Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies
Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2019-01 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Clifton, Sara M Hill, Kaitlin Karamchandani, Avinash J Autry, Eric A McMahon, Patrick Sun, Grace |
description | Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2170770520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2170770520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21707705203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNy7EKwjAUQNEgCBbtPzxwLqRJa9xFEcTNvcT21aSkSc1rB__eDH6A013uWbFMSFkWx0qIDcuJBs65OChR1zJjt7ueDY56tq12MIYOHYQeXug7jPC0mkD7DkwYw2Ss-4D1MMXQI5ENPhFjMerYptCOrXvtCPNft2x_OT9O1yKB94I0N0NYYkLUiFJxpXgtuPzv-gIwDD1x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170770520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Clifton, Sara M ; Hill, Kaitlin ; Karamchandani, Avinash J ; Autry, Eric A ; McMahon, Patrick ; Sun, Grace</creator><creatorcontrib>Clifton, Sara M ; Hill, Kaitlin ; Karamchandani, Avinash J ; Autry, Eric A ; McMahon, Patrick ; Sun, Grace</creatorcontrib><description>Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bias ; Fractionation ; Gender ; Hierarchies ; Human bias ; Leadership ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Psychological factors</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2019-01</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clifton, Sara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karamchandani, Avinash J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autry, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMahon, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Grace</creatorcontrib><title>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Human bias</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Psychological factors</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNy7EKwjAUQNEgCBbtPzxwLqRJa9xFEcTNvcT21aSkSc1rB__eDH6A013uWbFMSFkWx0qIDcuJBs65OChR1zJjt7ueDY56tq12MIYOHYQeXug7jPC0mkD7DkwYw2Ss-4D1MMXQI5ENPhFjMerYptCOrXvtCPNft2x_OT9O1yKB94I0N0NYYkLUiFJxpXgtuPzv-gIwDD1x</recordid><startdate>20190122</startdate><enddate>20190122</enddate><creator>Clifton, Sara M</creator><creator>Hill, Kaitlin</creator><creator>Karamchandani, Avinash J</creator><creator>Autry, Eric A</creator><creator>McMahon, Patrick</creator><creator>Sun, Grace</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190122</creationdate><title>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</title><author>Clifton, Sara M ; Hill, Kaitlin ; Karamchandani, Avinash J ; Autry, Eric A ; McMahon, Patrick ; Sun, Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21707705203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Human bias</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Psychological factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clifton, Sara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karamchandani, Avinash J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Autry, Eric A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMahon, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clifton, Sara M</au><au>Hill, Kaitlin</au><au>Karamchandani, Avinash J</au><au>Autry, Eric A</au><au>McMahon, Patrick</au><au>Sun, Grace</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2019-01-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Women have become better represented in business, academia, and government over time, yet a dearth of women at the highest levels of leadership remains. Sociologists have attributed the leaky progression of women through professional hierarchies to various cultural and psychological factors, such as self-segregation and bias. Here, we present a minimal mathematical model that reveals the relative role that bias and homophily (self-seeking) may play in the ascension of women through professional hierarchies. Unlike previous models, our novel model predicts that gender parity is not inevitable, and deliberate intervention may be required to achieve gender balance in several fields. To validate the model, we analyze a new database of gender fractionation over time for 16 professional hierarchies. We quantify the degree of homophily and bias in each professional hierarchy, and we propose specific interventions to achieve gender parity more quickly.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2019-01 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2170770520 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Bias Fractionation Gender Hierarchies Human bias Leadership Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Psychological factors |
title | Mathematical model of gender bias and homophily in professional hierarchies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T03%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Mathematical%20model%20of%20gender%20bias%20and%20homophily%20in%20professional%20hierarchies&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Clifton,%20Sara%20M&rft.date=2019-01-22&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2170770520%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170770520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |