The Effect of Protective Football Equipment on Alignment of the Injured Cervical Spine

No universally accepted management protocol is avail able for dealing with the protective equipment worn by a neck-injured football player. The purpose of this ca daveric study was to determine the effects of the hel met and shoulder pads on the alignment of 1) the intact lower cervical spine and 2)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 1996-07, Vol.24 (4), p.446
Hauptverfasser: Palumbo, Mark A, Hulstyn, Michael J, Fadale, Paul D, O Brien, Timothy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 446
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 24
creator Palumbo, Mark A
Hulstyn, Michael J
Fadale, Paul D
O Brien, Timothy
description No universally accepted management protocol is avail able for dealing with the protective equipment worn by a neck-injured football player. The purpose of this ca daveric study was to determine the effects of the hel met and shoulder pads on the alignment of 1) the intact lower cervical spine and 2) the partially destabilized C5-6 motion segment. In Group I cadavers ( N = 15), the lower cervical spine was tested in an intact condi tion. In Group II ( N = 8), the C5-6 motion segment was tested in both an intact and a partially destabilized condition. Each cadaver was placed supine on a back- board and four lateral cervical radiographs were ob tained as follows: no protective equipment, helmet only, helmet and shoulder pads, and shoulder pads only. Results for Group I showed that wearing both helmet and shoulder pads did not result in a significant change in cervical lordosis when compared with the neutral position (i.e., the no-equipment test). Cervical lordosis was significantly decreased in the helmet-only category (mean, 9.6°) and significantly increased in the shoulder pads-only category (mean, 13.6°). In Group II, destabilized specimens under the helmet test situa tion showed a significant mean increase in C5-6 for ward angulation (16.5°), posterior disk space height (3.8 mm), and dorsal element distraction (8.3 mm). Immobilizing the neck-injured football player with only the helmet or only the shoulder pads in place violates the principle of splinting the cervical spine in neutral alignment, according to our findings. We support the concept that removal of the helmet and shoulder pads should be an all-or-none proposition.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/036354659602400407
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_highw</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_217062014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9891469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1064-9ae0470ea5ed713fd3315d6645fe2da50295d1a745ea82de1aeb95ca0c6e9d763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz0tLw0AQAOBFFKzVP-BpETxGZ9_NsZRWCwUFq9ewyc62G9IkzaP-fbdU5jAz8M0MQ8gjgxfGjHkFoYWSWqUauASQYK7IhCnFEyG0uiaTM0jO4pbc9X0JAMzo2YT8bPdIl95jMdDG08-uGWIZTkhXTTPktqro8jiG9oB1BDWdV2FXXxpPhzi7rsuxQ0cX2J1CYSv61YYa78mNt1WPD_95Sr5Xy-3iPdl8vK0X801SMNAySS2CNIBWoTNMeCcEU05rqTxyZxXwVDlmjVRoZ9whs5inqrBQaEyd0WJKni572645jtgPWdmMXR1PZpwZ0ByYjOj5gvZht_8NHWb9IT7WjrnIbNlzmcWQWvwBVglfuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217062014</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Protective Football Equipment on Alignment of the Injured Cervical Spine</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Palumbo, Mark A ; Hulstyn, Michael J ; Fadale, Paul D ; O Brien, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Mark A ; Hulstyn, Michael J ; Fadale, Paul D ; O Brien, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>No universally accepted management protocol is avail able for dealing with the protective equipment worn by a neck-injured football player. The purpose of this ca daveric study was to determine the effects of the hel met and shoulder pads on the alignment of 1) the intact lower cervical spine and 2) the partially destabilized C5-6 motion segment. In Group I cadavers ( N = 15), the lower cervical spine was tested in an intact condi tion. In Group II ( N = 8), the C5-6 motion segment was tested in both an intact and a partially destabilized condition. Each cadaver was placed supine on a back- board and four lateral cervical radiographs were ob tained as follows: no protective equipment, helmet only, helmet and shoulder pads, and shoulder pads only. Results for Group I showed that wearing both helmet and shoulder pads did not result in a significant change in cervical lordosis when compared with the neutral position (i.e., the no-equipment test). Cervical lordosis was significantly decreased in the helmet-only category (mean, 9.6°) and significantly increased in the shoulder pads-only category (mean, 13.6°). In Group II, destabilized specimens under the helmet test situa tion showed a significant mean increase in C5-6 for ward angulation (16.5°), posterior disk space height (3.8 mm), and dorsal element distraction (8.3 mm). Immobilizing the neck-injured football player with only the helmet or only the shoulder pads in place violates the principle of splinting the cervical spine in neutral alignment, according to our findings. We support the concept that removal of the helmet and shoulder pads should be an all-or-none proposition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400407</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSMDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</publisher><subject>Football ; Spine ; Sporting goods ; Sports injuries ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 1996-07, Vol.24 (4), p.446</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Journal of Sports Medicine Jul/Aug 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1064-9ae0470ea5ed713fd3315d6645fe2da50295d1a745ea82de1aeb95ca0c6e9d763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulstyn, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadale, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O Brien, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Protective Football Equipment on Alignment of the Injured Cervical Spine</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><description>No universally accepted management protocol is avail able for dealing with the protective equipment worn by a neck-injured football player. The purpose of this ca daveric study was to determine the effects of the hel met and shoulder pads on the alignment of 1) the intact lower cervical spine and 2) the partially destabilized C5-6 motion segment. In Group I cadavers ( N = 15), the lower cervical spine was tested in an intact condi tion. In Group II ( N = 8), the C5-6 motion segment was tested in both an intact and a partially destabilized condition. Each cadaver was placed supine on a back- board and four lateral cervical radiographs were ob tained as follows: no protective equipment, helmet only, helmet and shoulder pads, and shoulder pads only. Results for Group I showed that wearing both helmet and shoulder pads did not result in a significant change in cervical lordosis when compared with the neutral position (i.e., the no-equipment test). Cervical lordosis was significantly decreased in the helmet-only category (mean, 9.6°) and significantly increased in the shoulder pads-only category (mean, 13.6°). In Group II, destabilized specimens under the helmet test situa tion showed a significant mean increase in C5-6 for ward angulation (16.5°), posterior disk space height (3.8 mm), and dorsal element distraction (8.3 mm). Immobilizing the neck-injured football player with only the helmet or only the shoulder pads in place violates the principle of splinting the cervical spine in neutral alignment, according to our findings. We support the concept that removal of the helmet and shoulder pads should be an all-or-none proposition.</description><subject>Football</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Sporting goods</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotz0tLw0AQAOBFFKzVP-BpETxGZ9_NsZRWCwUFq9ewyc62G9IkzaP-fbdU5jAz8M0MQ8gjgxfGjHkFoYWSWqUauASQYK7IhCnFEyG0uiaTM0jO4pbc9X0JAMzo2YT8bPdIl95jMdDG08-uGWIZTkhXTTPktqro8jiG9oB1BDWdV2FXXxpPhzi7rsuxQ0cX2J1CYSv61YYa78mNt1WPD_95Sr5Xy-3iPdl8vK0X801SMNAySS2CNIBWoTNMeCcEU05rqTxyZxXwVDlmjVRoZ9whs5inqrBQaEyd0WJKni572645jtgPWdmMXR1PZpwZ0ByYjOj5gvZht_8NHWb9IT7WjrnIbNlzmcWQWvwBVglfuA</recordid><startdate>19960701</startdate><enddate>19960701</enddate><creator>Palumbo, Mark A</creator><creator>Hulstyn, Michael J</creator><creator>Fadale, Paul D</creator><creator>O Brien, Timothy</creator><general>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960701</creationdate><title>The Effect of Protective Football Equipment on Alignment of the Injured Cervical Spine</title><author>Palumbo, Mark A ; Hulstyn, Michael J ; Fadale, Paul D ; O Brien, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1064-9ae0470ea5ed713fd3315d6645fe2da50295d1a745ea82de1aeb95ca0c6e9d763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Football</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Sporting goods</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulstyn, Michael J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fadale, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O Brien, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palumbo, Mark A</au><au>Hulstyn, Michael J</au><au>Fadale, Paul D</au><au>O Brien, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Protective Football Equipment on Alignment of the Injured Cervical Spine</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><date>1996-07-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>446</spage><pages>446-</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><coden>AJSMDO</coden><abstract>No universally accepted management protocol is avail able for dealing with the protective equipment worn by a neck-injured football player. The purpose of this ca daveric study was to determine the effects of the hel met and shoulder pads on the alignment of 1) the intact lower cervical spine and 2) the partially destabilized C5-6 motion segment. In Group I cadavers ( N = 15), the lower cervical spine was tested in an intact condi tion. In Group II ( N = 8), the C5-6 motion segment was tested in both an intact and a partially destabilized condition. Each cadaver was placed supine on a back- board and four lateral cervical radiographs were ob tained as follows: no protective equipment, helmet only, helmet and shoulder pads, and shoulder pads only. Results for Group I showed that wearing both helmet and shoulder pads did not result in a significant change in cervical lordosis when compared with the neutral position (i.e., the no-equipment test). Cervical lordosis was significantly decreased in the helmet-only category (mean, 9.6°) and significantly increased in the shoulder pads-only category (mean, 13.6°). In Group II, destabilized specimens under the helmet test situa tion showed a significant mean increase in C5-6 for ward angulation (16.5°), posterior disk space height (3.8 mm), and dorsal element distraction (8.3 mm). Immobilizing the neck-injured football player with only the helmet or only the shoulder pads in place violates the principle of splinting the cervical spine in neutral alignment, according to our findings. We support the concept that removal of the helmet and shoulder pads should be an all-or-none proposition.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</pub><doi>10.1177/036354659602400407</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 1996-07, Vol.24 (4), p.446
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_217062014
source SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Football
Spine
Sporting goods
Sports injuries
Sports medicine
title The Effect of Protective Football Equipment on Alignment of the Injured Cervical Spine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_highw&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Protective%20Football%20Equipment%20on%20Alignment%20of%20the%20Injured%20Cervical%20Spine&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Palumbo,%20Mark%20A&rft.date=1996-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=446&rft.pages=446-&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft.coden=AJSMDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/036354659602400407&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_highw%3E9891469%3C/proquest_highw%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217062014&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true