophily%20in%20professional%20hierarchies&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Clifton,%20Sara%20M&rft.date=2019-01-22&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2170770520%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170770520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true